CreamCat

You say there is a plan. What plan?

Lesson He said God is precision engineer. I realized that I have gotten random results because my execution was not precise or consistent. To get precise results, my execution needs to be precise or consistent. My plan is precise enough. I just need to improve precision of execution. Even though precise execution could increase short-term inefficiency due to rigidity, it is a rocket fuel of productivity in the long term. If you allow imprecise execution, you will soon end up being distracted and procrastinating. By sacrificing a bit of flexibility in execution, you get far superior execution. Elon Musk's schedule is somewhat rigid. But, through precise execution, he gets superior results. Questions He said God is bored in nirvana and decides to go back to life because there is nothing to do in nirvana. He said in another video that God can never be bored because it is infinitely fascinated by itself. In nirvana, God experiences infinite bliss. Which one is correct? Is God bored or not bored? Why would God be bored in nirvana if it experiences infinite bliss there?

Yet, we need egos to advance humanity. Without egos, how can we hope to survive intelligence singularity caused by AIs? AIs might carry the torch of life, tough. You are going to have opinions in one way or another. It's better to have healthy opinions and healthy conclusions.

You imagined a meaning for the word, object. You have creative power to imagine anything. So, when men are bedazzled by your sexy body, they treat you as an object? I think that's a matter of interpretation. Interpreting looking at you as if you had three heads as objectification feels like association of irrelevant words in my mind. When a man is bedazzled by the cute paws of a cute cat, is the man objectifying the cat? When you are bedazzled by a cute cat, are you objectifying the cat? When you are bedazzled by a painting, are you objectifying the painting? In my mind's dictionary, an object is something inhuman and something that lacks life. Personally, when a woman is bedazzled by my body, I don't feel that I'm objectified. I take it as a sign that she is interested in my body. You probably also think "Is he interested in my body?" instead of "Is he objectifying my body?" when a man you are attracted to is looking at your body. Objectification is probably not a problem when you do it to men. I guess what you really want to say is that you are creeped or exhausted by too much sexual attention or by sexual attention from ugly or needy guys. So, I would interpret objectification as unwanted sexual attention. According to Leo Gura, if you are truly enlightened, you would not mind running naked on streets. Personal development will eventually make unwanted sexual attention non-problem. There's nothing embarrassing about your body.

The fact that I only want hot women is not any more of a problem than the fact that you only want hot guys and reject every incel that approaches you. You become an object because you perceive yourself as an object and project your perception onto men. Projection works in mysterious ways. A man who is attracted to a woman thinks that the woman is attracted to him because of projection. If you stopped perceiving yourself as an object, you would discover that you don't feel that men objectify you.

I'm more bothered by your typos than by imaginary vicious women.

Are you kidding? If there are 7 women for one man, men will have vast advantages in dating. A man who is not ugly will be able to date very hot women. Hot women will chase me into forests.

I didn't know that you were an incel. My condolences.

It's not just MGTOW/Incel/RedPill that need love. Feminists also need love. From my vantage point, lots of feminists seem to do things out of anger and hurt, not out of love. MGTOW, feminists, RedPill. They are the same. They are hurt. They whine. They are not in love. To many women, feminism can be the female version of incel or MGTOW.

@arlin They can love themselves. Self-help. Self-love. Help oneself. Love oneself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khmer_Rouge_Killing_Fields explains how Pol Pot and his regime killed a third of its cambodian population. Pol Pot somehow hated the fact that new industries are killing old industries and tried dialing back the technological progress by killing people. New industries make things cheaper. Cheaper guys win in the end although more expensive guys might persecute and kill the cheaper guys in the beginning. If Pol Pot was not stopped, his regime could have killed more than half the population.

I think they just happened to have more power to cause more problems. If other kinds of people had more power, they could and would have done the same. The weak have little power to cause problems on the global scale. The weaker devils are still devils. They have the same destructive potential waiting to burst out. Native americans are not better than white people in terms of devilry and destructive potential. If you read about chinese cultural revolution, you would think that chinese had the same destructive potential. Devilry is universal.

