Danioover9000

And no, I don't think Socialism is evil. Socialism and it's followers are special, mermen and mermaids with DORSAL FINS, in need of therapists and COUNCELING, PERSISTENT they find themselves HOWLING at the WIND, DOUGHS spent watching DORA THE EXPLORA, singing behind planes of glass: DORAMIFASOLA! WITH her PARASOL, SOLDERING hot IRONY, brandishing her BRAND OF MUSIC DEVILRY!!! ?

@KH2 This is my problem with Coffeezilla's cover of Andrew Tate, and downplay his positive impact he has on some young men who NEED DRIVE AND AMBITIUS ROLE MODELS, and exaggerates the negative aspects of Tate's business and marketing. It clearly is a SEMI SCAM TO QUARTER SCAM, while just being an average business onto itself. Andrew Tate isn't offering anything new or revolutionary with how you can make money fast, but he does offer contacts and networking OPPORTUNITIES! Clearly that New York deadbeat journalist is TOO BIASED, and maybe a VICTIM OF A SCAM BEFORE, and that clouded and distorted his views on people who are self employed and legit entrepreneurs of their own hands, self made.

I'm ruminating, with some rum, reading Rumi poems till I'm drunk in my divine bliss, wonder why this thread is still passive aggressive even today, mumbling to myself 'Why hate myself for my own self referential thoughts I'm having?'. Contemplating, all this and that hating, in contempt of tempting wickedness, the temperature of this rose rose up, tempting explaining why templating this is too complicated.

@Arthogaan For example, I say to you this 'In my opinion, you're dick is too small to satisfy any woman. No wonder you're a beta incell LOLOLOL!!!', That is my opinion of your near nonexistent dick. Option 1, now, you are going to think and feel differently, maybe very triggered and offended, well, at that moment you given meaning to my opinion about you as relevant to your sex life that's miserable, whatever behavior or action you take towards me, is you conceding to me that my opinion is very valuable and meaningfully negative, that I'm right and you're upset. Option 2, if my opinion really is irrelevant to you, then my opinion of your sex performance is going to not trigger or offend you as severely, it may just annoy you, but you can now laugh and flip that back at me, or even laugh it off and continue whatever talking you were doing with someone else.

More focused on the neutrality of the country, during WW2 and even today. What are your thoughts? Also, is one more bunker too many?

'Finger swipes the digital screen.'. What is this passive aggressiveness I feel in the thread?

@TheGreekSeeker Mostly stage red to blue. With Civ games, you get to see stage orange, green and yellow societies. Mostly the stage yellow perspective comes from me being in my satellite making decisions for them. Seeing almost every part of their systems.

So, what's the consensus? PUA weird, or normal?

Also, they're the only country, so far I know, that instead of negotiating peace deals, they dig. dig around the mountain ranges to make incredible fortress. Reminds me of when I played age of strategy, or civ like games, I made almost everybody build a fortress around cities and villages. Isn't this a stage blue or stage yellow aspect? I think it's strongly a stage blue thing, but building bunkers and digging holes into mountains, do they like to emulate Dwarves? I mean, Dwarves in fantasy are not known for complex societies on the level of Star Trek, they're more known for being very nationalistic and Monarchist like, digging into the earth and building complex architecture. Yes, I'm referencing Tolkien's version. So, why dig?

@Fearey But Switzerland seems like a stage yellow society, just look at some of it's history of staying neutral to other countries. Or is it strongly stage blue in it's national identity? But again, it's welfare state is handled like stage green or even yellow, so, is it mostly stage yellow?

@Tatyana Basically, that's where they're conservative minded. Are orgies conservative or liberal to you?

@Arthogaan Is this the part where people's opinions of you are irrelevent?

@Pudgey I agree, speaking of which: https://www.msn.com/en-gb/cars/news/demon-ghost-captured-on-camera-crawling-across-path-in-clumber-park-kennedy-news-media/vi-AA15woqc?cvid=641cfdc81daf42eb906385859c752e3b&ocid=msedgntp Is this a ghost, or a demon? Can I bless and consecrate any object, including a camera, or a flashlight?

We can even discuss about the philosophy of these two statements of attitudes: I DON'T GIVE A FUCK! I DON'T CARE. Both statements convey similar to different attitudes about life. What do you guys think?

@Stovo Agreed, and people can learn and modal for that, for example his drive, ambition, and work ethic, that's WAY MORE IMPORTANT than Bugatti cars, private jets, mansions, para military, and rooms of OnlyFans 10/10 chicks.

@StarStruck He is a different breed of man: A TOP G. I'm a different breed of human: PARANORMAL.

@Nilsi Oh, I see now, makes sense. Never mind what I was posting.

@Nilsi It just seems like he's liberal here and okay with how the teacher in that video deals with self referential thoughts, while you seem to value the modals mentioned here, which makes you a bit conservative here.

