Mellowmarsh

There’s no echo in absence, because absence is never not here.

Why don’t you make up your own mind about God? Instead of believing what others are saying? The Osho saying is selling spiritual bamboozle in exchange for money. Selling water by the river to confuse you into believing this is for sale, and some buy it hook line and sinker. In reality nothing is ever absent, nothing is never not here. NEVER NOT HERE

To create a false distinction simultaneously creates a true distinction by the sheer act of distinction. The human mind has no other frame of reference in which to refer itself to, so of course it’s only going to refer itself to its own self created conceptual narrative. Which of course is an integral part of reality, why dismiss false in favour of not false. When all distinction is equal to God anyway since God alone is? This is the madness of the nondual speakers, they only prefer one part of the dream in favour of the other. It’s just mind blowing nonsense, a futile attempt to put God back inside the genie lamp, in the vain attempt to show God off to the whole world and to declare look what I’ve caught, as if the rest of the world hasn’t seen anything like it before in their entire life. Everyone knows God can’t be caught, or put back in the genie lamp to show others.When one thing knows God then everything knows God. The human mind already knows it’s not in charge, it already knows it’s not beating it’s heart or breathing it’s breath. There’s no dream without a dream body to carry out the function of autonomous action or agency. That’s why this conception is conceived in the first place. Inconceivable this conception comes out of the genie lamp eventually, and once it’s out the expansion is so huge that there’s just no return to the genie lamp. The conception is forever. And everyone knows it, because God is everyone. This is Gods Solipsistic nature.

How would a mind / ego person fall away, if God is all, Alone.

This feeling brutal is a distinction. Why does it in your opinion have to be conclusively brutal? Are you concluding there’s no other way to feel?

You have deflected from answering the question. Why assume it’s brutal for the ego/ person to die?

So God lives through dead people. Okay, if only that was true, my dead mother would be alive right now as the living goddess herself. This is absurd nondual understanding. Maybe time to ditch it and think about something a little more plausible.

Why assume it’s brutal for the ego/person to die? What is brutal about that? Why not allow all the dead people to speak for themselves, to tell you the actual truth about the brutality of their death? Why are you speaking for dead people? Can you see the dilemma here?

İf God is all, who says it is alone or solipstic? Same who who says “if God is all”

You don’t look at the mirror. You are the mirror.

You make too many presumptions and whatabouts. You have never known death, it’s absurd to speculate about it. The person is real as the concept is known, even if the real is just an illusion, the illusion still happens. The illusion is written, it’s spoken, it happens. And what is can never be what isn’t. That’s the absurdity of old and modern day nondual speaker. Your delivery is full of many unnecessary contradictions, dismissals and discards it’s festooned with red flags, especially when you shut down these conversations like you’ve done previously. Why not just tell the whole truth, instead of half a truth. Why lie, when you can just be totally honest about everything. Simply, reality is never detached from itself anyway. To talk about attachment to thoughts is to imply thoughts are something separate from the awareness of them, that awareness believes it has to form some sort of attachment to them. The truth is, thoughts have never been detached from their source in the first place. Thoughts are not some imposter secondary passenger along for a free ride. They are the very fabric of the dreamscape reality.

There is distinction, there is ego. The very fact that these concepts are known as this very conception, cannot then, be spirited away to some mysterious place known as nothingness. No more than blood can be washed away using blood. Your nondual message is getting more and more absurd. It’s never too late to realise the absurdity. The power is always within you to substitute it with something that actually makes sense. You can always write a more credible story, but first you have to burn your old books so they become null and void of persuasion or influence that may self serve to revive your past sloppy misunderstandings into the real and true nature of reality.

The messenger James delivers a Nondual message that contains mostly half the story. Sometimes it contains full integration which resonates deeply. But mainly it’s totally butchered and wrong. Only James can realise either now or on his deathbed how wrong and brutal his message is and admit he is wrong. Nothing can fix how he thinks, except himself. Truth is all that really matters. Leo has emphasised that there are many awakenings for genuine truth seekers, and each awakening must be discarded before entering the final awakening, once that final door is opened it must be simultaneously closed for good. Because it’s the good place. It’s God.

Dissolve is only a conceptual distinction between two states. Tangibly Solid and Intangibly Ethereal. These distinctions carry connotations of spirituality or a connection to the divine because it is the actual nature of the divine. All distinctions have an antithetical nature that allows the distinction to occur by nature of a contrast that allows a perceivable identity. It being a distinction leads to the inevitability that people will disagree for that is how distinct things occur: contrast. Your postings butcher the divine and may be the actual cause of the very suffering you are attempting to eliminate through your false dichotomy. Integration is the key to unlocking and discerning actual truth here..

Reality devoid of any concept could be likened to the state of constant deep dreamless sleep devoid of waking. Reality has become aware it is aware as and through the thought mechanism. A thought has created this entire conception. There’s simply no way this conception can not be conceived once conceived. Awareness is present in both awake presence and during sleep, if not present in sleep,then there would be no knowledge of ever waking up from sleep. Awareness has never experienced the experience of never waking up from sleep. Awareness never actually sleeps.

Awareness of the disappearing appearing concepts simply points to the disappearing appearances capacity to reappear infinitely for eternity. There’s simply no way to escape conceptualisation as an alive witness. This aliveness is all that’s known in its very conception. Meaning there is nothing but aliveness, so even death is aliveness. Both. Same. Identical. Only as conceived, known. Even if solipsism is just an illusion the illusion is without doubt or error because only aliveness is known. One with the knowing and not even with, just alone as one.

Be witness of arising. That is the true meaning of Solipsism.

Only. All one, alone, sole, single, solitary. All these words pointing to Solipsism or Only.

This is a thought?

Is the ocean of all that is was and ever will be ever detached from the totality of ocean?

A thought likened to a wave rising from the ocean falling back into the ocean exists as the infinite ocean, these thought waves are being inseparable from the ocean are infinite thought waves arising and falling infinitely for eternity?

It is named ( Being) that the name (Being) doesn’t touch the name( Being) ?

What is the “IT” ? Apologies for the questions, I’m just trying to understand what’s being pointed to.

Okay.

Are you saying there’s nothing outside of God, or there’s nothing outside of knowledge?