Bernardo Carleial

this is not a single video, but an entire playlist! ???

Joe Rogan is actually a very open minded vMEME Orange and vMEME Green, which made me think that he might be at Tier 2, but now I don't really think that way, because he is still very biased towards individual responsibility and freedom, and that became very clear to me when he brought Tristan Harris and Daniel Schmachtenberger on his podcast: they were trying to present a bigger picture on how to address the issue of misinformation on social media, from both an individual and a collective level, and at some point Joe Rogan got tired of discussing this "theoretical stuff " and wanted a quick fix solution on how can we, as individuals, can take the burden of not engaging nor spreading fake news on social media platforms.... I got very disappointed when I watched Joe Rogan endorsing and spreading misinformation about ivermectin... the same way I felt when Rebel Wisdom made a video about it...? But I still like his podcast and I still think it provides with a lot of good information, the problem is when people personalize too much these youtubers or talk show hosts to the point of believing everything they say or do....

"Don't forget this is a show business, so as you're doing your show, don't forget to have your business checked back door..." Said one of the guys from Backstreet Boys This is an Amazing, well produced documentary, which shows how people in the music industry could be some of the greatest con artists behind closed doors...

If they were able to think Holistically that will not happen, they might be able to transcend their nationality and at the same time including their own cultural and social identities, the only thing that will be lost is their attachment to that particular identity... Of course I know that it's easier said than done, and because this is the first model that we're witnessing(at least at that magnitude), there's still a lot to unfold in European Geopolitics in order for them to be able actualize this project...

Hello guys! This is my first topic on this thread. On Leo's video on SD vMEME Yellow, he talks about what would be an example of a Yellow Tier 2 government, and he concludes that it would be a World Government, by which countries will transcend their own borders and cultures in orders to reach out to each other for the benefit of the whole continent, we have examples like that with trade blocs like NAFTA and BRICS, and on a diplomatic order with NATO... But with the EU is very peculiar to me... because their decisions seems very entrenched with one another, since the European Council, to the point that a country's affair becomes interwoven with one another, which might require a much stronger effort to solve issues collective without interfering with each other's sovereignty... I don't know what might come next, if a much stronger alliance will emerge or if they will exhaust and dissolve the EU. What do you guys think?? Let's have a discussion ?? here are a couple of video talking about the conception of the E.U, as well as their setbacks...

INTJ-t

What's the problem with skipping a few parts of the video? I don't do it, but I see no problem if people don't wanna watch the whole thing... And Leo himself is very aware that his content might be misrepresented by some of his followers, even if they've watched an entire video thousands of times... because he knows that people can only grasp the significance of what he's saying at the level their at... and that's why he sometimes makes a disclaimer whenever a topic is too advanced for certain audiences...

I have thought the same thing recently... But he also has the actualized clips, probably because of that demand by his followers

This was a very big deal in Argentinean society, this law has been kept on hold in congress for about 15 years, and it represents a huge shift on women's individual rights, a more secularized society, and a significant victory for the vMEME Green Feminist movement. And of course an enormous backlash from the vMEME Blue portion of the population... In my personal opinion, I'm pro-choice, however, if this ever going to happen in Brazil(my country), I don't want that law to be decided by Congress, but by a referendum(represented ONLY by female voters). That's because the majority of Brazilian politicians consists pretty much of middle aged vMEME BLUE/Orange Patriarchal men, who doesn't really know (nor even care) how to address this issue seriously nor with respect. P.S: as an additional note, I got very worried when I watched this HUGE social gathering on television... it has no social distancing, and the Covid death rate in Argentina is pretty high.(although not as bad as Brazil of course, which is only second to the United States in number of deaths... )

Neither do I, but I wouldn't be surprised with it...

In a nutshell...that's pretty much it.

@PurpleTree I think that's inevitable, if we take in consideration the growing social and income inequality that the country needs to face every year, due to a neoliberal ideology of deregulation, "tax is theft" and the monopoly/oligopoly of the private sector

@melodydanielluna is totally understandable your confusion towards vMEME Red and Orange. Our culture does a terrible job at differentiating the two, specially when it comes to the entertainment industry, like movies, games and sports when they make a misrepresentation of vMEME Red agression and violence for the sake of vMEME Orange entertainment, and not really taking the time to present the audience with a more broader perspective on why/how Red Emerges... But If I have to give you clue on how to distinguish the two is this: how each stage perceives and uses violence VMEME Orange not only transcends vMEME Red, but also transcends vMEME Blue, which means that, if it was a healthy transition, they will recognize the importance of a life with discipline, stability, and the importance of work ethic(now with the exception that is for his/her own development, and not for the group). vMEME Orange might emulate vMEME Red as an archetypal figure, to represent the self-reliance of an individual who lives in an environment which is "every man for himself". When Orange gives an aggressive speech, for example, they do so more for the sake of competition ("to crush the other players","to beat the market" etc...) than to be really serious about it. While vMEME Red would use violence as a tool to "get to the top" and have all his need met, if in a hypothetical scenario, a vMEME Orange man/women resorts to violence, (like killing someone) in order to achieve something, he/she would probably feel guilty/ashamed of it(might even have an existential crisis) and will try to hide this from everyone, while vMEME Red would take pride on it, and will probably announce it to everybody, because this is what it takes for them to keep in power, they have to constantly keep that image of being a tough guy and an intimidating figure in order for his authority never to be questioned, even if he got in prison. (even more so). I know this post is a little bit lengthy... ?? But I tried my best to present you with a more broader notion, in order to emphasize the distinction between vMEME Orange vs vMEME Red. I hope it helps ???

https://www.venusinventions.com/

These are two beautiful case studies, requiring a vMEME Yellow Systemic solution, to the unchecked vMEME Orange Capitalism of modern times.

"Significant for such a project is Hegel’s discussion of the relation between death and the “becoming subject.” Hegel’s account of death centers on a bipartite concept of negativity. First, the human negates nature (a negation exteriorized in the human’s effort to reduce nature to his or her own needs); and second, he or she transforms the negated element through work and struggle. In transforming nature, the human being creates a world; but in the process, he or she also is exposed to his or her own negativity. Within the Hegelian paradigm, human death is essentially voluntary. It is the result of risks consciously assumed by the subject. According to Hegel, in these risks the “animal” that constitutes the human subject’s natural being is defeated." I've read this in an article about Necropolitics

I find it a little bit yellowish too...

That's totally true @Carl-Richard. Even me saying that phrase doesn't feel intuitive at all... I had to read an entire book on Systems Thinking* in order to grasp (just conceptually) the significance of what that quote really meant... *the book is called "The Fifth Discipline"

These two can be summarized with just one phrase: "Structure influences Behavior"

@Carl-RichardWhat a beautiful concept/paradigm! I loved it!??? And I appreciate the fact that you were kind enough to share it to us, you presented in a way that is "very easy to digest" but I can see how much thought you have went through in order to convey this information in a more "simpler manner ". Congratulations!?? And I'm looking forward to see your next thoughts on that topic???

This game is a very good example of how to apply a healthy vMEME Green design to a product in an overwhelmingly vMEME Orange market like the gaming industry... also pay attention to the set of values that this game director shares, and the importance he gives to the emotions and the experience of the game's environment(vMEME Green) rather than the traditional rewarding/achievement feedback system(vMEME Orange). He also designed the game to be non-combative, which it's very unusual(for a first-person game)... That's a very good case study for all of you guys who want to work with game design!??? Note: there's an extended interview with him on this channel, but I decided not to post it here because it's a bit lengthy and technical, but I'm telling you guys just in case you'd like to know more about the knitty gritty stuff..??