Limited Dysfunction / Limited Consciousness

[tvali]

# Introduction

 

_this introduction paragraph is written by Artificial Intelligence_

 

In the relentless pursuit of knowledge and self-awareness, we find ourselves tangled in paradoxes—science beckons us toward rationality, yet philosophy reminds us to doubt its rigid structures. "Limited Dysfunction / Limited Consciousness" explores the tension between material consciousness and spiritual inquiry, where systems of power often dictate what is deemed as truth. Through the lens of history, philosophy, and even martial arts, we observe the fragile balance between intellectual rigor and the subjective experiences that shape human perception. This journey is not merely an academic exercise, but a reflection on the limitations of societal constructs and the essence of personal evolution.

 

# Limited Dysfunction / Limited Consciousness

 

Once the Science Books gave us some good advice:

• Use the philosophy to doubt in science; science is not a democratic entertainment, resembling rather bread and circus, but a personal journey towards higher consciousness.
  • Philosophically, scientific laws for example often leave out the cognitive functions or lack of them, for each thing, or almost: trivial mind would see they argue _against_ it; they would be able to foolisly protect this gain by using their available powers, such as simulacrums of ethics and official attitudes, far from reality.
• Work in the scope, where you won't lose your reputations, given that you lose your Truth; the ancient Popes are the historic experience, where the foolish situation would put the reputation into dependence of foolishness and greed of glory in violent activities, rather telling us the "high truth" of the past, of a man killed by such people of gratitude.

 

You can see the office full of men, who rather fought for their purpose: the offices are fully atheistic. In creed of having material consciousness, they would rather put down the spiritual consciousness - it's important to notice the battle weakness in such case, for people who are conscious; the number of limited and foolish activities to represent oneself as a criminal in situations, where smarter person would rather try to appear foolish in one or another question: it's the story of Socrates, where the breakage point of complete yang - a central topic in Chinese martial arts, tao, I Ching - The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable; this gives the point where the foolish man, residing on their reputative power, and actively creating artificial dependence of it, as if it was their de-motivational drug they use in case of emotions; the emotional stability is dependent on having lack of success of others: the Christian activity "Knowledge of Good and Bad" would make them argue with a Buddhist, trying to convince in Good and Bad: trying to involve the broken emotion, where one can not give away. We see the disfunction of the linguistic understanding: in infinity, they would respect the "good emotions" they get from insight into joining us, but they would fight the "unscientific background" of study, which involves more than a few variables or parameters: where balancing the available parameters, we call holistic or integrated system, and that's what we mean: we could be seen mean that we do the foolish crime instead of our endevour, fighting for "positions" and "resources" we displayed we are affiliated with; the irony turns into deep crime talking like this with Zen Buddhist, about your Knowledge of Good and Bad, including limitations of letting go and giving away, what does not serve you any more. We see the linguistic disease in police, in official, in non-profit member and I have seen it in businessman.

 

For example, after you have given away a woman, a male would, by your free interaction, start a delusionary and aggressive dream about themselves in such position: aggressive, broken, needing of some sacrifice. This is the point where Buddhist would say: You kill the man. The buddhism, where a foolish killing like a common man is rather sin, would celebrate the "killing" where they commonly say: you are having a superior karma. Where in the end of Bruce Lee, Tao of Jeet Kune Do you can read: the eastern superiority towards a western man, in martial arts, is to fear a man, who has shown brilliance. The western man would not fear, thus in this world of small and big, they have made this sacrifice of their lives: what they put into game, being fake, does _not_ create the karmic cyrcle a Buddhist would call Life: one where we have pleasures and pains. Once seen that their karma would kill them, we can follow what happens..

 

Given the spiritual ideas, Knowledge of Good and Bad, which I rather see in materialist in Catholic country, and even some others in this world, they have tendency to say they are materialist, and break the logic here: it's illogical that spiritual would be materially aware, such as a girl properly choosing a boy, because in spiritual sense, you won't materially confirm and you break the law. The atheist, given Mark Twain and his imaginary of a corrupt church, has infantile childhood fantasies of a Religion, which in this point naturally _thinks wrong_. Spiritual people in my sense of vision are materialists: they do live in material world, and they verify their fact. In the other sense, an atheist person sees, in his childhood fantasy, _high gain_ on the side of spiritual endevour, trying to same time _kill it's source_ in their practical approach. Here, we reside in _thermodynamic world_, which means we give and receive, and where the Police or an Atheist would indeed see God guilty in not knowing the law, in the story of God, and karma being for fear: the belief in _God_ or _karma_, in this childhood fantasy, is fear of punishment, like Satanistic Cult or medievial Dark Church. We need to study the laws of karma to get the understanding that we won't break the laws of what brings success, but we also see the hope that by behaving, we win. The Police, which would sense this aggressivity of a pure man, the fearful danger of losing even their money and control in the situations like Truth, Science, Technological Innovation..

