NewKidOnTheBlock

He is fiscally pretty stupid like all socialists are, you just don't understand how economics work and the importance of that. Neither do you really know his intentions, you just assume he's good because of that smug smile of his and socialist policies lmfao. One irony about this whole situation tho, is that despite all that, this is such a unique time in history due to current and projected technological advancements, that Mandani's attitude of giving away/socialism may actually be beneficial since capitalism as we know it is going to fall apart. So in a certain sense, you are right. Btw, socwokie and a classical bolshevik socialist on the same thread, what a combo rofl

It belongs to a category of technological inventions that I'm going to have to witness/reap the benefits of in order to believe in it's realness. Currently my mind just can't fathom

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYWgnkDNJI7/?igsh=MTUwODgwMDY4bmJjcA==

I would say that if A.I. posseses these 3 things: 1. Fluid core inteligence - can handle completely new situations it's never seen before, doesn't know the rules of and can't depend on any training data nor scaffolding - including handling any tasks outside the virtual world without any problems - entailing it posseses appropriate sensors for all such tasks as well 2. Complete agency and autonomy - can take on any tasks without being prompted/ordered to do so, and continues working on the task autonomously until it's completion 3. Human level economic and creative capabilities - can perform literaly any cognitive job humans do at a human level or better, including potentially newly created ones that don't even exist yet Then it could be clasified as a first, early version of AGI, it wouldn't posses a physical body yet nor any sort of qualia - but it doesn't have to, of course. All A.I.s are still doing very poorly (like, almost 0%) on the fluid inteligence according to ARC-AGI-3 benchmark, and are making reasonable progress on the second and third points but are still not there. Not saying I necessarilly dissagree with the 2027-2029 AGI prediction since I cross check it with multiple A.I.s and they are all making similiar predictions. Guess it's just hard for me to accept LOL

Indeed, it is confusing if you are weak minded and you take them seriously

He's missrepresenting requisite variety as well, using requisite variety entails you are trying to solve a problem and so, complexity of your mental toolbox must exceed a complexity of the problem. First of all, we don't even know what exact problem is OP trying to solve (there might be one but I don't wanna be offensive LOL), second of all even if the problem is named, the OPs mental toolbox to hilariously simple to "solve" a societal scale "problems"

Nope, wasn't directed at you at all. To be honest, you are too inteligent to be engaging on this thread😂 might save that energy for something else instead

Riiiiiiiiight, they'll do a whooole lot of science, I'm sure of it LOL. Good luck

Oh yeah, I know this exact problem lmfao I think I did not solve it either, you cannot login and authentificate your microsoft office 365 account and even once you login, you still cannot save those word documents and it keep telling you to login, right? Was a uni account for me as well. Still procrastinating on it lol

There are no benefits from it as it is a pointless torture long term, however in a certain sense I think our very liberal culture is underestimating the negative effects of just fapping/releasing in general all the time, or as many times as you please. It shouldn't necessarilly be as many times as you please. I think once or twice a week is the best (a week of no release reaches testosterone peak for men according to certain studies). I don't know how it is for women but I've even dealt once with a woman who couldn't cum anymore cause she had a desensitized vagina cause she masturbated and looked at porn so much, if this is something that can happen to a woman then of course it's bound to have some negative effects on men

Good example of an activity which importance does not justify the investment

Nowhere am I seeing what it is that you are supposed to provide, except for yourself. Not even any kind of effort from your side, and clearly not being raised all too well, considering you are engaging with the idea of spinning men as plates (yes they'd all be dates, but that's pretty much almost identical as men spinning women via sex from a woman's POV). So, since you haven't been brought up well and you'd never be willing to put much effort if any, it is pretty much a wrap, or, in other words, it's over, finito

It is only a highly fringe group within feminism, which is already a relatively minor group (although a large one), most women don't neccessarilly even identify themselves as feminists, they might just agree with some of their points if you ask them about it and are swimming in the waters created by feminism, so to speak. But even a general, much more common type of feminists (who really identify as such) conglomerate mostly on the internet and so it creates the illusion like the movement is everywhere and very popular. But even for them, a lot of them wouldn't want to even end capitalism or are not focused on that at all, they're just focused on the most popular issues such as supposed wage gap, harrassement etc. etc. So, it is hard to understate how irrelevant these matriarchists really are lmao

