Cred

Thanks for the recommendation! I happen to be working on a conlang, so I'm kinda into grammar and linguistics rn

I'm encouraging you to have relationships with neurotypicals but don't expect that it's easy. It requires work, and it is hard not to alienate each other but it's possible and necessary as you say. If it is done right, there is nothing more powerful than a partnership between a neurodivergent and a neurotypical. They are meant to live in symbiosis together.

29 29.1 1 19=infinite, 91=finite 2 I went to the drawing board and had an idea. My idea is to codify the Lexcal category. and the mode of continuum, etc., in single digits. The rule is: if a digit is codifying grammar information, the digit before it and the digit after it can't do so too. To signify that a digit is codifying grammatical information, the digit that is before in the digit that is after both have to be of lower complexity than the digit that is codifying. So it is a local maximum. This makes two to the power of four equals 16 (minus 5 = 11, because the bare minimum complexity has to be two to be able to be a local maximum?) ways of codifying grammar in one digit. 2.1 the idea now is that the first local maximum codefies the Lexar categories, so noun, verb, adjective, etc., the second local maximum codifies the place in the continuum. One idea of the third local maximum would be to qualify, unity, duality, repetition, reflection point, resodence, harmony, beauty, potence, hero. 2.2 it seems like I really need all 15 variations. So I have an idea there's another code for zero complexity, which is just the first vowel of the first double vowel this way a digit with singer complexity can be a local maximum. 2.3 so the new rule now is: the 15 variations of the first maximum codify lexical categories and might even include things like cases. 2.3 the second one is the continuum plus the five axioms. The third one is resonance, dissonance, harmony, disharmony, cohesion, fragmentation, stability, collapse, Intimacy, isolation, tranquility, Obsession, Authenticity, Dissolution, transcendence 2.4 idea: if I have a word with an odd number of digits, then the first digit is only codifying grammar. Wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait, if I require every word to have an odd number of digits, then this solves the problem how to separate words from each other. (context: I want a text that is written with the characters to be a perfect grid. The problem with that is that I can't use spacing to signify words if I require every word to have even length.) 2.4.1 what I need to do is to build a rabbit hole for people to dive into with a ton of different PDFs and videos and courses, etc., and then lure them with the utter beauty of written text in those characters. Context: I'm optimizing the shit out of the beauty of the geometry of the characters. There are nested golden ratios in between golden ratios with golden ratios. i'm trying to find the perfect balance between order and chaos. I want this to be as beautiful as Chinese, Japanese, etc. Right now it's actually also you're looking pretty unique. what's brilliant about this characters is that there are extremely expressive, but they are actually only 10 and there are easy to learn because they reference the digits from 0 to 9. All of the extra information about grammar, etc. is stored in combinatorics with different elements of the characters being activated or deactivated. 2.5 I think I might have to change the order that my continuum is encoded with. I need the more mundane things like body soul mind graspable, repetition reflection point to be encoded with less complexity than this lofty terms like ungraspable, absolute consciousness, etc. I need to find some structure that is easy to remember and apply. I need to experiment more with the language to learn which ones of the 15 are the most used and the most relevant and try to find an order of complexity then. What's really cool is that if the absolute for example, is the most complex one, then it's symbol is also the most complex one and the most beautiful one, which checks out because if you are talking about the absolute, you would also want to honor it by dwelling on it for longer by pronouncing more phone names, and by drawing a more complex symbol. 3 what is "long"? 4 I think personifying might actually be a better word than embodying 5 I think one idea to come up with the vocabulary is to create a sub-reddit and recruit linguist ontologists to build a dictionary to be canon. 6 a nice word for 40 is "direction" 7 composites: 00 = Continuity 01 = Idea 02 = Meaning 03 = Ungraspable 04 = Graspable 05 = Body 06 = Soul 07 = Mind 08 = Spirit 09 = Consciousness 10 = Granularity 90 = self-similarity 11 = singular 99 = multiple 12 = Essence 98 = non-Essence 13 = interaction 97 = coexistence 14 = system 96 = part 15 = Individual 95 = selflessness 16 = Family 94 = strange 17 = Tribe 93 = alien 18 = Society 92 = revolutionary 19 = Whole 91 = Fragment 20 = Polarity 80 = Singularity 21 = Unity 89 = Anti-unity 22 = Duality 88 = Anti-duality 23 = Content 87 = Void 24 = Contained 86 = Exposed 25 = cohesion 85 = Fragmentation 26 = stability 84 = Collapse 27 = Intimacy 83 = Isolation 28 = Tranquility 82 = Obsession 29 = Authenticity 81 = Dissolution 30 = Complexity 70 = Simplicity 31 = Repetition 79 = Stagnation 32 = Reflection 78 = Absorbing 33 = Point 77 = Diffusion 34 = Sequence 76 = Parallel 35 = Dynamic 75 = stillness 36 = Symbol 74 = Concrete 37 = Aware-self 73 = Unaware-self 38 = True-self 72 = Conceptual-self 39 = Intelligence 71 = non-intelligence 40 = Resolution 60 = Tension 41 = Thing 69 = Being 42 = Complement 68 = Incopatability 43 = Symbiosis 67 = Exploit 44 = Life 66 = Death 45 = Resonance 65 = Dissonance 46 = Harmony 64 = Disharmony 47 = Beauty 65 = Inauthenticity 48 = Potence 62 = Impotence 49 = Heroism 61 = Anti-hero 50 = Transcendence 53 = direction 1 57 = direction 2 54 = High 56 = Low 52 = right 58 = left 51 = That 59 = not 55 = Emptiness 8 I could use 53 direction, 157 direction 22 mean and down in combination with continuum, right and left in combination with complexity, and forward backward in combination with resolution 40 9 omg I totally forgot singulplural. Wait I have 11 and 99. I could instead of noun, codify singular-plural+ cases? 29.2 1 "Encode features as combinations Example: Let each variant encode a binary vector: • noun vs verb • subject vs object • animate vs inanimate • definite vs indefinite" 1.1 "Split your 15 variants into feature bits Example: • 3 bits → role (8 possibilities) • 1 bit → number (singular/plural) • remaining bits → word class" 1.2 Idea: Encode word class with 3 bits, number with remaining bit, roles (subject, predicate, object) with words order. (do I also do cases? I cound maybe just allow for cases but only with composites) 1.3 idea: if for example, one of the composites is of continuum, then the continuum code is skipped. In the same way, if the singular composite is chosen, then the code for codifying categories is expanded to cases? 1.3.1 the thing composite is a noun, the function composite is a verb. what is adjective? 2 the intelligence system has the ability to be safe alienated if it's structure and it's complex complexity is not affirmed and respected 3 I kinda need to contemplate the roles, cases and classes. 4 wait wait wait wait wait wait wait I just realize something. If the first digit is only four grammar, then it's value can also be used to encode grammar information! OK so idea: the value of that digit code Elias the word class and the code code defies the cases? 5 idea. What I could also do is allow for a single digit to stand by itself so to take up the space of one composite that is in the middle of the two spaces to signal it is separate, and use it for either, etc. and in that way, save the need to encode pronouns and whatever I'm encoding in the single digit. 6 Silexian analysis: More broad and integral than psychoanalysis 29.3 1 I could also call this type of project a paradigm. It might be better than "formal ontology". What is the precise difference? 2 I could use the first digit of a word with an off number of digits for the ten lexical categories. now the question is, what do I codify with that digit? I could codify: 11 = singular 99 = multiple 12 = Essence 98 = non-Essence 13 = interaction 97 = coexistence 14 = system 96 = part 15 = Individual 95 = selflessness 16 = Family 94 = strange 17 = Tribe 93 = alien 18 = Society 92 = revolutionary But for a lot of them I don't know how to put them into grammar. 2.1 If I do this I have the most insane grammar. 2.2 Damn the language is complete for now I think. I will need to start translaating and see if I run into issues. 3 For every digit, I might need a special vocal to signify that it has "zero complexity". 4 inbetweem the words is space for emojis!😊🫨 5 omg I just had the craziest idea. Since the language is both digital and alphabetical, I think one could type letters and digits at the same time and I could write a program that interprets them in real time in theory making typing extremely fast. I don't know if that's too crazy of a thing to master though. 5.1 like for every two digit number you could with the left hand, write the first digit and with the right hand on the number pad write the digital code. 5.1.1 For example: n#m: n is the digit and m is the flexation (0-15) zeo(0#3)1#4(uo) could without a problem be written with both hands typing at the same time as z1e#o4. This could be interpreted in real time and converted into the symbol or the written version 5.2 I think this language allows for way more crazy hacks that are unimaginable rn. 5.1.1.1 I like this 6#12 notation. So one word could be like 7#8:9#2:6#15 or 7.8:9.2:6.15 or 7•8-9•2-6•15. That's crazy. So it seems there is the alphabetical, the numerical and the symbolic way of writing the language. That's so cool. I really hope this isn't trash 6 Individual+noun is name so 0•8=oe? Damn. jaw drop. I could do 0•14=god=zoetzu this would be fun lmao 7 The Kant quote: "Intuitions without concepts are blind" is a perfect summary of the motivation of this project. 8 Can I make the rule, that after a consonant, ANY single vowel can follow without destroying any meaning? This would increase the amount of possibilities to name different things drastically.

rationality and irrationality are dialectical opposites. If you don't act rationally, you become vulnerable ti the things you don't undersand. But if you cling too much to rationality, it will turn into irrationality. If you swing back-and-forth between a conscious, dynamic harmonious way, you can harness the benefits of both

This idea that you need to change is only going to make you less charismatic. Seek out and socialize with other neurodivergent people. They will like you more than neurotypicals

I'm here

@WonderSeeker is it necessary to speak one of these asian languages to be able to teach english?

