Danioover9000

@Rishabh R I've done enough of CBT, and I'd say on my end it's decent and can help improve how you think and how you see yourself, marginally will depend on the quality of the therapy as well, good for learning a bit how you think in patterns. Give it a go, and tell us how it went!

Also a deep problem, sometimes not most times, is when your calling or passion is valued greatly, and feed back or what others say, from your family to friends to lovers and to other members of society tell you, is devalued extremely less in your mind, is where problems can arise from this extreme individualism, For example, if I completely disregard societal and family norms, of socially acceptable behaviors, disregard whatever the social programming is indoctrinated and gaslight into my mind, and prioritize what my heart and my subjective experiences are, and my desire and deep cravings, for instance if it turns out what excites me and makes me turned on is killing people and raping hot chicks in secret Mr. Brooks style, that has it's own list of costs and prices to pay, plus if this starts to scale up such that now people become more authoritarian and Libertarian and extremely selfish we start having problems. This is why I believe calling and passion is on a spectrum, shared with your upbringing and environment and cultural values. Your passions and calling is interconnected with all your other developmental factors, and your emotions, and to some extent, fear. FEAR IS A CONCEPT ABOUT THE FUTURE, which is why majority of the time, you mostly don't misbehave as much because you DEEPLY FEAR going to jail, getting sued, going to high security prison, locked into an Asylum, and even fear retaliation and karma. I believe that calling and passion is also partly informed by your environments and other developmental factors. Kind of like a very complicated RPG game, except you're the character wearing the skin.

I think @Leo Gura or another mod's input would be nice 9in this part of the video, where they talk about the red pill solutions, seems like both Destiny and Charlie were kind of wrong, few parts were right, but both misunderstand PUA and how PUA can actually help self development of mostly males(some females too). I kind of agree that when it's long term relationships PUA is limited, but short term and dating experiences PUA seems like a really good approach. Seems like to me both men have limited experience with dating and PUA techniques, and make a whole lot of assumptions that are mostly, intuitively to me, wrong, and not just on this specific issue but on various other contexts the assumptions were pretty loaded and leading. Of course, I don't mean to be personal attacking Charlie or Destiny, but what gives them the right to condemn PUA in some way? Destiny for one didn't practice PUA and hasn't used PUA to hook up with Melina, nor used PUA to start a relationship with his ex wife, so seems like he's talking from inexperience. Similar to Charlie.

Part 1 was them talking online, this part 2 is face to face: Great interviewing and framing control skills, leading and loaded questions and statements, and manipulation dynamics. Also lots of lessons based on SD stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types/traits, states of being, other lines of development in life and society, ideological indoctrination in one's upbringing and culture, and self biases and preferences. Also some degree of misinformation and manipulating narratives. Comment below, what are your thoughts and feelings and takeaways of this video?

@Juan Okay won ton soup.

@Epikur ?

This seems like another decision that has negative domino effects later on in the military and society. I don't know much of the government bodies here, but if this is the case then the civilians will have less power in nominating a higher position, and the presidency having more power: What are your thoughts?

@Yimpa You know, it's been 4 years since I've joined Actualized.org, and NOBODY picked up this reference at all! Even the few proclaimed otaku mods here! So am glad finally someone realized the meme.?

@Yimpa Quick on the post son! Also agree, let's strange loop analysis to analysis, meta analysis.

HAHAHA! I guess I've inspired this guy to body analyze James Cameron: Very interesting takes.

@Dauntment Yes, I mostly agree, plus PBD has a libertarian bias and believes in libertarianism, so naturally he'll strongly lean into free markets and individualism at the expense of demonizing the mainstream and conformist office types. Sanders is nearly the opposite of PBD and that he's a socialist/progressive with some reasonable takes, although to be honest Destiny is far more reasonable. Also in this heated exchange I intuit that it's mainly this capitalist versus communist paradigm far more at play.

