Random Utalitarian Narckohumes

[8gates]

There are already millions of equal/better narcos (20 percent of 8 billion = 2 BILLION RANDON UTALITARIAN NARCKOHUMES)

-then consider the ones who are slighlty not as good ( ie- 21%) and selfishness/unlovingness for long term pleasure becomes 99% impossible

21% ie- dk met ( facefailo, but 6+, capbars etc)

 

nyle- better 12% however paley has 6+.if nyle is unloving , g can easliy connect with paley

 

 

 

[8gates]

21% narckohumes

1600000000

[8gates]

According to 8gates

-even though 8 gates can be comfortable at any moment (as proven by mal.ds without any ☆gs/connections or tickles)

8 gates is going to force itself to be uncomfortable until 8 gates tickles more than AVABAJ? (Ie- if av got a B.tickle, but 8 gates gets b+gash tickle then i gates will allow itself to be comfortable)

FORCE ITSELF WHILE CAUSING SUFFERING TO KITTS/TUMORS?

Even though avatars like Z,TAIB,MARIMAR have had no ☆gs likes 8 gates and are similar

And avatars like V.HACKER,J.WRIGHT,J.BEARESWELL,       BRYCEH,JOSHRICH,HOSSL,ANWAR        ROMEO LEXLITTLE,FORZLIN,JESSE,JERM,GRIFFIN.J,HAVE HAD MORE ☆GS?

For what reason is 8gates forcing itself to be uncomfortbald? What does it mean to be tickled more than avabaj?

-summary- let it go. Its not needed to be comfortable and is meaningless.and causes kitts/tumor harm/famdom instability

Edited June 19, 2022 by 8gates

[8gates]

Proof-

June 5th 11.30-12:30 (av still has ☆g .might even be getting b.tickled at the time)

- however 8 gates is completely comfortable with no ☆g/no connections by mal.d and selftickling.

Proof having more ☆gs than av is unnesacrh to be confortable.

[8gates]

 

[8gates]

Edited June 21, 2022 by 8gates

[8gates]

So Im is comfortable with 22 iman

but not with Avabaj? 

No rational justification.name the trait.

is is because avabaj were connections? First of all avabaj weren’t connections since they never knew real 8gates as 8gates was always lying

2) can’t get an ought from and is

-is the case avabaj were known to 8 gates

-how does this equal 8 gates must be uncomfortable with them having gs but comfortable with iman?

 

 

even from a selfish POV gentle is best. Being known as someone who changes images in the long term isn’t best.

and if 8 gates just wants a huge hit of short term excitement and doesn’t care from what xp it comes from ( ie- running after gs after causing fandom instability)

the best excitement will come from amphetas.

final descision- treat avabaj the way Anthony m,lexx,Oliver ,Oman etc will be treated.

its possible being unloving/selfish might unlock some xp. But we can’t be sure and we can only choose one chance.

as the loving path in the long term seems to have as much pleasure(possibly even more) /peace of mind as the unloving . Why not be loving? It’s best for 8 gates as well as for others

— also boxer was the admiration of everyone.

main thing 8 gates wants us to be admired. 

Imagine being tickled without any admiration in the long term.

And if thats fine, why not be a bit patient and tickle prosts after famdom? Prosts-tickle without admiration.

The chance ts prosts will be around is as good as tickling as 23y.o, no 1825 in uk.

-why not make famdom instable and have both

-imagine the mental state during the non nightime hours (10+ a day) from feline harm, umam instability etc. It will make the pleasure not worth it.

 

Example of how - laid back image backfires. 

As soon as their is a narckohume(millions and millions (2 billionish) in the world laidback turns to jumpy.

Not good in longterm.

 

Edited June 21, 2022 by 8gates

[8gates]

taking loving famdom stability path is not unloving

-when looking at the top 1 % of sls 

When considering at 20+ if they should destroy famdom stability to go to uk to find gs     for their own pleasure its not recommended

-ie-what will mindi,canute,thisur,nethmin do during the daytime hours. Thoughts going through their head etc. Dont you think theyll wonder if their unlovingness will cost them the afterlife etc?

-what will they do daily @ 25+?imagine their thought pattern. Preventing ☆g from having kittens etc.

-imagine thisur,kooj at the club with narcohumes.is it that different from prosts?

-if narcohumes aim to get someone healthy,others too will probably be interested. Therefore its not the best option.

-to tell sathnim/sahith (21+) not to reduce  famdom stability is not being unloving.even if 8gates is in the top 1% of sls its not recommended.

[8gates]

Imagine-no 1825, 22+ is it worth destroying famdom stability/20+ mill, unloving,tumorharm,unethical capitalism,nonveg ,unlovingness to get ☆m?

Imagine preci got 8 gates. Imagine during the daytime hours(10+), imagine sitting across during meals atms passing by (anish,taty,maria),wondering etc .

Imagine 3 years max+ (25+).isnt their a good chance the discomfort will outweigh the pleasure? If their is a chance why not be loving?

S10mins is most selfishly loving/selfless for preci

[8gates]

 

Edited June 24, 2022 by 8gates

[8gates]

7+ years ( can come close without sters)

Reaction when ant tells 8 gates about tickles?  Best option is exactly the same as avabaj reaction (loving etiquette)

[8gates]

7

 

Edited June 26, 2022 by 8gates

[8gates]

nonfeline , tumor harm possibility etc..

mike/blonde are utalis. (Cabin in the woods postponement justification)

-toby/aishas postponement is purely selfish( if not for FAMDOM STABILITY)

 

 

Edited June 27, 2022 by 8gates