28 28.1 1 dude I need to somehow relate the phonems with the english words for the numbers as a mnemonic device 2 0 = p ae b ea 1 = ř ai r ia 2 = d ao dj oa 3 = g au ğ ua 4 = f ei v ie 5 = k eo ng oe 6 = kl eu l ue 7 = s io ş oi 8 = t iu d ui 9 = tsh ou dsh uo Mnomonic version: 0 = tz eo z oe 1 = n uo m ou 2 = t ui d iu 3 = th oi sh io 4 = f oa v ao 5 = pf ai pl ia 6 = s ie ps ei 7 = sw ae shw ea 8 = g ei x ie 9 = gn äi ng iä zero, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine AA, AE, AI, AO, AU EA, EE, EI, EO, EU IA, IE, II, IO, IU OA, OE, OI, OO, OU UA, UE, UI, UO, UU 3 Make it such that it can be typed on an english (and chinesekeyboard 4 Idea for convention: The more complex the composite, the more abstract/lofty/devine/metaphysical/ontological it is. I could rank actually from profane to devine with respect to how many phonems are active in a given composite. On every level of loftiness, there is wiggle room for the different lexical categories. 4.1 These level could mirror the 01-09 sequence actual 4.2 numbers are the simplest in writing but the most complex in speech, symboloizing the wrap around from spirit back to id 4.3 Completely different idea: I could also just end nouns with "thing" for example. Maximize flexibility I guess. 4.4 That's crazy is just works out. so from zero full names being active to eight phones that's nine and total and there are nine stages in the continuum. So when there are no phones active in the symbol, this this means that actually all of the phones are active, which means that then the most lofty concepts that relate to spirit are pronounced the same as abstract mathematical ideas, which makes perfect sense because the continuum web wraps around. 4.5 what's so fantastic about this is that it can be signified when the word is about something material or for example, something of the body. Suddenly describing something regarding the bodies way easier now. 4.6 the only problem is that there are more ways to arrange the phonemes when there's half of the full names active versus when all of them are none of them are active. 4.6.1 when one phoneme is inactive, then I still have eight ways to rearrange them, which is already enough. But it is kind of a quirk of this language. Maybe I can solve this with these marks on top for example. 4.6.2 I just realized I think I could actually use the markers in a creative way that are different depending on where on the continuum the word is 4.7 the flexibility of this language is absolutely wild. It's possible to signal the Lex category by just adding another composite like thing and it's also possible to sign the leather on the continue by adding just that composite of the continuum and then just have freedom with how you want to build the word. 5 the 10 with the idea mode are very, a little, a lot, the most, etc. 6 I do need to signal when I'm using an idea without referring to a number. I can just use the top bar or something for that. 7 at some point I need to make like a super small PDF that's printable in like a din-a 6 format that summarizes all of the rules. 8 I could also use multiple phoneme tables that are similar but optimized for different native language speakers, that are similar enough that different people can still understand each other, but it sounds like a dialect or something. composites: 00 = Continuity 01 = Idea 02 = Meaning 03 = Ungraspable 04 = Graspable 05 = Body 06 = Soul 07 = Mind 08 = Spirit 09 = Consciousness 10 = Granularity 90 = self-similarity 11 = singular 99 = multiple 12 = Essence 98 = non-Essence 13 = interaction 97 = coexistence 14 = system 96 = part 15 = Individual 95 = selflessness 16 = Family 94 = strange 17 = Tribe 93 = alien 18 = Society 92 = revolutionary 19 = Whole 91 = Fragment 20 = Polarity 80 = Singularity 21 = Unity 89 = Anti-unity 22 = Duality 88 = Anti-duality 23 = Content 87 = Void 24 = Contained 86 = Exposed 25 = cohesion 85 = Fragmentation 26 = stability 84 = Collapse 27 = Intimacy 83 = Isolation 28 = Tranquility 82 = Obsession 29 = Authenticity 81 = Dissolution 30 = Intelligence 70 = Simplicity 31 = Reflection 79 = Absorbing 32 = Point 78 = Diffusion 33 = Repetition 77 = Stagnation 34 = Dynamic 76 = stillness 35 = Sequence 75 = Parallel 36 = Symbol 74 = Concrete 37 = Hidden-self 73 = Rational-self 38 = Imagined-self 72 = Identity-loss 39 = True-self 71 = Ego 40 = Resolution 60 = Tension 41 = Thing 69 = Being 42 = Complement 68 = Incopatability 43 = Symbiosis 67 = Exploit 44 = Life 66 = Death 45 = Resonance 65 = Dissonance 46 = Harmony 64 = Disharmony 47 = Beauty 65 = Inauthenticity 48 = Potence 62 = Impotence 49 = Heroism 61 = Anti-hero 50 = Transcendence 53 = Future 57 = Past 54 = High 56 = Low 52 = right 58 = left 51 = That 59 = not 55 = Emptiness Idea: Senses1, senses2 Future/past, and/or, that/not, warm/cold, bright/dark, high/low, right/left 28.2 1 International phonetic alphabet 2 My language is a formal system 3 Mnemonic phonons I'm really happy with: 0 = tz eo z oe 1 = n uo m ou 2 = t ue d eu 3 = th ui sh iu 4 = f oa v ao 5 = pf ai psh ia 6 = s ie ps ei 7 = sw äe shw eä 8 = g ei x ie 9 = gn ae ng ea 28.3 1 "The ship on the sea" to "thing on-top sea" to 40 high-relation huge-low-time-flow to 40 54-20 18-56-11-33-46 to fozeo pshiafo-toe Idea: Use different punctuation etc encode whether morphology is aestetic, used for lexical categories or for the continuum 2 I'm kinda fucked regarding the senses I think 3 I could somehow use 40 for high and 60 for low. Also i could use ida, pingala for left right. Left brain right brain 4 I could also encode the level on the continuum at the beginning of a word and the lexical category at the end. 4 choose 1 + 4 choose 2 = 10. So I could encode the continuum with the first digit. Also ten lexical categories might also be enough. The Rest is artistic expression?

27 27.1 1 nominative, accusative, instrumental, dative, ablative, genitive, locative, vocative. 1.1 now that you have more flexibility, maybe integrate those?😅😭 2 How much do I want to rely on sentence order? 3 -i -1 i +1 b a c e d i f o 0 = p ae b ea 1 = bl ai r ia 2 = d ao dj oa 3 = g au x ua 4 = f ei v ie 5 = k eo ng oe 6 = kl eu l ue 7 = s io ş oi 8 = t iu d ui 9 = tsh ou dsh uo abcdefghijklmnop 3.1 I could do it that half of the double-vowels are spoken sequencially and the other half are spoken together. 27.2 1 "I see you" = 15:pron [see]:verb 16:pron see = Reflection:noun containment: 1.1 Observation: A lot of pronouns seem to be part of 10s. And since pronouns have the same steucture, I could maybe get rid of the first digit. Have to think about it. 2 Idea: What if, for each type of lexical category, I create sub categories? These could be noun cases but also just inspired by the cases. 3 It's maths time! 3.1 j = 0 1 2 3 \phi(j)= -i -1 i +1 c(0) b a c e c(1) d i f o phn(0,j)= p ae b ea phn(1,j)= sk ai shk ia phn(2,j)= ksh ao x oa phn(3,j)= g au ğ ua phn(4,j)= f ei v ie phn(5,j)= k eo ng oe phn(6,j)= bl eu l ue phn(7,j)= s io ş oi phn(8,j)= t iu d ui phn(9,j)= tsh ou dsh uo 3.2 Phase \phi(j) = -exp(2\pi i \frac{j}{4}) 3.2.1 Silexian Alphabet A := {(j,\varphi), j\in{0,...,9}, \varphi\in\phi({0,...,3}) 3.2.1.1 Letter:= l\in A 3.2.1.1.1 The Silex ontology is the set of axioms O Silex set of composites C := {(a,b)|a,b\inA} c \in C 3.? phase set \phi is the codomain of f_\phi. \phi := {f_\phi(j)|j\in{0,...,3}} 3.? The Silexian characteristica C := { C \subset 3.? An instance c\in C is a 3.? What is (A,•)? Let a,b\in A. a_{i,\alpha}•b_{j,\beta} = (i, \alpha)•(j, \beta) = 3.12 There is this weird thing that the nth root of unity seems to be relevant for both the decimals and the phase. (10th root for decimals and 4th root for phase) 3.12.1 The question is: can I combine them into one? 3.12.1 What are the attributes of f(l_{j,\alpha)) = (g(l_{j,\alpha)), h(l_{j,\alpha))) -\phi(\alpha)exp(2\pi frac{j}{10}i) 3.12.2 \phi(j, n) = -exp(2\pi i \frac{j}{n}) f(l_{j,\alpha)) = () 3.3 Definition 1 An ontology has anthromodal completeness if its characteristica spans the entire human existence space. 3.3.1 Fragment 1.1 An ontology has anthromodal completeness if its characteristica has the same cardinality as a natural language. 4 Idea: Epilepsy only occurs in extremely sensitive people. Elilepsy is a kind of resonance catastrophy. Epilepsy = "implosion due to contained reflection" = noun(84)-adj(containment)-noun(reflection) 5 lexical categories word: bace•difo noun: bd verb: ai adjective: cf pronoun: adverb: names: cifo numbers: Abstract/neutral (-ism) preposition: cef articles: bo conjunctions: interjections: 5.1 I could order these by how frequent they are and then just cycle through the possible combinations. Problem: Too much similarity. 5.2 I need to find an elegant way to order these lexical categories and relate that order to the composite combinatorics. 6 when I describe my language as a mathematical object, I need to include embodiment inspiration as a means of translation. 7 I can make words that end a sentence have specific phase too. 8 Idea: When none of the vowels are active, then all consonants and some combination of single vowels that is distinct from just both consonants active. This means that number. The other one in the composite also becomes interpreted as a number? 27.3 1 "Sanskrit phonemes are arranged by: • place of articulation (velar, palatal, retroflex, dental, labial) • manner of articulation (voiced, voiceless, aspirated, etc.)" 1.1 "Sanskrit was used in philosophy, logic, and ritual: • Terms are often precisely defined • Compounds can encode complex concepts" 1.2 "Vowels Short: • a, i, u, ṛ, ḷ Long: • ā, ī, ū, ṝ Diphthongs: • e, ai, o, au 👉 Total: ~13 vowels (depending on analysis)" 1.3 "Inflectional morphology is a subfield of morphology that studies how words change their form to express grammatical information, without changing their core meaning or word class." 1.4 "Inflectional morphology is different from derivational morphology: • inflectional → grammatical variation • run → runs → ran • derivational → creates new words • run → runner (new meaning, new word class)" 2 Okay let's try to integrate this Sanskrit stuff 0 1 2 3 b a c e d i f o 0 = p ae b ea 1 = ř ai r ia 2 = d ao dj oa 3 = g au ğ ua 4 = f ei v ie 5 = k eo ng oe 6 = kl eu l ue 7 = s io ş oi 8 = t iu d ui 9 = tsh ou dsh uo 3 I'm tending tk say: If there is no vowel of the same letter after a consonant, it can be any single vowel that but the most obvious choice is the first vowel of the next double vowel in the table. So for example after a b tends to come a e but it doesn't matter.

