Aaron p

I know trumps quite chaotic, but I don't like the demonisation of him. I'm coming at this from a philosophical perspective, where it's less appropriate to demonise even if he is a bit mad. Honestly, I don't like the fact that the establishment manipulates the public with media and such...like the media pushing the word "war" to describe the Ukrainian invasion. Regardless of if it was actually a war, Its obvious they started inserting this word intentionally and repeatedly to turn through west against Russia as quickly as possible. I could be completely oblivious as to the underdevelopment of political leaders and their sheer madness or immaturity, but I have a feeling Putin didn't just wake up one day and randomly say "fuck it, let's invade motherfuckers." I know one thing, in political movement, there is usually more going on behind the scenes than what we know................

Holy fuck, so aliens are real. I just chat gpt'ed the shit out of this: Here are 10 of the most compelling and widely discussed cases that many consider to be among the most convincing in the UFO/alien phenomenon: --- 1. USS Nimitz “Tic Tac” Incident (2004) Navy pilots encountered a white, oval-shaped object off the coast of San Diego. The object displayed flight characteristics beyond known technology (e.g., no wings, rapid acceleration, no visible propulsion). URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Nimitz_UFO_incident --- 2. Pentagon UFO Videos (Released 2020) Three officially released videos (FLIR1, GIMBAL, GOFAST) captured by U.S. Navy pilots show unidentified aerial phenomena defying known physics, including sudden stops and hypersonic speeds. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_UFO_videos --- 3. The Ariel School Encounter (Zimbabwe, 1994) Over 60 schoolchildren reported seeing a craft land and beings exit. The children independently gave consistent drawings and descriptions. A Harvard psychologist interviewed them, finding no signs of deception. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_School_UFO_incident --- 4. The Phoenix Lights (Arizona, 1997) Thousands witnessed a massive, silent, V-shaped object with lights moving slowly over Phoenix. It was seen by civilians and military personnel and remains unexplained despite official claims. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Lights --- 5. The Rendlesham Forest Incident (UK, 1980) U.S. Air Force personnel stationed in the UK reported strange lights and physical traces in the forest. One officer claimed to touch a craft. Multiple witnesses gave affidavits, and audio recordings exist. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rendlesham_Forest_incident --- 6. Barney and Betty Hill Abduction (1961) A couple claimed to have been abducted in New Hampshire. Their detailed and consistent recollections under hypnosis, combined with physical evidence like broken watches and scuffed shoes, set the template for future abduction reports. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barney_and_Betty_Hill --- 7. O'Hare Airport UFO Sighting (Chicago, 2006) United Airlines employees saw a saucer-shaped object hovering over the terminal before shooting up through the clouds at great speed. FAA initially denied it but later confirmed radar anomalies. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_O'Hare_International_Airport_UFO_sighting --- 8. The Belgian UFO Wave (1989–1990) Thousands of witnesses, including police and military, reported large triangular craft with lights. Belgian Air Force scrambled jets, and radar confirmed objects performing impossible maneuvers. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgian_UFO_wave --- 9. The Roswell Incident (New Mexico, 1947) Initially reported as a “flying disc” crash by the military, then retracted and claimed to be a weather balloon. The incident spawned decades of whistleblowers and speculation about recovered alien bodies and technology. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roswell_UFO_incident --- 10. Commander David Fravor's Testimony (2020 Congressional Hearings) Fravor, a decorated pilot involved in the Nimitz incident, testified under oath that the craft he encountered was “not of this world” and outperformed anything he’d seen in his career. URL: https://www.congress.gov/event/118th-congress/house-event/116282/text

Awww dope

Nah only joking lol, that sounds pretty wacky lolol

...yeah I thought that happened to everyone.. your telling me it didn't happen to you??

