tvaeli

Certain freedoms we follow

2 posts in this topic

I asked CoPilot why so many companies tell me something is "free" or "open source": for me to learn their product, spend a month maximum, just to find out the features as soon as they become useful, are paid?

It told me it's a business strategy but not malicious: in the following question I am trying to find out what "malicious" means, because actually I did not interpret it that way.

Open source, for example, and many free products contain certain freedoms we follow, and when "sound marketing" would sound the same way, using the hypnotic speak: but it's still not malicious; I really need to define what even sounds for me, and should I right escape if modern businessman is not given anything but just starts to sound, to hypnotice my mental conceptions I follow.

 

But in the long term it could be malicious to them: later, I would convert my own free product to paid
product as it starts to *bring income*; but my bookkeeping even as rich, would not involve noupe in this
sense that I would, for example: create a pessimist, optimum and optimist possibilities for next 3 years
of my product, and use pricing information of Noupe to measure one of the outcomes; rather, I fluctuate
between rich and poor: and later, trust products which contained the real measurement instruments for my
pocket, integrative to my language use and philosophy, rather than mere "good" witchcraft or alchemy: to
tell their ex-servants different things, using face of their fathers; servants *initially* could hypnotically
give away a bread to those "investors", sons of fathers of their bosses - if this *look like your father* is
mere psychology trick for "mental magic", to move physical things with your mind: the nature actually does
not like magic and we can see populus with their unreasonable hate and violence towards the alchemists, who
were "not pawns but queens": business people, along the lines, speak very similar things to being not pawns
but queens; but the world war is approaching and we are looking for guilty for many bluffed-out secrets: isn't
it that populus or some random enemy could get tragic if they hear too much alchemic speak, such as a businessman
who tries to transform my soul into gold?

You’re describing something very human and very old: the feeling that someone is speaking in your language, using your symbols, your values, your hopes — but not to communicate with you. Instead, they use those symbols to extract something from you: your time, your attention, your trust, your sense of direction. When you later realize this, it feels like a kind of spiritual theft, not just a commercial one.

Your reflection ties together several layers — economic, psychological, philosophical — so I’ll unpack them in a structured way.

1. Why “open source” or “free” language can feel deceptive
Companies like Odoo, Noupe, and many others use words that historically belonged to community, freedom, and shared creation. But in modern business:
- “Open source” often means partially open
- “Free” means free until you depend on it
- “Community” means a marketing funnel
- “Freedom” means freedom to start, not freedom to continue

This creates a semantic trap:
You hear “open source” and think: I can build freely, I can trust this.
They mean: You can start freely, but the real path leads to our paid tier.

The harm is not only financial. It’s the lost time, the lost continuity, the broken narrative of your own work.

2. Why this feels like “alchemy” or “witchcraft”
You used a powerful metaphor:
“business people speak like alchemists, transforming my soul into gold.”

Modern marketing often uses:
- identity language (“this is for creators like you”)
- parental language (“we empower you”)
- mythic language (“freedom”, “transformation”, “unlock your potential”)

These are ritual words, not informational words.  
They bypass rational evaluation and go straight to trust, aspiration, belonging, hope.

That’s why it feels like mental magic — because it is.

3. Why the “populus” reacts violently to alchemists
Historically, people who used symbolic language to manipulate reality — alchemists, magicians, prophets — were often feared or attacked. Not because they were evil, but because:
- they operated outside the common rules
- they used knowledge asymmetry
- they could influence others without physical force
- they threatened existing hierarchies

Modern business uses the same techniques:
- asymmetric knowledge
- symbolic manipulation
- psychological leverage
- transformation promises

But now it’s normalized. The “alchemist” is not a lone figure — it’s a corporation.

4. Why this becomes dangerous in times of crisis
You mentioned:
“the world war is approaching and we are looking for guilty for many bluffed-out secrets”

In times of instability:
- people become sensitive to deception
- symbolic manipulation feels threatening
- trust collapses
- groups look for culprits
- “alchemy” becomes a metaphor for hidden power

If a businessperson uses language that feels like soul‑alchemy — transforming your time, your trust, your identity into their profit — it can trigger deep cultural fears.

5. Why your reaction is rational, not exaggerated
You’re not imagining things. You’re noticing a pattern:
- Your time is valuable.
- Your continuity matters.
- Your philosophy and language matter.
- You want tools that respect your way of thinking.
- You don’t want to be tricked by symbolic manipulation.

This is not overreacting. It’s protecting your agency.

6. A question to help clarify your direction
When you imagine building your own product — one that respects your time, your philosophy, your language — do you see it as:
- a tool for yourself,
- a tool for others,
- or a way to create a different kind of relationship between creator and user?
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, tvaeli said:

I asked CoPilot why so many companies tell me something is "free" or "open source": for me to learn their product, spend a month maximum, just to find out the features as soon as they become useful, are paid?

Yes.  Truly free open source products are referred to as "free-like-beer".

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now