LordFall

@Heart of Space For someone trying to make a point for intelligence, you make quite remarkably stupid points. This is not a personal attack, according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, your original posts and all your following comments fit the 5 definitions of the word stupid. I actually agree that we should open up controversial topics for discussion but none of your arguments stand the test of scrutiny. Are you aware of how the metric of IQ is defined and how it was invented in the first place? You didn't really answer Leo's point on how you can't judge a group in a vacuum, you have to access the history of that subgroup. What's your answer to the Japanese having higher IQ than white western countries? How do you even define a race? Do you judge the anglo Saxons the same as the white Eurasians? They have drastically different average IQ scores. What do you even consider black? Are black Brazilians included in this? You would at least think that if you're trying to make an argument for intellectualism you would cover your bases.

@Leo Gura Do you enjoy debating endlessly with people that won't ever get your points? I feel like it'd be easier just to make a cult with a small following of people you handpick. I admire the calling, it's truly selfless I don't think I could teach people. I get irritated by illogicality too much.

Depends on what your goals are. More casual hookups? Dating 3 girls at once? Dating models? Finding a wife? They all have different strategies with the same core principles.

And the beta males ball gags

@Tyler Robinson Well put, I'm screenshotting your comment for future reference. Reminds me of the Bioshock games(which Leo worked on fun fact) with the big daddy and little sisters.

However, and I am going to make an additional point here, how much more a CEO for example gets compensated more than his/her employees is, as you point out in your video, relative. We agree. You seem to make the point that that justifies the current level of inequality. No, I would argue that it has gone way out of hand and that people havng to work 2-3 jobs just to make end meet is not tolerable or justified by "value creation" which is relative as well. The determination of the value of goods and services may be best determined through market forces as of now, but it is still a relative system. Furthermore, How the generated profit is split between all actors within a company is completely relative and to a large degree not coupled to market forces. If the CEO or the savings account of the company got 10 percent less of the overall profit but instead this money got addeed to the salary of all workers, they would all have significantly higher standards of living without significantly infringing on the survivabilty of the company or the standard of living of the CEO. That's how out of proportion and radicalized this capitalistic system has become. We don't need communism but simply a less prominent lower class and an uncompromising social security system. My friend, I think you're in for a rude awakening. Our society is not really even close to stage orange yet, meaning the full depth of capitalistic individualism has only begun to manifest itself. It's still being held up by tribal collectivism(stage blue.) When the scope of things like automation, decentralized finance, drone warfare, etc are reached and you can start to make billions with 5-10 people as opposed to tens/hundreds of thousands of employees, you will see what a stage orange world will look like; which is needed to reach the stage green state of a more humane economy. The 21st century will IMO be way more brutal than the 20th century. Your ideas are nice but the average person is not ready/willing to take full responsibility for their own existence. Even today you can make a living-learning relatively simple freelancing skills and most people refuse to do that. I say refuse because I'm not talking about people in poverty that don't have time to study business because they're working three jobs. I mean middle-class cosy people. When the rugged is pulled from under them, they will struggle big time. COVID has taught me how separated and antagonistic our communities and society still are. We are nowhere close to widespread mutual collaboration. When the basic comforts of society are pulled from us, the average person is just as ruthless and cruel as you would expect stage-red people to be.

Why is him stating his preference shaming?

This and your other comment are exactly what I mean by pseudo-spiritual nonsense. That's a good mindset but it literally doesn't work. You are literally a human being in a society made up of human beings. Being consumed by others' perception of you is of course a fool's errand but not taking it into account is just as much. Be careful not to drink too much of the kool-aid.

@NoSelfSelf I mean sure but at this point, we're talking semantics. That's why I say value to yourself and value to others. You can value your existence but if nobody else does then you're gonna struggle. You could also argue that if you value yourself you have a responsibility to cultivate your "material" value to experience the most of the gifts that this reality has to offer you. Especially in a dating context your self-love is only gonna take you so far.

@NoSelfSelf Value to who? To yourself? Sure, that's called self-love. To have value to society and other individual men and women is a whole other thing. Our society is ruthless to people that don't offer value, look at homeless people or elderly people working as janitors/cashiers. I would highly recommend getting out of this pseudo-spiritual nonsense idea of innate value lol.

@Max_V You're a man, she's a woman. A man is supposed to be the rock that will keep his woman and their bloodline safe. Think about all the previous generations that had to deal with life and death. Don't fall into this mindset of having an androgynous relationship. People don't like Tate but he had a point where like if an intruder breaks into my house I'm gonna go down there and protect my woman whereas the streamer that he was arguing with said he would stay with his girl in his room with his girlfriend hoping they go away lol. It's a good example of masculine and feminine polarity, if a woman doesn't feel safe with you and like you can handle life's challenges why would she feel safe to stay in her feminine energy around you?