@Rishabh R what was your method of stopping the mental talk. My negative mental talk is so automatic that its like I have to interrupt it quickly when I see it's about to say something negative, then tell it off like a child

You have no problem with information retention. The mind is nearly like two minds (or at least in can be split in this way), you have information floating around like 2+2=4 and "chocolate tastes nice." These you can spit out quickly. But there is a deeper knowledge base, knowledge that is imbedded into your minds body (the very fabric and structure of your mind itself). Tell me...within 3 seconds right now: how many windows are in your house. 3, 2, 1, answer out loud. You might not have been able to do it, yet I'd be willing to put money on the fact that if you search the fabric of your mind right now you will be able to move throw each individual room in your house mentally and count each window. It's all there. As long as you read the words in books and listen with a mentally testing attention, all of it stays in your mind. You can reinforce it multiple times then completely forget about then one day in 10 years it will be needed again and you can fly back right here and get it. (You might also be completely unable to do this until the information is required). It's almost like you just trust the information to remember itself, and let speak instead of you. Most of the time my mind is completely lost. I also get the sense that all knowledge is a lie... definitely still better to have knowledge, but...it operates by ego......I think. In pragmatic terms, listening to information you enjoy and naturally love means it will naturally flow into your mind and will sustain itself effortlessly. In fact, if it's aligned with your heart and passion, processing thousands of GB of mental information is likely to be so easy, that it's actually extremely pleasurable. Like biting into a big chocolate cake Sometimes I read some of the shit I say and it's like someone else wrote it and I'm like "damn"

I know one thing, I don't know politics. But Leo does, and if he's as accurate with politics as he is with spirituality, I find it highly likely that he is accurate about trump. I seriously get the sense that trump is bad news. although he gives political correctness the finger, which is slightly entertaining. Honestly I have no idea about politics, but yeah...eh, I say Leo for president lol. I found a YouTube channel that apparently prides itself on its unbiasedness in delivering political info. "Breaking Points" it's called

To me good energy at death is like good music during a trip...makes it better

How are more Americans not recognising that they are propping up someone who is extremely chaotic and dangerous. Donald trump nearly resembles the antichrist

@trenton have you read this. So far my favourite book of all time. I'm only really starting my reading journey properly recently That subheading: "How true skeptics know there is no death and fathom answers to life, the universe, and everything." I squirted a little pee out when I read that

See most minds here are highly developed, or at least more developed than average. The problem with being highly developed psychologically is that it's it's usually difficult for us to appreciate the levels of stupidity and obliviousness that can exist inside of the minds of people who are less aware. And often this is all it is, a lack of awareness. Typically you dont find that most cases involve men who are completely aware and are just straight sadistic monsters who enjoy destroying women's honour. It's not uncommon that men are simply unaware of the damage their causing, or unaware of the fact that their causing any damage at all...remember that the idea of consent has been radically updated and refined over the last 30 years...when guys like Russel were growing up, there was no intelligent and intuitive distinction between slowly influencing the situation to encourage sex (like is normal and happens virtually all the time in pick up) and influencing the girl directly, too quickly or too strongly to encourage sex. Once again, not saying it can go unquestioned...but there are for sure better ways this type of deal can be handled. I also don't know any of the details as I skimmed only, so I'm again pointing at the larger beast on the whole rather than this individual case

I can see that some of the contrasting comments aren't attempts at justifying or side stepping justice, they seem to be simply looking at the broader beast as a whole and at how it could be adjusted to be less unnecessarily damaging in handling people who are convicted (with compassion and consciousness). None of this changes the fact that If he's guilty then he should be convicted. After the fact, Holland is an excellent example of a society that is leading the cutting edge in compassion, insight and a rehabilitation focus...rather than a "let's see how badly we can fuck people's lives up to try and deter others" focus...