Bro woke up and chose to speak the language of straight up FACTS

It's a little hard for me to believe that genuine AGI will be created in such early dates, but I have nothing really to dispute this prediction with. Just wondering if it's not more of a marketing tactic than reflective of an actual state of A.I., that's all. Reality tends to be more boring, complicated and messier than what is ussually anticipated. I think I'd rather believe it when I see it, and in the meanwhile I'll stick to a much more moderate predictions

Apparantly not yet but now that you mention it, I watched this video a few hours ago, predicting a gloomy outcome for our A.I. development - that we are heading to techno feudalism, and that even though we are technically already there, it's going to get worse according to him. That we are going to be described as a reduntant biomass, or something like that. To be frank, this guy used to make a lot of predictions for A.I. and it's development and has been a techno optimist up untill this point, now he suddenly became a techno pessimist like everyone else. Makes me wonder whether he's not shilling his audience a little bit, I mean these content creators are living off of triggering emotions because they need as much attention as possible to make a living. Not saying it cannot happen but if you look at the comment section - and even look at some wild predictions about A.I. and technology in general on this forum - people are comming to all sorts of wild conclussions and make all sorts of wild claims. But if I put this topic into multiple A.I.s to see what they think, they claim that A.I. is simply projected to take 15% of jobs within like 5+ or even more years, whilst influencing many more. But also, it's projected to create many jobs as well, granted, it's CEOs who are making these claims but their input is not completely worthless. So, idk. I suspect most content creators just care about shilling more than the truth

First you claim this, then you claim this: Completely contradicting yourself because obviously types of people like you are luddites with no appreciation for advancements of technology we have managed to achieve. I mean, look, if you are prefering to live the way primitive hunter gatherer societies used to live, then suit yourself, but know that you are definitely in a significant minority (and your real preference is modernity anyway, you're just unaware or lying to us - likely writing this from an Iphone that you hardly can exist without). Btw, isn't that interesting how all these few examples of matrilineal/matrilocal societies that ever managed to exist during human history, were always primitive? You mentioned Haudenosaunee (Iroquois), Aztecs and Incas were living on the same continent, sure, different geographies, but resource wise they weren't so different. And yet, Aztecs and Incas happened to be more advanced than Iroquois, and they happened to be patriarchies, isn't it interesting coincidence? That any society with any semblence of progress and not a shithole was always patriarchal. Just a food for thought. Of course you gonna cope with changing the definition of what advanced means, but that was to be expected. I will not adress this at all since for me it'll never change. Herein lies the heart of the issue; people like you are not really focused on true understanding, you are in reality a political activist. And on this thread, what you are doing is a political activism via influencing; i. e. trying to make us change our opinions and accept your worldview and ideology. But I don't think most people here are interested in political activism

Genious solution of Rafael: let's all return to a pre-industrial era mindsets and societies because of this one example of a small, isolated and highly primitive North American tribal society. The kind of society that even Aztecs and Incas mogged in terms of scale, technology, urban development and administrative capacity, yet somehow we are closer to apes than they were, according to Rafael LOL

Any of you I challenge you, try put this stuff into any A.I. and it'll tell you, in a civilized polite way that you're essentially retarded, that you are incorrect and that things are much more complicated and nuanced, it's gonna list you all the factors you have not considered. Even wokie ChatGTP should tell you that despite how ass kissing and censored it is LOL

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYZ31i9AegR/?igsh=c2gxNHh5NnQ5MmVw

They could've resisted our domestification attempts like elks or mooses did. Or like elephants have, and many other animal species that are too wild to "tame". Apparently it had to be a mutually beneficial deal, otherwise they'd have to reject us and get a job instead

This is why China is beating our ass right now lmfao bro would probably get imprisoned for 20 years for dumb shit like this

Most dogs shouldn't allow people to own them, then. Why don't they create dog unions to fight back against inequality, why don't they just get jobs?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYcf1l_R-4G/?igsh=ZjA5dmd4MGJ6eDhk Comrade Mandani stealing money from the future New Yorkers in a form of higher future taxes due to his present budget rebalancing seems like a fitting theft example to me lmao socialists simply can't help themselves, they have to get their hands on that dough and socwokies are no exception

So what? Has Leo trademarked or copyrighted the content of his videos? He hasn't done any of those things! Healthy competition cannot hurt