Elliott

a black guy getting arrested 60 times at work is my emotions speaking?

No, that's the opposite of what the student in your video said, systemic racism does not mean explicit or intentioned racism. Go to a college campus party, drugs are everywhere, smoking bongs on the porch on a busy road. Google "kansas city stop" black neighborhoods are not targeted because a guy says "black neighborhood target them" it's because of people like you that don't even understand your racial biases are afraid of black people, this is what 'elevates' the crime rate by blacks, they're targeted more by police, subconciously because they're black. Look at the opioid epidemic in appalachia even JD vance harps about, where's the DEA there?

-DEA stationing in poor urban neighborhoods, but turn a blind eye to college campuses where drug use and sales are in the courtyard like selling lemonade -longer incarceration times for black people for the same crime -public school funding -public infrastructure funding -running highways through black neighborhoods -neighborhood zoning, allowing industrial in black neighborhoods -putting housing projects in black neighborhoods and all of these things have hopefully obvious knock-on effects, i.e. "systemic"

Chomsky is not implicated in wrong-doing, Tate sex-trafficked girls. Do you disagree with chomskys letter?

Ghislaine is in prison...... I think Tate lies to boys, leads them down destructive paths. Misogyny knows no bounds.... TRUMP IS PRESIDENT, HIS ENTIRE CABINET IS IN THE FILES. Trump is in the files auctioning girls, and raping, "bUt ePsTeInS aSsIstAnTs!"

Figure out her specific need. What's her 'love language'? Either she needs some specific way of connecting, this doesn't actually require much from you aside from figuring it out, or, she has some insecurity issue. Do that, if you're still unsatisfied after that, breakup. You'll probably be satisfied, spirituality is pretty individual, and she's supportive of yours. Your situation could be better for your spirituality, put two spiritual people in the room together and it's two different paths, often conflicting.

....you think the "matrix" outed itself? The people in those files were pro Tate, actually. Musk, Trump, Bannon,

@BlueOak

And then blame the feminist movement or dei. It's coming. "men are going to have sex with someone, nature"

Ya i did. I've found there's usually already circles there, and they're welcoming. Other people are looking for people like you too, just not everyone. Some recreational sports are quite social too, but that's been very hit or miss to me. I would just go through any groups that you would have any interest in, and lookup new ideas you may never have thought of, different cities have different lanes. People that use the MeetUp app seem to usually be looking to make a real friendship, maybe scan that for things that pique your interest at all. Try new things, I went to improv practices I had little interest in and they have a great community, it's fun too. I haven't gone to them much, but there are Buddhist and humanist centers, a Unitarian church in my city that seemed like great and social people too. If you give some of your interests people might have ideas for you that you haven't thought of. There's some cafes that do some community things,.... Do you have isolating work? For myself, when I've been isolated I have found that I wind up needing way less socialization than I desired when I was isolated. I think finding people to do occasional stuff with, that actually seem to care about you is important though, life tends to be scary on your own. Just finding the first or first few people is probably the most meaningful. I never try to push or initiate like you say, I always just get a sense from people and then just be open, if I want to have lunch with them or whatever I ask, not really efforting, passive filtering, you only need to find one.

A lot of people are not available in the way you want, they're preoccupied with other things. You have to find the right people, filter people. I find social people by volunteering, I like to help at parks, museums, festivals,.... I don't actively initiate like you framed it, I just enjoy being playful with everyone, and you just run across people you mesh with.

Enlighten me, share your thoughts. Sincerely. I never liked Biden out of the Democrat field, I did like Harris though. Don't like Newsom, but any of these will destroy republicans long-term. You just don't want someone corrupt or dumb, like AOC or Bernie, out-dumbing republicans. Nothing Biden did aside from running in 24' "led to disaster", nothing policy wise, you're just butt-hurt. We screwed up in 2016(I opposed Hilary in the primary too, don't like hilary), Hilary was shoed in like Biden 2024. We need more participation in the primaries. Still, the structural problem is the socialist rhetoric, those were all acute problems.

-Andrew Tate the sex trafficker This is a hair away from being an epiphany. These are the guys that say society's problems are from feminists being mean...

Why would you argue for God if you doubt it? I suppose that could be within your argument. But, why would you care, if you doubt God's existence?

Ya. Is it necessary for the government to be the ones in charge of production(socialism), to achieve what you want? Is the Norwegian government in charge of making cars? Acknowledging that resources belong to everyone, including government action as a resource(like building highways is no different than welfare), is just egalitarian.

BRUH, YOU SAID YOU WOULD BE OKAY WITH FREE TRADE, THAT MEANS YOU WOULD BE EXPLOITING THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES.

You guys conflate socialism for egalitarianism. Egalitarianism(including in regard to resources and government action)exists in capitalist society, that's not "socialism in capitalism"(there's no such thing).

Bruh, it's on every socialist flyer, essay, t-shirt. The Communist Manifesto (1848): "Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workingmen of all countries unite!". -Marx and Engels Just take your concept to its logical end. It would be no different than the UK being a corporation in a capitalist world. Corporatism, YOU would now be the bourgeois! Indians and Africans or whatever, YOUR proletariat. That's "socialist" to you? YOU being bourgeois, that's what your concept is. An imaginary border makes "exploitation" okay in your "socialism". YOU'RE A CORPORATIST. This is no different than what Musk does to people like you, "we're separate". Your concept is no more ethically superior than Musk's, you just want YOU in his circle.

Easily. You've obviously NEVER read Marx. "The Socialist movement is a working class movement, a movement in the interests of the great majority. Workers support each other internationally on the industrial field during strikes. There will be no lack of mutual assistance when the greatest working class movement of all, the movement to free the toilers for ever from the domination of a master class, reaches the point that it can call upon them for international solidarity in striking the final blow." https://www.marxists.org/archive/mcclatchie/1946/transition_period.htm#:~:text=Thus some people may have,in striking the final blow. Socialism cannot, structurally have borders and free trade, it would not be socialism. There's literally no difference between that and corporatism. This is basic 1+1=2 math. Just draw a new state around ExxonMobil then, a new state around X,..... blackrock,.... draw a new state around every individual, every property. This is down syndrome level coherence.

No it's not, socialism is a stage in marxism. At this point you're just outright lying. You know nothing about Marxism, 4th grade americans know more than you. You're being a troll, perhaps unintentionally.

Just going to completely ignore what the thread is about? Socialist amnesia?

You literally don't know what socialist means. "Workers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains," -concluding The Communist Manifesto, Marx

I can't believe you just choose to read over the most commonly stated and basic part of socialism. Essentially, you personally don't want socialism, you just want benefits for yourself personally, you actually don't care about people in general. You're the perfect example as to why marxism is idiotic, and socialists are completely contradictory. "Workers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains," -concluding The Communist Manifesto, Marx

So... do you agree Marxisms goal is that the entire world be socialist. "Transition period" is meaningless in this discussion, what's the goal.

Marxism does not recognize states, it's proletariat vs bourgeois, every person on earth. This is basic socialism. Listen to any socialist essay, "workers of the WORLD unite". This is why I call it a cult, you people literally don't even know what you're spreading.