Danioover9000

@Ajax For example, when Lawrence of Arabia lead the tribes across the Sahara desert, to invade a coastal town, the British military had anti sea artillery cannons pointing towards the coast, but there was no mechanism for the gun to swivel back to defend the town from a land invasion on the other side BECAUSE NO ONE, INLCUDING THE BRITISH, THOUGHT AN ARMY WOULD CROSS THAT DESERT. History repeats itself during the pacific war, when Japan's imperial empire was on expansion mode, and it invaded Singapore with some military ingenuity. What happened? HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF, THE ANTI SEA ARTILLERY GUNS STILL ARE FIXED TO THE SEA, AND CAN'T SWIVEL TO DEFEND FROM THE OTHER SIDE, BECAUSE NO ONE THOUGHT AN ARMY WOULD RIDE THE JUNGLE WITH BYCILES AND MAKE SHIFT RAFTS! This is what is meant when learning about history, there are mistakes, and history repeats itself albeit in different contexts. What was the valuable lesson, in a military context? Make sure your artillery can swivel and point to another direction if needed. So, despite history being full of nonsense and fantasy, that is still useful information to learn from. Another example is the ancient Chinese warfare and different points of history, of how that culture dealt with wars and internal conflicts. you could focus on one part and see for example the invasions sometimes increased migrations from villagers or towns onto other places, which artificially created immigration issues in those warring kingdoms, and the military back then, some of them, realized that if they destroyed villages close to their enemy kingdom, they'd make those people leave and move into their enemy kingdom, thereby increasing chances of food shortages, and lessening war of attrition in that kingdom, making siege warfare feasible. We can see a similar dynamic play out between China and North Korea, and that it supports North Korea for geopolitical reasons, but also to prevent mass immigration from North Koreans onto China, because if North Korea fell against Sough Korea, that would create a huge immigration problem in that region.

@The Redeemer I would say it's more propaganda and narrative warfare. Not sure about the complete destruction of male roles though, as despite the narrative those feminists make, men will still have social roles to fill regardless of A.I or increasing feminism. Life always finds a way to correct too much ideology. I can sympathize and understand a little even though I'm female. Hang in there, no pun intended. Take your personal development, business and marketing seriously, take your LP seriously, and you'll do fine, despite the peaks and troughs of life.

@Sucuk Ekmek It specifically is if you want to become more open minded, because at any point, if the other side won, you'd be identified differently, or be raised in a completely different world. Think about the magnitude of implications that would have had in your own life, when 500 years ago one side lost and the other won solidly. You'd be a completely different ego.

@Israfil I'm not here to argue and debate, heated discourse, against forum guidelines. Sometimes it's useful to study history IMO, from multiple perspectives, to learn the lessons, mistakes, and successes, especially the failures, so that we can discern the present and the future, to not repeat past atrocities. If you don't take counter history into consideration, and don't look at past mistakes, and maintain general ignorance and evil of the population, and elite class, then people who are ignorant of developmental factors, will keep on repeating their ideological worldviews thinking they're right. Again, not limited to Christians, Muslims, Jews, there's so many more ideologies like Taoists/Daoists, Confucianism, Traditionalism, conservativism, modernism, centrism, liberalism, libertarianism, socialism, progressivism, communism. and so many others.

@D2sage But why emphasize @Leo Gura being wrong, when generally most other people can be wrong? Yes, health issues can largely be genetic, and health is somewhat determined by genetics, plus stress, environmental factors like toxicity in air pollution, water quality, toxicity in foods, diet, sleep, nutrition, exercise activity ECT. However, why are you honing down specifically to Leo being wrong then? Japan's collective health issues are both a combination of their homogenous genetics, and environmental actions. Same with America. How does these have to do with one man, @Leo Gura, being wrong? In fact this whole thread is just WHACK and CORNY AF, like a passive aggressive complaint. How about taking care of your own health instead of trying to argue and have a heated debate over some other person's health??

@Israfil Come on, don't be bad faith and uncharitable. Please try to understand that user's point of view.

@hyruga Yes, I partly agree, but eventually those would be limits to religion, and the separation of religion and state, and liberalism would still emerge, capitalism would still happen regardless. For example, even if Germany won WW2 and half or more of the world fell under it's sphere of influence, later Germany would still fall like all other empires before it. Stage blue would hit an excess, which would make it untenable, and the transformational dilemma would still occur and the collective ego would transform more over time into stage orange and green, maybe into stage yellow and turquoise. Evolution, despite what individual egos or collective egos want, will still happen regardless of ideological worldviews indoctrinated, groomed and gas lite by your upbringing and culture.