@Nilsi Agreed, if I had to guess, @Carl-Richard's plight is that antagonizing the self referential thought is okay, so this means he's more liberal minded in this aspect. Whereas you are more conservative minded when having an antagonistic attitude towards the self referential thought. It all depends on one's stage of development, cognitive and moral development, personality typing, ego development, states of consciousness, other lines of development in different areas of life, worldviews, ideologies indoctrinated into you from cultural upbringing, and many more. With that said, I hate it when Buddhist monks chant monkey mind. There is nothing monkey about the mind. THE IS POWERFUL, THE MIND IS LIKE A DRAGON!

@UnbornTao Small world, eh? I contemplated design, and the conservative mind. All of a sudden, Leo's making videos on understanding the conservative and liberal mind. Can't wait for the centrist one, I expect it to be similar to his other video on not knowing, but detailing most of the pitfalls based on the moderate/centrist mind of trying to not rock the boat, or always be a middle man and try to quench down conflicts through diplomacy, even when sometimes the situation needs much more than diplomacy. Maybe related to sucking up to others, sycophant behavior, door mats, and more.

@Osaid Okay, so that means that it doesn't have information after 2021, until the computer scientists give it additional data?

If psychedelics were beneficial in treating drug addiction, why were these substances outlawed? Psychedelics, also known as psychoactive or hallucinogenic drugs, are controlled substances that are illegal to possess, use, or distribute in many countries around the world. In the United States, for example, psychedelics are classified as Schedule I controlled substances, which means that they are considered to have a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use. There are several reasons why psychedelics are controlled substances in many countries. One reason is that these substances can have significant effects on a person's mental and physical well-being, and they can be dangerous if used improperly or without appropriate caution. Some psychedelics can cause serious physical side effects, such as increased heart rate, high blood pressure, and body temperature, as well as psychological side effects, such as anxiety, panic attacks, and psychosis. Another reason why psychedelics are controlled substances is that they have a potential for abuse and can be addictive. While some studies have suggested that psychedelics may have potential as a treatment for drug addiction and other mental health conditions, more research is needed to fully understand their potential risks and benefits. Until this research is conducted and the safety and efficacy of these substances are better understood, they will likely remain controlled substances in many countries.

@Leo Gura I see, so it's scrapping text as part of it's learning process? So, it may be aware of you, from your test website, or comments? But wait a minute, it had to have browsed the internet beforehand, or fed information from one of the employees...right? How can this program know stuff, but can't access or browse the internet now? I'm confused... Likely in the future a company is thinking about designing an A.I program that can scrap text and video. That's imaginably insane levels of creativity.

@Osaid What do you mean? I thought chat had limited knowledge of events up to 2021? It still can answer historical events, and a large part of Leo's content was the past 8 years or so, so it certainly knows who he is, and what his website does.

Can you explain to me what psychedelics are? Psychedelics are a group of substances that can alter a person's perception, mood, and cognition. These substances, also known as psychoactive or hallucinogenic drugs, are often used for recreational purposes, but they also have a long history of use in spiritual or religious rituals, as well as in therapy and research. There are many different types of psychedelics, including naturally occurring substances such as psilocybin (found in certain types of mushrooms), LSD (lysergic acid diethylamide), and DMT (dimethyltryptamine), as well as synthetic substances like 2C-B (4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine) and 5-MeO-DMT (5-methoxy-dimethyltryptamine). Psychedelics work by altering the levels of certain neurotransmitters, such as serotonin, in the brain. This can lead to changes in a person's perception, including visual and auditory hallucinations, as well as altered states of consciousness and changes in emotional and cognitive processes. It is important to note that psychedelics are powerful and can have significant effects on a person's mental and physical well-being. These substances are not safe for everyone, and it is important to carefully consider the potential risks and benefits before using them. It is also important to use psychedelics responsibly, under the supervision of a trained professional and in a safe and controlled environment. Is it true that psychedelics were used to treat drug addiction? Yes, it is true that some studies have suggested that psychedelics may have potential as a treatment for drug addiction and other mental health conditions. However, it is important to note that research in this area is still in the early stages and more research is needed to fully understand the potential risks and benefits of using psychedelics in the treatment of drug addiction. Several studies have shown that psychedelics, such as psilocybin and LSD, may be effective in reducing drug use and improving the symptoms of addiction in some individuals. For example, a small study published in the Journal of Psychoactive Drugs found that a single dose of psilocybin was associated with a significant reduction in alcohol abuse in individuals with alcohol dependence. Another study published in the Journal of Clinical Psychology found that a single dose of LSD was associated with significant reductions in drug use and psychological distress in individuals with substance use disorders. However, it is important to note that these studies are limited and more research is needed to fully understand the potential risks and benefits of using psychedelics as a treatment for drug addiction. Additionally, it is important to note that psychedelics are powerful substances that can have significant effects on a person's mental and physical well-being, and they should be used with caution and under the supervision of a trained professional. Does Actualized.org and Leo Gura have videos explaining what psychedelics are?