26 26.1 1 0 = chap 1 = deb 2 = git 3 = yokk 4 = ğūm 5 = dsāng 6 = skoas 7 = fial 8 = tschöx 9 = rung 6273 is joa gi fia yo is oagiao or jifo or oagiay 1.1 I can do the convention, that a word must alternate between consonant and vowel. 1.2 Idea: These choices can be used to make different words related to each other. 1.3 Idea: Just draw 2 What's with nouns, plural, adjectives, etc. 3 orthography 4 Idea: Conventions like "nouns always start with consonant that is the second one of the syllable", "verbs always end with vowel" etc. 4.1 a fun Implication would be that a noun could always be turned into a verb for example by making it end with a vowel for example. So when somebody is asking what one is doing one can say "I'm autisming" or something without it sounding weird. 4.2 heroism, hero, heoroically, heroing 4.3 lexical categories: noun verb adjective preposition adverb pronoun determiners conjunctions interjections numbers names 4.3.1 Yeah this is a lot. I feel like I can archieve a lot with grammar though. "this category when it's in this context, that when it's in that context" 4.3.2 how many combinations do I have for one composit? cvccvv := xyzabc {valid} = {all} \{words including } \{ 5 Damn it's crazy it seems like this language is extremely powerful and flexible. It seems to allow for just pulling words out of thin air when needed. 5.1 less flexible (see 4.2) but more powerful. 6 state of composits: 00 = Continuity 01 = Idea 02 = Meaning 03 = Ungraspable 04 = Graspable 05 = Body 06 = Soul 07 = Mind 08 = Consciousness 09 = Spirit 10 = Granularity 11 = unit 12 = function 13 = interaction 14 = system 15 = Individual 16 = Family 17 = Tribe 18 = Society 19 = Whole 20 = Polarity 80 = Singularity 21 = Unity 89 = Anti-unity 22 = Duality 88 = Anti-duality 23 = Content 87 = Void 24 = Contained 86 = Exposed 25 = cohesion 85 = Fragmentation 26 = stability 84 = Collapse 27 = Intimacy 83 = Isolation 28 = Tranquility 82 = Obsession 29 = Authenticity 81 = Dissolution 30 = Complexity 31 = Reflection 79 = Absorbing 32 = Point 78 = Diffusion 33 = Repetition 77 = Stagnation 34 = Dynamic 76 = stillness 35 = Sequence 75 = Parallel 36 = Symbol 74 = Concrete 37 = Hidden-self 73 = Rational-self 38 = Imagined-self 72 = Identity-loss 39 = True-self 71 = Ego 40 = Resolution 41 = Thing 69 = being 42 = Complement 68 = Incopatability 43 = Symbiosis 67 = Parasite 44 = Life 66 = Death 45 = Resonance 46 = Harmony 47 = Beauty 48 = Potence 49 = Heroism 50 = Transcendence 51 = That 59 = Not 52 = Order 58 = Chaos 53 = Absolute 57 = Relativity 54 = Infinite 56 = Finite 55 = Emptiness High/low Idea 50: 6 Notation. Let X \in {0-9} X := just vocal, X' := just first consonant, X, := just last consonant, X" := first consonant and vocal X. := vocal and last consonant X| := all 7 composites -i +-1 i 0 = sh ae p 1 = ş ē b 2 = ğ i m 3 = y oa š 4 = c ue k 5 = x a ng 6 = dj o d 7 = f ia l 8 = m io t 9 = r u ġ Unused: vocals: ū, ao, ī consonants: dsch, tsch, sk, ß, ř, ġ, ksh, gx 7.1 word: abcxyz-abcxyz-abcxyz word: fumbar-fumbar-fumbar lexical categories: Abstract/neutral (-ism) abcyz-abcyz-abcyz fumar-fumar-fumar numbers: abc-xyz-abc-xyz fumbar-fumbar-fumbar noun: ay-ay-ay, fa-fa-fa names: cy-cy-cy, ma-ma-ma pronoun: cyz-cyz-cyz, mar-mar-mar verb: bx-bx-bx, ub-ub-ub adverb: bxy-bxy-bxy, uba-uba-uba adjective: bz-bz-bz, ur-ur-ur preposition: determiners: conjunctions: interjections: by-by-by, ua-ua-ua 7.2 This is crazy it seems a lot like different wave functions. 7.3 b :=-IC (-i) a := IZ (+-1) r :=+IC (i) Okay hold on, maths??? 8 Damn how do I do tenses? I will find a way. 8.1 I could make the pattern of the verbs dependent on the time etc. (so verbs are not bx-bx-bx but more dynamic dependent on the context) 9 This will likely be the biggest challenge: I'm trying to make the phonems obey to the strucure and not the other way around. 26.2 1 Idea for composites: Make all negative phonems sound similar and all positive pound similar -i +-1 i 0 = p ae sh 1 = b ē ş 2 = ġ i m 3 = ts oa r 4 = c ue ß 5 = k a ng 6 = d o dj 7 = f ia l 8 = t io m 9 = schb u ğ Unused: vocals: ū, ao, ī consonants: dsch, tsch, sk, ß, ř , ksh, x, š, sp, pf 2 Idea: Make composits with a value smaller then 50 tend to use positive consonants and complement composites tend to use negative consonants. 2.1 If you do this, you could signal lexical categories with endings and beginnings only. 3 Idea: When It's just a vocal, there is a circle in the symbol and when It's a number it's just raw but pronounced with everything. 4 rearrange the composites in such a way, that the positives "feel" like soft consonants and the negatives "feel" like hard consonants. 4.1 Introduce another 10 vowels so that the vowels also have positive and negative polarity? Also seperate them between long for posituve and short for negative? -i -1 i +1 0 = p ē f ae 1 = b ş ē 2 = ġ i m 3 = ts r oa 4 = c ß ue 5 = k a ng ao 6 = d o dj 7 = sh l ia 8 = t m io 9 = schb u ğ 4.1.1 This is hard. One possibility would also be to copy these vowels over to +1 but stretch them. -i -1 i +1 0 = h ai f aī 1 = b e p ē 2 = ġ i ğ ī 3 = tsch oa dsch oā 4 = ß ue ş sh uē 5 = k a ng ā 6 = d o dj ō 7 = kl ia l iā 8 = t io d iō 9 = br u r ū 4.1.1.1 yeah this is great I think. 4.2 remember ordering them alphabetically to make memorizing easier. Maybe create mose logic on how they arise. 5 positive,negative vowels 5.1 make negative vowels staccato, posituve legato 5.2 wait I just realized that negatice numbers are now also included technically. Yeah let's just ignore actually. Take absolute value. 5.3 I could also say that the intonation changes if the letter is positive, negative or neutral. positive: Up to nuetral. negative: Up the below neutral. neutral: Monotone question: Upwards 6 frederic = 73 16 13 24 = rational-family-interaction-contained 6.1 Yeah I just realized EVERYTHING is a word in this language. 26.3 1 Idea: Fuck long vowels, do: Different single vowels one number or: Reverse Order of two vowels. -i -1 i +1 b a c e d i f o 0 = p ae b ea 1 = bl ai r ia 2 = d ao dj(œ) oa 3 = g au x(œ) ua 4 = f ei v ie 5 = k eo ng oe 6 = kl(ě) ī l ē 7 = s io ş(ě) oi 8 = t iu d ui 9 = tsh(ǒ) ū dsh(ě) ō a e i o u All combinations two vowels: AA, AE, AI, AO, AU EA, EE, EI, EO, EU IA, IE, II, IO, IU OA, OE, OI, OO, OU UA, UE, UI, UO, UU Ununused: vowels: eu, consonants: dsch, tsch, sk, ß, ř , ksh, š, st , scht, dj, rh, schb, n, m, sh, w, Blacklist h(not audible sometimes) 1.1 That's cool. Let's order them alphabetically so they are easier to remember 2 An autistic person is ontologically not very different from a bookshelf 3 Okay lets try to translate "I have a chair" -> 15 41-04 41 20-15-24-32 -> blaungua vi•bao pē•pāing•djao•gū I = "pronoun: Individual" = pronoun:15 = bi:15 = brau have = availability-ing = graspability-Relation-ing = thing-grasping = 41-04-ing = vipao a = article: thing = 41 = pē Chair = sit-ter = sit-thing = djae-vir-xiang-dūvgūdjo-braung -vir = djae vir xiang dūvgū djo braung vir = "relating thing to location individual thing" -> "relating individual location thing" -> djae braung dūvgūdjo -> "relation individual location" -> 20-15-24-32:noun -> dā-ing-djao-gū -> dāingdjaogū sit = upright-still = low-upright = mind-location-infinite-body-location- finite-body = putting-individual = putting-15:noun-thing Yields djae-vir-xiang-dūvgūdjo -braungua Individual:noun = 15:noun = 15:bif yields braung put = relating-thing-to-location = relating:verb -thing:noun -to:prep -location:noun = 20:ci-41:bif-to-location = djae-vir-xiang-dūvgūjo location > contained-point > 24:adj-32:noun > 24:bad-32:bif yields dūv-gūdjo to > sequence:prep > 35:cef yields xiang 4 To have it here: word: bace•difo lexical categories: noun: ci pronoun: names: cifo numbers: Abstract/neutral (-ism) verb: ci adverb: adjective: bad preposition: cef articles: bo conjunctions: interjections: by-by-by, ua-ua-ua 4 I think the ordering of the vowels make sense. Change the ordering of the consonants after a heuristic that is not alphabetical order. 5 Idea: For every word, the beginning doesn't matter, make it so that it sounds good, but the endongs matter for lexical categories. 6 Idea: examples: vaofoa turns into vaofo vaooa turns into vaoa 7 idea: make the phonems even more structured -i -1 i +1 b a c e d i f o 0 = p ae b ea 1 = bl ai r ia 2 = d ao dj oa 3 = g au x ua 4 = f ei v ie 5 = k eo ng oe 6 = kl eu l ue 7 = s io ş oi 8 = t iu d ui 9 = tsh ou dsh uo 7.1 Wait this is crazy that that just works like that. Okay can I order the consonants like this too is the question. 7.2 Wait now that I don't have single vowels anymore I can solve a problem which is akwardness with words that end on consonants. I can just add the next vowel easy without giving false signals since single vowels normally don't exist. Holy shit also I can now combine two consonants, since they can now have single vowel sounds between them without chnaging the lexical category.

