Angelite

It would be paradise till it happen. Then it would be hell. There's no turning back once you're in. Wanting a war is not equal to actually be in a war.

Correct by the God that I worship 's standard. Killing one person without a justified reason is equal to killing the whole of mankind. ?This is by God's standard. (the only justified reason: if they kill one of you. A life for a life) Don't make a joke out of actual war. "regress" back into war when we've already paid that "growth" once. And now you wanna create another war? Only those who've never been in war will wan't it to happen. For whom? Using the general public for your own ego? Goodluck receiving your karma. That's part of karma. Actually I didn't know what a hippie revolution was. This? @electroBeam you are a part of your previous generation's karma.

This is the hypocrisy that i'm seeing. An enlightened being will look at everything as "God's delicate art" , it is those who are the least conscious who sees the other 99.9% "unconscious people".

Actually I had forgot it. But this post reminds me of it.

@SpiritualAwakening is Adam the kind of person who would cry easily? Have you ever considered if you'd be in the position as he described it? I had a few dreams which have became true. I also know that we can't change our fate. It will happen the way it would. I have yet to know the Wisdom behind these. I think it's a good thing if your dream is open ended.

Have you ever been in a war? It's a lose-lose situation. Especially if you wanna start a new one when we have reached to a point of non-violence. To regress back is foolish. You'll only regret it once it happens. Only when peace is no longer an option. Defending yourself from the intruders. The line between ego and survival is who the intruders is. This is my value even at a one person level. If someone trespasses this one particular value, then God will take care of you. Karma is unavoidable. God IS against violence. God is not against integrity though. The sages too.

Why? It didn't crossed your mind that there could be a God other than you? *replace "other" with "higher" in my language.

So this is how it looks like from @zeroISinfinity's lens. Thanks for sharing your lens. I always learn a third point perspective from someone else's first pov. For example: you must have been a long time seeker. (I don't call myself a seeker. I am simply worshipping God) Along the way, I learn a lot about God. And everything else. I said God guides me.

? Why? Actually I leave pretty much everything to God. Except what God told me to do. Because I am not God~ Did I control the sun? No. Okbye~

I'm a watcher. So yea.. i'll let you learn things the hard way. That's probably more effective in your case.. i'm not doing anything to you. I'll leave you to God. I can point out your biases/limit but nah. That's tiresome. So yea~ goodluck

You can be a trendsetter in the relative. But when it comes to the Absolute, there is only one Truth. It's not a choice. It's not an option. There can only be one Truth. The relative and the Absolute is not comparable. It is not a variable. It's good to be the followers of the Greatest Absolute. Not the relative. You can be the trendsetters within the relative though. And be the followers alike. But the best kind of following are those who follows the Absolute. Together in Truth. As for the relative, it will be infinitely many. It won't be fun if there's too many dragons. It won't be fun to be the only dragon either. The dragons are busy training. You can choose your role, and do as you wishes. Accordingly. The Absolute will always be the same. It won't change a lil bit. Everyone will arrive at the Common Ground. ... I've noticed that everyone's descriptions of the Absolute are actually my relative...

@SpiritualAwakening First, what is your definition of being enlightened?

Can someone shine a light on this? Unbias interpretation. To those whom have died. Sūrah [6] The Cattle 122. Can he who was dead, to whom We gave life, and a light whereby he can walk amongst men, be like him who is in the depths of darkness, from which he can never come out? Thus to those without Faith their own deeds seem pleasing. 123. Thus We have placed leaders in every town, it's wicked men, to plot (and burrow) therein: but they only plot against their own souls, and they perceive it not.

So this is how it looks like from @SpiritualAwakening 's lens...

What's offending about your words? I only wanna know objective truth. The correct interpretation. Not a relative ones. Interpretations are two steps below the absolute. & translations are one step below the absolute.

Let me tell you what he got to say. Prophet Muhammad : 46:9 Quran Say (O Muhammad), "I am not something original among the messengers, nor do I know what will be done with me or with you. I only follow that which is revealed to me, and I am not but a clear warner." Yusuf Ali translation: Say: "I am not a bringer of new-fangled doctrine among the messengers, nor do I know what will be done with me or with you. I follow but that which is revealed to me by inspiration; I am but a Warner open and clear." (It means he didn't bring something new which is against the previous scriptures, but the same message from God of all creations) 46:10 Say (O Muhammad), "Have you considered: if the Qur'an was from Allah, and you disbelieved in it while a witness from the Children of Israel has testified to something similar and believed while you were arrogant... ?" Indeed, Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people. ... So, did you see how every verses are not by Muhammad himself? Even his answers are from Allah. It wasn't his "words". He simply says what was given to him. His answers are from Allah. Prophet Muhammad simply conveys the Words. Eg. Say O Muhammad... etc While the hadeeth are from his own words. That's the difference between the Qurān & hadeeth.

It is His Words that has manifested into our reality through, Angel Gabriel, to prophet Muhammad, to the prophet's friends ( one of his friend are assigned to write the revelation, everyone else was not allowed to write it but to remember it in their heart, instant integration) . The same thing happened to the previous prophets. Did I keep the first written Quran by Zayd ibn Thabit ? No, I got a haramain english translation version. And in other language too. But there are many people who memorize it in their hearts, including my bro. It's not a big book. Even young (arab)kids can memorize it.

I only say that I know a God higher than me exist. I know Him through His Book(s). And I know He exist because He answered my prayers. Actually not only my prayers but other people's prayers too. Anyone who asked Him. That's how I know Allah exist. I said I didn't know how He looks like. (In my religion) It is actually a sin to imagine how God looks like. Because God is not anything like creations. Re: me = creation(s) = (everything) < God ?this is not a belief or a concept. It is true in my reality. 200% ... Actually your question is quite fun. Do you think your mom created you? It is by God's mercy that we are able to create(?). For human beings can only manipulate resources. But can never create something out of nothing. Only God can create something out of nothing.

If there are not “two”, one believing there is “two” does not know true happiness. If there are "one", one believing there is "two" does not know true happiness. But your definition of "one" is equal to ; Everything = God. In my reality, there is one God higher than me(re:everything). So.. as one does not know who one is, but knows only the physical pleasures, and surface level pleasures of mind, mistaking this for actual love. I do know my Creator though..I didn't know how He looks like but I do know that God exist. And It is not anything like creations..definitely not a human being.

This is actually a free Haramain translation. It can't be sold. Just like Moses. Moses didn't know God initially. God made Himself known to him at the blessed land. ❤

@Nahm I actually understand you Nahm. But there's more. You're only scratching the free will.

Oh I just noticed the difference. Hahaha (Both are still false btw) But my conclusion is still the same. It doesn't make them God. Rewind to my replies. ... I said God is with me. Not in me. For in indicates a place that could be in or out. God is with me. A human being cannot be without God. It is not possible. There is only with God. In other words, in or out is a materialist paradigm. Without God, you'll be nothing~ ~~~ ^I wonder how do nondual people would interpret what i've written.. Oops i'm still editing @JustThinkingAloud

@cetus56 thought this would be interesting [43:38 Quran] Until, when he comes to Us [at Judgement], he says [to his companion], "Oh, I wish there was between me and you the distance between the east and west - how wretched a companion." I think i'm lucky then. ? I've noticed the differences in "language" and "meaning". Though visually it looks the same. Jk. That verse is actually referring to the satan who mislead us human being? For those who take them for guides instead of the one God.

@JustThinkingAloud I said everyone's God is the same one God. I can keep editing as much as my ideas comes. But i'll stop now.