The Crocodile

Plenty of people have anxiety attacks without committing violence, dear.

What happened was he walked onto somebody else's property, walked up to a golden retriever with the express intention of interacting with it, then when it went to interact with him he started kicking it, it possibly fought back, and he kicked it until it actually seemed to be dead.

looks like Schizophonia

@Carl-Richard Is this true?

Show proof.

Errr no, this just means people are brainwashed by Leo.

Dude, THIS is not your direct experience. You're just a Leo cultist.

I would have difficulty explaining it without you objecting, because it goes against the spiritual dogma that "the present moment is the only thing that's real". But I'd say just try to approach the truth from all perspectives, and that solipsism isn't right because you can also view everything as outside you, not inside.

very good quote I'll remember it from you, not the movie.

No, he's done that. He's just realized it's not true. He's realized The Absolute is not limited to that at all and never could be. You could know that stuff exists outside of your current moment, given that the current moment ten years ago is a different thing, is a different emanation. And through paranormal means you can directly connect to other people's bubbles of experience. No, it exists in a context.

@strangelooper You are right. Leo was just very stupid on this issue. You could say in The Absolute "neither solipsism nor non-solipsism is true". Solipsism is a wrong belief caused by the belief you have a physical body, or the delusion your current bubble of experience is the only thing in relative reality when relative reality obviously has more stuff in it, so any spiritual experience gets wrongly interpreted and perceived to be "ultimate" by the level someone's at.

Play a football game on one screen and a Leo video on another and see how they have almost nothing in common.

@zurew The truth value is Absolutely True, ie. not subject to scientific thinking. Same thing with God. I could give techniques that could be used to verify it though, just like how somebody could verify God through direct experience.

Case closed. Socialization being "natural" does not mean humans require it. A rock you're looking at is not a hypothesis. God is not a hypothesis. There may be anomalies. Someone can have anger or sadness while experiencing real magic, but there's an underlying bliss always. It's not the suffering endemic to how people live nowadays. The type of magic I mean they'll be gazing off into fully visible other realms, energies, and be in a totally heightened nonlinear perception that includes this one as a single perceptual point. Not that they're "visualizing" or fantasizing spirits. That's the distinction.

It's not a hypothesis. Not really, suffering is a result of not having real magic. The modern state of socialization is not natural at all to humans.

@Nilsi Yeah, you have good taste in music. I remember you also like Charli XCX and Sonic Youth. You see the goodness in a variety of higher quality type things. Leo (and others) have horrendous tastelessness.

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say the dog biting him is just a lie. And if it was the dog was defending itself.

So you just murdered a golden retriever because you're retarded? And you want . . . advice?

They would be able to perceive other worlds and entities, because they never would have "grown out of" their monster under the bed or Santa Claus phase, nobody to decondition them from it. And they would have less of an internal dialogue, so their perception would be less stunted and less limited. The survival we had hundreds of thousands of years ago hunting, exploring, and camping is actually more conducive to seeing spirits. Because you're not fretting over all the horrible personal problems you have in your life and grievances with society, you're not pretending to understand reality using the intellect or science, you're just existing and discovering things. You just go into the forest, and the forest spirits are there.

@zurew I meant if a person grew up totally by themselves they would naturally spiritually develop, but because of the socialization we have they're forced into a particular low state of perception and unexpanded perception suitable to modern socialization.

Dude, you seriously need to turn off your internal dialogue. Like right now. Too noisy. There are post-human stages without internal dialogue. If you removed the internal dialogue you would go into a post-human state of being, and would too have superior understanding of what the human and pre-human even are. Nonlinear perception is better. That's why I said if a child grew up without being socialized out of mystical and magical experiences and without being lineated into a single fascistic perception, the child would be gazing off into other realms and interacting with entities and energies which are of a far superior plane. And there's no contradiction between this and human psychology and human biology. I don't think he wrote much. You're probably wrong and thinking of something somebody else wrote about him. Yes. He's a conman and a scumbag, and a pretender.

@Rigel The yellow dot would work just fine Or even an image of something you like

That would work. Though a candle might work faster,

Humans do not need to know how to speak. And sorcery could be very cold, to someone that values "a warm prosocial home". That's just how it is. ramana maharshi sort of I would say sadhguru but he doesn't count as a yogi.

Many children have magical and mystical experiences but are conditioned out of it. If a child grew up on a planet with no other humans or animals they could probably only become a yogi, because they wouldn't have anybody to condition them out of their natural capacity for perceiving unacceptable things.