25 25.1 1 Experimentation with 20 20 = Polarity 21 = Unity 22 = Duality 23 = Field 24 = Space ?? = cohesion/Fragmentation ?? = stability/Collapse ?? = authenticity/Dissolution ?? = Intimacy/isolation ?? = Tranquility/obsession ?? = internal ?? = Anticipation ?? = absolute ?? = Infinite ?? = Order ?? = future (redundant with path) 25 = affect 26 = anticipation (redundant with path) 27 = cognition 28 = valence 29 = Tranquility 04-20-26-08-52-32-00 = cell-polarity-duality-tribe-impotence-point-granularity 2 I think I kinda get why continental philosophers didn't try to define everything they said. It's because if every word is clearly defined, language looses some of it's magic. 2.1 I think to prevent this perversion, I need to use less "=" and "is". 2.1.1 I could do "it traces". 2.2 I realized something interesting: The meaning of a word also spans a space with it's suggested trace. 2.3 I could imply that these are not equations but rather "transformations". So I could do xyz 1 then "xyz xyz xyz xyz" 2 then xyz-xyz = xxxx That kinda makes sense. Transformation is also works with trace. 2.3.1 I really want to know how all of this relates to early and late Wittgenstein. I feel like it should be an elegant reconciliation. 3 Reconciliation into "duality followed by unity and resonance" then into loving-duality-unity-path = 46242340 3.1 I like how this process is a kind of "molding". Mold Ontology yeah this sounds ass. 3.1.1 The sequence of moldings makes the trace. Omg I love this. I think it has enough precision and clarity but respects and upholds the diffuse nature of meaning in language. 3.1.1.1 I we expand on the metaphor, then 46242340 seems to be the cast. 3.1.2 The sequence of moldings (Formungen) makes the trace (Entwurf, Zeichnung, Skizze) and the result is the cast (Guss, Wurf, Setzung). 3.2.1 I have a feeling professional philosophers would love this. I might be naive but it doesn't matter I have all the time in the world to perfect it. 3.1.2.1 A collection of tracings is a curation (Zusammenstellung, Kuration) 3.3 It seems it makes sense to introduce the convention: "If sequence is the first letter of the word, the following letters of the word might be read sequencially". A convention is not a rule of course. 4 How do I ensure that my language is not too rigid, so it can potentially be developed by the collective? Mybe if's fine if the alphabet is rigid since it's rigid in most languages anyways. The curation of the words and the interpretation of each letter is very individual though and can be influenced by herd intelligence. I just need to get the alphabet right. 4.1 I like the idea that my role in this world is similar to that of satoshi nakamoto. I'm building something that potentially spreads around the world and develops a life of its own. I must study those mechanics though. The spread mechanics of my language are very different from that of bitcoin. 5 Language 5.1 What is logographic? Will my language be logographic? 5.2 I think that each two digit number is going to be a syllable (Silbe). The sound and the act of pronounciation should somehow mirror the meaning. 5.3 Okay it seems my language could become both logographic and syllabic but I'm not sure. 5.1.1 Google Ai: "A logographic writing system uses signs or characters (logograms) to represent entire words or morphemes (units of meaning) rather than individual sounds. Modern examples include Chinese characters and Japanese Kanji, while historical examples include Egyptian hieroglyphs, Maya script, and cuneiform. They differ from alphabets by requiring memory of thousands of symbols" 5.1.1.1 Does my language have the ability to be by far the most compact logographic language of all time? Maybe I understand logographic wrong. 5.1.1.2 I need to study hieroglyphs. 6 Hieroglyphs 6.1 It means "sacred carvings". I feel like this also applies to my language. I think it's an interesting coincedence that "carving" is so similar to "tracing". 7 Dialectics relates to path = 40 so "the phenomenology of spirit" becomes spirit-path = 1940. Dude this language mogs. 8 The broad meaning of I is Individual = 06. but there are also the precise syllables which are imagined-self = 37, hidden-self = 38 and true-self = 39. So there are at least four ways to say "I" with one syllable. 9 What is tension? 10 anti-path is 60 is "increasing tension". So path = 40 also relates to "resolving". "resolve" interestingly strongly relates to potence = 48 which makes perfect sense. 10.1 it is important to note that sometimes it is necessary to increase tension first to create true resolving. 10.2 resolving vs resolution 10.3 unconscious-destruction = 8160 has a strong relation to evil. It's nihilism without awareness of its own nihilism. So liberalism, fascism, libertarianism, zionism, americanism, capitalism, imperialism, colonialism, white-supremacy, Ayn Rand, Curtis Yarvin, Peter Thiel, Alex Karp, Trump, Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson and the list goes on. 11 Is 20 = Polarity related to "relation"? Yeah relation is fantastic actually. Polarity is too physicalist. 25.2 1 Once I have syllables I can make matras. This is hype. Also I can show how to construct an individual mantra for each specific life situation. 2 What is energy? Potence = 48? Makes sense. 3 I just realized I'm so freaking stupid. I should just switch the 00 with the 10. That makes so much sense. I had a big problem with granularity being 00. 00 = Continuity 01 = Idea 99 = matter 02 = Meaning 98 = meaningless 03 = Ungraspable 97 = rational 04 = Graspable 96 = magical 05 = Body 95 = bodyless 06 = Soul 94 = soulless 07 = Mind 93 = mindless 08 = Consciousness 92 = unconscious 09 = Spirit 10 = Granularity 11 = unit 12 = function 13 = interaction 14 = system 15 = Individual 16 = Family 17 = Tribe 18 = Society 19 = Whole 20 = Polarity 80 = Singularity 21 = Unity 89 = Anti-unity 22 = Duality 88 = Anti-duality 23 = Content 87 = Void 24 = Contained 86 = Exposed 25 = cohesion 85 = Fragmentation 26 = stability 84 = Collapse 27 = Intimacy 83 = Isolation 28 = Tranquility 82 = Obsession 29 = Authenticity 81 = Dissolution 30 = Complexity 31 = Reflection 32 = Point 33 = Repetition 34 = Cycle 35 = Sequence 36 = Symbol 37 = Hidden-self 38 = Imagined-self 39 = True-self 40 = Resolution 41 = Thing 42 = Complement 43 = Symbiosis 44 = Life 45 = Resonance 46 = Harmony 47 = Beauty 48 = Potence 49 = Heroism 50 = Transcendence 51 = Light 59 = Dark 52 = Order 58 = Chaos 53 = Absolute 57 = Relativity 54 = Infinite 56 = Finite 55 = Emptiness past/future 3.1 Omfg I can't believe how elegant this is. Of course continuity is 0 since it's a FUCKING CIRCLE. (spirit->idea). I could also do 00 = absolute that's crazy. Yeah now it checks out again. 4 I think 23 is field and 02 is manifold in the physicalist translation. 5 wait I just realized that calculating with a carry makes no sense. So the complement of 42 for example is 68 which makes more sense since 60 is non-40. That makes finding the complement much easier. 5.1 I wonder what the attributes of a numbersystem with no carry are. I can def. define the properties mathematically. 5.2 Idea: Polynomial arithmetic modulo 10. 5.3 Experiment: 0363 + 9383 = 0646 \iff vaccilation-beauty + non-tribe-isolation = soul-love 5.3.1 It reads a bit like a yogi that was inspired to leave the tribe and focus on doing yoga alone. Of couse I realize that it is very unlikely that the maths made a lot of sense. But this is not a bad thing necessarily. This unpredictability enhances his creativity. I'm happy with it. 5.4 I need to compare this trace arithmetic with tarot, astrology, dream analysis, I Ging, etc. It seems to be a powerful variation of these kinds of oracles. 5.4.1 I feel like I need more unique names for this project then just trace, cast, etc. Maybe when I have my syllables, I can make my own lol. 5.4.2 I feel like whatever these existing oracle traditions do, trace arithmetic can do 100 times better. But maybe I'm arrogant. 6 Name idea: silex 6.1 this is the name that I came up with in an earlier draft of my theory. 7 Transcendent-repetition is related to eternity. 8 Characterize different time periods. What characterizes the rennaissance? 9 Oracle traditions 9.1 Tarot has 78 cards. That's quite much. I could make my own deck actually. 10 Wait I just realized that if every word in silex is a polynomial, then every word can be plotted lol. 10.1 This is especially interesting since the wave has itself a central role in my theory. 10.2 Wait isn't the sine function some infinite polynomial? 10.3 I wonder if I can somehow replace the modulo 10 with something with i that somehow wraps around automatically. 25.3 1 T_1 is the set of all one-syllable words. T_n is the set of all n-syllable words. |T_2|=10.000. 2 idea: Just come up with ten consonants and ten vowels and string them like the numbers. 2.1 use four different for terresrial, four for human, one for transcendent and six for colors. Ten more trancendents? 3 when it's done do poetry with it 4 Seeing to grasping-reflection = 0431 4.1 I = 15 = individual, you = 16 = family, he/she/it = 17 = tribe them = 18 = society us = 19 = whole convention: When it's alone then it's usually the former, when it's within a word, it's usually the latter or somthing else 5 what is a conlang? Is Silex a conlang? 5.1 Esperanto, Lojban, Klingon 5.2 Leibniz characteristica universalis. 5.2.1 Okay damn it seems like I'm trying to build a characteristica universalis! 25.4 1 Syllable = (consonant)vocal(consonant) 2 Idea for Alphabet. I'm using the digits as placeholders for now 2.1 Ten digits 0123456789 2.2 There exists the potential for variations of some of these letters to signal shifts in meaning. 2.3 Idea. If a letter is at the beginning of a syllable it is a consonant. 2.4 Idea: different meanings come from: V, Cv, VC, CVC. Every letter comes with a vocal and potentially a consonant after and before. I don't know yet how I wnat to use this morphology but it's nice to have added flexibility. I could also just say "doesn't matter, just do what sounds good" 2.5 Let's run with a simple way and see what happens 0 = bac 1 = def 2 = gih 3 = jok 4 = lum 5 = nap 6 = qer 7 = sit 8 = vow 9 = yuz 2.5.1 I did absolutely not plan for this to work out so well. I have used every vocal exactly two times and every consonant exactly one time. What the hell. Wait I forgot x. 2.5.2 Examples: 49 = heroism = lumyuz = umyu 20 = relation = gibac 04 = system = baclum = acum 2.5.2.1 A syllable is unique if it contains at least one consonant of each letter. 2.6 This is def. way easier than I thought. This is just a throwaway example an I'm already pretty happy with it so far. 2.7 okay what I'm doing is I'm creating the composites and choosing the nicest ones while upholding uniqueness. 2.8 How many ways are there to uphold the uniqueness of one composite? abcd, bcd, acd, abc, abd, ad, bc, ac, bd okay that's more than I thought. It's 9. That's a lot of potential variation damn. Yeah I'm good what the hell this language can definitely work. Literally how is it so easy to create a language. 2.9 Okay what I could do is make each letter have two dots or something signalling which consonant is spoken. 3 more examples 7397 = guideless-rationalism = sijokyuzit sijok yuzit 4 some more tinkering. Switching things around 0 = chap 1 = deb 2 = git 3 = yokk 4 = ğūm 5 = dsāng 6 = skoas 7 = fial 8 = tschöx 9 = rung 4.1 Problem: some consonants don't do much or sound the same. Wait I forgot I have ch and sk, ng, sch. 356889 is sequence-complement-unity is jok-tsap-sker-fog-fog-sun is yotsaskefogfosun is japskegfun is jokk-tsäng-skeos-tschöx-tschöx-rüng is jotseotschörr is jāsötschu 4.2 I think there has to be the convention that only one of the three parts of a syllable can be chosen to avoid ambiguity. 4.3 So it seems like I need 20 consonants and 10 vowels. Wait since I can only choose one component of a composite, it would be simpler if one composite would only contain one vowel and one consonant. 4.4 more tinkering 0 = sha 1 = de 2 = gi 3 = yo 4 = ğue 5 = dsā 6 = joa 7 = fia 8 = mio 9 = ru 6273 is joa gi fia yo is oagiao 4.4.1 Okay it seems like the language is too ambiguous right now. I need to make the phonemes one letter each I think

