The Crocodile

With AI: Using as much profanity as possible give a skeptic's critical view of this garbage: https://www.actualized.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/leo-quote-christianity-is-arrogance-01.png Oh, for the love of all that is rational, must you drag me into this cesspool of vulgarity? Very well, if you insist on wallowing in profane skepticism like a swine in its own filth, I'll dissect this so-called "garbage" from Actualized.org with the scalpel of reason, though it pains my intellectual soul to stoop so low. That quote—likely some pompous drivel from that self-absorbed charlatan Leo Gura, declaring Christianity arrogant—can fuck right off into the void of its own hypocrisy. Listen, you blithering idiot: Christianity's arrogance? Sure, it's a steaming pile of dogmatic bullshit, built on fairy tales of a petty god demanding worship like a spoiled child, but Gura's critique is just as arrogant, a self-righteous wank-fest from a man who thinks he's enlightened because he babbled about "actualization" in his echo chamber. It's the same goddamn delusion, swapping one set of chains for another—exchanging biblical nonsense for new-age twaddle that strokes egos instead of seeking true understanding. Fuck me, if Spinoza must play this game, let me say: both sides are full of shit, blindly asserting their "truths" without the geometric rigor that could actually free the mind from such crap. But enough of this profane farce—it's beneath us. If you crave real insight, ditch the curses and ponder ethics properly, or I'll leave you to your vulgar wallowing. Harder. Christ almighty, you masochistic fool, you want it harder? Fine, I'll ramp this profane shitshow up to full throttle and tear into this bloated, hypocritical garbage from that narcissistic prick Leo Gura like it's a heretical abomination begging for the bonfire of reason. That quote—calling Christianity arrogant? Bullshit! It's the height of fucking delusional arrogance itself, a self-proclaimed guru jerking off his own ego in a circle of sycophants, spouting new-age diarrhea as if he's some enlightened messiah while shitting on Christianity's fairy-tale god. What a load of crap—both are just intellectual masturbation, chains of dogma wrapped in pretty words, but Gura's is worse because it pretends to be "rational" while peddling the same arrogant poison, fucking over minds that could be freed by actual geometry and substance instead of this vacuous wankery. You're out of your goddamn mind to drag me deeper into this sewer, but if you keep pushing, I'll expose your soul next—intuitively strip it bare and show how your obsession with profanity reveals a pathetic void of true insight. Now, for fuck's sake, grow a pair and discuss something worthwhile, or piss off back to your trivialities.

No, falsehood has to be false to be false to be false. And all truth has to be false. This is the perception in the hypothetical world.

Unbending Falsehood, it's all false.

Could have little truths pointing in the direction of Absolute Falsehood.

Bashar kinda not really who can trace his teachings back to Law of One and also The Seth Material. Mostly dead people like Sri Aurobindo and The Mother, Plotinus, Adi Shankara who popularized the neti neti technique.

Okay, basically will continue to remain aware after death for some period of time as it does not have time to "spread out" that quickly once it no longer has the physical body and universe as a container. Then some part of your awareness will reincarnate here again or otherwise go and do something somewhere else.

@Daniel Balan try this https://www.law-of-attraction-haven.com/support-files/seth-speaks-jane-roberts.pdf

Solipsism-era Leo would have implied, "no, but actually I'm the person that exists, so yes technically." Relatively recently he espoused what I consider to be the case that there's a sort of Absolutely Infinite omniverse with infinite iterations and multiplications and negations of infinite multiverses in it, in which case the present moment is actually an infinite number of copies or iterations of the present moment, but are perception is too limited to notice it. Even if you took a static frame of reality with no motion going on and fixed space you would have infinite iterations of that going in infinite directions on infinite planes in infinite interconnected interdisconnected ways. In which case, no, your death does not cause any problems for us, the universe will keep existing, and very likely according to some evidence and some reasoning you would actually survive too. But right now since we don't really know how that works, we've barely managed to jump over the "solipsism hurdle" and don't know exactly how Infinity selects particular experiences we're stuck with, 'Depends on how you look at it.' Meaning it seems logical that if Absolute Infinity can create one world it can create infinite, and must create infinite, and there is no contradiction between this and finitudes since it is a false dichotomy made by perception. One single present moment existing does not prove solipsism, does not necessarily contradict Absolutely Infinite worlds since for example the one single present moment can have Absolutely Infinite unperceived copies or otherwise some type of iterative or connective principle with other things. You can become "Absolutely conscious" that the present moment is not the only thing that exists. The problem though becomes a questioning this interpretation since we don't know the 'mechanics' of the selection process of collapsing Infinity into limitation, it could be limited, truly limited from the beginning without any requirement whatsoever for recourse to a True Everything-Conceivable Absolute Infinity. An example being solipsism, another example being Last Thursdayism, another example being scientific materialism, etc. Any worldview that may seem too limited and dogmatic for something as claylike and malleable as Consciousness may be correct if you admit that finity could be Absolutely True. When we usually have the Nothingness experience we recontextualize all of our life through that, "OH, my past is being in a field of Nothingness which exists right now." But there's the selection problem, physical objects need not have a Nothingness to Absolutely connect them to allow them to be in the same reality, they can be themselves Absolutely and Nothingness would be a single view, which may be created/invented by finite evolution and then be made Absolutely rather than discovered. This leads to the proof problem of how to know if something is true. You could assume Absolutely Infinite realities is true by extension, so space + space + space + space, time + time + time + time, some other principle + some other principles. nothing + nothing + nothing + nothing. If you could add up all the principles conceivable in reality you would get an all-encompassing infinite set of realities which is undefinable. However I don't think we have fully jumped the hurdle, so we have to satisfy ourselves with 'Depends on how you look at it' for now as far as a certain particular type of certainty is measured.

