Cred

Is it possible you don't know what a vanguard party is? You might have a skewed image in your head of what a leftist is. Real leftists are highly organized. They don't just run around, complain and randomly attack people. The people who only complain and protest are fake leftists.

The goal is to keep the rich in check so they don't abuse their power like in the west

people need to be free of worries about material conditions to be free enough to be truly creative. In my view, the government is supposed to help the people not the rich

What you people need to understand is that no amount of theorizing will get the people who are currently in power to give that power up. When you scream at them "but truth!" they just laugh. They don't care about truth. These people have zero self awareness they just follow the money all day. There is only one way to get integral theory into practice at a big scale in the west and this is to start taking over the governments. And the truth is that Marxist-Leninists are the specialists when it comes to that nobody can deny that. What you need to realize is when you sit in your room and split hairs about marxist theory, at the end of the day you are just helping the rich stay in power. Stop with this useless endless fragmentation. It's exactly what the rich want and that's why they love critical theory since it keeps people divided. Have a revolution first and then argue about whether integral politics or marxism is better (spoiler: They are compatible)

what are dream mechanics?

The more radical an idea is the more time it takes people to process it because for them it's a lot of new information to take in. For you the value of the idea is obvious but that's only because you got to sit with it for a long time. The way I cope with this is by being more obnoxious with it (lol) and also patient. Another trick is to organize the ideas hierarchically to reduce complexity. Numbering is also good (think 7 noble truths etc.). Be creative. There is also a trap which is that a metaphysical theory is essentially just an arrangement of different concepts. There are infinite different interesting arrangements of concepts. The question is, how does it affect your life? Does it change how you act in the word? Does it make you happier? Is it pragmatic? For example I don't give a fuck if everything is consciousness or a dream or me or matter or someone else like this is not relevant to my life at all I would argue.

Wait you think Leo is autistic???? Whaaat?

🤡

Also it is important to distinguish populist marxists from theoretical marxists. Hassan is a populist and therefore he can not radicalize someone as logically minded as you. You need to find the theoretical marxists and then you will realize that they have bullet proof logic. Some good ones are Madeline Pendleton, know way no how and Hakim

capitalism is not inherent to human nature

The key is to learn about the view of history of someone who in educated in dialectical materialism and historical materialism and then compare that view to your current view. What you will notice is that their view is more coherent and more plausible than your view. If you only learn about history from people who don't have this background, your view of history is incomplete.

@Leo Gura This is false. @Joel3102 is correct in saying Hassan poses as stage green but is not actually stage green. The reason why I can see behind his facade is because I know how radical leftists operate and the reason why I know how radical leftists operate is because I am a radical leftist. Hassan Piker is a Marxist-Leninist and Marxism-Leninism is stage Yellow, because dialectical thinking is a kind of systems thinking and thus stage yellow. Note that spiral dynamics itself is just a version of dialectical thinking. The reason why radical leftists think they are superior is because they are superior. Why are they superior? They are superior for the same reason why spiral dynamics is superior, which is because any political ideology that integrates dialectical thinking is superior to every political ideology that doesn't. Marxists are not the ones who are in an echo chamber. The capitalist realists like Leo are the ones in an echo chamber. The echo chamber of propaganda an misinformation about the history of communism from capitalists. If someone suggests to Leo he is in an echo chamber about god, he would laugh since he knows what he is talking about. The same is true for Marxists about governance. We know we are right and that's why we are not open to criticism from people who do not practice historical materialism. What differentiates Marxism-Leninism from other ideologies that integrate dialectics is that they are the only ones historically with the balls to wage war against evil. "The horrors of communism" have absolutely zero to do with Marxist-Leninist ideology. In reality, the horrors of communism are just the horrors of being oppressed by the west. There is no such thing as a country that doesn't primarily act in the interest of western capitalists that is not actually oppressed by the west in hopes that they submit. The ideology of the state can be the best, most epistemically rigorous system on the planet, it would still struggle under western oppression.