@Danioover9000 Also, he's ignorant in that he's underestimating the scale of danger and damage here, thinking that the LGBTQ movement is a greater danger, when in fact throughout history it's been the traditionalists, Monarchs, Feudalists, and Nationalists, of which white supremacists and Ethnocentric nationalists take advantage of the system to bully and demonize others different to themselves, who also happen to be majority heterosexual and traditional males and females. Sweeping the vast amounts of historical events of demonizing LGBTQ people, by predominantly heterosexual people, under rigid systems, and sweeping counter evidences of how vicious the bullying and demeaning actions towards minority groups, which this PBD guy is also a part of.

What an ignorant take by PBD: He's ignorant of how history is all a development, based on SD stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types/traits, 9 stages of ego development, states of consciousness, other lines of development in other life and societal domains, especially ideological beliefs indoctrinated, groomed and gaslight by culture, and self biases and preferences. PBD is ignorant that he's also indoctrinated by this anti LGBTQ agenda, and is spouting nonsense here. Never seeing this guy as credible, and blocking this guy's content.

What a great video, one of many examples of stage orange values corrupting stage green values: Also a lesson in masculine and feminine love here too. The whale to me is obviously too sick and too far gone to be released back into the wild, and the obvious solution is masculine love here, yet it's like in Sun Tsu's Art of War, and the entanglement and contested grounds, in which whoever and what army makes the first attempt to capture a swamp land or some inhospitable terrain, gets the disadvantages first, and nobody wants to be first or initiate first, so instead they're left with inaction. That combined with the social ramifications of what might have happened, nobody wants to nor can't exercise masculine love. Regardless, it was a good attempt, yet deep down, metaphysically and epistemically, there's a lot of bias with these decisions.

@Philipp No dogma of any kind, and calling out individuals and groups for their bad faith tactics, uncharitable interpretations and lack of good faith. Call them out as ideological, deluded, and correcting that worldview is a start to how we can clean the epistemic ecosystem.

@StarStruck 'Porn is wrong for men'. So, you would rather revert back to history, and have men impregnating women, consensually or non-consensually, because 'loads of men not reproducing because busting a nut is a click away'? Do you have ANY IDEA how hard it is to raise a family? The financial, emotional and psychological costs of raising a child, just because you had to get your wife pregnant, especially accidental pregnancies? Not just related to pornography but also condoms use and sexual education. Do you have any idea of the consequences of your over simplistic wish to restrict and prohibit pornography could lead to for other parts of society? True, that sexual impulse been part of the driving force of humanity, but are you correct in assuming that entire battles and wars were ONLY fought for pussy sake, really, only for the pussy, and not for example expansion of empires and civilizations, gaining more territory and lands and riches? Yes, pornography plus sexual education has reduced rapes and unwanted pregnancies, yes partly true that that statement doesn't change that pornography is a 'super' stimulus for the nervous system(partly true but I think you meant for the neuro networks and neuro pathways in the brain, not the nervous system) but that doesn't necessarily mean that it's equally as addicting as cocaine here, yes the neural pathways that cocaine and pornography watching and masturbating(also real sex) light up, but the chemical differences and chemical addictions that cocaine has is not present equally when watching pornography and real sex because pornography and real sex and masturbation lacks the chemical addictive substances that binds and enforces your brain in seeking out more cocaine. In fact it's far more emotional and psychological than chemical, as you're falsely equating cocaine to pornography here.

@Schizophonia How does this: Answers @zurew's question? How is reserving your sexual power for a real woman an argument against both amateur pornography and onlyfans?