@Sucuk Ekmek Yes, my whole point in making this thread is to share what ideological views, biases, especially for past historical events that had a lot of stage red/blue, looks like. To me, this is not limited to Christianity vs Islam vs Judaism, it's ways more than that. There was a point when the Mongolian empire was so wide and big that if they were more tactical and resourceful, they'd become the next super power or at least their fall as an empire would have been later. If China's geography or evolution was different, and they were aggressive in they're expansion, they would have been the super power later. Id Germany won WW1 or WW2, Germany would have been the next superpower. That's all I'm trying to show, oh, and those still reading please stop with the hate mail, haven't attacked anyone personally. Just sharing some ideological views and examples. Please be civil, read the guidelines before commenting thanks.

@D2sage What does this have to do with OP's thread? And what would you have done in that timeline, of this serious virus that's rapidly spreading? It's not enough to rely on data and information gathered now, you have to consider a point in history where we had no idea how severe this rapidly spreading virus could have been, see? What would be the cost of inaction, 5 years of science testing of this vaccine, and a more liberal approach from governments and businesses regarding this pandemic, versus a more conservative political approach of lock down policies, and a more liberal action of rushing vaccine development within a year in anticipation to the lethality of this virus?

@Sucuk Ekmek How? I'm just sharing what bias looks like, from the mainstream takes of the crusades, to this person's take. It's mostly an example of some misinterpretations of stage red/blue.

@Zedman Can't be helped I guess. Not many people have a tier 2 cognitive development, a systemic stage yellow view of the world.

@Bandman The argument makes sense for that user. The Buddha is better in comparison because he spent 40 years meditating under a tree, going around spiritual circles to debate with other spiritual teachers, and ended up making a Sanga despite all the odds and passed doctrines that at the time ended up being useful in a spiritual context. Meanwhile, Mu-ham-mad going around the middle eastern region, forcefully converting the other polytheistic tribes, even the native Christians in those regions to convert to Islam, while having polyamorous relations with multiple wives, of all ages. Obviously the user making that comparison makes the Buddha a super saint, comparing a strong stage blue/orange/green Buddha to the stage purple/red/blue Mu-ham-mad.

Why am I getting hate mail and death threats here? Please go a read the guidelines page first before posting. No dogma please. 'Don't shoot the messenger.'.

@Recursoinominado Yes, this video is a good example of that. Just people sugar coating history, whichever side you bias and prefer for, you'd give a rosy tint to.

@Vrubel To me the video is a great example of a time when the world was peak stage blue to red, and problems with revisionism. As the principle goes, no ideology or dogma of any kind.

@Carl-Richard Nice observation, now it all makes sense.?

@Twega We? I thought it's only you talking about general health, and genetics? I'm just including genetics, body composition, and other developmental factors that could influence gene expression one way or another into this discourse. Where exactly does @Leo Gura overestimates the impact of heritable genetics in the healthy population, underestimates environmental/lifestyle on health and epigenetic? Where does @Leo Gura confuse genetics with determined traits/diseases?

@Twega So what is your main argument here? That @Leo Gura is wrong about genetics because he said 'health is largely genetics', and you took it as an absolute claim? And if you do have research links do share them here. IMO, factors like genetics and body composition can play a part, and so does willpower and determination, although that too could be influenced by brain chemistry and brain modules being more or less active. Take for example this man: Clearly he exhibits strength that not the average male body can produce, yet he can produce such strength, and not just him but hundreds of old school strongmen can do, from Bruce Lee, to Charles Atlas, and so on.

Not just an unhealthy marriage, but a debate that is charged emotionally and ideologically, based on many developmental factors that these people are ignorant of: My thoughts and first impressions, best course of action was to study dating and relationship dynamics before getting into one, take your personal development seriously, and read up on some modals for handling relationships and a marriage. Don't find yourself, nor have a self fulfilling prophecy that gets you into this situation. Thoughts about the dogma and ideology displayed here?

Forgot to mention this man, what amazing feats of strength, and just weighing 140 pounds and height of 5'4:

How is it that almost every time I post a video, sometimes some person or group copy write strikes the vid?

@ZenAlex True, which makes the Tate brothers evil. There's little to argue and justify their sex trafficking and tax evasion.

First listen here, my impressions already in 5 minutes and I'm liking this guy's style, although yes 3 hours in total, plus either edits or jumps to camera angles, I do like this guy's style.

Actually seems like a more decent podcast, the host actually pushing back and asking the more tougher questions and really grinding Destiny here on some of his past takes: Suggest listening, and posting what you think and feel of how the host handled Destiny here.

Very interesting to compare and contrast these other body language analysts on the UFO hearing: and Are very interesting takes.