Mellowmarsh

It’s obviously changing the subject. Everyone has their own opposition.

The topic is “ Fuck Enlightenment “ I personally agree with the topic. I also interpreted the F word to mean “dismiss” or “forget it” To let an idea go completely. I personally agree with the topic because “enlightenment” is just another try tactic of the ego to get something, adding more to it’s archive of achievements, when this is already perfectly being itself without trying or controlling it. I personally didn’t interpret the F word as meaning anything to do with a “someone” expressing itself as rage or anger. The point is… The topic is about letting go of try, and just recognising yourself as this effortless being you already are. That’s how it’s interpreted here anyway, I have no problem with how others interpret this. If it’s being interpreted as rage or anger, then that’s what it is there, but it’s not what is being interpreted here. Hope this is back on topic and not diverging into semantic tangents.

We’re all just messengers. When a message is heard and that message is fully understood, it’s only because the listener has already been there first. I am the first and last idiot so to speak… ⬅️ not to be taken literally.

Anyone assuming they know what’s good or better for someone else is obscene arrogance.

Enlightenment is not for sale. It’s already free. If anyone is determined to sell this stuff, then sell it for free. No one has to be a beggar in their own kingdom.

It’s all Greek to me.

I can’t because I am not disagreeing, I’m agreeing.

Art is natural. Nature is artificial.

No.... not mistaking the images... Yes, mistaking the images for what’s looking. What’s looking is real, what’s looked upon is unreal.

We project other people and then make them our idols because we have nothing else to relate to, or with.

Continuing… Process vs. Product: "Knowing" can be viewed as a continuous process, whereas a "concept" is a static product or labeled idea. Beyond Words (Non-Conceptual): Non-conceptual knowing is considered a state of consciousness that occurs when not thinking, involving a deeper, immediate intelligence rather than conceptual categorization. "Knowing" vs. "Understanding": While understanding involves mental, conceptual, and intellectual processing (connecting dots), knowing can be a direct, non-mental recognition, sometimes described as an unconscious competence. Essentially, this perspective argues that the act of "knowing" transcends the mental structures (concepts) we use to label it.

Mistaking the images on the screen of consciousness for reality is pornography. Fuck that.

Semantics. It’s about switching context. You do you.

Leo, or any other named avatar is a 3 dimensional projected image upon a 2 dimensional screen of consciousness. Awareness is conscious on contact with a surface. —— A.I. “This statement aligns with the perspective that awareness is the fundamental, formless, and absolute state, while consciousness is the localized, relative, and dualistic experience that arises when awareness "contacts" or interacts with a specific form or content (like the mind, senses, or an object). “ According to teachings from philosophers such as Nisargadatta Maharaj, the distinction is that awareness is primordial and total, while consciousness is a "reflection against a surface”

For me, me absolutely 💯 agrees with that impeccable message. Pure Beauty. 💯

If, or when ONE thing is known , everything is known. If Leo is right, then everyone is right. We’re not the pixels on the screen of consciousness. The pixels are the projection of the fundamental light source known as consciousness, in this conception. —— A.I. “This is a metaphorical statement. If you understand the essence or "material cause" of something—like understanding that all gold ornaments are fundamentally just gold—you understand the nature of everything that appears as diverse, separate objects. It means recognizing that the entire universe is a manifestation of one absolute reality.”

A.I ( “Be like water" is a spiritual and philosophical concept, popularized by Bruce Lee from Taoist teachings, emphasizing adaptability, flow, and resilience. It means letting go of rigidity to handle life’s challenges with effortless grace, non-resistance, and internal strength, allowing one to flow around obstacles rather than breaking against them. )

Surrender & Non-Resistance: It does not mean giving up, but rather letting go of the need to control every outcome, which reduces internal stress and suffering.

Yes, a pro found dead. 😊

Your interpretation above is one interpretation, but there’s another. Ever heard of switching context? In English : the opposite is also valid…“Fuck it” signifies eager positive determination, transforming from a phrase of resignation into a powerful, liberating, and motivating tool. In this context, it represents a conscious choice to break through fear, overthinking, and the constraints of ‘others' opinions to pursue a goal boldly.

Tell the avatar to the left to blow its nose. The avatar to the left is frozen energy fixed in space time duality.

You are faceless. You have no image of yourself.

Can something that dies be real? What is the sense of aliveness, and is it real?

The Absofuckinglutely in me honours & greets the Absofuckinglutely in you. 🙏 What a Pro!!

An interconnected one would be recognised as this 👉The Bardo of Dharmata (Clear Light): Immediately after death, the mind is stripped of its physical body and sensory input, laying bare its fundamental nature. This "no-thingness" or empty, radiant awareness is the fundamental ground of being. So that’s where the sense of self (the human) goes every night during deep dreamless sleep. It dies. Sleep is just death that one wakes up from multiple times infinitely for eternity. Death is not what thought thinks it is. Death is the gap between thoughts. The bardo state is a transitional intermediate state—most commonly between death and rebirth. Or, sleep and awakening from sleep.