Fruehlingserwachen

Deepends on how healthy the social structur of the church is, not on what they believe there.

Because there is this intersubjective moral dogma that only the democrats are good. Intersubjective means that a thing doesn't really exist in material form, but because we all accept its existince, it exists. Like all states, institutions, organizations, moral codes, laws etc. And the moral dogma of you having to be democratic is one ot these things. Although nobody gives a fuck about democracy, everybody knows that he has to pretend like he's a good democrat to justify his participation at a debate. But in the end only flat minded people can be real democrats. Because you really need to have no strong beliefs or political ideas to really think that it's a good idea to let people vote. Otherwise you only think this if they vote for you and if they don't, they need to be better informed. Because if they were rightly informed they would had voted for the best candidate and this is obv your one. It's about legitimation, not about good politics.

First - pls don't come up with this like "why don't you use this technique instead" or stuff like this. I have an idea about a technique and I want to read your opinions about this specific technique and not some tips I could do instead or ad hominems. Pls let this thread be about this topic. So here is the idea: Make a audio record of yourself remembering you about all the things that trigger you or that stressfully pop up in your mind, like mini trauma, things you regret, stuff you said 10 years ago and that you are still ashamed of... All these things that feel like there is a tab open. And then you meditate to this audio and try not to react in any shape or form. The idea why I think this really could be a now tool in the toolbox is because all the yogis who invented meditation techniques didn't have the technology available to do so. And I really think this could help because being non reactive to burdensome thoughts is easier said than done when they just pop up randomly. So pro active bringing them up to your mind may be a good idea to train non reactivness. And note that this is distinct from active remembering them. Because we want to soften the part of the nervous system that contain them, not strengthen them. And this may be the flip side of this method - bringing this bad stuff up to your mind, even it is done passivly by an audio record, may reinforce these thoughts we wanna weaken. And this is also the reason why I didn't even tried this for myself - because I suspect that this might be actually a bad idea and that I just reinforce mini traumas with that. What y'all think?

And I am a dolphin!!!

No it can't and it never will. AI is just a large language model, that repeats patterns. It has no concept of what it is coding. And if it is good at making code, then this is even worse. Because it will create very subtle bugs, that no one can debug. Because for debugging you need a good understanding and this is what people will outsource more and more. Yes you can create more and better prompts and you cann tell the AI to create workarounds. But this will just bloat the code and and increases the need for processing power because the AI generated code becomes more and more unperformant. It is already a shitshow that we use AI to create code in languages, that are made for objekt oriented programming. OOP was developed to make the maintenance of complex software easier for humans but it is less performant.

I have a formal education in programming, I think there is no equivalent in the US for this. It is below a bachelor degree but takes 3 years to accomplish. And now I am rather unemployed and live from social welfare than continue doing this shit. Coding really is the worst job ever. You are always stressed because there is no finish line. You develop bad posture because of sitting. You have to deal with the spaghetti code of other people and most of the time you are not even programming but try to understand something that somebody should had documented. You also have no agency and you are literally just a cog in the machine, but normal cogs are ghetting told exactly what and how they have to do. But as a programmer you always have tho figure this out for yourself. Not by reading some manual or the current ticket, but by mindreading what the ticket writer wants from you and by experimenting with your total abstract inhumane virtual machine. And then comes AI. No AI won't make codes unemployed. This idea is so delusional and comes from people who have no clue about how software development works. In reality AI won't make it easier but way harder to do this job. Because it automates the easy parts and these are the parts the junior developer once did to grow their skills. Now that everybody leverages their skill by using ai, the stack of requirements for being a good developer increases. You still have to master the basics but they expect you to outsource them to AI, so that you can focus 9-5 on the very disturbing, mind fucking tasks, that drain on you. And to even get there you have to master the basics in your free time. And the better AI becomes, the more stuff is considered as basic stuff that's done by AI, and the more hardcore the hardcore stuff becomes you as a developer have to deal with. But this is only if AI makes no mistake. Have fun debugging thousands of lines of code, that are ai generated and already implemented in the working system and only drop an error every few months. What you do now? Oh yeah, lets create a workaround to blow up the spaghetti code even more. Modern software development is an evil shitshow. You rather work at construction. That gives you a nice healthy body, good sleep and you can use your mental capacity to do some creative stuff after work. That's way better than getting drained mentally and degenerated phyisacally at work like coders do. If you are a nerd and you love doing this, then do it. But if you just wanna have a job, then this is the path to suffering.