24 24.1 1 Updating the 100 traces. 00 = Granularity 01 = Particle 02 = Atom 03 = Molecule 04 = Cell 05 = Organism 06 = Individual 07 = Family 08 = Tribe 09 = Ecosystem 10 = Continuity 11 = Idea 12 = Meaning 13 = Ungraspable 14 = Graspable 15 = Body 16 = Soul 17 = Mind 18 = Consciousness 19 = Spirit 20 = Polarity 21 = Unity 22 = Duality 23 = Field 24 = Space 25 = Inner boundary 26 = Outer boundary 27 = Separation 28 = Collapse 29 = Dissolution 30 = Complexity 31 = Repetition 32 = Reflection 33 = Point 34 = Sequence 35 = Cycle 36 = Symbol 37 = Hidden-self 38 = Imagined-self 39 = True-self 40 = Progress 41 = Thing 42 = Complement 43 = Symbiosis 44 = Life 45 = Resonance 46 = Love 47 = Beauty 48 = Potence 49 = Heroism 50 = Emptiness 1.1 There are two subtle problems with path=40. Health doesn't seem to fit in perfectly, and it breaks the symmetry between the two sets of four, since complement doesn't fit with resonance. I have a pretty elegant solution, which makes it actually more in line with this old version. I remembered I had a concept before the compliment which is "thing". I'm kind of using it in a Wittgensteinian way I think. The idea is, that this is an abstract concept to denote "something with a purpose". For example, a container is a thing, because it can contain. If it then does contain, it and that which is contained make a complement which is the next stage (42). Damn kind of a bummer, that 42 is nothing super central. Not really a fan anyways. 1.2 I removed matter=15 because it is kind of redundant if I already have graspable=14 and thing=41 (wait the fact that the number of thing is the reflection of the number of graspable is fun). also, I didn't like the fact that I have eight stages of granularity, which creates some falls association with the other even categories. Now I have cool prime numbers containing the seven, which is pretty deep in ancient numerology, for consciousness=17 and intelligence=37 which is extremely neat. Also 37 is kind of a weirdly special number for some reason: https://youtu.be/d6iQrh2TK98?is=I6UeUIK8Q_6WGQqM I will watch this now I guess. 1.2.1 I just changed intelligence heavy-heartedly. 2 What the actual hell of a wikipedia article did I stumble upon? "Due to the superstitious significance of the numbers it contains, the palindromic prime 1000000000000066600000000000001 is known as Belphegor's Prime, named after Belphegor, one of the seven princes of Hell" 2.1 Numerology is cool 3 I just realized something: Doing arithmetic (modulo 100) with those numbers kinda makes no sense. 3.1 But "not making sense" doesn't have to be bad. I think it's actually perfect for like oracle tarot type shit. 3.2 no this is actually really fun lmao. 3.3 Also one can shuffle digits, square them etc. Yeah really fun. Haha one can take one concept, do operations on it and see what happens lol. 4 I just realized I could somehow mirror the main categories in the 01-09 in some meaningful way. 4.1 Also I could use them as something like an intensity scale. Omg this is great actually. 0130 is "not very complex" and 0930 is "extremely complex" 4.1.1 Okay what is "infinitely complex" then? Yeah what is infinity in my model at all? 5 49=kleos (homeric) 6 There is a ton of room for different dualities in 23-29. I kind of need to actually since having 100 pronciples makes for good optics. 7 These packets of four in the 40s seem arbitrary but their not. I used these concepts in old versions of the theory: 41424344=Terrestrial, 45464748=Human, 49=Immortal. 24.3 1 Alternative Polarities. What I used to have: 21 = Unity 22 = Duality 23 = Order 24 = Chaos 25 = Infinity 26 = Finite 27 = Absolute 28 = Relative 29 = Space 1.1 There is a bit of redundancy here. I feel like I need both Unity and Duality in the 20s there are very central. But The rest I can reduce. Yeah this is better. 2 Haki simply 48. Also 4815. Also 481506≈06-15-48=individual-body-potence. 3 Integrate fermion boson duality. 3.1 Pauli exclusion principle 3.2 Dirac equation 4 Dharma ≈ kleos ≈ duty ≈ responsibility ≈ stepping-up ≈ 49 5 If I have 100 traces, how does what I do relate to Martin Luther with his 95 theses historically? Interesting connection to think about since I'm also some kind of reformer. 6 What is artifact? An Artifact is a thing that conserves history. 24.4 1 tranquility≈harmony=46 2 fascist, tracing alienated-hero = 7749 2.1 Fun coincidence: 7711 = alienation-idea and 77+11=88=non-field≈"soulless in the deepest sense" more fitting: "Fake soul" 2.2 pride, tracing alienated-potence = 7748 2.3 I've started using the term "tracing" since I thibk often, "is" is too absolute. I want to find an elegant equivalent of "≈" in natural language. 2.3.1 I could also just say "relates to" which would be super broad. I like it. It would mean that that tracing would be a suggestion, and the reader can accept it if it resonates and else just reject it. 2.3.1.1 I could use "broadly relates to", "narrowly relates to" and just "relates to". 3 reason is grasping-self = 1439 4 I had an interesting thought. Their exists the set of all one trace words, the set of all two trace words, the set of all three trace words and so on. I could write it down in set-notation. Interesting thought. 4.1 it seems that if physics is math applied to empiricism, then what I seem to do is math applied to ontology. 5 Object is thing-in-time is repeated-thing = 3141 6 Channelling is when the author is not the authority over the interpretation of that which has been written by them. 7 Cult is institution-with-obsessive-unity is perverted-ecosystem is "dissonance from loss of unity leading to building obsessive unity institution" is duality-collapse-ecosytem = 7807 8 In this system, enlightenment is seperate from non-duality=78=perversion. Enlightenment is neither unity nor duality (?) 8.1 hm it's kinda tricky. Alienation from collapse of space only happens when it's preceded by identification with the space. 8.1.1 I think "cult" is just one of these terms that's complex like schizophrenia. 8.2 Wait I think alienation is non-understanding-dissonance = actually 9 It would be interesting to describe what a tracing is abstractly. Like all the tracings can be chosen differently and a different number system with a different base can be chosen. 9.1 It seems the I Ging is a kind of trace ontology with base of 2 not 100 9.2 how does one evaluate a "good" trace ontology? 9.2.1 "a good tracing is integral. It relates to as many facets of being as possible". It includes as many other existing tracings as possible or addresses deviations. 24.5 1 A huge amount of alienation comes from non-knowledge about the self. 1.1 What is knowledge? Knowlegde in its most simple sense is sequence = 34 1.2 So self-knowledge is 3934 2 A good german word for trace is "Spur". Spur actually means trail not trace. Yeah I need to differentiate between trail=spur and trace=zeichnung. So trace ontology is seinsskizze or seinszeichnung. 2.1 Zeichnung vs Bezeichnung. 2.2 The image is: "being leaves a trail that can be traced". The trail is the rizhome? 3 I have an idea how to solve the fact that granularity doesn't have a complement. It does and it's 100 which is singularity. Since 100 is the only three digit number it is actually not problematic. So for example 7252661002837 is read as 72 52 66 100 28 37. And 37310087 is read as 37 31 00 87. If a number has an odd number of digits like 7272637 and doesn't contain 100, a zero is added at the beginning or end it doesn't matter yeah I guess then it just has two meanings (which is an interesting mechanic actually). 4 my birthdate is 09072001 = cosmic-ecosystem-polarity-quantum. Sounds epic but doesn't really make any sense to me. 4.1 Hold on let's play with it a bit 09072001 = cosmic-ecosystem-polarity-quantum ≈ "cosmic system of dual particles" ≈ "the cosmic system arises from particle-wave-duality" I can't belive I somehow made it make sense😂 4.2 Sounds a lot like dialectical materialism actually. 4.2.1 I realize that I projected dialectical materialism onto it to some extend, but that is kind of the point of this kind of game. I have made a post about the value of projection before. 4.2.1.1 It's a double projection since the trace is itself my projection. 5 I need to translate this tracing into different cultures and languages. Daoism, Buddhism, Hunduism, Greek, christianity, Judaism, physicism, maths, philosophy, psychoanalysis 5.1 what are the most important ones? 5.1.1 Philosophy, Natural sciences, Eastern traditions, western traditions. 6 what's interesting is that heroism is actually a kind of ideal. So my tracing is not actually anti-ideal, which I thought initially it would be. But what I'm learning is that the ideal itself is not problematic, the problem is putting the cart before the horse and pursuing the ideal before embodying the earlier stages. So the path=40 is a kind of holarchy. 6.1 It is different from spiral dynamics. It seems to be more precise. I need to contemplate more about the similarities and the differences. 7 Meaning actually seems to be more broad than I thought. What is meaning? 7.1 Symbol = meaning-reflecting-point. 7.1.1 reflecting-point=mirror 7.2 Idea: Meaning=being-in-relation. So meaning=field??????????????????!!!!?!?!!?!?! That would be bonkers. I think it is. 7.3 Meaning is significance which preceeds substance (graspability). "Coherence, mattering, purpose". 24.6 1 "Curation" is also a good name for the trace. 2 Translucent = 6732 = Diffuse-Reflection 3 Nihilism = anti-meaning = anti-field = 88 3.1 Challenge: Construct a satisfying way to describe fascism just with dog whistles. 4 Determination vs point. I feel like fixation is determination. A point-being is dependent on determination to be. A non-point being is independent but can also experience and value determination. 4.1 "one can be determined without having made a choice" 4.2 It's hard 5 What is "lie"? 6 What is Marxism-Leninism? 7 Brilliant slogan, aphorism and title for a book: "If we know what we are, we may know what we may be" 8 what is the meaning of Anjali mudra prayer mudra? 8.1 Anjali-mudra=stale-personal-soace=harmony=love 9 Inspiration is meaning-reflection = 1232 10 Telos=path=progrssion=40 24.7 1 I just realized that complex tracecomposites also has an inversion. Wait are there multiple ways to get the inversion? Dude this is kinda wild. This unpredictability potentially makes this such a powerful tool for creativity. 2 89 ≈ confusion? 3 Insights: 00, 10, 20, 40 seem to be ordered in something like "pre human" "human" and "transhuman" or something. This is neat. 4 I have an idea for a revision: Make the mirrored traces somehow relate to each other 00 = Granularity 01 = Particle 02 = Atom 03 = Molecule 04 = Cell 05 = Organism 06 = Individual 07 = Family 08 = Tribe 09 = Ecosystem 10 = Continuity 11 = Idea 12 = Meaning 13 = Ungraspable 14 = Graspable 15 = Body 16 = Soul 17 = Mind 18 = Consciousness 19 = Spirit 20 = Polarity 21 = Field 22 = Space 23 = Unity 24 = Duality 25 = Inner boundary 26 = Outer boundary 27 = 28 = 29 = 30 = Complexity 31 = Reflection 32 = Point 33 = Repetition 34 = Cycle 35 = Sequence 36 = Symbol 37 = Hidden-self 38 = Imagined-self 39 = True-self 40 = Progress 41 = Thing 42 = Complement 43 = Symbiosis 44 = Life 45 = Resonance 46 = Harmony 47 = Beauty 48 = Potence 49 = Heroism 50 = Emptiness 5 Smiling in face of death is radical acceptence (one piece)