I've checked it out it actually seems super cute. Not my aesthetic though. However verrry neurodivergent

The only bad thing about Hassan is that makes content for people who are already radicalized. He had the chance to radicalize me early and failed. Still a bit mad about it

I might be biased here, but this post feels like it is partly a response to the word view that I'm trying to formulate. Especially with the ADHD example. It's nice to see that I could get some peoples gears turning. The problem that I have with the statistical worldview is that it does not explain why this specific set of symptoms is being clustered in the first place. Or does it? If reality was complete chaos, it wouldn't make sense to cluster anything ever. Yet it does. Why? Clustering is a method of statistics as far as I know so the statistical worldview is not anti-clustering. What I'm asking is: What are we clustering around? The way you are using the term ADHD here is as in "the set of ADHD symptoms". I agree with you that the symptoms of ADHD are influenced by other variables. But I do believe that there is some variable, some phenomenon in reality that is the origin of all of these that is rooted in the laws of nature that is itself not influenced by other variables. I also believe that it can be mathematically formulated and this is what I'm currently trying which is why I'm less active on the forum. I admit that this is somewhat an esoteric belief but it is akin to Occam's razor. It is also akin to the worldview of Paul Dirac. I believe that the purpose of science is to simplify reality and not to make it more complicated. It is possible that we are just fundamentally different in this approach but I'm remaining open.

Normal people, in the sense of people who are not obsessed with truth, like to get told what they are supposed to do since it saves them energy not having to make a decision every time. They prefer to invest energy into relationships, happiness and meaning rather than epistemology and there is nothing wrong with that. Authority is just one way that can be provided but it's not the only way. The big tragedy of humanity is that the people who are actually qualified to tell people what to do are the epistemology people but they are too busy with theory and isolation to do that, so that at the end the only people who end up doing it are idiots and narcissists.

I recently came to the same conclusion. When the leader of a cult is not a narcissist, then it is not a bad thing at all. The reason why cults are so intense is because they fulfill humans genuine desire for meaning and community beyond capitalism. I can actually imagine founding a cult one day. The reason why I have been less active lately is because I'm working on formalizing a philosophical system to be the foundation of a potential new religious movement.

Phone.April.28 1 What are the 6 6-clusters of 93? T2 NP11 P00 Absorb P01 Consum P02 Eat P03 Devour P04 Suck P05 P10 Collapse P11 Constrict P12 Suffocate P13 Vakuum P14 outside pressure P20 Obsess P21 Lust P22 Ungrounded P23 on cloud nine P30 P31 P40 P50 Clasp P51 Claw P52 Cling T3 NP12 P000 1.1 How many six-clusters are there per 0-morpheme? (Assume to not go over T3) 6 * (n6c_T2 + n6c_T3) = 6 * (n6c_np11 + n6c_np21 + n6c_np12) = 6 * (6 + 6*6 + 6*6) = 468 Yeah that's a lot That makes 46800 6-clusters over all. 1.2 A six-cluster consists of one term that denotes that six-cluster and five concepts that fit that cluster. 1.3 What I could do actually is use the first term of the first 6-cluster to denote that 0 -morpheme and use the other 5 to denote the five other 6-clusters. Yeah this is crazy genius. 1.4 What I could do actually is use NP11 for the abstract meanings of each word like obsession, obsessive, obsessing, obsessively etc. summarized and then use NP12 for each of the versions. Do what versions are there? Lexical categories? So we got nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs. The other ones are optional? Seems cool. "The ones you’re missing are: 5. Pronoun – replaces a noun (he, she, it, they) 6. Preposition – shows relationships (in, on, under, with) 7. Conjunction – connects words/clauses (and, but, because) 8. Interjection – expresses emotion (oh!, wow!, ouch!" Some of these I got covered with T1 I think. I need to track it. Else I have a lot of free slots with NP21 of course and even NP22. This seems really great. The only problem is that I have little control over the phonetics but I think this might be an okay trade off for this insanely regular and mnemonic structure. Like this shit will be super easy to learn and remember 1.5 What I could also do is use NP11 as abstract terms, use NP12 and NP13 as more specific terms and then do parts of speech with composite words 1.5.1 I could do NP12 for specific versions of NP11 and NP21 for others 2 Instead of push pull do showering 3 Post Love showering Colin and ethical alternative to push and pull