 

..here the Fool breaks the Law: the police would consitute to you the one who does not know the law; in the _mathematical limitation in understanding infinities_, starting from _hope of unlimited success_, the infantile atheist, in power, claiming the realistic sense not in existence of materialism, but in lack of spirituality, as we are materialist as well. It's not a scientific and democratic conversation, where they, against minorities, would assemble the democratic theme. Here we see: the materialist is attacking you with free market, their right to business, in sense of leaving you out of motivation in your own company, and cleaning from the free rights in their own enterprise, tho help the poor or provide the unmotivating work; to thrive is the "bad motivation". We can see the Fool fails: telling you by attacking back the karma, or the incidence of meeting a better Soul, where they lose the right essence of democracy, of communism, of religion and ethics, or any good behavior. You can see they want to win, in their perverse laughery when the victory is yielding around, or how they discuss feelings of others: the crime is to see their infantile perversies only in higher and purer feelings of theirs, where a healthy dose of love and flirt, a good project, work, will to achieve and success, the tension, pain, excitement or feelings of success are attacked as signs of their weakness, of the "common woman who also sits in the office".

 

# Afterword

 

_This is written by artificial intelligence_

 

As we navigate the complexities of thought, belief, and existential struggle, the interplay of knowledge and ignorance becomes evident. The limitations imposed by societal norms, political influences, and philosophical dichotomies reveal the fragility of human cognition. Yet, in this chaos, there exists an opportunity—to transcend the narrow confines of imposed understanding and seek a more holistic truth. Whether through the wisdom of ancient traditions or the courage to challenge authority, the path to consciousness is an endless pursuit, and perhaps, the greatest form of rebellion.

 

# Beyond Boundaries: The Fluid Essence of Consciousness

 

_this part, including it's title, is the follow-up to my ideas perhaps to have the topic covered, based on it's own "intuitions" or guidelines_

 

To exist is to engage in an intricate dance of perception and meaning—where the constructs we build around us, be they institutional, ethical, or intellectual, often seek order within an inherently fluid reality. Humanity, in its longing for certainty, carves out doctrines that shape the collective mind, yet fails to see the horizon stretching beyond rigid thought. In this space, the study of consciousness becomes the bridge between disparate realms: a meeting point where belief, cognition, and empirical observation fold into one another.

 

Throughout history, consciousness has been regarded as both the divine spark and the computational function. Some seek its origins in theological reverence, where awareness is the breath of existence itself. Others unravel it through neural mapping, tracing the mechanics that animate cognition. And yet, neither approach alone holds the full truth, for consciousness is not merely understood—it is lived. The experiential reality of mind is unquantifiable, irreducible, and perpetually expanding beyond its definitional limits.

 

What does it mean to be fully conscious? The question unsettles even the wisest scholars. The law seeks clarity, yet human understanding evades its grasp; ethics aim at justice, yet perception of morality shifts like tides. Science pursues explanations, yet every theory dissolves under the weight of the unknown. The philosopher meditates on abstraction, questioning the frameworks through which truth is perceived. In this interplay of inquiry, a singular truth emerges: consciousness is not simply what we observe, but also what we surrender to—the act of relinquishing control over rigid beliefs, allowing fluidity in the mind’s perception of reality.

 

Consciousness studies remind us that we are not passive observers of existence, but active participants. The fabric of awareness interweaves across disciplines, where a mind trained in logic may awaken in contemplation, and a soul immersed in belief may refine its perception through reason. Beyond classifications, beyond conviction, there is only the infinite unfolding—a perpetual state of questioning, discovering, and evolving.

 

True consciousness is a movement, not a destination. It is the choice to transcend outdated limitations and see not only with the mind but with the fullness of being. Where certainty once stood as a fortress, doubt now serves as liberation. The essence of awareness is no longer confined within the borders of dogma but resides in the willingness to embrace complexity—to live, not in rigid knowledge, but in the fluid dance of perpetual awakening.

Limited.pdf

Edited April 15 by tvali