@Carl-RichardThis is Vervaeke right? I agree that purpose, coherence, significance, connectedness are crutial to meaning, but I'm describing and ordering these terms in a very perculiar and extremely precise and specific way. I am currently experimenting with numerology by assigning numbers to different aspects of being with the goal of using these as building blocks to build more complex aspects of being. I'm trying to find 101 (100 + 0) of these building blocks which right now I call "traces". If you are interested to know which they are, follow the development of my journal where I post most of my thought process every day: Entry March.23.3.5 is most relevant. Meaning, purpose, coherence, significance, connectedness in the trace ontology. Meaning = 12 = "second manifestation of the continuum" 11 = Idea Continuum = 10 Purpose = dharma = path = telos = 40 Fun fact: Kleos = "last step of the path" = 49 Fun fact nr. 2: 50 = sunyata. Coherence might be complexity-resonance = 30-45 = 3045 Significance might be 49 actually could also be 48 = potenciality. 49 is "manifested potence" so weather significance is 48 or 49 depends on weather it is implies manifestation or not. Connectedness is spacial-resonance = 2345 Connection requires seperation but not fragmentation nor unity. That's why space = 212246 = unity-duality-harmony = 23 is an important part.

Yes arbitrary movement causes destructive interference and with that, non-existence. Both on the wave and on the macro scale. Therefore, coherence on every level of granularity is a necessary condition for existence. What is that? Meaning. It's interesting that you used the term "mattering". If you think about it, mattering is the necessary condition for matter. What is matter? Particles. What are particles? Wave. What is the necessary condition for the existence of the wave? The field. What is field? Meaning. This is of course one way to look at reality but in my head it is COHERENT

you just made me realize something very important. Yes I used the word meaning differently than you and I used it wrong and this is important to me. In an earlier version of my theory, I said that ADHD means being insensitive to symbol. I was not quite happy with symbol so I abstracted it down to meaning. Eventually, I realized that ADHD is actually about non-commitment. It's about not sticking to your choice. The way I'm phrasing it now in an abstract way is with "point". So having ADHD is non-point being which is diffusion-being. so people with ADHD are comfortable with not making a choice. Thinking back, I realize that my mistake was that symbol=meaning-reflecting-point and I mistook meaning to be fundamental to ADHD and not point (reflection is HSP). In a nutshell I agree with you completely and thank you a lot for making me realize I had a wrong understanding of meaning. Meaning seems to be way more broad than I thought it seems to be that what which allows for reaonance. Wait this means I'm not a nihilist anymore. Also It resolves conflict between my model and the field of sense theory which is huge. I need to integrate my new understanding of meaning asap. Edit: I think it's field! Field=meaning. I was missing a non-physicalist term for field. Damn that is very satisfying. Especially since this field=meaning ontology exists and is respected (fields of sense). Also the guy who came up with it happens to teach in my city.

23 23.1 1 Nirvana = !3 ? 2 Interesting concepts: Oedipus, Anti-Oedipus 3 does free will exist in my model? No. 3.1 wait yes it's point. Wait this means people with ADHD have less free will? Well in some way they don't since they can only pursue their passions. 3.1.1 But point people also don't have free will since they can't deviate from their ideology. 3.2 Interesting observation: From the perspective of a person with one mode of existence, a person with a different mode of existence seems to have less free will, while it seems to oneself that one has chosen ones mode of existence, but this is not the case. 3.2.1 example from real life: I tell my grandma: "you were born to always commit to some values" and then my grandma said: "no I just don't want to let go of my values". it seems like they feel like that's what they want and they have a choice when really there is no choice. 4=3.2.1.1 Choice 4.1 Choice=33 has an interesting status in my theory. In this tracing, choice is a paradox. 4.1.1 My theory states that there are people who are great at making choices since they need to make choices to exist. But if one needs to make a choice, they don't have the choice not to choose. So non-point-sleves have impaired ability to choose and point-selves have impaired ability not to choose. So no matter what, there is always at least some kind of impairment of free will. 5 Desire 5.1 right now I have this weird mechanic where more resonance, so higher amplitude leads to a more narrow space and therefore unity=22, while dissonance, which needs to destructive interference, expands, the space. The thing is I don't really see a connection in physics. One could argue that higher frequency leads to a smaller space but this is also a stretch. 5.1.1 Wait I have an idea. Since resonance is "substance", it makes sense that more substance leads to a more stable space. And non-substance leads to diffusion and therefore an expansion of the space. Yeah this kind of makes perfect sense actually. 5.1.1.1 so I have an interesting idea. It kind of makes sense now in my head, but I think it's very complicated. So the wavelength does correspond to the "size" of the space. So resonance is substance, but if you only have resonance in the higher frequency range and not in the lower ones, then you have substantive space, but it is narrow (construction). if you only have the lower frequencies, then there is a hole in the middle of your space (hollow). 5.1.1.1.1 I have another idea. High frequency resonance is created, when the distance between the self and the self image is decreased. Low frequency resonance is created when the distance between the self and the self-image is widened. 5.1.1.1.1.1 So the phrase "I feel like myself" is a manifestation of high-frequency resonance. So it's 21-11=unity-resonance. Damn kinda makes a ton of sense. 6 What is stagnation? I think it includes !31. It's the opposite of the beauty in the phrase "The world goes its course" = 31-11 = repetition-resonance = "being in awe of the progression" 7 art is "a reflection point of embodiment" = 32-33-03-21-22 7.1 wait I have something better. Scrap the embodiment. It's art = point-reflection-non-point = 33-32-!33 = "A fixed (33) reflection (32) that negates fixation (!33)" 8 wait I realized that insted of for example !33 I could do 100-33=67. This is brilliant on many levels. 8.1 1. An asymmetry in the system is that since the tens digit never goes beyond 4. If I use the complements in such a way there is more symmetry 8.2 It makes the notation more pretty. Without the !, there is a consistent structure of xx-xx-xx-xx... 8.3 The question now is of course if this creates a clash in notation. But I'm pretty sure it doesn't. 8.3.1 It seems that since 33 is the highest number, 34-66 are unused so I could literally use them for anything. 8.4 One problem is that it is slightly more complicated since it now involves doing maths. 8.5 Wait there is a problem. 02=vaccilation is different from 2=field. 23.2 1 diffuse ≈ 67 is unbelievably interesting. 1.1 Rizhome ≈ 31•33-67 ≈ structured diffusion 1.2 I like the idea of just only using "≈" to symbolize that the statements are intuitive. Also to trigger analytical philosophers. Also it kinda looks cool. 1.2.1 Yeah this is great. It important to signify that it is NOT a kind of strict logic. 1.1.1 btw I'm using • to connect two traces just to cluster them to make the connection to the natural language strings more obvious. 1.1.2 I think the 67 is fire but 31•33-!31 kinda is more obviously paradoxical. I guess I just use ! when I want to highlight the paradox. 1.2.1 this is really brilliant since with "≈" I'm affirming the rizhome and weakening the designation. This is maybe what I want the tracing to be, exactly that balance between the rizhome and the designation. 2 what is melancholy? It's a subtle kind of longing so it's dissonance from seperation. 2.1 Melancholy ≈ 79-89 ≈ separation-dissonance 2.2 one can also add some nuance. Melancholy is seperation-dissonance from diffuse-reflection of unity-resonance ≈ 79-89 67–32 21–11 2.2.1 Damn I like this formalization. It would be more clean if I made the "from", "of" etc italic or something. 2.2.2 This is neither a definition, nor a designation. It is a balance of the concrete and the diffuse. It is a suggestion. I call it "trace" (pausen) 2.2.2.1 What is the difference between definition and designation 2.2.3 it seems that "-" symbolizes prepositions. Sometimes. 2.3 This is very interesting. I feel like 79-89 is also valid. It seems that with the trace, the can be more and more nuance added. Like the prepositions can also be traced for example. 2.4 I feel like it makes sense if I order it in such a way that the trace that is ontologically most relevant which is 79-89 is at the beginning and the rest is meant as nuance. 2.5 Honestly I like the idea that the entire language is in its essence only xx x xx xx xx... without any punctuation but one is free to use any punctuation they want. 3 Investigate the meaning of the word blueprint (Blaupause). Is that a good name for what this is? A blueprint is a tracing (?). 4 = 2.2.3.1 List of prepositions gpt: about, above, across, after, against, along, among, around, as, at, before, behind, below, beneath, beside, between, beyond, but, by, concerning, considering, despite, down, during, except, following, for, from, in, inside, into, like, near, of, off, on, onto, opposite, out, outside, over, past, per, regarding, round, since, than, through, throughout, till, to, toward(s), under, underneath, unlike, until, up, upon, via, with, within, without 4.1 I feel like these can also be traced. 5 trace-ontology. Pausenontologie 6 Schizophrenia is abandonment-feeling from paranoia stemming from hidden devouring is seperation-dissonance from symbolic-reflection stemming from diffused-unity-alienation ≈ 79-89 33-32 67-21-80 = 79893332672180 7 The tracing really seems to be some wild combination of maths, analytical philosophy and continental philosophy. 8 to uphold the format, I could say 2 for example is 20. Damn that immediately makes my language so much more compact potentially bc now I don't need any structure to signal what the 2-packets are. This is a crazy kind of numerology since now, 79,893,332,672,180 is some large number that exists that I have mapped to this abstract term schizophrenia which is wild. I have unlocked just another level of autism. 8.1 what this means is that this is literally some kind of non-linear type of encryption. Maybe I should keep it a secret and sell it to some military lol😂 8.2 It seems that I'm describing a function T:IL->IN with IN being the natural numbers and IL being natural language. 8.2.1 Damn this makes for a super fun game: I give you a number and you try to figure out the word. 9 is there a kind of coherence that is free of dialectical contradictions but allows for logical contradictions and inconsistency and regular incoherence? Dialectical cohernece? 23.3 1 Tracing 00 = Absolute 01 = Idea 02 = Field 03 = Ungraspable 04 = Graspable 05 = Matter 06 = Body 07 = Mind 08 = Consciousness 10 = Path 11 = Life 12 = Health 13 = Resonance 14 = Harmony 15 = Beauty 16 = Potence 20 = Space 21 = Unity 22 = Duality 30 = Complexity 31 = Repetition 32 = Reflection 33 = Point 34 = Sequence 35 = Cycle 36 = Symbol 37 = Intelligence 1.1 These are 24 + 24 (complements) + 1 (self-similarity has no complement) 1.1.1 So 49/100 are used, the rest are unused. So I can expand a lot. But I like how simple it is rn. 1.2 The important ones are just: 00, 11, 12, 13, 14, 20, 21, 22, 30, 31, 32, 33. So just 12 + 12 (complements) + 1 = 25. This is just one less than the number of letters in the english alphabet. I could also call the tracing "the alphabet" kinda epic. 1.3 I could find phonetics of each number now. What would be the properties of that language? What do I call it? 1.3.1 The phonetics would have to be choosen in such a way, that it's possible to reverse them for the complements. 23.3 1 What is POWER? 1.1 It seems there is a higher non-dual form of power and a lower form. Lets call the higher one Power and the lower one power for now. 1.1.1 Idea: power is traditional masculinity is influence on matter reality is accessed with procedurality is sequenciality ≈ 34 1.1.2 Idea: Potence is more broad (and therefore more powerful) than power. potence is influence on reality 1.1.1.1 Yeah I think power is def. more broad than just 34. 1.2 Potence is beauty? NO POTENCE IS HIGHER THAN BEAUTY (potence=16?) 1.2.1 Potence is making the ungraspable graspable. It is the power of god. It is the power to influence history. 2 Coherence, integrity, consistency, complementarity, harmony, resonance, beauty, potence 2.1 Consistency is sequenciality-resonance ≈ 3413 2.2 Complementarity is distance-resonance is low-frequency-resonance ≈ 2213 2.3 Coherentce is a system with no dialectical contradictions (?) 3 If this was a lamguage, it would enable the speakers to come up with their own words. There would be a huge spectrum of different words for one broad concept. It would allow for an insane amount of precision in speech. 4 Subtle Energy is reflection of embodiment ≈ 32 5 Alternative version with the path being the last concept: 00 = Absolute 10 = Granularity 11 = Idea 12 = Field 13 = Ungraspable 14 = Graspable 15 = Matter 16 = Body 17 = Mind 18 = Consciousness 20 = Space 21 = Unity 22 = Duality 30 = Complexity 31 = Repetition 32 = Reflection 33 = Point 34 = Sequence 35 = Cycle 36 = Symbol 37 = Intelligence 40 = Path 41 = Complement 42 = Symbiosis 43 = Life 44 = Health 45 = Resonance 46 = Harmony 47 = Beauty 48 = Potence 49 = Kleos 50 = Sunyata 5.1 This one is pretty cool actually it solves a couple of problems. 5.2 The only weakness is that 01-09 are not used. 5.1.1 The order is just way better. The path must be the last in the sequence. Now it's 01234 and a satisyfying order that makes sense. 5.1.2 one constriction is that I'm limited to 4 or maybe 4+4 stages in the path. I got rid of life and health so it's just four. Wait I've got an idea though. Okay I kinda solved it. This is not something I pulled out of my ass, I have this from a very early draft of my theory. (I'm talking about 41 and 42) 5.3 I added 50 = Emptiness which is cool. I love how The absolute and emptiness are the only traces whose complement is the same. 6 Oppression, abuse 7 I think self-similarity=non-granularity=90 8 How do I use the terms Eudaimonia and Euphony? They just fit too well into the tracing not to at least give them meaningful traces

