Mellowmarsh

I think the word awareness is interchangeable with the word Logos and Tao and Nothing. Nothing is aware of anything other that the Nothing itself. It’s basically emptiness looking at emptiness. Empty and full are the same-seeing …this bridges the gap between the sacred and the physical world. The gap is simply illusory.

All’s good then. 👍

Content not viewable in your region. The never regions. 😂 Classic.

I could possibly have placed this topic in the wrong sub forum. If I have then it can easily be moved to the right place.

You cannot get to heaven without first going through hell. No one said this was going to easy, the hardest part is finding out the trip through hell was going to be worth it.

It’s not exactly about the physical man and woman. Earth men and women are easy. The hard penetrates a much deeper union, is what’s really wanted, the physical reunion with the non/physical.

Yes, sex really is a Drug too.

This video also gets Right what men and women really want.

Awareness is not aware to be aware of something. There’s nothing here being aware of something there…and there’s nothing there being aware of something here…because a nothing here is only ever an exact mirror reflection ( image of the imageless) of something there. This is who you are. 😲 Don’t faint.

How to see God is not to look for God. Looking for God cannot see God for looking. Not looking for God is when you can see God.

Yes. Seeing only sees the seen side, not the not seen side. A 3D object can only be viewed as a 2D image of 1D seeing.

Knock Knock ✊ Whos’ there. It’s me, do you want to come out to play. Okay.

Oh stop it. You’re just being a drama queen.

No need to petition God. No hope is hope.

Bump.

Yes, so no need for stage fright, there’s really no one watching. This is an audience for myself.

Okay.

Okay.

Anytime brother.

Yes, everything is okay, you’re welcome.

True Enlightenment isn't the complete absence of darkness, but the transformative mastery of both light and shadow through total integration.

If by others you are referring to people. Then no, no person can love another person, because a person is an object of desire. “The object of love is not an object at all, and that you’ve mistaken a person for an object is what’s wrong with love’s distortions. To feel the wretched pain of a love after a love has long ended is not just to feel the pain at losing love but feel pain at the way love turns a person into a possession that can be lost.” Mistaking a person or a goal for an object of love often leads to clinging, demands, or fear of loss. Detaching from this object-based need allows for purer, unconditional connection.

Real Love seen through the lens of the Absolute. For example: God would say no earthly man is man enough to take my woman, simply because there is no other Love but mine.

The royal we is conditional, it’s fake love.