Elliott

Could you give examples of wealthy change-makers: I disagree, technological advancements come with just as much drawbacks as 'progress', they're net-zero. Cultural and moral change is profound though.

MLK, Harvey Milk, Malcolm X, Jesus, Martin Luther, Greta, Obama, Mandela, Lincoln, John Brown,.... Who are you thinking of?

In the Bible belt there are a TON of black Christian pro-lifers that are democrats. Pro life democrat would win in Alabama and Missisippi, they're actually not as solidly republican as they seem. Pro-life is present amongst Hispanics too, and union workers in west Virginia area. 3 pro life democrats in congress with 350 pro choice democrats is FINE. It's not a shift to the right, It's reality, some democrats, a certain niche are pro-life. Pro-choice is not a party issue, it is the consensus. Red states have had voter referendums upending their idiot legislatures abortion bans. It's no different than accepting the socialists even though they promote killing ceo's. Consider that these pro life democrats also support taking care of poor people, universal Healthcare, believing rape victims,..... Socialists are so cringe and 'high and mighty'

If you want to pursue money you should, just when you get to the point where you're done with it, move on. Rich people are just as toxic as poor people, as scary as that sounds: there are non-toxic poors and rich, the area with the most non-toxic seems to be the middle: because it has the most people. I stand by "sub-cultures; volunteers, Buddhists, mindfulness, arts, ....." If you want to affect positive change, look at the people that have done the most; they weren't rich.

So, this guy is supposedly racist against white people, but he's a fan of white Leo on his forum full of mostly white people? It was just coarse language. @Twentyfirst ,purpletree defends palestine.

The stat you just qouted me posting says the opposite.

It's typically democrats that do better in presidential elections compared to other elections. "2022 midterm example: A Pew Research Center report found that in the 2022 midterms, a higher percentage of 2020 Trump voters (71%) turned out compared to 2020 Biden voters (67%)"

It's in the bag Newsweek Map Shows Where Democrats Are Overperforming in Special Elections Sep 10, 2025 — Special election results, some of which have seen Democrats overperform Harris by 50 points or more, "Recently, global investment bank UBS announced that, after crunching some “hard data” from between May and July 2025, there’s a 93% chance of the U.S. entering a recession this year [1]." https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/economy/major-bank-raises-red-flag-on-us-economy-warns-of-93-chance-of-recession-based-on-hard-data-here-are-5-crucial-money-moves-you-need-to-make-now/ar-AA1NxOnq?ocid=BingNewsVerp

We are on the brink of war with Russia, they flew nuclear bombers near the u.s. last week. I don't think it will come to war but obviously the military needs to prepare for it.

There's a Meidas video about how Trump changed the miss teen usa audition requirements to have the girls in bikinis, and he personally judged the auditions. A different Meidas video, there was a 90s news article of trumps miss teen usa party with the girls on a yacht with millionaires.

So, what does it mean by "extremism on gender"? @Inliytened1 @carterfelder , this isn't fascism?

What damage? 'Republican' has been damaged, 'Democratic' has been strengthened by the overt republican corruption. Democrats have been winning in red districts. It's not about talent, democrats win on policy, it's republicans only way to win is by smoke and mirrors shows. https://www.npr.org/2025/09/24/nx-s1-5551198/democrat-wins-congressional-seat-in-arizona-narrowing-gops-slim-house-majority

Going to be a lot of big payouts for violating rights. Hassan still thinks dems are the same though.

What is a mind? A mind would mean there's something outside of the mind. Consider there is no movement, what you perceive as movement or time, as something happening, consider nothing is happening.

Most people are not affected by healthcare or income problems. But, I feel like if liberal regions could run wild that the success would be so evident that the backwards region would follow suit. That alone isn't reason enough to me to split it up though, I think geo-politically if the u.s. split up it could bring more global harmony. Pair a smaller national identity, with less international hostility, and 3 different cultural experiments.

Were you not citing Eisenhower as right-wing? Today the right wing supports Israel financially. Europe would've moved toward the Soviet union.

You cannot look at both sides the same way. The largest red bar on that chart was only 40%. You need to take it in context, conservative voters lie, they lie to themselves, they lie to polls, Democrat voters lie much less, to themselves and polls. Conservatives overblow their satisfaction, democrats are more negative in perspective about their politicians, just naturally, because they're more honest. Friday, September 5 2028 General Election: Vance vs. Newsom Poll Yahoo News Results Newsom 49Vance 41 Spread Newsom+8 All that's required is for whomever you believe is the better advocate, for them to speak up and get out there, they don't need Schumers blessing if that's what you think. Buttigieg is unelected and he's everywhere.

It's a unique dynamic and history. I seriously question if the U.S. should be broken up, it's possibly too big. A couple smaller nations could form tighter knit and I see no point except trade and global monopoly for staying as one, which in my opinion is actually a negative in the bigger scheme of things.

Eisenhower was actually the president that staged the first coup in Iran, for oil. Targeted and killed civillians in Cuba,... "have just one purpose ... and that is to build up a strong progressive Republican Party in this country. If the right wing wants a fight, they are going to get it ... before I end up, either this Republican Party will reflect progressivism or I won't be with them anymore."[161]"- Eisenhower How is Trump not a conservative?

Were 60s hippies orange? MLK? Lincoln, John Brown?

Interesting angle. Say U.S. took care of each other, say we allowed liberty and rights, say we stood for those things and our culture was liberal(including gun rights): would guns and violence still be the problem it is?

I don't think it's new, look at Bush in the middle east, Reagan in Iran: the 'morals' has always been a lie. Pence was asked to do something highly illegal and publicly, I think he was just looking out for himself. What's an example of their morals, ever? They run on fiscal responsibility but have added the most debt, they run on pro-life but vote to take food and Healthcare from needy kids to give corporations tax breaks.

Nothing-burger, will go nowhere. Absolutely impeachable act though, if you read the background of the DA getting fired for saying there's no grounds for prosecution.