NewKidOnTheBlock

Anything can become porn if the mind views it as such, you the typa guy to find even this site's layout sexy. LEL

Even if you was desensitized (I keep repeating that word a lot don't I, LOL) from too much "porn" "usage", I'm pretty sure it would only take a couple of days or less than a week of not watching anything, not touching your dick and training like an animal for you to be ready to go or even cum prematurely while being with a girl cause you're so excited. LOL like, you'd have to jerk off like 4-5 times a day every single day to be fucked up like that. I can never understand how some men are able to crank up those numbers so high, but some people are just freaks of nature

"Which car brand you own? Honda, BMW, Wolkswagen?" "I own vehicle"

You keep mentioning this specific kind of porn, as if that's the only porn there is. Again, what is porn what's not, what's too stimulating and what's not. Do these studies apply to men watching light stuff as well? I'm not going to keep repeating my questions You don't need to, but you would want to. If you could, you would, is my point. As often as possible or as often as you'd be able to. How am I screwed up for that, that's normal LOL I can go without porn but literaly nothing would change. It changes nothing about you

You go to the job. You work from 9 am to 5 pm. You leave the job. Repeat at least 10 000 times.

@D2sage So you are against ejaculation in general. Unless it's caused directly by the woman's pussy ofc, then it's fine "Porn has made you into a horny goat" so help me here, on one hand you claim porn desensitizes you and causes erectile dysfunction, on the other hand horniness on the daily basis is bad. LOL nice logic right there. Haven't answered any of my questions either

@D2sage I don't find the evidence very convincing. Do these studies account for the types/categories of porn being watched? There's a difference between pictures, text, videos, solo videos of a chick masturbating, lesbian porn, classic porn where a dude is piping down a chick, etc. I don't even know if you're against porn or masturbation in general. Good luck with that. Replacing masturbation entirely with real sex would require going out heavilly every single day. Who's got time, money, freedom and will to do that. Or gf allowing u to fuck her every day. Could happen but again; good luck with that also. And ejaculating just once or even couple times a week is not optimal. Should be at least 21 times a month. This is all bullshit imho LEL

Income tax doesn't affect the rich anyway. Laws would have to be modified to cover all of the sneaky edge case loopholes rich people use to avoid taxation - such as capital gains, business income (both of which aren't taxed until they decide to pull the money to their bank accounts), presenting their income as business expenses, them living off of loans while using assets as a collateral, etc. etc. But even then, the way I see it. These issues will never dissapear so long as humans continue to have this dark, shadowy side to their psyche. This is what proponents of capitalism ultimately bank on as their number one argument for capitalism, it's that ultimately it is the greed and self interest that motivates us to excel. And I cannot help but agree with that, since human dark side seems to be unchangeable and will always be present in us to some degree

Yeah but that's even more stimulation. That's even more stimuli for arrousal for me, like, I'd get hard just by the smell itself. That's what makes sex much better in the first place. So that kinda goes against this erectile dysfunction stuff

Where's the proof of that? Have all of those porn watchers self reported that their dick were no longer functioning? Or did the researchers all watched the guy trying to fuck his chick and his shit not working? How is getting arroused by a woman in porn video any different than having your dick hard in the real situation? I think unhealthy life style is much bigger culprit but porn isn't one of those factors. Seems like BS to me. Has this study accounted for lifestyle as well btw?

Would you be able to explain how exactly would that happen? Ok, we see that in this study, porn watchers tend to have this particuliar area of the brain more active. And? So what? Can you explain exactly how that leads to erectile dysfunctions?

Well I like my prostate. A lot. Takes 21 times a month to reduce the prostate cancer risks to a minimum, and in general it seems that there's an inverse correlation/association between the ammount of times you're doing it and the risks of you getting prostate cancer. You won't be able to jerk off that many times just by using your mind, that's way too boring and it just takes forever to get off that way, and orgasms aren't that good. I'm emptying the sacks once a day at least and never encountered these "desensitization" issues or seeking more and more extreme content. Seems to me like these problems have nothing to do with porn and more with us being so anti social and socially inept while also lacking this sort of social courage

@Lucasxp64 It is kinda difficult to build good insta, you know, for you to be able to add good photos you need to have some life in the first place, a lifestyle worthy of taking photos off. And you need to somehow build your followers. But that's still fine, what's actually bad is that on these apps you are constrained and forced to play these stupid games such as who ghosts who, are you texting too much, etc. But the fundamental problem is that people can ignore you or text you 300 years later. You don't encounter these issues in real life

@Princess Arabia How am I a hypocrite, I never went to a prostitute or used such a service (althought I thought about it for some time before deciding not to, but who wouldn't at least consider it) and evaded all opportunities of having casual sex as well. You are the one doing mental acrobatics around this topic of prostitution, you did say you had sex with men for money couple of times so you basically are a retired prostitute, but found better ways of making money without having to do that work. And that's fine. But don't expect us to applause you for your bitter transactional way of looking at relationships with men, stemming from your vast "work" experience

@Princess Arabia Prostitution belongs to a job group akin to cleaning sewers or cleaning public toilets imo, it's trying to solve certain problems of society in a dishonourable, non-ideal way. It's just 100x more paid. You cannot compare them to honourable jobs. I wouldn't want to look at relationships and sex the way you do, so transactionally

I think people's selfishness is the biggest hurdle to overcome in both relationships and in regards to children, like, if both men and women understood each other, were very aware of their flaws and genuinely took responsibility over their flaws (that one's very important) and served each's needs and applied the same mindset to their children then most problems would just dissapear. It's the selfishness, narcisism, lack of self awareness and not taking responsibility and taking concrete actions to fix their flaws while also being genuinely unwilling to serve the needs of the other that creates all the relationship problems. And the problem with all this is that, even if you as a man (or you as a woman) were to do all these things on your part, there's no guarantee that the other party would be willing to do the same for you, i.e. meet you half way. So it's not so much about any one specific isolated thing but just about the general attitude and self absorbtion in an attempt to serve only ones interests. Our interests should be taken care off but ideally in a natural way

No they don't know it. You are over estimating intuition of women heavilly. How are they supposed to know what your intentions are unless you tell them? And btw, even if they do "know" it, there's a difference between knowing and feeling. Right now you are in your logical state of mind so there's no sense in debating this with you. Literaly no point at all

@Princess Arabia well, the best middle ground imo is to be straight forward (and ballsy) with woman and outright say that I'd want to fuck her, and just be explicit, and then have relationship and kids with that woman, I dont think I'd have to lie. I believe that we all can be honest and get what we want its just that the path to success can become longer (but so would the path covered with lies)

That's very true. The purpose of the act should be respected and adhered to, but since it's enjoyable for a reason (to make the most ammount of children) it also makes sense to make it as enjoyable as possible for the woman

All men only want sex. It's women who think of sex as a leverage to gain something else, or additional besides pleasure from the act So yeah that's a lie if you keep saying you want something else from women

Let's be real - the only realistic way for men and women to "not be using each other" is if they work towards a common goal for which both of them have to sacrifice themselves. That goal being having children and starting a family

Korea will finally become united, under a mercifull loving gaze of the Kim dynasty

If hugely popular dating apps are mostly made out of losers, how do you expect this idea to pan out? Expect double or tripple loosery LUL it's like those attempts at creating conservative dating apps. LOOOOSEEEERS LEL

I don't know about hell or heaven, but one thing is for sure - you're born without your consent or awareness. And since humans have enough consciousness and brain power to recognise this fact, therefore it is inherently unetical to bring new humans into this world