Spiritual taxes and conspiracy theories

[tvaeli]

I mentioned that while conspiracy theories were written in goal-based logic, I mean exactly some of the ones critizised:

- They were not criminal accusitions, but actual honour-based qualifications to *not be sure whether they belong to our society in the future*.

- At that point, by actual law, to understand the criminal aspects meant to wait: let's say they are not *honour-based members of our court* if they do not qualify in the end.

This initial statement sets: variable A, to measure whether we need to collectionize our social basis and guarantees in way which can fall back to people with higher honour. It's the safety of our childhood: this was not the *only* principle we knew, the flat account of "goodness" provided, which was seen as conspiratoric - if it talks about criminal law, it reduces the actual responsibility of *our own government*. They said not to make claims.

They took part of our spiritual discussions: people who took part, made claims and took actions, where *financial and political questions were established based on these spiritual view*.

Variable A now is evaluated: our claims that we cannot trust those people on honour and responsibility in our own governing systems, where we are equals, is based that *spirituality did not become equal way to be cityzen*, but we can see: heavy accusations.

I have now seen it was *physical exclusion*, because we are not honour and responsibility members of their societies to guarantee every investment of us is in our own tax system, streams back to our own innovation and creation, and definitely, no better account takes over the whole cycle of any spiritual project in terms of it's income: this means the society lives, and there is responsibility and honour in our own governors and tax system.

Now: if spiritual people were accused in actual wrong accusing that many people do not follow their values to survive and live better themselves, but based on very values, have *actually excluded the voice*. It's not honourable in courts: which means that based on initial scientific discussions, where honour was *explicit* that this allows speak in every metaphor or real language and resolves spiritual discussions and studies their sciences. Classes which do not provide full honour to us are criminals if:

- They succeed to remove money, jobs, reputation etc. from others in way that it affects our own society and it's life, and our personal lives.

- In such case, any "doubts" in spirituality and our theories or claim that they are not based, is not studied that way: if not based on their own proof means excluded from their own honour, we can *not* give them honour to talk of their authorities and responsibility in terms of our own society, cycles and finances and taxes - rather, it's our own responsibility to create the long-term success network to invest the money back exactly where it came from: into ourselves, not others, to survive as our own society, where our rules hold. To say "we did not scientifically reach the same result with strength": it seems one can legally say that, but considering it means exclusion, *statements that they do not have 100% guarantee our statements hold take criminal degree, because their meaning is deduced only from actions: if based on this, someone is fired, they are fired based on "we do not know", and in case they want to establish this in whole society - they are fired from whole society*. Legally, if people get fired from whole society: we must see that we must establish civilized, real society and base our actual incomes, taxes and long-term support in a way that we ourselves are responsible of our past income, our plans, and taking away our own investments from the ones they belong to.

[tvaeli]

Here is:

• Spiritual people accounted that Spiritual laws hold, and miracles possibly exist; some miracle-like definitions definitely exist.
• Material people claimed there is not enough evidence for miracles, and some went to extreme: there are not much evidence for spiritual laws, such as that which we know as life: a cognitive momentum.

To be based on legal claims, to attack other side by financial, political, scientific or other cooperation:

• Spiritual people should prove 100% that spiritual laws exist. This is what I have done with my public framework - the rest is personal, up to personal proof, a silent realm where personal honour holds, but no law. This is like spectacle of speech and votations for free government - ones which are personal, as long as every parliament member can agree with 100% - otherwise, for example power of 51% is democratic minority in regards to effective law production of 49%, by which they might not qualify the internal fruits.
• Laws hold by thermodynamic laws. Police and government estimate laws.
  • Thermodynamic process breaks the wrong law estimation - this is a natural revolution, one that humans won't stop.
  • Physical laws hold in 2nd degree for humans: 0th degree is linear energy, 1st degree integral is the accelerative energy - equilibrum, which you see in 1st integral function; 2nd integral is homeostasis - mutations, which *keep equilibrae*, muliple of them, instead of single balances stage - the essential, definition-by form continues unaffected, while several equilibrae in basic natural term are formed.
  • This means wu wei: we estimate capital as spirits, and estimate laws; we function as stock market - the price of honour is outcome of repeated game, which finally makes the 2nd integral balanced and continues upwards; while it breaks by any instability in 0th for long range. Capitalism is evolution: who estimates wrong is touched; who estimates right - altough we can be many times in dead branches of proper capitalism or it stands apart from the constitutional country and law; basically the right estimate is spiritual, inside cognition we do not enforce by will: but by waiting proper thermodynamic law. This is why we do not enforce conspiracy theories, but we do invest in balanced players and state in honour law, who we trust.

In every case where spiritual people are materially left off of condition:

• We need to establish stable governing laws, choose the right government and keep our taxes in our own circulation:
  • If the income was spiritual, in it's circulation the fundamental source of that income is which receives that part of circulation, not the outsider with their own opportunities - the society definitely does that with that specific person and the income from it's dreams, to support his.
• We need to define our society as one which:
  • Supports our spiritual ideas and succeeds in reality of long term investments, being the initial investor of long term goal or off from that interest market. They do not hallucinate about their incomes outside their egoist constructs very well, because for our own income, they need to reason about our interest first, and demonstrate every loss by proofs and continued proofs, because we have some freedoms to fail - but not an estimation, because estimations are their personal problems, which are not here to affect our worlds and remain yet at their will and actual measurement of well-being. The society itself guarantees our well-being from our shared efforts, not the shadow purposes, goals out of our realms.
  • The positive account is only created by analyzing their own actual realms - what keeps their initial statement unconditioned by ours?

[Ziran]

On 8/10/2026 at 9:47 AM, tvaeli said:

The positive account is only created by analyzing their own actual realms

yes...

On 8/10/2026 at 9:47 AM, tvaeli said:

what keeps their initial statement unconditioned by ours?

Their own actual realms are ... "their own".  By definition.  Their statements are governed by their own actual will, which includes ( but is not limited to ) the will-to-deceive, both for help and/or for harm.

On 8/10/2026 at 6:53 AM, tvaeli said:

actual honour-based qualifications

Question:  ?  How do you propose to evaluate this ?

Suppose that all communication is inherently deceptive to a degree.  How so?  In the translation of thought into words, the phonics act as a veil cloaking and packaging the speaker's thoughts.  

 

If so; then, any attempt to evaluate the **actual** honor-based qualifications will fail, lacking consent to share their unfiltered thoughts.  Attempts which lack consent are a violation of privacy.

 

Further, if all communication is inherently deceptive to a degree, then, even if the intention is truthful, the mind is already neglecting its own deceptive capabilities.  It's a redoubled deception.  Because of this, it's easy to slip into deception, because the mind is already cloaking and veiling for the purpose of abstracting and relating the thoughts into words.

 

thoughts << abstraction >> words

 

The abstraction is inherently deceptive.

 

If the speaker intends to speak honestly; then, they'll need to ignore this inherent abstraction.  The neglect is a type of deception.  The abstraction is a type of deception.  That's a re-doubled deception, which is why it's so easy for people to lie to themselves and others.

 

 

 

Edited 3 hours ago by Ziran