Cred

The big paradox in every community is this: Neurotypicals cannot live without ideology. One has to be insensitive to meaning in order to be able to produce it. But if you are insensitive to meaning, then you don't value ideology. Therefore, it only happens extremely rarely in civilization, that a new ideology is brought into existence by people who don't see meaning but understand peoples need for meaning and provide for it. Positive examples of this are Jesus and Lenin. This has the effect that most neurotypicals follow outdated ideologies that hurt them like Judaism, Christianity, capitalism and the American dream for example.

@Oppositionless i'm not sure if I understand you correctly. Do you have problems sensing the energy that I'm talking about? What do you need to understand Is that Kriya yoga is a a system that is designed for highly sensitive people. The more sensitive you are genetically, the easier Kriya yoga will be for you. If you are zero sensitive, then Kiya yoga will seem like a scam for you. This doesn't mean that transcendence is not accessible to you though. It just means that you have to take your resonance profile into account. if you're on the autistic side, it will be easier for you to reach transcendence through observing cosmic patterns, and understanding. If you are more on the Neurotypical side, it will be easier for you to find transcendence through community and identity. If you are none of those things, then it will be easiest for you to realize emptiness through nirvana in my understanding.

The trick to breathing properly is that when you breathe in, you try to relax your upper body, such that there is pressure between your diaphragm and your upper body. Try to only breathe with your diaphragm with every other muscle being relaxed. Also try to relax your diaphragm as much as possible. This pressure that builds up will open your chakras. You can practice with increasing that pressure. When you master it and you maximize pressure you will be able to have full body orgasms. I personally don't do it often because it's very intense and exhausting. Another important point is that the chakra energy in the lower chakras is sexual energy. Do what do you want is some kind of "pure horniness". Then what you do is you alchemise the sexual energy into divine energy, by pulling it up your spine. This is how I understand kundalini yoga. All of this will work easier, the more empty your mind is. One last thing: One has finite sexual energy avaliable each day. It can be depleted. It's actually not a bad thing if you don't have any sexual energy left. just do normal Zazen meditation. In my understanding, you can have legit awakenings without any of the energy stuff. Using the energy of the kundalini is like strapping a rocket engine to your car. You can also arrive without the engine, but it takes longer. Also using rocket engines is more dangerous.

US military base

You have a pretty good understanding already. Maybe you just haven't connected these terms to your specific understanding yet. My point is that this sentence in the initial post does a lot of heavy lifting

Okay never mind. I just thought of a couple more useful definitions: A polymath is someone with multipotentiality, which is someone with autism and ADHD. A polymath who is also HSP is a visionary, a seer, a prophet, an oracle, a sage.

Most war in modern times is constructed to serve the interests of the rich. It is as simple as that.

I like the term "multipotentiality". I strongly identify with it. I think it comes from a combination of ADHD, autism and HSP

I'm also confused about the fact that I'm confused😭 My model perfectly predicts and explains the existence of such content. But there is a gap between explaining and grasping I guess😅 It's crazy, I sometimes have moments, where I predict the existence of some mode of existence and try to describe it abstractly and then being dumbfounded when I find out that there actually exist people who have experienced this hypothetical state. This happened the third time now with different predictions. Before seeing this I had a thought that went something like this: "It seems like the autistic brain accesses infinite consciousness through the pattern, I wonder what that would look like". Well I guess I have found at least one possible answer in "googology". Thanks a lot for sharing! Studying people like this is important for refining my theory.

@LambdaDelta I must admit, I don't take psychedelics. I am very confused about this channel you sent Mathis. I would like some context.

Same! I knew that someday somebody on this forum would see the potential in my ideas, I just didn't know when this would happen. I agree with you. I am differentiating between emptiness and the void. The void happens, when somebody who is still too identified with existence (inside samsara (?)) gets a glimpse of emptiness sunyata, which is precisely what you are describing. This is why I am saying: Maybe I'm using the word nirvana wrong. The way I understand it is that emptiness itself is not a state but a concept, with nirvana being the state where this concept is embodied like you say.

I feely uncomfortable just letting this reply stand like this. I don't think you are evil or a bad person. This reply is 20% emotional and has 80% substance. I will get into how I came to that conclusion when I'm motivated.

I do want to do this, but I need some time to ponder. If you want to read about that older state, this is the relevant post: I need to reconstruct the argument I've made there in my head before I can talk about consciousness

I agree with you completely. Love is the centerpiece of my model. The sentence "[Love is the] structural basis for existence" is a very elegant way to summarize one of my biggest points with this ontology. I have described precisely how this structure of existence which I call "space", can be destroyed, such that love is absent in this post: It's my best post so far. Have you read it? If no than this is a cool thing that we are on the same page in regard to what Love is. This is the relevant part: In my model, Love is the same thing as symbiosis

fascist

Most of what he uploads is pretty solid

What if one were to describe logically what experience is?

I'm calling this "the void". I described it in this post:

I actually did this, back when my theory was still an analytical idealism. I have not come to the point of merging them properly. So I'm open. I think the idea would be that the idea of an infinitely complex low entropy system, which is god consciousness or something, already exists prior to anything. I think that checks out. I need to think more about it though and maybe delve more into Bernardo Kastrup. However, right now I'm more interested in this idea of the mind-topology. Their exists an interesting field called spectral geometry that seems relevant. Right now, I'm trying to see a connection between this idea of the topology and a neural network. But I can't steer my brain into anything anyway so we'll see what happens. I'm interested, why do you think that consciousness doesn't require a prior?

There is a phenomenon that only starts appearing once a low entropy system is complex enough. It's the ideal. The ideal creates the possibility of judgment (not knowledge. It's the tree of judgment not the tree of knowledge.) and from that the ability of self-judgement and from that the ability for self-alienation. What I'm trying to reunite is every being that has passed this threshold and is actively living a life in self-alienation. Yaweh and Zeus symbolise the ideal

It seems like you're talking about something like "Mary's room". The concept of "redness" is also integrated in my model. I am calling this neutral kind of experience "neutral resonance". For example, if you have a person who is only HSP and zero autistic and maximum ADHD (minimum meaning). They will walk around and only see the beauty of "isness" and not the beauty of pattern, nor the beauty of meaning. That's why HSP's love color and can't survive without it for example. The way this works in my example is that a system has more of that sensitivity, if it contains more feedback loops. In my model, a violin is a sensitive system for example, because the cavity in the violin creates a feedback of the sound inside, which amplifies the wave.

The "we would've found it already" assumes that it is easy. I'm asking: what is the difference between saying "the rational numbers can't be explained logically because they are infinite" and "reality can't be explained logically because it is infinite"? This dream of a logical description of reality exists, and it's called "the ideal language". I think it's doable.

It's neither air quality nor ego. It's capitalism

Yes! Love is neither unity, nor duality. It is oneness. It is symbiosis. It is a symphony and a dance. Love is beauty. Love is flourishing. Love is fullness. Love is abundance. Love is harmony. Love is balance. Love is authenticity. Love is self-acceptance and the end of alienation and self-judgement.

I found a good quote from Nietzsche: "If you gaze long into the abyss, the abyss also gazes into you"