Mmartinez

Hello I’m a new member, my membership has just been approved. Here I’m going to present Leo Guras views and ideas about consciousness that I find terrifying and disturbing and I’ve suffered a great deal because of these views. My purpose here is to know if these views and ideas are definitively true and are true definitions of consciousness or are just philosophical views that it could or not be true and nothing more. Also are only primary foundational insights considered definitively true and secondary insights are open for debate? consciousness knob that spins forever the nature of infinity. figments of imagination that grow forever in consciousness. Consciousness can zoom forever in the infinite fractal or infinity. Consciousness can do what it wants since it’s unlimited that means I can do whatever I want, I can rape, commit murder and other crimes since I’m unlimited. Regarding omnipotence, is the omnipotence insight of Leo Gura the same fundamental foundational insight that Advaita Vedanta presents. Or Leo Gura has made a new discovery of insight through psychedelics regarding omnipotence that goes beyond Advaita Vedanta teachings on omnipotence. Also is the omnipotence insight a primary insight or secondary derivative insight. consciousness expands forever, is it a primary foundational fundamental insight or is it a secondary insight. the physical universe stretches on forever. Also does consciousness exist beyond my ego minds perceptions, Leo Gura seems to say that nothing exists beyond the ego minds perceptions. Forever locked in bubble of consciousness is it a primary foundational fundamental insight or it’s just narrative subjective view.

@Aaron p Advaita Vedanta does not present these views as true and by the way Leo Gura said that the views could be fantasies.

@Leo Gura but you wouldn’t consider the views presented as primary foundational insights right? Since you said I’m clinging to fantasies.

@Breakingthewall thanks for your responses.

@abrakamowse thank you that was helpful.

@Breakingthewall Leo Gura called these views that I presented as fantasies that I’m clinging to fantasies. So that means the views presented are not presented by Leo as primary insights. I’m not asking if Advaita Vedanta presents theses views as primary foundational insights I’m literally saying that they don’t present these terrifying ideas as primary foundational insights. The ideas have triggered panic attacks I’ve had plenty of panic attacks.

@Breakingthewall these ideas are not presented by Advaita Vedanta as primary foundational insights.

@Breakingthewall so your saying nobody can tell me a single thing or concept that is true. Anything I hear is not absolute truth. Those ideas must be secondary insights, for sure they’re not primary insights.

@Breakingthewall so these ideas are not primary foundational fundamental insights?

@OBEler Leo Gura clearly said that these views are fantasies, that I’m clinging to fantasies so it’s clear that he does not present these views as primary foundational insights. You are saying one thing then Leo gura is saying another thing.

@Leo Gura I’ve realized that these views are not presented by you as primary foundational insights which would be considered definitively true they’re probably secondary insights open for debate thanks Leo for your assistance.

@OBEler Leo Gura just said I am clinging to fantasies which he meant these views are fantasies. That just shows you he’s not treating these views as primary foundational insights. So stop messing with me .

@James123 ok thanks so the views are not primary foundational insights just beliefs.

@OBEler That’s terrifying that they are primary foundational insights my suffering will continue thanks a lot. But again they’re not primary foundational insights, Leo gura does not present the views as primary foundational insights. The primary foundational insights definitive answers are love, truth, infinity, consciousness, oneness, god etc. These views are not primary stop misleading me.

All I wanted to hear is if these views are definitively true or not. Leo gura no one has terrified me like you did. Are these views primary foundational insights which are definitively true or secondary insights open for debate.

Well to begin with I was genuinely interested in psychedelics but then realized it wasn’t my thing so that’s why I got interested in consciousness topics. Again if these views are not definitively true which is what I want to hear then that’ll be the best news of my life because I’ve been suffering for months now.

First of all I’m a newbie who got into self help I’m not trying to do consciousness work I just discovered Actualized. Org and I stopped watching Actualized org. So you are saying that these terrifying views are definitively true but I have to realized them for myself. Leo gura you are terrifying me even more. Sometimes I’d rather not hear back from you. Because you’ll terrify me even more those views must be secondary insights open for debate not primary insights which are definitively true.

So these views are not definitively true ? That’s all I want to know.