Cred

@Butters I agree with Leo here (if I understand this point correctly). You have a very simplistic view of the concept "good person". What you are saying is discriminating against the autistic mode of existence.

This is what I meant with fighting your own shadow

Is your point different from the point that I am making? If yes, I'm not seeing the difference.

You probably expect me to dismiss your observation. The opposite is true. There's a lot of truth in this statement. There is a very subtle distinction between the myth that I am talking about and the myth of the Arian. There's a reason why the fascist mythos which is now manifesting again in the form of the ideology of the pseudo-philosopher Ayn Rand was and is able to gain such momentum. The distinction that I'm talking about is that fascism is enacting and celebrating the myth of Prometheus while I am trying to point to the enactment of the myth of Heracles. The reason why my narrative is so intertwined with the fascist narrative is simply because the Heracles narrative is so intertwined with the Prometheus narrative. I have written about my current interpretation of the Greek Mythos here:

The attack was an authentic reflection of my emotion. Also, since I'm a Marxist Leninist, I am strictly pro propaganda and pro censorship. The culture war is not an authentic reflection of freedom of speech. It is an abomination that is created by Evil billionaires like the Murdochs. For me, it is illogical to play nice with these demons. If these people are allowed to exist in this world, then relentless conflict will never end, since they profit from it. This is why I want to see red. It is simply ridiculous to me to claim that everyone is entitled to their harmful opinions.

I think I also see a point about non-fragmentation. The first image can be interpreted as roads leading outward to different destinations with the second image showing there's actually just one that lies back at the center after a full hero's journey which is at the absolute.

Either make a nuanced argument or stfu about judging other peoples lifes.

@Carl-Richard I must say you're a very inspiring force for me. The way you (a bit dismissively) described my approach by saying that I interpret the DSM-5 concepts as metaphysical principles inspired me to double down on that idea. The way I tried to describe narcissism today was to postulate that the self is the space that is created by the relationship between the true self and the self image, with that space being unstable in a personality disorder. When I had this thought, it made sense in my head, but it was in someway unsatisfying for me to just pull this concept of the self image out of my ass to be able to explain personality disorder. It seems to me now that the default mode network seems to be the mechanism behind the self image, while the tasking network might relate to set true self. Of course, this is just a rough connection that I saw in your description of the pair which is itself rough as you said. However, I think it is an interesting thought to think about and share.

@YIDIRYIDIR the reason you don't understand what I mean by duality is because I explained neither the crystal nor the fragment. The problem is that in my model, duality is defined through these symbols and their relationship to direct being. I have written about the crystal and the fragment here but I have since polished the concept and managed to reduce the eight principles in the post down to three plus two. These three are sequentiality, simultaneity and interactivity (sensitivity). The other two are unity and duality, with the physical three dimensional space being some kind of "pure" form of duality. I think. It's a work in progress. You see, there's still a lot of polishing to do. Unfortunately neither the fragment nor the crystal is explained in the post "An ontology of hell [...]"

I thought this would fit here:

With space I mean a metaphysical principle that is only possible with duality which includes the physicalist understanding of spacetime. I know this sounds like a circular definition, which it is since the unity duality dichotomy is at the end illusionary and non-separated from the absolute. In my ontological cosmology, everything that is not pure unity, which is singularity is duality. All of reality is well defined with the crystal of eternity and the one-fragment. I'm planning to post much more in the future. I have already pre-written a very long post in the same style of writing as my first reply in this thread that is called: "An Ontology of Hell: The Abyss, the Maw and the Void". The reason why my style of writing has changed is because I have started to use the dictation function from Apple. It seems my brain is better at producing speech than at producing words so I will utilize this more in the future. In that way I think I have a very similar brain structure as Jordan Peterson whose lectures were always better and deeper than his writing if I remember correctly.