@Schizophonia However, if you're saying yes that most porn stars are crazy and insane, that implication too also muddies the definitions of crazy and insane, and even other mental disorders too. So, are you saying that all porn stars are mentally disordered, insane and crazy, and willing to risk muddying the established terms of crazy and insane? How does consent have nothing to do with pornography, when consenting and signing written contracts IS what makes pornography legal and ethical sex work, versus non-consensual sex work not signed or contracted? Is it really the case that it's only understood to come from only what causes a person to accept this, and what is 'this' are you referring to? Why just cause and not correlations or multiple causations? Why do you assume there's no love in pornography? Do you mean no sexual love, no genuine love? So men who mostly sign up for pornography are more in control, dominant and psychopathic, and women who sign up are mostly submissive? How are these assumptions not sexist and misogynistic to men and women? How is sexism and misogyny a liberal excuse? So what is your logic here? That denial(negation) of balance of power, between social agents(porn stars, men/women, contractors?) + the qualifier 'as a fallacious means'(not definable yet.) = denying individual experience? How does that line of reasoning include this other line of logic, that sociological subjects = liberal delirium? Again you seem to use very loaded terms here that you yet to define carefully, to justify some anti porn sentiments you seem to have. What is true? That a man, or women, had to do pornography? Why are you assuming that men or women that do pornography had to do pornography? What causations and correlations are you bringing up here to create a situation that all male and all female porn stars are FORCED into working in the pornography industry? Why are you assigning a conditional negation of 'but she was CONSENT' and (sophism 2 approaching what do you mean sophism 2?) and stating it's normal that there are difficult jobs? Stating that it's normal that there are difficult jobs necessitates CONTRACTS that are written, that the parties involved consented, interviewed, and trained, into being porn stars. Otherwise, since it's a difficult job(and what do you mean normally a difficult job here, getting fucked? How is getting fucked a difficult job?) that can mean that the more the difficulty, the more prone to abuse, which is why there's legal CONTRACTs and written CONSENT, otherwise you get black market illegal pornography here. How is stating that a brainer, or cashier, is a tough job, and then stating 'btw(HOW IS THIS A FALLACY?)you have something against cashiers! You are a misogynist!' a rebuttal to my one of my points I raised??? Why did you misquote and misconstrue what I've stated here? How is this: 'From one: There's a difference between drinking a cup of Senseo coffee and being filmed licking a man's sex with the look of a bitch until internal ejaculation. And then it wasn't "self-rape." You basically do whatever you want with your life including self-destruction. The review is not here.' a rebuttal and refutation of my questions here? Why are you dodging my questions here?

What is systemic Racism, and what is your definition? IMO, in my words, here's how I define systemic racism: What is systems, and systemic? It means that there's a moderate to big thing that contains multiple parts and other elements that make up that one big thing. So, for example, if you like at air plane factories, one airplane factory is not just one singular thing, that factor contains the assembly lines, the markers and symbols, a control room, human resources, automated machines, and parts of an air plane that was designed in a person's mind and blue printed, in the drawing boards and the 3d modelling systems the air plane designers do, then after many deliberations between designers and engineers and stress, they make thousands of simulations, then they make each part of the plane and assemble it. Finally that factory outputs that aircraft, which is also a system onto itself because it's also not just an airplane but a thing made of multiple other parts, and even other systems that are small enough to fit within the airplane like the electrical systems and gasoline piping systems. Another example is society, it's one giant thing which onto itself is made of many infrastructures. What is Racism? Simply put, it's a sub derivative off of the field of discrimination. What is discrimination? When one sentient and conscious agent discerns reality into parts, into comparisons and contrasts, and when one thing discriminates another thing, sentient things or non-sentient things for survival purposes, for example I'm discriminating hemlocks from blue berries, or discriminating toy guns from real guns, or discriminating camouflage patterns to warning patterns on a creature. So, racial discrimination is a sub derivative of discrimination based on what a person's skin colour is, approximately, and is specific between human to human discriminations, like I'm white and your black, or he's Asian and your white. Racism also is systemic, as well as overt to covert as well. Also a bit confused by this YouTuber, like how about define systemic racism then? Why so triggered? Not just systemic racism but there're other words loaded terms as well, but systemic racism to me feels most loaded and needs careful defining and clear, clarity of framework in discussing what is systemic racism, before discussing how do we improve ourselves, or improve as an individual to overcome these systemic issues? I mean it's in that word too as well, systemic, which means that almost no matter how hard you make appeals and fallacies to logos, ethos and pathos in your video, your appealing to individualism, which is mostly asymmetrical to systemic racism or systemic issues, because systemic deals with systems and collectives, and much less with individual parts. Can someone explain this part to me? Do you guys agree or disagree with my definitions, or is there a better explanation? I have yet to see someone actually tackle on this systemic racism, and give it a proper definition seriously, like most videos or most podcasts this systemic racism or systemic issues, when brought up, the interviewer and guest just talk circles around these terms, like COME ON!

