Cred

I stand with my critique of Buddhism. Duality is not a bad thing at all, and it allows for the fulfillment of space and for symphony as I said. pain and suffering are a part of the symphony. The only way to arrive at cacophony is by engaging in self-hatred.

yes exactly!😭😂

what do you describing is sequentiality and it is not survival but existence for the autistic brain. if you put down the sequence, you are putting yourself down, which leads to self-hatred. So stop

Agreed. Without dissonance there can be no resonance and therefore be no harmony and therefore be no symphony. Emptiness is great because it is silence and a good symphony needs silence to have contrast and structure. But emptiness itelf is just empty. It is neither infinite nor beautiful by itself.

you are completely correct. Of course I would not use the word with retardation, but I understand what you mean. The reason why Neurotypicals hate neurodivergent people It's not just because of ignorance. The reason is much much much deeper. What do you need to understand is for a Neurotypical person, their identity and their conformity is their existence. So when the neurodivergent person runs around shitting on conformity either directly or through their actions, they are invalidating the existence of the Neurotypicals, which leads to them being alienated of themselves by the suggestion of their own non-existence. So this hate is existential in nature. This conflict can not be solved. There will always be dissonance between the neutotypical and the neurodivergent for that reason. What I teach, though is that this dissonance can be used for counteracting the destabilizing effect that pure resonance, which is pure love, which is pure unity, has on the existence space. This process of counteraction through complementary spanning leads to symbiosic space. This is why the neurodivergent people and the Neurotypical people are in reality codependent of the other. It is also the reason why free love in hippie communes can lead to disaster, because in free love, there is the risk that the overrepresentation of unity among likeminded people causes the collapse of existence space. this is not to hit on hippies, usually people naturally seek this counteraction. This is why the attraction of opposites exists in the first place. Precisely because they repel each other paradoxically. OK, here's an esoteric thought: what if that's the dynamic that is precisely what keeps atoms intact? What if the electron and the proton are secretly in love? This leads to an interesting distinction between being in love, which is symbiosis and being love, which is unity. That's why you don't want to meet your soulmate, because if you were, you would mistake being love, which is obsession with being in love, which is symbiosis. This is actually what happened to me. This is why the saying that there has to be some amount of conflict and therefore distance in a relationship is true. With understanding of the dissonance between opposites, it does not have to turn into alienation. This is the basis for my plan to reduce fragmentation in society.

You are both correct. A conspiracy theory is what happens when you have an autistic person who has not learned epistemic responsibility. That's it. There's no such thing as a Neurotypical that has the ability to come up with a conspiracy theory. A conspiracy theory is basically what happens when you only have off the charts pattern recognition and other than that no real knowledge about reality. So what a conspiracy theory is, is it is always a very real pattern in reality that is just interpreted the wrong way and therefore leads to the wrong conclusions. So when examining a conspiracy theory, never make the mistake to ask what it says, ask instead what pattern it points to. when you don't see the pattern, this usually means that you have not looked hard enough or that your interpretation of reality is incomplete. That's because for a conspiracy theory to be popular, a lot of people with superior pattern recognition have to agree with it in some way. Here are a couple of examples. "birds are spies" of course this is wrong, but this doesn't change the fact that western people are being spied and Palantir exists. "the elites are Satanist" is wrong but what is right is that they worship Yaweh who is the Demiurg in the gnostic interpretation of the old testament, which is the devil. So in that sense this conspiracy theory is completely correct. "they eat babies" might be wrong, but they sure as hell like to fuck minors "Bill Gates wants to implant chips in my bloodstream" is wrong because it's Elon Musk who wants to implant chips "the system is rigged" well that's just the truth "the leftists want to replace Christianity and traditional values" yes that's exactly what I want to do

I know this sounds arrogant, but I honestly think that I am the best source. I'm not mentioning masculinity specifically much to avoid sex-gender confusion, but what I'm talking about is extremely relevant for the concept of masculinity. I am precisely, logically, and ontologically describing what you mean when you say "the balance between masculinity and femininity". I have the answer for why this is important in the first place. When you think that you have deficiency in masculinity than everything about my theory that has to do with sequentiality, which is objectivity and power is especially irrelevant to you. But of course everything is relevant since learning only takes place through making distinctions.