This is great, but I would like to add some nuance. Duality is what creates space. Partnership is that duality which stabilizes space. Meditation is what empties space. Finally, a stable and empty space is that which allows for harmony, authenticity, flourishing, and therefore fullness to occur.

@Rafael Thundercat here is a scary truth and prophecy. There has never been a movement started by a Neurotypical, since Neurotypical can only ever follow movements. If you think deeply about it, you will realize that Donald Trump is a genius. This is not a deepity but a fact. It is well known that Donald Trump has an IQ that is well above average. This truth seems contradictory when examining his behavior. In reality, his stupidity does not stem from cognitive inability (I'm talking pre-dementia Trump) but from the naivety that stems from his narcissism that was created by the American values. So what is that genius act of Donald Trump that I'm talking about? The genius of Donald Trump lives in his ability to sense and to utilize sentiment. If you look at Donald Trump's career from a neutral view, you will realize that he is one of the most successful people when it comes to mobilizing the masses for a common cause. The fact that he did that mainly in order to prove his enemies wrong, and in order to receive applause does not take away from the genius of the act. The reason why I am sharing this insight is because this American narcissism embodied by Donald Trump is the main reason for conflict and destruction in the world, and I believe that it stems from a similar mechanism that is explored in the movie The Menu. in my view of geopolitics, the most likely scenario of a future nuclear bomb explosion is as a result of Israels climb of the escalation letter, enabled by America. In this sense, I do see a connection between real world explosion, and the symbolic explosion at the end of the movie.

Sitting allows for independence from the strive for dual existence which is passion. This Liberation arises without the requirement of magic, which is the spanning of stable space through complementarity, which is the synthesis of itself with its opposite, with which it is in dissonance with. Further, it allows for the experience of non-dual infinity in the unification with God. When you leave out the middle part, you've got your one-liner.

This idea that every human structure is necessarily corrupt is a false idea spread by the controlled left in order to legitimize capitalism. This logic works something like this: if every right wing organization is corrupt, and any liberal organization is corrupt, and even every leftist organization is corrupt then it follows that it can't be expected that any human can be capable of building a system that is truly non-corrupt. It follows that any spiritual organization must necessarily be cult-like in some way. The logic breaks down once you learn the real history of true leftist organizations and learn that their levels of corruption are completely incomparable with the levels of corruption and liberal systems and in right wing systems. This idea that leftist organizational structures are somehow unnecessarily oppressive is a lie that is only really present in western states due to western propaganda. A lot of the non-western states have already woken up to this reality. However, western people with their narcissism still believe that their values are the highest ones and anything else is authoritarianism and oppression because of relentless propaganda from the bourgeoisie. I know that people will read this, roll their eyes and accuse me of the attempt of spreading ideology. What you need to understand though, is that the knowledge about the possibility of true abundance in this world is inseparable from ones word view, and therefore ones view of the self and self-worth. If you realize that the hierarchy, where "productive" business people are at the top and the "lazy" and "unproductive" people are on the bottom is a complete fabrication, only then you can truly allow yourself to live authentically and defeat self-hatred. If you manage to do that, it is much harder for you to create a cult since the cult is a manifestation of devouring narcissism, which is itself a manifestation of self-hatred.

@Carl-Richard You make a good point. Here is my explaination of this paradox how people with ADHD (low symbolic being) sometimes lack commitment and therefore mastery, but on the other hand, they sometimes excel at certain skills. Based on my understanding, symbol oriented people, so non-ADHD people require identification with the Symbol (career, degree, marrige, etc) in order to exist in resonance. This is why they tend to be able to commit to jobs or careers really early without much exploration since they cannot stand living in an "identity vacuum". Since people with ADHD don't fear that identity vacuum they have the ontological freedom to postpone the decision. The downside, of course, is that early specialization and therefore early success is unlikely.

I agree with you. My two replies were connected. My deeper point is, that mastery requires commitment and people with ADHD struggle with that. However, non-commitment enables exploration which has its own upsides. So how about this: Understanding has two poles: Mastery and exploration.