@Ajax Apparently she's accused of grooming young children in her chats, from what I have learned so far, so that also explains a bit about the muscular tensions around neck and face when certain topics are worded. The manipulative part is she's disguising her tonality in this sing song way so I can't read her voice accurately, whether she's intentionally stressing the pronunciations for the music or actually defensive. It's manipulative sure, I'd even say self manipulation here. Also spotted contempt here and there from what I can observe.

@Nilsi Thanks for the share!

The observe guy's breakdown of her is amazing, and a bit funny: Sums up parts of my intuition and feelings about my first watch through of her.

This is a very interesting case. I've got a notification from this guy: The Behavioral Arts19 hours ago I have to sit this one out ?… I have been getting requests from many of you regarding the apology video by viral YouTuber Colleen Ballinger (aka Miranda Sings). I normally have a pretty rigorous selection process for the topics I cover. I have a few boxes a subject has to tick and I’ve often let trending topics go for many reasons. My goal here is to provide fair and unbiased analysis and if I can’t, I let subjects go despite how trending they are. As such, I cannot deliver a fair and unbiased analysis of Colleen Ballinger. As some of you may or may not know, her brother, Chris Ballinger, is a very accomplished and talented magician and since the magic/mentalism community is pretty small, we go way back professionally. He has performed many of my created tricks on his YouTube videos, we have worked together on television and I’ve always respected him as a colleague. As a corporate interviewer / interview consultant, it has happened once or twice in my career that an applicant for a position was someone I knew or related to someone I knew and I bowed out, it’s the same situation here. Even if I think I can analyze her apology video without bias, I’m sure my respect for her brother would play with my emotions. Thanks for understanding ❤️ Now that's his opinion and perspective, which is fine. I'm new to this community, but I am a firm believer in keeping an in group accountable, which means I'm will be analyzing her body language, framing choice, tonality, and micro expressions to muscular tensions around certain topics and words. Just because it's a fellow mentalist or language reader doesn't mean I can't treat them as equally as I treat others here when I analyze: First impressions: Manipulative for sure, but I will watch this repeatedly, because the deceptions and defensive signs are mixed here, plus music making is actually muddying this analysis a bit, but unfortunately for here I'm a rapper too, and can analyze music patterns as well so...her intent is clearly not to apologize, maybe to troll the haters and the mob that attacked her with these pedophile allegations?

@Hardkill Yeah, it's very sad when your reality bubble starts crumbling, and the external world reality checks your biases in place. real wake up call, and another example of transformational dilemma. Every change, and action will have an opposite reaction. an ego backlash, to maintain what's working, developmental factors all at play and all part of a more complex system and intelligence.

Take this for example in Japan, Sumo wrestling: What these people are ignorant of, especially in western cultures, divisions and hemisphere, is that the collective EGO doesn't care for your petty small concerns, your individualistic projections from your tiny EGO, it cares for IT'S OWN SURVIVAL! So if this is part of SUMO CULTURE, then the collective ego of sumo wrestling will defend it's practices, as is the case throughout the whole of history, based on the developmental factors and patterns of SD stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types/traits, states of consciousness, 9 stages of ego development, life experiences and other lines of development in life and society, and ideological beliefs indoctrinated, groomed and gaslight from upbringing and culture, as well as self biases. What these western biased people don't know of is that this is the transformational dilemma faced by Sumo wrestling, and by it's culture and collective ego, they don't get how challenging it is to enact change for the positive here, like more breaks for suspensions when the taking the break risks that injured Sumo Wrestler to be plummeted back down in the rankings.