Without self-hatred, his ideology would collapse

A very wise man once said "I'm a lot more literate than you Mr. Monelli. The problem is you don't know the english language Mr. Borelli"

(I think you meant ND above is that correct?) I agree with you and I'm aware of the risk. When I think the truth is true and important, then I speak it. That's what autism is. But this is also what autism is: If you have a truth that I don't know, YOU NEED TO TELL ME I NEED TO KNOW WHAT I DON'T KNOW. That's why I have faith that it's going to work out. Fun fact: The purpose of the book of not knowing is to balance out this autistic obsession of wanting to know. It helps to induce stability in the space that is spanned by the duality wanting to know, letting go of wanting to know. What he is trying to describe with "the state of not knowing" is precisely that balance of the duality.

Why are you talking to people on the internet right now then? Why aren't you outside and talking to people? Aren't you being a bad bad individual right now by your own standarts?

Bro, you could literally not be more wrong. I'm actually impressed. I want you to describe to me how you think someone can develop resentment without culture.

Did you consider that I might have arrived at this conclusion by observing humans and contemplating about human nature? The question that I'm asking you is this: Why is Leo so uncorrupt? Why does he not run ads on this forum? Why does his "store" only contain two products? Is there something unique about Leo that makes him value truth above corruption? The answer is yes but actually no. Leo is unique, however, there are plenty of people like him. It's just called autism. The idea of getting autistic people into power is not a lofty idea at all. In fact, autistic people are already in power currently. The reason why there's so much suffering is simply because of their self-hatred and because ot the fact that they genuinely believe that liberalism is true. If you structure society in such a way that autistic marxists have all the hard power, then there will be a lot less corruption, and inequality and injustice will slowly be eroded.

CHALLENGE wait for it ACCEPTED

What the HELLY???

i'm actually with Leo on his take about the danger of mentally ill people, especially narcissists. They do so much damage to society, especially to the people who are closest to them, and they are not aware of it at all. If I was in charge of a country, I think I would actually try to identify narcissists and put them in psychiatric clinics involuntarily in order to help them. You might now scream that this would be anti-freedom. But the problem that I would be addressing is that a shit ton, if not most of the people who are currently in psychiatric clinics, arrived there as a result of the abuse from narcissists or other cluster B disorders. I would honestly prefer to live in a less free world where this unfair imbalance does not exist. also, since the root of the problem would be addressed, the problem would actually become less severe in the long-term. The problem with the current system is that it just allows for narcissist to run free and ruin everybody's lives.

HAHAHAHAHA I'm dying! Take my money! AHAHA

How did you come to that conclusion?

My model is way more powerful than both the MBTI, the Big Five and even the DSM-5. The problem with these models is that they just blindly categorize while they don't explain shit and have no root in ontology. They all can be completely explained with my model. I might make a post about that in the future.

@Basman I'm not saying to get rid of Neurotypical people. Also I'm not saying their existence is less justified just because it's more simple. In some way, the Zen existence is the most simple yet it is ridiculous to use this as reason to get rid of them or something. In that way, I am not making the same mistake as Ayn Rand who believes that the genius of the world can somehow just survive without the normies. If you truly understand my argument, you will realize that I'm saying that the geniuses might be able to create the finest gourmet meals, which suck at keeping you alive like simple, warmed up meals do. This is what Marxism is. It is precisely the notion that the state should mainly care about its working class since all of existence and economics is rooted in it and not in the lofty ideas of the few geniuses. This is why in in Leninism, it is required for a small group of the elite to commit "class suicide" and dedicate themselves to the needs of the simple people. This is why Marxism is literally the opposite of fascism. Fascist are very open about that fact. There is no fascism without communism. It is a direct response to communism.

I'm actually with you. The more I'm learning about human nature the more I realize that corruption is just a mix of people who are corrupt out of self-hatred and people who are corrupt out of conformity, which makes your scenario actually not that unrealistic if the issue of safe hatred would be solved by some radical idea. This is why I'm not just pursuing Marxist-Leninist activism but am also trying to build something that might just make ML so powerful that it does not require a lot of violence for a revolution. My take right now on the revolution is however to try to make it as likely as possible, even if it requires violence. The reason being that I believe it is unreasonable to say that sparing the lives of a hand full of billionaires for the price of upholding the capitalist system with its thousands of victims unnecessarily is justified.

How are you planning to deal with the ones who profit from polarization in the current system. They will not just allow you to go along and install your system that promises unity, because that would mean them loosing power and prestige.

This is what Marxism-Leninism is at its core.

@Butters I want you to explain to me why you think a social person is somehow good and a person who is socializing through the internet is somehow "not doing harm but also not good" Because there are no grandmas to save on the internet? That's a shallow argument.