Mellowmarsh

Okay.

I think the difference between Joseph and Mellowmarsh is obvious. You teach people how to live, whereas I teach people how to die. And let’s not confuse this with physical literal suicide, it’s not about that, it’s about the dissolution of the illusory separate “ I” There is no “I” here right now. I never existed. There is a body and a brain. That feeling of aliveness is not going to go away. Life will go on as it always has. The belief that there is a “you” that controls life can be seen as just that, it’s a belief. From belief to clarity.

It killed me off. So that’s a good thing because dead people no longer question anything. Or think about anything, anymore.

I’m saying there’s no you doing. A you doing implies separation. A “you” is a Thought. Thoughts are referring to fixed objects that pre-exist in a world outside language. But those thought things can simply not be found. Thought things appear to be superior and are a powerful conceptual belief in an objective perspective. This is not about giving it up. It is about realising that thought things are simply concepts. But an objective perspective is not experience. It is not real.

How much of a you is truly needed in everything you do this day? The body runs itself, there’s no you running it.

I don’t understand bug talk, sorry. I personally find your personal language method of communication to be very confusing. 🫤

Okay, I respect your opinion, it’s your story after all, who am I to deny you your opinion. I don’t, it’s just not mine that’s all. Only I’m me, not someone else. I’m also here to understand me, not be understood.

With all due respect, You don’t need others to understand anything, you don’t need to be understood, you’ve made it pretty obvious by now that are doing just fine understanding yourself. I respect that.

I’ve actually no idea what you’re talking about, and that’s nothing unusual for me tbh.

Well don’t let the voices in your head talk you out of this chatter in your head.

Okay.

Well thanks for the talk about it. But I don’t really think that’s what you are talking about, is it. It’s never about the about. I understand that.

Creation is a man made artificial synthetic phenomenon that apparently is sourced within a human brain as an idea. And yet when you look for the idea, all you’re likely to find is a lumpy slimy mass of grey matter.

Belief is a synthetic artificial chemical creation. An idea without an idea of what it is, except as a belief.

So there’s just thoughts about thoughts then? And these thoughts just effortlessly appear and disappear, and there’s nothing making them happen or unhappen.

Apophatic Creation (The Unknown): Creation is understood as the manifestation of divine energy. Because the ultimate reality (the Absolute or Brahman) is boundless and uncreated, it cannot be fully conceptualized by the human mind. Walking the razor's edge means embracing the unknown—the delicate, silent space beyond ego, words, and thoughts. Dualities of the Material World: Creation is built on dualities (good vs. evil, pleasure vs. pain, material vs. spiritual). The razor's edge represents the perfect "middle way" where you exist in the material world without being consumed by it.

Your response makes absolutely no sense to me. Our stories, like seeds, can only be planted, never controlled. Reality itself is infinite, but our language is limited.

Our words can chain the dragon or set it loose.

Then it’s better to build bridges instead of walls.

I hear you man. We’re all walking the razors edge of creation … so let’s just wait and see what happens to you, and maybe me… maybe here today, gone tomorrow, just like you’ve been saying in your absofuckinlutely amazing posts.

There’s not even an “I” dropping a view here. Just as there’s no “I” that sleeps or is breathing. And that’s the point you’re making that seems to go unnoticed, but not by I 😉 Great topic starter, my friend. 👍

Knowing is known as the limits of the known, the unknown is but the limits of itself as known; limit remains boundaries fold and unfold as but a river.

Can the unreal be a problem? If you know that all thoughts are about the real or the unreal, but are never themselves the real, do they have to be taken so seriously?

Yes, exactly true. Thought and language are not understood as referring to fixed objects that pre-exist in a world outside language. This is because those things can simply not be found.

How much of a self is truly needed in everything you do this day?