Mellowmarsh

@PurpleTree The OP is correct there’s no Tuesday. No thing can describe “what is”, or, every thing describes “ what is” Same difference where there IS/ None.

@Yimpa 😂

A thought cannot be unthought. “Cannot” is the block to understanding.

Don’t need to waste time refuting this. This can be recognised now. This is not even a theory, it’s the recognition that all theories must be deduced to nothing more than nothing burgers. This is it, exactly as it is. Is it, yes, it is.

The story is never separated from the book.

No one banged her, not even you. Every one is no one.

That which appears to awaken: never awakened. Nothing is asleep everything is wide awake aliveness.

Leo if everything is God then fake spiritual people is TRUTH which is LOVE “Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me".

I did read it all the way to the bottom. But my point was does it matter how we translate the meaning of the idea solipsism. The point is it can’t be unproven or proved. It cannot be wished to be true or false. Oneness is already self evident. There’s simply awareness and nothing outside of that arena.

Claiming never vanishes. What appears to vanish- never vanished.

Integral thinking is very important or necessary when seeking for the entrance to this nondual reality.

Logically prove solipsism is not truth? Do that first .

Solipsistic golden rule number 1 Never talk about yourself to others, or, never talk about others to yourself. 😂

Cannot detach or attach to something that is within. The Consciousness and the contents of consciousness are a unity. Consciousness cannot unhinge from its content no more than a wave can unhinge from the ocean, or, an object can unhinge from the space in which it occupies. 😂

Very nicely explained. 👍

Seems like arising is more prominent in this case.

Yes beliefs are communicated, that’s unavoidable, unless you prefer to be silent, where there’s no way to communicate that silence. Show me someone who has finished with words, and what would that look like? 😂 And what would be the point in being a blank canvas without a paintbrush?

Yes, and you communicate a dismissive tone to the word. That’s palpable.

Yes, it’s all language in this conception. Reality is whether there’s a concept about it or not. The sense of aliveness cannot be refuted or negated. And I think the solipsism idea springs forth from the realisation that there’s nothing outside of the sense of aliveness, there’s simply no way to cross boundlessness, there’s no horizon so to speak.. duality is conceptual, while the sense of aliveness is nondual.

I don’t know why the word solipsism triggers you so much. Everyone is caught up in the same error of translation. What the word means to some might mean something completely different to others. Nothing is preventing the solipsism idea from being imagined. Nothing can make what is imagined be imagined away. 😂

You are projecting yourself onto me, I am your mirror and will reflect back every answer to your question. You are the giver and recipient both. Have a nice day! 🙏

@Natasha Tori Maru I understand your work here is to be professional, I respect that. But I loved that you came out to play for a little while. 😆 Thanks, it made my day.