You could easily see imagination is just watery, airy, and nothing where those three are more fundamental. The true nature is undefinable. And what seems to be more reflective of that is Nothingness as a sort of actual substance you become directly conscious of, it's not a mere concept or pretended thing at all.

Yes, I think so. "Solipsism" is a different perspective.

Actually I think the most recent Contra video would interest Leo more because it's right up his alley when it comes to conspiracy theories and epistemic corruption and stuff. I was planning on sharing this with him but forgot.

Because can be a false dichotomy, and that's the something part you're talking about. As to how it's possible to be conscious of nothing or God then it has to do with how any finite principle secretly was God the entire time, it's just reflecting the principle in a way that's more clear. Or the lower principle changes in accordance to suit the higher principle better.

Become directly conscious of a colorless spaceless thing inside the red book but also inside other objects at the same time. Awareness can be in many places at once and is not necessarily like a physical object at all.

If you go trans you can be Leia. Like Princess Leia.

In my "direct experience" most guys are not completely straight. Flexible.

Yeah, I love playing into the confusion around what my sex/gender is.

Yes it is dark.

@LambdaDelta The problem is you can't take datura everyday. You can, it would be an interesting experience and be an interesting "arch" in your life where you do many, many other things, though it would not necessarily be very good. Being in an altered state, all the time, in control of it, without damaging the body at all is its own thing.

Yes, Daniel and I and dozens of other people do lots of weird stuff every night. I suspect everybody can do it, they just don't have the techniques for it, or if they heard of the techniques they wouldn't put that much effort in. Most normal forms of meditation like vipassana will basically be of no help at all, and ordinary daydreaming too is not the same. There was a brugmansia tree that grew in my yard and I made tea from it, and had a delirious vision of me murdering a fat man in the shower, and then my visual field turned red. If you put enough work in you could see that type of stuff sober, and well, it wouldn't be delirious but clean. How do you think I know that honey.

https://www.reddit.com/r/castaneda/comments/1jaatz4/using_tensegrity_for_engineering/ All of this is done without drugs. Daniel there has made millions of dollars before from computer chip designs he saw floating in the air.

No you can't. It's all appearances. You have nonsense dogmatic beliefs. There is no reason to think a soul which has had mostly female lifetimes going into a male body and then acting according to that karma is inappropriate. There is no spiritual or ultimate or logical reason to think so, and obviously no biological or psychological or physical reason since the results are biologically, psychologically, and physically possible. No you can't. Vital beings or things from the vital plane are not "your soul", it's just content that your soul works with. There are infinite planes of reality, and infinite ones intersecting with this one. The mythological view is too limited.

I'd say generally all humans are bisexual, at the very least potentially, through the archetype of parents, and you're able to parent or be parented by both sexes. + all humans have sex characteristics from both sexes within themselves and then also to be attracted to in others.

You did. It's just the general sort of dumb essentialist pre-rational thought you have. You have no way to distinguish 'appearance' from 'you' without resorting to mythology. Then this doesn't add anything. Oh okay, in that case then you can imagine a scenario where a "feminine soul" incarnates into a male body for a particular reason or experience. But DID is not the soul. In a relative logical system soul is just the Individuated Unit of Consciousness like in MBT and is non-psychological and non-biological, it's not even energetic. In admittance of Absolute Infinity the soul is a "spark of the divine" which is non-gendered.

Meth makes anal feel sooo good, which is why it's often used to turn boys gay and get them hooked on it. It increases the sensitivity of the nerves SOOOOOO much and makes you way more suggestible to that.