NewKidOnTheBlock

Please do not listen to that guy. Most fruits contain nothing but sugar, some contain a few petty vitamins but it's not like you wouldn't be able to get them from other sources. This is the type of diet you can expect to die on the quickest (followed by a more general vegan diet of course)

That is way too simplistic. Cholesterol being the #1 thing that's bad for you was a theory propagated (and was originated) in the previous century, but as it turns out it's actually the sugar, or the complex carbohydrates that's mostly responsible for heart dissease. Mostly from eating junk. Cholesterol is actually good for you and necessary for your survival. And there's no way a good healthy meat and animal products would increase it to such a degree to which it would be a problem. And if it can, again - show me the proof. There's no actual study observing effects of this kind of diet. Plant based diet without meat or animal products lacks at least 5-6 micronutrients and that's just the bare minimum, it likely lacks more. Artificial supplementation is not enough

@Sugarcoat So you're implying that meat causes heart dissease. Yes, the shit meat products we're consuming today do cause heart dissease because they are cooked on vegetable oils, riddled with preservatives and it's gained from largely unhealthy animals from these massive animal farms. Show me a study of people eating actually good quality meat that's at least semi raw so it conserves most of the nutrients that concludes people get heart dissease from consuming such meat. I'll wait.

@Princess Arabia The pyramid is fine like I said, you just have to take out top 2 layers and reverse it, eating mostly meat and animal products, then carbohydrates (important energy source and somewhat important for the brain), and then lastly vegetables. The pyramide could be a scam but that's how most people throught history (since the start of civilization) were eating, while meat was reserved for the rich. The wheat and vegetables were for the slaves. That's how it always was. It's the only way to sustain the population we have/had so in a way it's completely understandable but if you individually still have the choice to eat meat then you should probably do so. But that's just my opinion.

Just eat what the US food pyramide tells you to eat basically, but without the top 2 stages (junk food sugary shit and various vegetable oils) and in a reverse order. While consuming the most high quality meat and animal products and consuming them as raw as you're willing to risk it (the more you cook them, the more nutrients you'll destroy and the more carcinogens you'll create but at the same time if you don't cook them at all you'll risk exposing yourself to some life threatening ilnesses so it is a carefull trade off you have to make). Any recipes that would abide by these principles are basically perfect. If you can visualize the pyramide you'll know how I meant it

There is no such thing as alpha female, just another retarded internet term with no basis in reality and nature

@Emerald Your assumption that humans got to where they're now by being able to organize themselves into communities is laughably wrong, literaly thousands of animal species are capable of organizing themselves into communities and yet none of them achieved even 1% of what humans managed to achieve. The main things actually separating us from the rest is our superior brains and our 5-fingered hands - or in other words, our superior inteligence and our ability to make tools. And since your long posts are structured in a way in which each paragraph is suppose to be a logical continuation of the previous one, and since your innitial assumption is completely wrong, we can safely assume most of what you said in that post and in the posts following after that is also incorrect (since most of your posts are built on incorrect assumptions)

It's just hard for me to imagine or conceptualize living that long, as I'm just a mere petty human

One year is not big enough of a time frame for accomplishing anything worth mentioning in my opinion. I don't know why you guys keep setting up goals this way. But my significant long term goals are to live as naturally as possible (living in nature in a nice sturdy, well furnished cottage with every modern luxury that meets the eye as well) I already have a nice place in a city so now I want the opposite of that as well. I also want a good remote flexible relatively high paying job that will keep my brain sharp (but no people managment, I hate that). I want to be able to afford the healthiest and the tastiest diet humanly possible. That's pretty much it. Women are easy to get so I won't even mention that as a goal.

Broootaaal. Draft inequality, oofy-doofy-esque marriage out of convenience and natural female narcisism shown all in one post. Damn. That's a hatrick right there

If I was to be allowed to completely wild out without consequences for my future, I'd legit try to impregnate as many women as possible. But since reality functions the way it functions I'll have to find a compromise that would work for me

Oh my oh my. Where to even begin

Keep pretending that black pill isn't reality and keep being surprised

Yeah but is that really "messing up" or is that just a way dating works nowadays? Especially legit 9/10 women (I don't like a rating system it's better to just call them beautiful or above average at least. In general it's best to use below average-average-above average metric system in my opinion) you know they're the ones getting the most attention (crazy ammount), how can you know whether it wasn't just her ego or whatever. How can you know for sure it was your fault. Plus if you go well above your league (althought aiming somewhat above your league is the best approach still, just to have access to the best genes in case you'd want a child with her) you're basically guaranteed it's going to be hard for you

Yes there are. They are always there It's not an ideology, it's the truth. There's no need to defend a truth, just open your eyes. Actually, the only real proper question to ask is, to which degree is it true? There is no way to mess up the escalation when the girl is already attracted to you. Period. Any "messing up" that could happen in that scenario is completely outside of your control. You make this shit way more complicated than it really is.

There's no way to really "not handle" the situation if she throws herself at you. The so called "game" (the verbal part) basically just boils down to one thing - to act on your instincts instead of the societal conditioning which enslaved you. So basically to not act as a slave. Just keep escalating basically. You'll naturally want her in that situation and so you'd naturally act according to your insticts, therefore the only thing that can stop you in that situation, is you. That's the so called "game". Pretty much. Ofc some women will get horny from the escalation process alone ("masculinity"), but ussually you'd need to pass her looks threshold. As for me being gay, well... my dick would definitely dissagree with you

@Princess Arabia You are wrong. If a man is good looking enough there's a lot of women who will approach him or at least show him very significant choosing signals. Or if they want to use him for status or money. Either way, whether it's natural or unnatural way, this disproves your claims completely

You're consuming a chemical psychoactive compound extracted from a toad poison, it shouldn't come off as any surprise that there can be dangerous side effects

Yep, we gonna make it REAAAALLY easy for the Skynet, won't we?

Well if you keep insisting on being so realistic then yeah, masturbation is better most of the time. A.I. gfs will shake things up a little tho, I'm pretty sure of it

@Princess Arabia @Leo Gura I just think if there was a following situation: you are a heterosexual male who's horny right now and wants to release, and there would be a woman already ready for you to screw her without any cobsequences, don't have to deal with any BS cause she's already "cooked" so to speak, you'd choose to screw her 10/10, I mean I certainly would. I'd choose her over masturbation any time. That's why I think people tend to get lost in these abstractions which can sour the sex but in reality, sex is objectively better because of all of these additional pleasurable sensations. Strange thing to argue about anyway

I'd just like to have US job😂 does that count? You guys are making an ungodly ammount of money for literaly doing the same work. And yall sometimes do it worse than us europeans

Sounds like they are both in need of some help

@Leo Gura Sex without a woman is not sex at all, by definition of the word LOL I will never understand this thinking of yours. The feeling of the presence of the other throught skin contact, warmth, intimacy, aroma etc. is literaly what makes it 10x better (at least) than masturbation. If it wasn't you who keeps saying it but someone else I would assume you're coping fairly hard, but since that's not the case it just must be some strange thinking of yours.

@integral I don't even watch horror movies at all but if I had to watch one, it would be Come And See. Based on real events. That's the only one I'd be willing to give a shot