This is my journal about the journey of pursuing my life purpose which I seemed to have found almost a month ago. This journey began with a single insight that turned out to be a well that just goes deeper and deeper with no end in sight. I had this insight while formulating the following post: Thanks to this forum, I can narrow it down to this exact part in the post: Simply put, the insight is the observation that people seem to engage in social interactions to affirm their preferred mode of existence, which for some is the symbol, while for others, it's the object for example. This distinction of different modes of existence led me to develop the prototype of the metaphysical concept "ontomodality". Since I came up with this concept, I spent a lot of time contemplating about it, and it led me to have numerous massive insights about the biggest questions of the universe. When I posted "Thoughts on the Theory of Ontomodality" on the February third, I claimed, that it is the unifying theory of all fields of human knowledge and is the "crown jewel of self-actualization". Since then, my belief in the model has only strengthened. It truly might mark the end of all fragmented thinking. I believe that ontomodality has an insane amount of explanatory power and that it can help answer all of the following questions (I already had a ton of insights about all of these) and much much more: God What is god? What is being? What is existence? What is non-existence? What is the difference between existence, life, being, the self and the "I"? What is emptiness sunyata? What is purpose? What is meaning? The human What is the human? What is life, how did it arise and why? What is death? What is survival? How does one overcome death? What is consciousness, how did it arise and why? Why does consciousness seek unity? If unity is good then why is the collective consciousness fragmented in the first place? What is love? What is symbiosis? What is the relationship between the two? Duality What is seperation and duality, how did it arise, and why does it exist? Is there a fundamental "first" duality/separation? What are all the dualities? Does it make sense to track, how the dualities of existence came from this one first duality? What would this genealogy of dualities look like? What is non-duality? What is liberation? What is harmony? What is infinity? What is transcendence? How are these different from each other? What is morality? Does it exist? Does evil exist? Does the "good" exist? Is god good? Why does conflict exist? Why is love and unity so hard to attain? Culture What is religion? How did it arise and why? Is it any good? What is mythology, how did it arise and why? Is it any good? What are non-monotheistic gods? Where do they come from? Are there evil gods and good gods and if yes, which are which? Is mysticism really better than religion and mythology? What is a prophecy? What is a prophet? When does one arise, and can it happen again and if so, how? What is the prophecy? What is the future going to look like? Is it possible to bring order into the world and if so, who will do it? Is there an "end" to history? What is language? What would the ideal language look like? This must do for my first post of this journal, I need to give my brain some rest. I did not even scratch the surface.

Phone.April.26 1 Research Hong Xiuquan. I seem to have a lot in common with him. Research millenarianism. What is the difference between millennialism and millenarianism? Okay it seems that millenarianism is more broad. Silexian political theory is millenarian Millenarianism is a kind of eschatology. What is the difference between eschatology and teleology? 2 Research about Donna Haraway. "Make kin not babies" Phone.April.27 1 Is sequence really symbol and not mirror? People who are sequence seem to be into geography, linguistics etc. If sequence is symbol, then what is mirror? Is symbol maybe all three (intelligence)? Maybe mirror is culture. Devotion? Worship? Emotional identification. Yeah makes sense actually. I guess language, symbol etc is actually more sequence then than intelligence. 2 In the script, maybe encode the hierarchy instead of the phonemes? Point is loyalty then. April.27 1 Thoughts - Valuable is living authentically. - The goal of life is to produce variety. Valuable is that which contributes to increase variety. - Variety is maximized in authentic living. - What is variety? uo shto keukcha? - What is authentic living? uo shto rhao crhosva? What is the purpose of constricting variety? Uo-shto she-keogx eo gnat-eukcha ga variety increases information (?) therefore it decreases predictability. eukcha vlie-pushto. Eufrhe-de nusk-uen. Low predictability causes alienation in 21-people. ouf-uenu zosh äefr-uosf-uevlu. Therefore the goal of Silexis is to create predictable variety? Eufrhe sh-uofr-eo-zeo shto oez-eukch-uen-eukcha ga 2 change the name of the language to silexic?