Mm

Don't know what's happened with the lines

So now, even before any proof has been examined by a court, all men who appear to defend Russel are "the type of guy that would do something like that." Your saying that anyone who defends him, are likely to be rapists themselves... ...so your saying that "most men" (by this I assume you mean over 50% of the males that exist on the planet) should be seen as potential rapists and or paedophiles... They're scared of men because certain demographics of people have encouraged the media to stigmatize young horny guys to the point where teenagers are being called dangerous paedophiles and men who can't read body language are being reported as being violent rapists. Females are scared because of the exacerbation of ideas that are made to sound as bad as possible to cause as much destruction and emotional upheaval as possible. This is obviously very tragic and I'm very sorry for that having happened to you. However you need to recognize that we are not defending violent offenders... In fact we're not defending any offenders. We are simply using intelligence to gain insight into how the media takes the most Extreme cases and makes all men out to be equally monstrous... Including the teenager who has sex with his girlfriend after she has had two glasses of wine. We are not for a single moment undermining the traumatic gravity of your situation. We are simply trying to be mindful of the aspects and details of this area of law enforcement that are too extreme and that paint with two broad a brush... Tarring all "perpetrators" with the same brush. It's to the point where if someone is called a rapist, this could mean that they were a teenager who had consensual sex with his girlfriend after she had two glasses of wine and couldn't read body language and she never actually said no verbally...and a 70 year old who abducts a young girl and is extremely physically violent while forcing her to into sex in the back of his van at knife point. We are simply saying that these terms need to be more specific and that there are many degrees of offence. And that it would be more beneficial to introduce terms and labels that are more specific, giving a more contextually accurate background of each situation. And what people need to be reminded of is that they need to be mindful of how out of control their emotions can make them, fueled by stigmatized and emotionally charged terms like "sexual battery"... Which could be something as simple as a kiss that is incorrectly timed.

Actually yeah your right, it's nauseating hearing the opinion of...men...*vomits*.. Your right... actually nah he's probably raped more like 100.

Nah bro it's more like: your head runs the very close risk of being put on a chopping block if you meet the wrong woman. Also there's a catch 22, people who it's happened to, will typically be so annihilated by it that they don't say anything or comment publicly on it. The intentional violent perps need to be dealt with firmly but not harshly, compassion and consciousness is what will properly fix it not annihilation, nevermind cases like oblivious teenagers or people who have raped someone accidentally (which is becoming more common because of the lowering of the bar of what qualifies as rape, just as you said).

@gettoefl Very rarely in my life has a girl ever verbally said the word "yes" when we have sex, virtually every time it's been a nonverbal qué...like open, loose body language. Usually it just relies on skill in reading body language. Trust me, you start representing male strength and you will run the risk of being made out to be a sexual deviant. Maybe we should start writing contracts of agreement that requires a written signature in the presence of a lawyer right before the dick goes in.

Word

I have lost all respect for law enforcement bodies and media outlets that deal with sexual misconduct. They've did it to themselves by tarring everyone with the same brush. I have had to sit and have conversations with people who have had their lives destroyed by either fabricated or exaggerated allegations. The fact that the word "rape" applies to a teenager who has sex with his girlfriend after they both have had alcohol...and to a 70 year old who kidnaps and violently forces himself into an 8 year old...tells me that this entire area has lost all credibility. It kinda feels like certain groups of people have this big red rape button that they push when they don't like someone. I have lost all respect for law enforcement bodies and media outlets that deal with sexual misconduct. Russel could very well have been forceful with girls, but Jesus Christ, this shit ruins people's lives. It's a dumb autistic fucking attack on men. These people and anyone who supports the automatic destruction of people's lives because of sexual misconduct need to seriously check themselves and or fuck off

Here’s a list of the top 30 countries with the highest average IQ levels, based on several studies and assessments like the International IQ Test and historical data on cognitive ability averages (starting with highest): South Korea China Iran Japan Singapore Austria Canada Finland Germany Estonia Netherlands Sweden Norway Denmark Switzerland Belgium France United Kingdom United States Poland Australia New Zealand Russia Israel South Africa Latvia Slovenia Czech Republic Luxembourg Hungary This list is based on various IQ measurement sources, although factors like culture, education systems, and the method of testing can influence these results. ______________________________________ Interesting bonus note apparently the #1 country on this list is doomed: ______________________________________

This probably still not 100% accurate but eh, seems closer