Ziran

Not in a conventional manner. The excitement is an arousal, a stirring. It's excitement better described as agitation. The love for the "lowest-of-the-low" is rooted in the inherent negative valence.

All the best to you,

You're doing it again. Steering the conversation away from the topic so you can play with "Nothing" ( aka your-Self )

"Your mileage may vary." A blessing: "May we live in interesting times."

"You are what you eat."

Regarding rage: it's not the F word, it's the repeated accusatory to an unknown "You" who is doing or speaking something wrong. Also regarding rage: frustration is within the spectrum of rage. Frustration can be insidious, particularly if the individual insists on prohibited themselves from ... ... permissible pleasures. To be clear, my interpretation of "Fuck it / Fuck Everything" is upthread. Very briefly: it means the individual is fed-up.

That's changing the subject. Maybe so, maybe not. It's tempting to consider it, but, It's off topic. I still love you, tho. No harsh judgements. That's the spirit! The keywords are bold italic. The point is: It's a semantic fault. It's not arbitrary. If the meaning of "Fuck it / Fuck Everything" is being adapted, as opposed to being abused, perhaps within the context of poetry / art / freedom of speech, the one speaking would acknowledge the changes made to the conventional meaning.

No.... not mistaking the images... In English, the only time the expression "Fuck It" expresses positive determination is in the context of porn. If you disagree, please bring examples of circumstances where an individual exclaims "Fuck it!" "Fuck everything" to communicate a positive determination. Specifically catachresis. "Catachresis (from Greek κατάχρησις, 'misuse'), originally meaning a semantic misuse or error, is also the name given to many different types of figures of speech in which a word or phrase is being applied in a way that significantly departs from conventional (or traditional) usage" - Wikipedia Naturally

Fuck everything. Pursuing a goal. Those two things don't go together. Please recall my first question? It was asking for another interpretation. I'm glad we've gotten there. Outside of Porn? Positive determination? Really? ~blinks~

futile? Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Sometimes. But what does that have to do with burning all my stuff? Cars don't blow-up ln real life like they do on netflix. Burning stuff is hard work. Even managing a campfire is a lot of work. Posting on an internet forum is an RFC. I will not "Shut up". That's rude.

~shrugs~ ( how was that ? ) That's a lot of work.

A fair assessment. I appreciate the candor.

In English, "Fuck it" indicates the individual is fed up. They've reached their tipping point, and in a final spasm of contempt, they can do nothing more than erupt. Orally.

... and subtle, and deceptive, and fun, in the right context and company. The thread is a reaction in the form of rage. As stated previously. We're here discussing "nothing" and the corresponding word-play due to your inquiry.

Word-play is specific. AKA: double-speech. Have you heard of it?

No... not finished with words, finished with the word-play regarding the word "nothing". Just like any other parlor trick, once it's known and understood, it's easy to see how the magician "wows the crowd".

Yes. 100%. The information of the event: "apple-crossing-over" never dissappears, AND, the information of the event: "apple-crossing-over" is possessed by the category: "descriptors of nothing". Agreed. That wasn't my intention.

Ok. I'll play. ~points to avatar. to the left.~

A paradox is a type of contradiction which is simultaneously true, false, and coherent. All three. Example: "Bitter-sweet". ? those are constituents of creation ? ? "... am not interested in X, Y, or Z. Only interested with creating ... " ? Not creation? Creating? The action of?

When you refer to "information", I understand that as a collection of resonating and harmonious relationships. If so, I agree, however, that does not prohibit the phenomenon of apples becoming "nothing" when proximal to a blackhole.

... because "empty" is an illusion. Once this is known and understood the word "nothing" is reinterpreted more accurately and the word-play ends.

Yes. It's irrelevant; because, concepts and descriptors are not "things". ( I recommend reading the article from the Phd. It's a really good read. )

Nothing is routinely described... in academia. " ... Physics to the rescue. If we dump a box of apples into a black hole, then Poof! It is gone!" https://webhome.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Philosophy/axioms/axioms/Null_Set.html

That's not a chain. I've been fooled before.

Good News! Realizing enlightenment has never been easier!