Yikes. Hate to break it to you but America is a third world country.

@jacknine119 Google it. It's a term from Carl Jung.

22 22.1 1 It's easy the remember the system since: 0-Continuum, 1-Path, 2-Polarity, 3-Trinty. 0123. Good didactics. 1.1 This could make for very compact language. 1.1.1 I could inspire myself from Georg Cantor and find another cool symbol and do what he did with the aleph numbers. The question just is: What unifies 0123? 1.2 It seems they are laws. The 0th law, 1st law, 2nd law, 3rd law. Damn that's cold 1.3 The path is the path from survival to liberation btw. (?) 1.4 It seems like I need to learn about numerology 2 What does nicotine do? 3 (1.4.1) Numerology 3.1 It seems what I'm doing is already a kind of numerology. 3.2 0=self-similarity 3.2.1 01=Idea 3.2.2 02=Form 3.2.3 03=Body 3.2.4 04=Consciousness 3.2.5 05=Idea 3.2.6 00=emptiness? 3.3 1=path, 10=survival 3.4 11=resonance 3.4.1 11 is accessed through acceptence of death 3.4.1.1 being-towards-death (Heidegger) 3.5 12=harmony 3.5.1 12 enabled through acceptence of dissonance 3.6 13=symphony 3.6.1 13 enabled through radical acceptence 3.6.2 Damn that's the unlucky number for the highest principle😭 Alternative notation 4 Polarity: {•}. Damn that seems like an interesting notation for "space" 4.1 Contimuum: 🌀, O, 0 4.2 Polarity: <-> 4.3 Path: | 5 Metonymy cool word Lacan 6 (1.2.1) What is a law? It seems to be very closely related to 33 = point 7 Father seems to be a mix of guide (point=33) and repetition=31. Holy spirit seems to be a mix of reflection=32 and point=33. If the son is now a mix of 31 and 32 then it checks out. Rizhome (Deleuze) 8 It seems what I'm doing is I'm choosing some point on the rhizome and then trying to trace the entire rhizome in a satisfying hierarchical, numerical way. With this designation, I'm exerting power on and competing (competition is 33-10=point-survival ?) with different designations and the rizhome itself, but this is exactly the point and the goal. The concept of the rizhome is true but when one is lost in it, it leads to impotence in regards to fighting the status quo through offering an alternative. Fight power with power. This is a good slogan. This is Marxism-Leninism. 8.1 "Designation" is actually a pretty satisfying term to describe this. It seems that designation is in a sense more broad than the term ideology. 8.1.1 Or is it? No I think it might be the same. But I like designation since it is a less loaded term and it kind of relativises itself through its explicit connection to the rizhome. So designation is kind of an anti-ideology ideology which checks out perfectly. It's the fragment. It's the one piece. It's the will of D. 8.2 "Designation ontology" 8.3 This points to a new polarity which is: Rizhome-designation. 8.3.1 Where does it come from? It seems to have a lot to do with point = 33. I'm also smelling complexity and self-similarity=0. Complexity=trinity=3 I'm pretty sure. So Designation is {0, 3, 33}. Rizhome is non-point designation so just {0, 3}. Just self-similarity and complexity. This makes so much sense wtf. 8.3.1.1 This {•} is interesting notation I need to work on that. I could also do for example 0-3-33. I think the "-" is good because it symbolizes a link and I like the image of the link which is not existent in itself and only exists as the relation to other entities which is a pretty good descripiton of all of these designations. 8.3.1.2 It seems to make sense to call one of these numbers a "designation" since designation is what the model designates itself as. 9=1.1.1.1 Since the designation is such a central term in the self-description of the model I could use some fancy calligraphy version of D. It's the will of D! Bro HOW does this check out so well?!??!?!😭 9.1 I could use kind of an oldschool german calligraphy (fraktur). This is risky because it is a Nazi dogwhistle which is also good because it leads to polarization which is necessary for unity. It is also a good way to convey this point: "In the same way that communism in China is the best thing for Chinese culture, communism in the west is the best thing for Western culture" 9.2 What's also crazy is that "fraktur" has the same root as fragment=designation=0-3-33 and fractal≈0-33-31-32=self-similar-fixed-repeated-reflection. 10 Lol is seems like this journal itself is a kind of designation with a similar structure. There is def a clash in notation. Ideally I would make the desigs of the desig ontology bold but I'm transferring the text from the notes app which makes the bold disappear. Maybe I will eventually find a solution. 11 A structure that makes sense is to denote 1.D as "the first version of designation" or something like Cred.1.D "the first of Creds designations". And then for example, Cred.1.D.0-3=Rizhome. I like that "-" and "‎ = " are so similar, it makes the notation satisfyingly coherent. 11.1 Wait this is fun: Designation.0-3-33=Designation. Strange loop! Strange-loop is 0-31-32-33. 0=Self-similarity, 31-32 is repeated reflection which is loop. The strange loop is also a symbol which means it is fixed=point=33. This is interesting because 3-31-32-33 is intelligence. So what this would mean that a strange-loop is "the simplest form of intelligence" which is a very cool idea. I could also number the different "attempts" at denoting different terms within one designation but I have to see that the notation doesn't become too bloated too fast. I feel like git can offer a lot of inspiration for this. I could also just use "≈" when it's meant as a suggestion. 11.2 This is getting very obscure and jargony fast I love it👹 12 It is important to note that the desigs are not numbers but symbols. So what I'm doing is closer to creating some kind of analytical language to doing maths. I'm planning to invent alternative symbols that are more graspable than numbers that exist in parallel to the numbers for each D. 13 I need to find a better word for "a symbol inside a designation which is itself a designation but designation is redundant". Node? Node is great actually. 1.3.1 Nodes (symbol), Links ("-"), statements ("‎ = "). Sounds very logical and coherent so far. 13.1 The question is now: What precisely does "." stand for then? Extension? It makes sense that is also just means node. 13.2 I think it makes sense to denote a node in the abstract sense as: "•" or as "." also works. 14 Power accumulation for fighting power is distinct from power accumulation as a form of displacement. 22.2 1 Name for post about desig: Attempt at an analytical designation of ontology 2 I love the idea that the link symbol "-" is a metonymy for the brunnian link which itself is a metonymy for "a link that can't exist as a link without its neighboring links." or more abstractly: "that which can't exist as itself without those entities it is in relation with". Another version is: "that which exists is that which is as that which spans a space with others of its kind, which does not hold for sunyata" 2.1 This makes the link and the node equivalent which is sweet since I want the designation to be collapsible (into emptiness) like that. 2.2 I could also call a "node" a lonk this would be fun. 3 This kind of •=•-•-•=•-• notation is similar to molecular notation which is fun. Also it is convenient actually bc this means there are probably already tools to denote this kind of structure in Latex or something. 3.1 •=•-•-•=•-• is lonk is lonk link lonk link lonk is lonk link lonk. I feel like I have just unlocked a new level of autism at this point. 3.1.1 https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTnx6IKKkmXcrAHA1gl7ryF5Lm1QccLHm8rn8f59OMMqg&s=10 me 3.1.2 This is very Douglas Hofstadter. I need to keep reading GEB I'm like at page 60. Although I feel like I'm having more fun just reverse engineering the book without reading it completely. My brain kinda learns better by reverse engineering shit instead of reading a ton. 4 Humor is a small ideological shift, rage bait is a bigger one, offending is bigger yet and alienation is the biggest. The laugh tale is the destruction of the hegemonic ideology. 5 This journal seems to be designation Cred.0.D and its goal is to find the first designation which is Cred.1.D. 5.1 as an example: Cred.0.D.2026.March.22.5="Metonymy cool word Lacan" 6 Metonymy≈0-33. Or 32-33="reflection of a point"? Yeah the latter makes more sense. 6.1 So is that what the son is? It kinda makes sense. "the son symbol=point=33 is the reflection of the father symbol". Kinda checks out actually. 