Danioover9000

@ArcticGong Fantastic example of someone who felt empowered to talk shit when an important person dies. Again, choose: to attack the royal family, or the Queen? Either one I recommend you make a thread and go crazy with it.

@Silodium That's nice!

@Someone here Yes, you can, although that means you have to be good with the contradictions you encounter in yourself. However, as soon as other people are around you, in practice it's going to be difficult, and you might wish that there are enforced ethics and morals for how those people behave around you.

@Sugarcoat I completely agree, I was lucky to have discovered athleanx and elliot hulse, and did some of their mobility and stretching routines beofre and after lifting heavy weights. I can thrust up 250 pounds above my head, and still be flexible enough to put both my hands and elbows behind my ears. I also suggest way more static training than dynamic training, as it's more common to damage your joints or ligaments or pull a muscle when doing dynamic training.

This statement is true, and this statement is false.

It's an exception to the rule though, despite how inspiring that is.

???

While the professor could have had a point, the way it was presented was very untactful, and makes stage green look unhinged. Is this the new standard for society? I hope not, as this gives all the excuses to shut down stage green even further.

@Vrubel That's true to some extent. You can't have a dry state at all. Nobody in the commons is built for a solitary boring life, there needs to be some distractions or else society wouldn't function as smoothly. You need sentimentality or almost all of that society would be harming itself.

Feel free to share yours, and your thoughts on why. I think this one by Destiny is great, as it shows so many rhetorical tricks and mental stamina to keep on debating like this:

I don't like Jeff Bazos, but this is an article of him tweeting, and getting roasted apparently: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjl4cTN34j6AhX6SkEAHc93BfAQFnoECAcQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.independent.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fworld%2Famericas%2Fjeff-bezos-under-fire-after-tweet-about-queen-s-b2163071.html&usg=AOvVaw1wKeNBGUZ_ILoPk2WuLejk As if that's gonna do anything to a multi billionaire man?

@D2sage That's the sacrifice you got to pay, for trying to lead a very successful millionaire like life, working away in some room, allocating most of your time and energy into projects. For example, I am not at celebrity level fame, I am reasonably famous, but the process of writing my stories, creating my backgrounds and sprites, finding the right music, and especially coding my Visual Novels, while doing my comic books, and on top of that doing my business and marketing stuff for my projects, takes so much time and energy, that it's no different from a 9-6 work in reality, really. It's just you slightly like this work versus the other, even though this work is more restrictive for the sake of higher quality content. I guess I'm very lucky, to have had a small circle of friends in the past, but now very few to sometimes no contact, which gets me much more time and energy to do what I want to do. Success is the hell you go through, to make the heavenly content.

@Guru Peter Jordanson That's not the topic actually, the topic, from the title, is 'Queen Elizabeth II has passed away'. You are projecting things that aren't really there, in the OP'S post, at all.

@Fleetinglife Alright, I see.

One of my lists of potential users, is maybe @Oeaohoo , because I roasted him with a crazy rap diss about him using Hegal and flipping that back at him, and maybe the music and Daniel Schmachtenberger in the video, is topics I've recently posted is just to get back at me. But that's intuitive speculation.

@Nilsi I have a good idea who, but am not telling.

@Tyler Robinson The Monarchy is already done with for the most part, and they do still bring in more tourist money, but that's a tangent that's better discussed in another forum. Same argument could be had with India, they need to do away with their patriarchy, and those temples as well, so antiquated. Or with the USA, what and why the hell do we keep the white house? or the statue of liberty? or those historic sites in the southern states? It's far more complex and bigger of an issue than merely trimming away what makes that culture unique, and don't Pikachu face when it's collective peoples come after you for threatening to take away their identity from them.

@trenton True.

@trenton To the overall system? Not too much. I see the death penalty improving parts of the system in the short term, making it clear that the state would not tolerate extremely horrendous acts of humanity and to its citizens. However, I do see more trickier applications of the death penalty to some of the types of offenders: Children to adolescent, aged roughly between 8 to 12, and 13-17, committed homicide of horrific nature, victims being toddlers, early adolescence and late adolescent years old. The offenders in question are considered minors in the legal system, so the majority of incarcerations would be at juvenile prisons, or to other facilities that house child offenders. Offenders, who are not as neatly categorized as complete psychopaths, sociopaths or other. Those with sociopathy, who know what and how to pass psychology assessments, can be tricky to determine the likelihood of repeat offence. Those who are falsely accused of a horrific crime, manufactured evidence and state bias against such individuals due to avoidance of paying false imprisonment reparations and to not look bad in the eyes of politicians or the public at large.

@DocWatts That was specifically focused on the worst offenders getting that lavish treatment instead of the death penalty, rather than the general offenders of a prison system. If the topic was about the USA's prison system and whether we should or shouldn't increase or decrease humane treatment for the general prison population, then yes, it's likely we can agree on increasing humane treatment and including rehabilitation facilities. But the main focus is on the most worst offending types of prisoners, who don't care about the well-being of the general population at large and are at high of offending again and whether we should death penalty them or not. A stage yellow individual can give nuanced takes on both sides of the debate and discussion, and unpack most of the ramifications of those decisions, and trolley problem you at almost every corner, until you see the limits of your own logical constructions back at you.

@Fleetinglife So, is it acceptable to show condemnation when somebody died very recently? I mean, if that's how much your level of compassion and empathy and understanding is, that makes sense, but it's just socially not tactful to be indignant to a famous person dying, Again, you're touching on topics like hypocrisy, double standards, and worldview biases between western and eastern divisions, stage of development, cognitive and moral development, personalities, states of consciousness, life experiences and other lines of development of this situation and making an apple to orange comparison of some military guy versus a royalty figure head. I don't think you care enough of the nuances of this situation, and instead want to write up a story to wind up users here who are right leaning to moderate conservatives. Which do you think is the more mature thing here: Make passive aggressive statements at me, trying to anger me and derail this thread into unnecessary drama because you are biased and bored, or make your own thread to open discussion of what the significance of this situation could entail?

@Kksd74628 Not that easy in practice. Words are like tools that signal to your mind which is good or bad, and at which degree, and at which line and complexity of logic, and so on into abstraction and towards going meta. However, when you are going mesa, and contextualizing words with their associated objects and happenings, to describe a thing or action that was harmful and nearly killed you, those words bring with it immense value to a mind's survival. So, while at the higher level's words can be completely relative, but at the lower level of practicality, they are useful for communication purposes, especially to other people to signal danger or something else. I still don't know why I'm being used as proof of some kind of argument you're having, especially without asking for my permission, can you tell me why?

@Hardkill Yes, I was also going to open a thread as well. May she rest in peace. Also, let us all take the time to observe all the stories and write offs we'll be doing in these posts to those in support or opposition to the Queen and monarchy, and hopefully observe a one-week silence out of respect for the Queen and her family. To those writing their wish for the desolation of the Monarchy and complaining about it, sorry, that's easily multi-generational, long enough that you'd be dead 5 times over. If you want to bring up those issues of desolation of the monarchy and have a discussion, do it in on another thread, I can easily see that turning very heated and would cause this thread to be locked.

What are your thoughts about this interview?