Elliott

Damn. Why do you say " go to my room to isolate myself from humanity"? Do you think you may be depressed? Some people don't need friends. Even just one friend makes a big difference, and then having others if something happens there or they are busy. They're very beneficial when problems in life happen, and when you're dealing with stupid people in daily life.

Do you socialize any other way, video games or reddit or something? Family?

Stephen Miller is the strategist, he probably didn't know trump was in the files and let Bondi , Kash, and bongino continue the maga conspiracies which backed them into a bit of a corner. Republicans aren't bright at all, Trump throws any shred of dirt at anybody, YET he was never the one to bring up epstein to attack people, he only replied with attacks when others brought up epstein. He would have given everyone epstein nicknames.

Everyone just ignores this guy, he's never trying to have an earnest discussion and 90% of the forum sees through the right-wing idiocy.

Theres no need to propose a logical plan for republicans, there's no rationalizing with them: just run as a Republican and lie to them, they love that. Just lie to them, and run as Republican. I would do the Democrats policy; publicly value education and Americans, basic infrastructure and schools in poor communities, no American should be homeless: build basic housing for the mentally ill and the people down on their luck with other problems, public addiction recovery, regulate pollution.

Yes, I added videos to my previous comment, watch second to last video, he goes after netanyahu 8 years ago, calls for his party's removal. The first 3 are shorts.

Ben Shapiros stance is wrong, he's a zionist, that doesn't discredit Pakman, whom isn't a zionist. 8 years ago 11 years ago

China and India are production economies, not consumption economies, they're not a substitute for Europe.

Pakman is an atheist, I don't think he has much of a tie to Israel, you do? I agree with him on Palestine though, I'm not Jewish at all, Palestine has a right to defend itself but terrorism should not be expected to be ignored. Palestine can fight openly if they choose that path over trying with diplomacy to gain more allies, but terrorist attacks are obviously going to be answered with reciprocal violence. Israel has the ability to slaughter Palestine right? Palestine doesn't stand a chance without some serious allies that appear to be lacking. So if Palestine wants to settle this with fighting they will lose, so they resort to terrorism which is just a form of war that someone that knows they can't win uses. How is it fair to allow Palestine to attack, but not israel? Palestine and supporters could have plead it's case diplomatically before October 7th, these protests should have happened before then. I support Palestine and would like to see Israel removed, but Israel obviously has a right to reciprocate violence. Palestine obviously has a right to defend against settlements too, be it with violence or diplomacy. The only way I see Palestine winning is with diplomacy, still a long shot, but it's worked other places, South Africa for example. And I don't mean diplomacy with Israel, I mean with the rest of the world, they need more allies to put pressure on Israel.

I've tried to listen to many, but I can only stand David Pakman and Ezra Klein. Cenk is a charlatan, this is his business, to evoke the reptilian brain for more clicks.

Populism and showmanship is a single election cycle strategy, it fails immediately the second election cycle because YOU ARE then the government, the outsider politician wins by default running on this idiocy. You have to have grassroots campaigning, there's no magic pill, people are just not willing to do the work. Go read the "Underdetermination" thread, you guys fall for everything.

How so? It's conservatives that bring up genders, you guys are obsessed with it. Obama and Biden both deported more immigrants than Trump, where has immigration been a problem, point to it.

Critical thinking is more important than ever in the instant communication age. Leveraging heuristics in the age of constant media has normalized deviation from critical thinking.

You're grasping at ridiculous straws, here's the page, apparently young men aren't young people to you? https://archive.is/9rRI2

"Respondents were asked about sexual acts that happened when they were “drunk, high, drugged, or passed out and unable to consent.”"

Unable to consent is rape.

What in the world do you think a president should specifically do for young men? An interview on 60 minutes about jobs and economy is not sufficient to prevent alienating young men?

No they don't. Did you read either? They say theirs was only 2 universities and rape was 1 in 7. This was a 2007 study, mine was a 2015 nationwide study of 10,000 respondents. Did you read this past the title? It's pathetic. "For one, CDC survey respondents are not asked whether anyone has used physical force or threats to make them engage in a sexual activity, but “how many” people have done this (in their lifetime and in the past year). This wording removes the extra hurdle of admitting that such a violation has happened, and thus encourages more reporting. But could it also create “false positives” by nudging people toward the assumption that the default answer is affirmative—especially when preceded by a battery of other questions and statements about sexually coercive behavior? A much bigger problem is the wording of the question measuring “incapacitated rape” (which accounted for nearly two-thirds of the CDC’s estimate of rapes that occurred in the past year). Respondents were asked about sexual acts that happened when they were “drunk, high, drugged, or passed out and unable to consent.” This seems to imply that “unable to consent” is only one of the variables and to include situations in which a person is intoxicated—perhaps enough to have impaired judgment—but not incapacitated as the legal definition of rape requires."

"Theo Von ✔️ is a popular Instagram influencer in multiple categories. With 6.8M followers and an average engagement rate of 1.05%, Theo Von is known for" "Jaden Hossler is the most followed member of the Island Boys, with over 10 million followers on TikTok." Because I think it's a retarded suggestion that this is alienating young men.

Source? Unironically this is an example of an attack on women. https://www.nsvrc.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/2015data-brief508.pdf 1in5 This is a study of 10,000 people

The island Boys get more views, should she take an interview from them. You're being ridiculous, Rogan is viewed as a garbage man, the others even lowlier, no thought, no legitimacy. Do you consider Fox news legitimate? Lmao, that's like being mad she didn't take an interview from Marjorie Taylor greene.

https://www.prageru.com/state-announcements "State Partnerships PragerU is now an approved educational resource in multiple states across the country, including our newest state, Alaska. Our free lesson plans align with national standards while teaching American history, civics, character building, financial literacy, and more. We are excited to announce our latest state partnerships"

An Overton Insights poll released last month showed that Harris would have a slight lead over Vance, with 45 percent of respondents backing her and 42 percent supporting Vance. from June 23 to June 26, 2025. Aug 2, 2025 · Since taking office as vice president in January, JD Vance's favorability has steadily declined, according to tracking data from Civiqs

Young men don't base their lives on what politicians say, they do it based on what their role models say. Why did 42% of young men vote for Kamala then? The garbage alpha media shouldn't be legitimized by Kamala going on.

That's just one, they pay every single 'alpha' influencer, Tate, Peterson, ..... "PragerU's target demographic has expanded beyond college students to include children ages 14 to 55."