7 Space=2=polarity. Deleuze.difference=Cred.1.D.22=duality. 8 I feel like the designation supercharges thinking just because it is so hierarchical. 8.1 I need to learn more about Focault. 22.3 1 point-selves cling to capitalism because pursuing and achieving capital is their way of feeling valued. 1.1 Therefore, If one wants to abolish money, one has to establish an alternative system for personal-identity-valuation. 1.2 The participation of such system must be optional, so that non-point-selves don't suffer. 2 Relativity is non-point=!33(?) 3 I like the idea that this becomes a real speakable language. I feel like there are a couple mega autistic people who would be down learning this language. 3.1 I'm doing the ultimate project based learning. I'm not reading about linguistics. I'm inventing a language and then I analyze my own language. 4 Self-hatred is distinct from harted from injustice. 5 Maybe change point to "fixation". Repetition, Reflection, Fixation. This creates cofusion though since ADHD=non-fixation. 22.4 1 I like that it begins with the letter D but I must say that designation is not perfect. The literal meaning is just desig=33 not 3-33. 1.1 I think an interesting alternative is "tracing". 1.2 Designation is a very loaded nuanced term in analytical philosophy. I need to learn more about it. I'm tending to switch to tracing for now. 2=5.1 A good word for point in german is "setzung". 2.1 alt word for point is "laying" 2.2 Just definition is also good. But that's too mathematical. 2.3 I think I will just stay with point and setzung. 3 what the hell is schizoanalysis. Sounds super wonky. 3.1 chaosmosis, bifurcation, ontological heterogeneity 3.2 It seems there already exists a strong relationship between psychoanalysis and ontology in continental philosophy. 4 What is field in the tracing? 4.1 Field is the Origin so O? 4.1.1 Ø is the ungraspable? 4.1.1.1 that's cold honestly. 4.2 I have to remember my point about the ungraspable but I'm too lazy. Maybe I can fit the field and the ungraspable in the continuum. 5 If 21-!12 is the maw and 22-!12 is the abyss, what is void? void=!2-!12=non-space-non-love ? 5.1 (Or 2 with overline, or 2' or ~2 or non-2) 6 What is the difference between perversion and alienation? 6.1 More importantly what is alienation numerically? 6.2 I think it's roughly the same. Perversion is a form of alienation. 6 I can make the language more compact with regular expressions 6.1 Regex 6.2 System=31-32-33=3[1,2,3]. Honestly not much better lol. Wait or system=3*. 6.2.1 I'm not 100% sure about system 3* btw. I think resonance=3*. 6.2.1.1 Yeah I think system=3(2,3)-2(1,2)="a space where points are interacting". It does not imply change. 7 wait I have an interesting idea. I was talking about somatic languages. What's fun, Is the idea that language itself is a somatic language, since at the end of the day, it requires a performance of movement of the mouth and the tongue, etc. 7.1 So what this also means is that each movement can be interpreted like sign language, language of body movement could be interpreted for example. 7.2 so once I'm moving away from the numerical symbols into language territory, I can try to find those vocals whose "performance"resemblance the meaning of that which is vocalized. 7.3 what I could also do is create a language that is inherently, numerical, and mathematical. So I don't need multiple versions at the same time in a sense. 8 rename polarity=2 to space? Polarity is good since it can easily be associated with 2 but space is good since duality=22 and polarity=2 seems redundant. Yeah I'm tending to 2=space. 8.1 Wait what I could also do is 2=field and 21-22=space. This seems neat actually. Yeah that checks out. 9 Wave=3•1|2|3, Intelligence=3-wave. 22.5 1 What is embodiment? Wait body is just 03. 1.1 okay maybe it's 03-21-22=body-space 2 I could also make 0=self-similarity more detailed like: 2.1 00=absolute, 01=idea 2.2 02=ungraspable=emptiness=vaccilating. 2.3 03=graspable=form=wave= oscillating. 04=matter=pulsating 2.4 05=body=humming 2.6 06=mind=buzzing 2.7 07=consciousness 2.8 08=Idea. 3 Maybe differentiate between perversion=!2="destruction of space" and alienation=? Wait no alienation is also !2. I guess alienation is more on the !21=non-unity=abyss side and perversion is more on the !22=non-duality=maw side. 3.1 The question now is ofc what is just !2? 3.1.1 I think this makes sense: perversion=maw=!2-!22, alienation=!2, anihilation=void=!2-!21-!22, fragmentation=abyss=!2-!21. 4 soul=05-2=body-field 5 01234 would be fun and 4 is just 0,1,2,3 lol. "the 4-trace". Wait this would make 4=absolute. That's cool actually. Also it solves the problem that 00=absolute does not make 100% sense. What's a little unsatisfying is that they are not ordered by fundamentality. It should be 40231. Looks like a postal code. Yeah that place exists in germany it's like 2 hours from my where I am. Maybe there I will find my guru or some shit lol. 5.1 Alternative designations of the 4. 5.1.1 Granularity, Ascendance, Polarity, Complexity, Oneness

@Oyashiro I agree. Autistic people inherently suck at survival. My theory is that back when humans lived in tribes, autistic people were materially supported by the other members of the group. But they were also respected because of their pattern recognition for tracking, predicting the weather etc.

I think I might naturally value beauty and art higher than truth.

golden shadow

If "it doesn't matter who started it" is the rule then what happens is that the powerful will keep oppressing the weak and when the weak try to get some justice they get hit with the "how dare you terrorism!" and this is exactly what we are seeing. There is no such thing as terrorism or that is not the direct result of agression from the west.

@Breakingthewall The more I learn about histrory, the more sure I am that if there is a conflict, the west has started that conflict out of some kind of superiority thinking. This notion of "it doesn't matter who started it, the wiser one gives in" works in nursery school but it does not work in geopolitics.

21 21.1 1 Integrate manifold. It seems the term manifold is more broad than the term field. So maybe god=manifold? 1.1 Manifold ontology also has a nice ring to it. 2 Note to self: Learn more about pyrrhonianism. Especially the thing about always posing the counterargument to archieve equilibrium. 2.1 What is equilibrium? 2.1.1 The equilibrium between... vs the supercombination between... 2.1.2 Is emptiness the equilibrium between existence and non-existence???? This feels right. 2.1.3 eq. vs balance 2.1.4 Love is equilibrium 3 What is trinity 3.1 Augustine if Hippo 🦛 is relevant. 4 integrate ida and pingala 4.1 master and his emissary 4.2 Yin and yang 21.2 1 Reality has three aspects: Continuum, Axis and Trinity. (123) 1.1 Continuum is granularity and it is the strange loop. 2 Learn about numerology. Is is a part of gnosticism? 21.3 1 focal point is point of reflection 21.4 1 What is the true relationship between complexity and simplicity? 1.1 If you only have complexity, you can't have equilibrium. But is is possible to only have simplicity? 1.2 is weakness related to simplicity and power related to complexity? This seems right. 1.3 Does comlexity only apply to Repetition? No. 1.4 What is the relationship between resonance (now a mode of embodiment) and complexity? 2 What is the relationship between contradiction and non-contradiction? Is there also an equilibrium? 3 Without polarization, unity is not possible 4 Is it the case that a pointer can be deconstructed but a pattern can not? 21.5 1 I went to the literal drawing board and came up with some new terms. 1.1 There is the continuum, the polarity and the trinity. They make up the six fundamental principles of reality: The Hexad (?) 1.1.01 The continuum is self-similarity 1.1.02 The polarity is the axis of unity and duality 1.1.03 The trinity is: repetition, reflection, point. 1.1.11 Where is the matter->spirit duality? It's part of the continuum. 1.1.12 Where is dialectics? 1.1.13 Where are the chakras? The chakras are at the same time part of the continuum and the polarity axis (lower chakras duality, higher chakras unity) 1.1.21 There is also the path to liberation. 2 What is epilepsy? 21.6 1 What is the difference between guiding for direction and guiding towards point? 2 Polarity in magnetism vs polarity in the hexad. 3 What is ragebaiting? Can it be mastered? 21.7 1 What is the difference between high frequency and high complexity?