Real masculine men are not into things like MGTOW and RedPill. They are in gyms.

@Petals Churches still talk about infinite hell where immortal devils are tortured for eternity. This universe we live in may be already an infinite hell from certain perspectives.

I think you give too much credit to government. Technological advancements did a lot, too. A good government is both a cause and a result of some other cause.

Are you sure? If God is absolutely infinite, I think there could be infinite hell for devils. Anything that is imaginable could happen.

I feel sympathy toward God because it seems unable for it to choose what form it takes. It suffers infinite amount of bullshit because of that.

The more time I spend on this forum, the more it becomes apparent that 99.9% of forum users are far less developed than he is. He may not be the most advanced learner, but he is far above forum users. He has his own flaws like being too quick to judge sometimes. But, he is honest, non-manipulative, and non-coercive. He seems to understand love. I've seen people who pretend to be advanced students but try to coerce, lock down, or otherwise manipulate others. He is not a pretender or a manipulative asshole. Honesty and non-manipulation and non-coercion are hard to come by. That's why I follow only a handful people.

Right now, my emotional development is several steps behind cognitive development.

That's what I have done. Cognitive development is far easier than emotional development. I deliberately chose to focus on emotional development. Cognitive development is going to be crippled if it is not balanced with emotional development.

Imbalanced development is a bigger problem. For some people, emotional development is at Red/Blue and cognitive development is mainly Green and a bit Yellow. Such people think they are infallible. Imaginary infallibility can easily stunt emotional development for decades. It's probably too late. But, if God wants to be drunken and unconscious, that's God's privilege. God has total freedom over its creation. As Leo said, Pablo Picasso trained to be a very good realist artist but chose to draw randomly after drinking a lot of vodka. They are like drunken Picasso.

You said "his own development". A genderless pronoun such as "one's own development" is more fitting. Your word choice could imply that men are more deluded. In my direct experiences, women are no better. I'd say men and women are delusional in different ways. Leo once said there's 1~2% difference between us and nazis. In almost all cases, I see through lack of emotional development after exchanging one or two comments. Lack of emotional development usually manifests in the form of absolutist ideological thinking which I have grown out of. They often think they are Green, but they are emotionally Blue. That's one of typical types of people on this forum. Yes, I can improve my ability to give feedback, but I don't count much on it. After seeing some users for months, I concluded that they are probably going to be close-minded until death or until a disaster happens. Or, optimizing my life toward convincing each kind of delusional people would take too much time from doing important work. At some point, you got to accept that some or many people are not going to be your people.

You forgot that not everyone has a penis. Self delusion and devilry have no gender. I can safely assume that I'm not advanced. But, some people on this forum are overestimating their development way too much. They think they are advanced just because they have done personal development for more than 10 years. They may know more concepts, but I could see that their emotional development is stunted at Blue or some other low stages of Spiral Dynamics and I can see that they have learned all sorts of random unimportant concepts. In the long term, lack of emotional development stunts their performance and their cognitive development even though they have worked on development for many years. The sad part is that if I point at their lack of development, they will just get angry due to lack of emotional development. It's also called dunning-kruger effect. There is a proverb, "don't throw pearls before swines". Or, they are not here to learn, but here to appropriate Leo's forum for advancing their own personal/political agendas. Some people talk very little about personal development but a lot about certain ways that politics should be done or what kinds of political views we are allowed to have. When someone writes a lot more about political enemies than about love, I can guess that the person is not here to learn.

When forum users try to convince others by mimicking Leo Gura's direct language or otherwise using harsh words, they don't do it correctly. Leo Gura comes from a position of non-manipulation. That's why he can pull off harsh words. Leo Gura has his own areas of genius. You are not Leo Gura. I think https://www.youtube.com/user/charismaoncommand can help you understand why your haphazard attempt at convincing is failing. The guy on charisma on command channel is good at analyzing why you are or are not convincing. For example, and

Tell that to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Inquisitor