Mellowmarsh

If you’re going to love. Love deeply on the unconditional level only. It’s the only real and true love.

No tale on me…

Okay Leo. I believe you.

The echo chamber has spoken and in full force today. 😂

@Mellowmarsh Preaching to the choir is likened to a still wind that’s full of wind. 😂 Speak for yourself, try to refrain from projection, those illusory characters you’ve invented that you’ve called Joseph.

This has to be serious play, you cannot be not serious. If this play wasn’t serious then we’d simply walk out, stop being it’s audience. Seriousness is what keeps us glued to the screen on which the movie is playing. James just picks and chooses his movies, preferring one part to another. The parts he doesn’t like he walks out on. 😂 Its just fun to watch him leave his own show, or even funnier, to watch him show up to his own show.

Well all I can say my beloved sister, is that you must by far, be the most interesting you, you’ve ever met. You really can’t see past yourself can you, rejoice and embrace that feeling. It’s all you dude, daddy O.

What the heck is your problem with suffering? You still haven’t answered the question. Why is it brutal for ego person to die?

It’s not arguing, it’s arguing. 😂 Oneness has no argument with itself, so it imagines one, or two, or three add infinitum.

You did your best for a you that in your opinion does not exist. And you call this resistance to non existing suffering? Oh my are you the confused one. You believe you are talking to someone who is suffering and that you tried your best to remove the suffering of someone you claim to not exist. Okay, all inside your own head be that, suffering is your own creation, now own it, not project it onto the non existent.

Nothing can own what you already are. Your just simply repeating nondual BS as if it is actually useful, meaningful or relevant. The denial of self is still the attempt to own the no self ship. How silly is that. The concepts known as solipsism, enlightenment, ownership non ownership, are fully relevant within the dream story. Fine, have no story then, that too is a dream story. It’s your dream story, you are experiencing, no one else’s.

@James123 Nondual speak is a stupid and dumb way to speak, or express the reality of God. It’s so overcooked and outdated now, and well overdue for some real actual authentic not fake, relevance.

@James123 Either now or on your deathbed you will recognise that final solipsistic awakening, or you’ll pass away in total ignorance.And nothing will change, because it was all your dream any which way it appeared to you, you imagined it all, nothing excluding, especially nothing. God is all inclusive, never not here, never absent. Even pretending to be absent is all inclusiveness.

There’s no echo in absence, because absence is never not here.

Why don’t you make up your own mind about God? Instead of believing what others are saying? The Osho saying is selling spiritual bamboozle in exchange for money. Selling water by the river to confuse you into believing this is for sale, and some buy it hook line and sinker. In reality nothing is ever absent, nothing is never not here. NEVER NOT HERE

To create a false distinction simultaneously creates a true distinction by the sheer act of distinction. The human mind has no other frame of reference in which to refer itself to, so of course it’s only going to refer itself to its own self created conceptual narrative. Which of course is an integral part of reality, why dismiss false in favour of not false. When all distinction is equal to God anyway since God alone is? This is the madness of the nondual speakers, they only prefer one part of the dream in favour of the other. It’s just mind blowing nonsense, a futile attempt to put God back inside the genie lamp, in the vain attempt to show God off to the whole world and to declare look what I’ve caught, as if the rest of the world hasn’t seen anything like it before in their entire life. Everyone knows God can’t be caught, or put back in the genie lamp to show others.When one thing knows God then everything knows God. The human mind already knows it’s not in charge, it already knows it’s not beating it’s heart or breathing it’s breath. There’s no dream without a dream body to carry out the function of autonomous action or agency. That’s why this conception is conceived in the first place. Inconceivable this conception comes out of the genie lamp eventually, and once it’s out the expansion is so huge that there’s just no return to the genie lamp. The conception is forever. And everyone knows it, because God is everyone. This is Gods Solipsistic nature.

How would a mind / ego person fall away, if God is all, Alone.

This feeling brutal is a distinction. Why does it in your opinion have to be conclusively brutal? Are you concluding there’s no other way to feel?

You have deflected from answering the question. Why assume it’s brutal for the ego/ person to die?

So God lives through dead people. Okay, if only that was true, my dead mother would be alive right now as the living goddess herself. This is absurd nondual understanding. Maybe time to ditch it and think about something a little more plausible.

Why assume it’s brutal for the ego/person to die? What is brutal about that? Why not allow all the dead people to speak for themselves, to tell you the actual truth about the brutality of their death? Why are you speaking for dead people? Can you see the dilemma here?

İf God is all, who says it is alone or solipstic? Same who who says “if God is all”

You don’t look at the mirror. You are the mirror.

You make too many presumptions and whatabouts. You have never known death, it’s absurd to speculate about it. The person is real as the concept is known, even if the real is just an illusion, the illusion still happens. The illusion is written, it’s spoken, it happens. And what is can never be what isn’t. That’s the absurdity of old and modern day nondual speaker. Your delivery is full of many unnecessary contradictions, dismissals and discards it’s festooned with red flags, especially when you shut down these conversations like you’ve done previously. Why not just tell the whole truth, instead of half a truth. Why lie, when you can just be totally honest about everything. Simply, reality is never detached from itself anyway. To talk about attachment to thoughts is to imply thoughts are something separate from the awareness of them, that awareness believes it has to form some sort of attachment to them. The truth is, thoughts have never been detached from their source in the first place. Thoughts are not some imposter secondary passenger along for a free ride. They are the very fabric of the dreamscape reality.

There is distinction, there is ego. The very fact that these concepts are known as this very conception, cannot then, be spirited away to some mysterious place known as nothingness. No more than blood can be washed away using blood. Your nondual message is getting more and more absurd. It’s never too late to realise the absurdity. The power is always within you to substitute it with something that actually makes sense. You can always write a more credible story, but first you have to burn your old books so they become null and void of persuasion or influence that may self serve to revive your past sloppy misunderstandings into the real and true nature of reality.