Javad

Member
  • Content count

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Javad

  • Rank
    Newbie

Personal Information

  • Location
    Iran (Karaj)
  • Gender
    Male
  1. Hey. I was just reading this poem from one of the Persian mystic poets from ~800 years ago or so, and it sat right in my heart and I thought I could share it with you. A little context: the poetry book is called "the logic of the bird" if translated word by word. But it's better translated as "the way of the bird" or "the logic of the flight". Flying is a metaphor for the path toward enlightenment. It's a story of a group of birds who decide that their kingless realm needs a king, as a kingless realm will end up in chaos. So the birds gather to go on a journey to meet up with the great phoenix to ask him to be their king. But in this path, there are many traps. Phoenix in persian is called سیمرغ (read: Simorgh/Simorq), and bird is called مرغ (Morgh/Morq). And "Si" means the number 30. So there is this clever use of language to show a metaphor: the 30 birds that went to the phoenix, were actually one and the same: Simorgh (phoenix) = Si-Morgh (30 birds). So they were the king all along. The book isn't translated in English I believe, and I'm not great at literary skills, so sadly the beauty of the poetry will be butchered, but I hope the meaning captures you as much as it did me. "See the travelers at the doorway, Coming together, one after another. There is in every speck another doorway, So from each speck there is another way. How would you ever know which way you'd be walking, And from which way you'd reach the doorway? He's hidden when you seek him in the obvious, And obvious when you seek him in the hidden. And as you look into both places at once, no trace of him still, he's out of both. You haven't lost anything, don't seek a thing Whatever you say it's not it, don't say a thing, All you say and all you know is you, Know thyself, that you are all there is to know." - Attar of Neishabur (Mantegh-ol-tayr - the way of the bird)
  2. Hello. How's everyone doing? So I realized something sad, and that's how little Islamic enlightenment-related philosophy is known in the world. Some of the best descriptions of the path of enlightenment that both make sense to the rational mind, and transcends rationality in practice, have been created in the Islamic tradition. But because of a lot of reasons, they have been almost totally unknown to the west and the east, and even the majority of Muslims themselves are unaware of its existence! (as based on the spiral dynamics, majority of Islam falls into stage blue and thus is not interested in stage turquoise material unless it has blue appeals) Anyway! I want to give you a few links to introduce you to the school called "Illuminationism", synthesis of the works and views of Neoplatonism, Ibn-Sina's philosophy, and influences from early Persian wisdom, as well as original ideas from the creator of this school: Suhrawardi. This is the main link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illuminationism In it, you can find a lot of links to get you started in digging deeper into the subject. It can give you a very general glimpse of the philosophy/view and be your starting point. . I think it's very important to know about "Knowledge by Presence" before continuing to read the rest, as it is the epistemological foundation for the whole illuminationism stuff. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_by_presence . This one goes into it a bit more in-depth: https://iranicaonline.org/articles/illuminationism . If you got interested in the epistemological foundations of this school, check this: http://www.mullasadra.org/new_site/english/Paper Bank/Ontology/Knowledge as light @.htm . I highly recommend you read these articles listed below as well, so you get a good contextual understanding. It helps you understand where the ideas of this school came from. First, the schools and views that influenced the creation of Illuminationism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peripatetic_school https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoplatonism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_philosophy And especially: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avicenna (Ibn-Sina is called Avicenna in English) Then we have the most influential persons of the school: Suhrawardi, the creator of the school: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shahab_al-Din_Yahya_ibn_Habash_Suhrawardi Mulla Sadra, the master, took the school to its highest form: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulla_Sadra Plus, this is and interesting and short read. It's Mulla Sadra's book: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Transcendent_Philosophy_of_the_Four_Journeys_of_the_Intellect I hope this helps someone. The interesting thing about this school is how organized it is and how much it MAKES SENSE if you have the contextual knowledge. It helps you map out the journey, not just in terms of metaphors, but with a good rational and philosophical understanding as well.
  3. Hey how's it going? I am making this topic because I have had quite a discovery for a month now, and I am very inclined to share it with the only online community I know that has any idea what I'll be talking about! So you guys might've heard of Sufism in the Islamic culture (the guy in Leo's bio, Rumi, is a Sufi for example). I just wanted to remind you that this school of enlightenment has been lost in all the information overload of the 21st century. Also, since the majority of you guys are not familiar with the Islamic and Persian literature (and also might have all sorts of pre-assumptions that shield you from going even near them) I assume that most of you have no idea about the amazing sources that you're missing. Sufism is a very highly developed spiritual/non-dual practice in its depth, and it also has had a lot of fakers and surface level users. But there are trustable sources one can study and follow up on. What makes Sufism very special though, in my eyes, is not their way of pursuing enlightenment, but their wholesome worldview. It does have flaws I must say, but the way they have been able to make sense of this crazy senseless infinity of existence amazes me. Another HUGE thing that makes them special is their poetry and literature. If only you had the context one needs to understand someone like Hafez, you would've been blown away by what I have called for myself "transcendental art". The poetry works in a way that in whatever level of awakening you are at, you get a different meaning from the poetry. Most people (who are only seeing life as a person in the world) only get the surface level meaning which is mesmerizing as a form of art, but have no idea what is happening. Now the magic with Hafez is that he uses irony in a transcendental level, by making the surface meaning of his poetry mean things that relate to sexual attraction, alcoholism, nihilism, living for the moment, determinism, confusion, beggary, and so on. And when the transcendental gets revealed to those who can see it, the meaning is in paradox or irony with the surface level meaning. I really wish it was possible to bring it to English without it losing a lot of its artistic value. Goethe was in love with Hafez as well. He wrote western-eastern Divan as a conversation between himself and Hafez I think. But yeah anyways, for those who are interested, Sufism and specially its literature (Rumi, Hafez, Mahmoud Shabestari, Sheikh Bahai, Attar Neishabouri, Maghrebi, Hatef Isfahani, etc.) are highly recommended sources for spiritual companionship.