You are discriminating against neurodivergent people and reinforcing capitalist ideology with this statement

I think you can always either have understanding or mastery. Never both. Phrased differently: Mastery and understanding are opposing forces.

@Judy2 Thanks! Congrats, you just encouraged me to write more. I am taking a walk right now, and I saw a woman who was walking her cat on a leash and the cat would not move. This gave me an insight. I think the biggest difference between dogs and cats is that cats require a lot less being seen to be content. While a dog constantly tries to get affirmation of its existence, a cat is content just existing with its emotion and it's patterns. It is possible to positively interact with a cat by enacting a pattern in the form of play or by engaging in empathy in the form of cuddling, but it is really hard to force the attention of a cat since it is independent of the affirmation of the human. This explains why people say cats are autistic because autistic people also barely engage in being seen.

I'm visiting my mom right now and she has a dog named Lilith. This dog is very happy to see me and she likes to interact with me, but I had this observation that I didn't really quite understand why she was happy, because I didn't really know what I was doing right with her. I feel the same way with children, so I did a contemplation about how to communicate with dogs and I think there's a lot of overlap in how to communicate with animals and with children since children and animals just have the same needs as adults but in a more trivial way. According to my model, for any entity, there are exist three modes of being which are being felt being seen, and being a part. These modes of being are manifestations of the principle of sensitivity, simultateity, and sequenciality. The way to make a being happy is by reminding it that it exists, which is done through engaging their mode of existence. In order to affirm the mode of being seen of an entity is with gesture. This can be done, purely by giving them attention and affirming their existence. In order to affirm their mode of being a part you interact with them by playing out a pattern, so this is play for example. Also, if you act out your own pattern and they get to observe your pattern and merge their pattern with your pattern, you also engage their need of being a part. The way to engage their mode of being felt is by empathizing with them. If you interact with them and feel happy about it and you are open about sharing your emotions with them they will they will receive your inner state and this will engage their need of being felt. This is why it feels like it is at the same time hard and easy to interact with a child because it's impossible to interact with it at the level of complexity of interaction with an adult, but it is also easy because it because a child or an animal is happy with much less.

The only country that is aggressively shoving its values and "culture" down others throats is the US. China mainly cares about providing for its citizens and doing trade responsibly. They have no interest in turning everyone chinese. (I'm aware that you meant it is a joke but I assume it is a "hahah there is truth to it hahah"-joke and I'm attacking this supposed truth)

🅱️ased

Fun fact, when he was younger, the nickname of the german chancellor was "Fotzen-Fritz" which means something like "Coochey-Fritz". Fucking hate that guy. Super corrupt. I wish we had someone like Xi

This is dangerous and bad advice. The label "disabled" can be very freeing for autistic people. "The mirror doesn't smile first"? tf does that even mean?? There has never been a functional person who just decided to "become" autistic and then suddenly become dysfunctional. Like what the fuck It's ALWAYS people who don't function and them ask themselves why This notion of "you can do anything if you just believe in youself" is incredebly hurtful for autistic people because it invalidates their struggles When you are autistic you can become functional but only if you ACCEPT the label and learn how to cope with autism. If you rejct the label you are at square one again which is "what the fuck is wrong with me" One thing we can agree with is that he should reject the "not smart". The difference between neutotypicals and autistic people is that autistic preoples brains are way more complex which makes it process information more deeply and therefore more slowly. So when you give a neurotypical person a task, they give an answer immediately and you might say: Wow that was fast! How smart! But when you look at the answer you will notice that it doesn't really have a lot of substance. When you ask an autistic person a question what can happen is that it takes them three businessdays to answer. But once they DO, it will be the most precise and deep answer you will ever hear. If you are mega autistic you suck at IQ tests bc they have time contraint. That's the only reason why they suck at IQ tests in my understanding of autism. If you give them unlimited processing time, they will always outperform everyone.