TheSomeBody

is this way much better than the dictatorship of the bourgeois? ( aka "liberal democracy") . the dictatorship of the proletariat is a democratic way of the proletariat to controll the state. this way the state is will not be controlled by the bourgeois class and make the economy better because the poletariat seeing the contradictions in the economy opposed to the bourgeois that might know about the contradictions but will profit from them short-term so they will not do anything to change it the right way. for example the colldge debt in the usa is pretty stupid way to run a country but the bourgeois are profiting from this becuase free (or cheaper) education will costs them lots of taxes and also some bourgeois will lose their way of making money. of course that in the long term free education is better for the bourgeois class but this class looks for short term gains . the poletariat can see that education will help them and also help the economy so if they had the power they will push for free education

they just in different sub category , it is known all different sub categories . their instrest is still getting their full payment for thier work, not fearing getting fired and getting to the street .like petite bourgeois, big bourgeois, today factory and digital bourgeois, they still have the same incentive just act differently at some degree. this is exactly like feodalism just with some more complex at the french revolution the knights was for the common people even though they where different lol, they knew they dont get the full paiment for their work

doesnt really looks much different , they both work for someone else and not getting the fruits of thier labor . it is more like some are having some advantages because the market giving them more of a fair share but this is it .i will agree that now working people have differnet interests because some payed pretty well and some dont but still the system needs to expand and it will expand on the richer workers too , you cant expend Infinitly and it is not like tech will keep developing forever (at least the for profits one). also as we get more advance the capitalist crisis is comming faster

not seeing that materialism is part of consciousness . at least not saying it .materialistic philosophy is right but not the whole story

defenetly das capital, really nice written for his time

so i just though about the last topic that i made (sorry for the spam). by leo, more consciousness is more consciousness reflecting itself so it becomes conscious. so the brain should have some way of two neurons to be conscious of each other and make other neurons somehow know that and act acordingly . every neuron is consciousness and consciousness is infinate and everything, so every neuron can see and feels everything by using the other neurons and multipule neurons see more stuff together. am i right or super far?

i preffer them than the usa

is the brain using consciousness for his own's sake? is consciousness using the brain? how i can be more conscious? is it info? if the brain and consciousness are separeted, how psycadelics can make me more conscious?

this is nice but not deep enough, how much the ego takes place? if there is a finite amout so the leo should be like i dont need psycadelics , i know everything. getting rid of the ego is more than taking energy, you just can hack the brain and then do the other stuff.

did it, can you send me some? i saw so much that i dont remember every video

it is not like i am lazy or having bad habits. it is just that i want more from life. i am having more habits but i am trying to write here more about habits that are unique seeing every day self development video. probably gonna see leos videos but hoplfully i will get to know more!

he talked about purity , not about identify it. but i do agree that with a noob you should taking about identify it, it just didnt got to my mind

it looks like he is parroting leo

home made dmt costs around 154 dollars for 15 gram of pure dmt which is alot. there is a place for making money here but not much unlike cocaine.

usually psycadelics are pure beacuse they are cheap to make

have you seen yin yang without white background? why is that? i think that the white beackground show you that complete god that are inheretly good . but in the bubble there is bad inside of infinate goodness. the bubble showing us is how to be a human with ego,having good and also bad but it is just a bubble , not the whole universe .

hi, i will start from the begining and then i will get to what the title says. so almost 4 years ago i did trip with a magic mushroom which treated my depression completly ,then my journy begin , and i started to read about psycadelics for pretty much the whole day every day. it got to this channel and leo really showed me that psycadelics can be really powerfull and that there is more to the topic. then i got curiuse and started to read about all of the spiritual stuff, buddhism, yoga,shamanism, different religions some morden spiritual stuff . then i was sure that i want that in my life, this is was what i was looking for but the road is really unknown and i cant really get to some religion that i think the best and get all of mystical stuff to explore (for me is about truth finding). after seeing some more stuff about psycadelics in youtube and reddit i was sure that psycadelics are the best way to get to there (all this stuff took monthes of non stop research, not arrogent like it looks here, also did some practices). then i started to make a plan but i understood that my age is too young for this (this time 19 years old, i knew that i needed to be 25 for be pretty safe doing it), then after more planning about what to do with my 4-5 years till then i understood that it would be shitty to know all those stuff and not be able to help peole to know it too. i uderstood that i dont want to helps some people but to help most of the people that i could so i needed some systematic idea . i got the idea of doing science with psycadelics so people would know that it can be helpfull. i understood that this is bad idea because i would get too great results . so i though about giving researcher psycadelics and following there progress to show people some evidence that this does help. i googled stuff about researcher and psycadelics and read about all the people that psycadelics helped them for science . so i have some research that might helps me. i know that so far no one got hospitalized after using psycadelics in a supervised place. in 6 years the fda probably gonna accept mushroom for depression so it gonna be good enough to get rid of most the the critics of hurmful stuff. but i dont know if this is enough for getting money for reseach in uni? i know a research about mushroom helps with openess , about making more connection in the brain, evidence about ego death and stuf like that showed of some benefits for researchers. but i really not sure if it enough for uni... what the steps that i need to be sure for it? if not what plan b might be a good idea for materialzing this idea? i know that i need to know this answers but some direction might help. you can ask me for more details about me if you need to. guess that you will as about my age (22), my social-economical class higher middle class. and i am in uni doing psycology and philosophy (not dying in debt like in the usa).