  4. well that tiny bit didnt have any effect. Im about to do my first trip either tomorrow or the day after. will write the report in the trip report thread as well
  5. so i got the lsd. i cut a tiny bit of it to both test if it works on super little doses, and also to taste it. it doesn't taste bitter. it takes almost nothing, but maybe a bit sour, like @outlandish said so. i had a problem cutting it tho. need a sharper thing to cut it with. it's been a while. the tiny bit is still not dissolved, also no impact. hmm also one thing. it doesnt matter if you put it on or under your tongue right? the point is for it to dissolve in your tongue?
  6. i have one friend who has used it before but i don't think he'd be available. another friend of mine actually volunteered to help! but he doesn't have any previous experience; neither in tripping nor trip sitting. So it'd be hard for him to help. but i think it'd be better than nothing since i have no idea what's to come it's better to have someone you trust be there to provide support
  7. hahaha enlightenment jokes. You people know how to make everything funny lol.
  8. Hello everyone. Hope you're all doing well. I have taken a huge leap of faith and have bought LSD and am ready to use it to move forward towards the place that you don't feel the need to more forward. Now a little background on me: I have pretty much ZERO experience on psychedelics. I never smoked until last year and then I smoked weed twice, and a cigarette once just so I'm a little bit familiar with a shift in state of consciousness, or just smoke inside of me. But that doesn't really ever get you up to the challenge of using psychedelics. I appreciate any help/tip that could help me have a safe experience and learn from it. The substance is LSD The dealer gave me some tips like "don't touch the substance it'll ruin it" but i don't know how to get it to my mouth safely (yeah i'm that ignorant in this matter) he said don't keep it in warm places but does that mean i can't keep it in my pocket till i get back home? and finally smth he said that boggles me: he said use a little bit of opium to get yourself down from the high. But opium is not a psychedelic and i DO NOT want to use drugs. Do you have any advice to give on how the trip goes and how i can get down from the high safely as well? thanks a lot
  9. Thanks to everyone. Helped a lot. Btw, as a food for the mind, check this way of explaining consciousness: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_man @Leo Gura i can only SORTA get conscious of existence itself. I can't point out to it, can't pin it down, and i feel like that's cuz I'm too grounded in ego's perspective. I can't really not look at things without having a subject-object relationship
  10. @Truth Addict his content, specially in his philosophy books and quotations. Personally haven't dived in his world, but with my knowledge of spiral dynamics, i can see both stage yellow and turquoise in his way of thinking. Example
  11. @Dumb Enlightened yeah that's most likely because you were following up with the main stream self help which is basically marketed all over the place. Try REAL psychology. It actually does deal with the deep issues instead of telling you to go for this shallow "success" type of life. I'll give you an example from my life: A little while ago, i learned that my teenage years' memories of my parents taking away the pc cable and arguing with me while playing video games have manifested in an emotional trigger. Every time i see something being taken from me "for my own good" unconsciously all of the past memories come up in 1 fast burst, which becomes anger, and then i suddenly am feeling angry from inside, am moody from outside, my performance drops, my logic shuts down. The mind blow part for me is, not having had the level of mindfulness i have, i woulda never guessed i am feeling so emotional because of a memory from years ago. Now you also might need to step back from super speed growth, take a little while to self reflect, see how you feel, and what you think, journal them, maybe show it to a psychologist, find the source of your emotions and thoughts, and with all that info, and maybe some outside advice, you can probably fix the problem from the root. It's true that enlightenment fixes all problems from the root (cuz you stop identifying yourself as the ego) but TO get to that stage, you might need to actually go back and heal up, fix old issues, mostly unconscious programming needing to be deleted or changed. Good luck on your path
  12. @Truth Addict oh! I thought i intellectually understood enlightenment after all the things i learned, but as i was trying my best to think through what you said and imagine a no separation of subject and object, i realized i actually can't not separate them. Is there a practice to focus on trying to see that perspective? I do meditation, but I'm not sure if I _even in my deepest states_ could NOT separate me and my thoughts/feelings/experiences and see with no me-and-other perspective
  13. For those of you interested in spiral dynamics and medicine and healing, i thought i'd introduce you to one of the most sophisticated healers of all time, which happened to also be at stage turquoise. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avicenna Believe me, combining his content will elevate your modern understanding of human body and mind to a whole other level you can't imagine right now!
  14. I personally haven't experienced enlightenment yet, but i feel like this might help. This seems to be a problem of balance in growth. If you grow your spiritual side a lot, to a point that you've had multiple and deeper enlightenment experiences, but your identity self has not been getting enough notice and growth, you could experience a big disconnect. I believe the best thing you can do might be going back, getting to know the identity self better, finding the depth of its issues (lots of which come from unconscious programming of childhood and growing up), and facing them. You could dissolve your identity to experience enlightenment as a state, but to be a truly enlightened self, you need to actually face every bit of your identity self and deal with it. In a way, most likely there is no human that is absolutely fully enlightened, since identity most likely has infinite parts and you have to put deliberate focus on each part to grow it or dissolve it. So yeah in summary, try shifting your focus on mindfulness over your identity, and dealing with the issues. Try a GOOD psychologist who also has an understanding of enlightenment. Helps a lot.