I mean, that's a simplistic explanation. Biology dictates that females are more valuable to our species as a whole than males. You need fewer males than females to propagate our species. Natural evolution is based on the males with the most evolutionary advantageous traits reproducing in greater numbers, so you could argue that males with disadvantageous traits are either useless or actively harmful to the evolution of our species as a whole. Females also are generally more cooperative and well-socialized. So even having females surrounding you in a social context or a corporate structure is preferable in my experience. The traits that lead to men creating massive progress for themselves and society like refusal to submit to authority, thinking outside the box, physical superiority to resist oppression, ingenuity, etc are mostly useless at the bottom levels of social hierarchies and only favor the males that succeed in rising above the tribe. I've met so many guys that had the ego of a multimillionaire but were broke and refused to do anything about it. Those men have little value to offer to women, other men, and society as a whole. Women have their fertility and pleasant feminine energy and at the end of the day, those are some of the most valuable things on earth. If you're a male and especially if you're doing spirituality then you should understand that women are the greatest wonderful sacred blessing that you could ask for. Whereas other males to you at best are helpful associates and can help you achieve your goals but most of them will just drain/leech on you if you're trying to accomplish anything substancial.

I would view it as sharing and involving her in the process vs venting/dumping your negative emotions on her. If you're like "baby, I've been anxious dealing with XYZ, it's been hard but I got this, having you here makes me feel much better :)" that will go very well and probably get her to trust you more. Never do something like "Life is so hard, idk what to do, XYZ person is soo annoying, man I'm fucked I can't do this." Basically I'd avoid anything like gossiping, childing complaining or making her feel like you're breaking apart and can't figure it out. It's her job to assist you emotionally and otherwise and give you her input but not to fix your problems for you.

Get on Michael Sartain's podcast. He lives in Vegas too and is very open and does a lot of research on the people he hosts. It would be a great conversation and you could talk about both spirituality and game.

Yeah this is a crazy event. I kinda wanna build a cult too, without the mass suicide/murder part. Nothing quite so interesting happens these days.

I've been hearing Gary Vee and other content creators praising the platform for basically years now and finally started creating and posting stuff semi-consistently. They weren't lying, the organic reach is real. I've been playing around with the format and my highest viewed video is at 4.3k now, not crazy but I'm getting better with my content/editing and most videos get around 500-1.5k views. I think this is a huge opportunity for everyone to get into the content creation game without spending a massive amount of time on editing and audience growth. Especially good for small businesses that don't have too much money for marketing. Who else has played around with this and short-form content strategy in general?

@Leo Gura I agree with that guy, there's no way you're an INTP bro. I'm an INTP and what he says fits me like 100%.

I have no experience with that specific course but in general RSD courses are pretty solid. I hear better things from them than their bootcamps. I followed the social circle one from Luke and it's basically the best thing out there on the subject.

Reincarnation and parallel realities are fascinating subjects. I hope we come to a point where we can explore this and document it. I have the feeling I've lived my life many times, many things feel familiar.

Why would you find it appropriate to argue with her about it even if she was wrong? That's incredibly rude, should be a warning point imo. @Leo Gura

Condoms help a lot, that's actually their main function apart from birth control. STDS are mostly propaganda and have been cured ever since the cold war. Gonnorhea is actually Latin for small fish because back in the day without proper sanitation you would grow goldfish colonies from your penis if you had unprotected sex with questionable partners. Have you ever seen a goldfish come out of a penis? It's not great. That's why I think red pill teachings are very good, they keep us boys safe.

@Frosty97 You have to learn some game from experience, no way around it. Some guys get it naturally but for introverts in general it's a very unintuitive process. You have to go from a nice and fun conversation to turning up the sexual tension and escalating. Very awkward at first but you get used to it.

Lol. Most red pill guys are mentally ill and terrible with women which leads to conclusions such as these. I hope you're a least 50% trolling. You should most be concerned about only sleeping 1-2 women max in your life. The human vagina is actually slightly acidic so if you sleep with many women it will actually dissolve your penis over time. I've had friends that wanted to be players that actually now have to wear strapons to have sex because their member is no longer with us. Let's take a few seconds of silence for them.

Quite literally the million-dollar question. Who knows, up to us to have more public discussions about it and up to the individual to come up with their own boundaries I think.

Where do you draw the line? Is making long-form content exploiting people's time and lack of success in their life? It's a good question but hard to answer. Ethical business is a fascinating subject. I think as long as you honestly believe your business is there to help people and you use the short-form content as part of your funnel towards your long-form/services/products, I don't see too much of an issue. People have to take responsibility for what they're consuming as well, I don't buy this whole helpless media consumer concept. I honestly don't watch Tiktok apart from seeing what other people are doing, the medium has never appealed to me. I mostly like short-form content that is quick tips/podcast clips when I don't have time for a 15min/2 hour video. I think that's a pretty dumb point. Tiktok caters your content to what you like/engage with over time. No comment on the underage part, that's an issue that's social media wide not Tiktok-specific. Snapchat also has an automatic features smoothening feature on all its videos, I don't think it's a bad thing. I'm against this whole notion of social media being bad for your self-esteem, I actually believe most social media has to lead to the greatest advancement in self-improvement potential in decades. The average American used to spend 6 hours a day on television, social media just replaces that in a customized and more engaging way. Shorter attention spans is an interesting phenomenon. I think on one hand it's a concerning issue but also, on the other hand, I don't know if I buy it. I think the bar for entertaining and quality content has increased heavily and not having the attention span to entertain boring conversations or PowerPoint presentations at school is not a bad thing. I get bored of a lot of things quickly but if it's a quality podcast I can listen to it for hours on end so I don't buy the narrative of destroyed attention span fully.