should we give psycadelics to scientist? will it help them or just make most of them crazy or do nothing to them because they so inside of materials paradigm? what your thoughts about this idea?

why it is silly? psycadelics are making change in the brain , like psylocibin making people more open to new experience or making more brain connection that might helps them to intigrate their knowledge better. i feel like people here thinks that the only think psycadelic does it spiritual or i meant to make them more spiritual, maybe i should post it in another topic? maybe self-actualization? not all trips makes hallucination

why no? lol kinda true, sometimes weed makes me think dumb stuff but usually is the process to get to the smart stuff what your domain? i think there are levels, it is not just happenes the question is if it will help most of them at least

the problem of statistics the problem of knowing what is true how science should change in his methods according for your understanding? should it stop statistics? maybe people will do random stuff at random places and verifie experience? how to verifie it fast? how science could keep up with all of the knowldge in the universe? does all of the ideas of yours are available to materialize them with our technology right now? to make all of this stuff we need to change the system heavily.

what you think about communism? what about marx?

hi, so i have done the life porpuse course two years ago, since then i have been following my path and working with a coucher (not only about this ). when i have done the course first i didnt got lots of good insights for my life porpuse, it was kinda blurry and i felt like most of the advise inapplicable to me . now i am really on my life porpuse but i felt like i missing accuracy and i remembered that there was tons of good advice that i didnt followed and i have second lockdown so it is a good time to start . I feel like this course have so much value that it is hard to fully actulized it. I find that the first time of doing the course kind of set you into the path but it is really hard to actulized , the course give you the feeling that you can actulize it pretty fast, what i find that it takes lots of time just to find your direction (maybe it is hard to communicate that?), actulizing it is like four times harder . just after a year and a half i understood what i wanted to do. Another point is that he says that under 25 the course is pretty much usless ( but on the YouTube channel he says the opposite, maybe he needs to change this in the course in q&a). I feel like it is wrong, i did this at 19 at it gave me lots of value. i think that this is the best time to start this couse because of lack of real world resposebility and tons of energy. another thing is that some of his edvice are not so usefull of some life purposes. my life statment is how to use psycadelics as a research tool for science. i mean for the small bets strategy i cant fully see if i like this all . i like psycadelics and science and philosophy and cognition but i need to make an academic research and getting into academics to really see if i like all of this which can takes lots of time. i think that i like this but kinda hard to conform it. the values assessment is really hard to change even every half a year or a year. it takes so much time and emotional enegy. maybe if i havnt done coaching it would be more relevant to me so maybe it isnt really a valide point. overall a great couse, i would recommend of doing it again after a year or two, i think i will do it again next year or so. another good point is do all of the assignment! some of them was usless to me like limiting beliefs because of the couching but the overcoming fear was really great! i worked of my fears but this gave me another prespective of them! edit: forgot another point, maybe to pdf sheet with every course that tells you that to do will be very helpfull, some times i dont write or i lose some points. maybe a pdf with all the future reminders will be helpfull

how you live your mundane boring life? when you gonna finish your book? how you gonna see actulized changing the future?

i feel like because of my adhd i get more neuroticism then the average person. when i take my meds life feels fine and my drive to better my life gets kind of "fine" mode . i feel like my adhd neuroticism makes me presue more alternative routes and pushes me to have more passion in my life and be more of myself.