Okay I think I know where our conflict might come from. Is it possible that you have a formal background in psychology? The problem is that psychology research is extremely relevant for the development of my ideas, however I did not spend enough time getting familiar with the methodology, rhetoric and the way of thinking of formal psychology to be able to integrate it properly. I think that people like you and also @oOo sense this ignorance. The reason why I have not yet sifted through psychology research yet is simply bc I was fixated on other facets of my theory. Eventually, I'm planning to go down that rabbit hole. I hope that in due time our conflicts will reduce. This does not mean that I'm planning to pose less risky hypotheses, simply because I like starting with risky hypotheses to then refine them. I'm encouraging you to keep pointing out limitations in my ideas. Having looked at psychology research briefly, it seems what I'm doing scientifically is akin to factor analysis. But I need to learn more about it to be able to contrast properly.

@Carl-Richard The style of a lot of my responses is akin to the fragment in Jena Romanticism. It is primarily meant to be thought-provoking rather than 100% true. When it manages to make you contemplate about my points, it has completed its purpose, even if you come to the conclusion that the perspective is limited.

Phone.April.25 1 In order to become immortal, the state has to harness the power of the mythos. Juche ideology is in that sense most closely aligned with silexian ideology. 2 Cynicism is also the enemy of Silexis. (?) 3 Chatgpt just said the antichrist is a short, dense and polemic text. This resonantes. I also want to be dense and polemic. I think my writing style will be simiar to that of Nietzsche. 4 The curse of monogamy is the fear of falling in love too hard with somebody who is not "the one". When you drop the concept of "the one" you can fall in love has hard as you want with whom ever you want. Damn I really like the term curse. What is it in silex? curse prolonged pain self-reinforcing pain 60 Wait I just realized that self-reinforcing is a fantastic way to denote 60. This is cool since it seperates contradiction 63 from self-reinforcing 60 so it's not redundant. This means that cybernetics is actually more 60 then 26 although it is also 26. Yeah it seems self-adjusting is 6026 that's so damn cool. 5 Symmetry 6 Research mere exposure effect 7 The two noble truths of Silexis 1. The fear intimacy will always lead to abandonment 2. The fear of abandonment will always lead to abandonment 8 Holes 1. Why are conservatives more fearful 2. Integrate the notion that people who suffer turn to religion. April.25 1 Hypothesis: Insecure people are drawn to other insecure people and cultures since they seem relatable to them. 2 "It seems the enemies of Silexis are property and merit. Are they related?" And morality. I think the fundamental principle behind these is the concept of value and the fundamental principle behind this is comparison. So what is the critique of the concept of value in silexis? Idea: Defining value only makes sense when there is scarecity. When there is no scarecity then all that matters is worshipping god and it does not make sense to measure that. Idea: Silexis defines value like this: You produce value if you decrease material scarecity or you liberate people from the need to produce value. 1. Producing material wealth (labour) 2. Using material wealth to decrease scarecity (planned economy) 3. Preach to people about detaching from the need to produce value and start worshipping god and cultivating culture. 4. Worshipping god and cultivating. So here is the thing. This is not meant to be a historical process at all. The only reason why this is a historical process is because the dominant ideology of each time period is so rigid. In theory, in an immortal state with absolute state identity (what is this in silex?) there is no seperation between worship and labour. In this state labour as it is present in liberalism is abolished. It's purpose is not to prove ones worth anymore it is practiced as an act of devotion towards the state. The cutial thing now is that adhd non-point 83 individuals are exempt from this. Their task is to cultivate culture through following their passion to bolster the state with the beauty they cultivate and their inspiring presences. There is a lot of historical proof that this could work. 3 Absolute state identity 39 00 tshungeoshto 4 What problem does liberalism solve? Idea: The purpose of liberalism is to substitute the conflict of war with the more efficient and less bloody conflict of competition. 5 silexis the universal science 6 It seems that Silexism is actually potentially a kind of positivism which is wild.

Wait what did I miss 😭

What's wrong with generalizing? Finding a single principle behind different phenomena drastically reduces complexity. This does not mean I reject precise concepts. I just like my concepts ordered in this hierarchical way. It improves thinking and makes communication and didactics easier.