Spiritual Warfare

😏

One day we will have the answer

Existence cannot spring forth from non-existence, as non-existence is neither a location nor an entity; it is merely the absence of being.

Thank God that non-existence does not prevail; only existence thrives.

Thank you for your honesty and humility. Many people believe they have an answer to everything, but it's important to recognize that there's nothing wrong with admitting "I don't know."

Thank you! I found this enjoyable to read. I did explore a topic on the idea that nothing is not truly something; in fact, there is no such thing as "nothing."

Fantastic! To me, the Divine is simply existence—the very substance of all things. I appreciate that you mentioned we can't have light without darkness. I feel this is true, but who are we to make such a claim? If God is all-powerful, couldn't He have created only light for His creation? Or perhaps the absence of something is an inherent part of everything.

That’s a captivating analysis, and it leads me to contemplate the nature of limitations. While I grasp the idea that God may need to experience limitations to fully understand or embody everything, it prompts an intriguing question: why do limitations exist in the first place? For instance, why did God design humans with two hands instead of three? Is there a specific rationale behind this design choice, or is there a deeper purpose at play? Furthermore, the assertion that all limitations are equally important challenges our understanding of significance. Not all attributes carry the same weight in defining what it means to be divine. Certain qualities, such as perfection, omniscience, and benevolence, likely hold greater relevance than others, like forgetfulness or weakness. To claim that all limitations are equally necessary undermines the very notion of divinity as an ideal state.

That’s not entirely accurate; ideas emerge from what already exists—everything is inherently present within existence. All that is exists within the realm of nothingness; nothing lies outside of this. Furthermore, God is bound by logic, as it is inherently impossible for God to destroy itself—such an act would contradict the very principles of logic.

I appreciate your perspective, but how can we be certain that there is a definitive purpose behind it all? You suggest that God must explore itself, as that encompasses everything that exists. However, one could argue that God might choose to remain in that harmonious state of oneness. What drives this underlying flow that compels God to experience every facet of existence? Is it not within God's power to control this dynamic? If one were to embody a 'God mode,' it seems unlikely they would willingly forfeit such immense powers. No rational being would abandon their true nature without compelling reasons. Moreover, consider the very design of existence: the fact that we must eat and drink to survive raises questions about its intelligence. What justification exists for children to starve to death before reaching the age of five? If you suggest that God wants to experience such suffering, it feels like a denial of reality. Earth often appears more as a trap than a place to genuinely appreciate beauty and joy.

It’s a beautiful thought, imagining God becoming weak and then powerful again. But I still don’t see why God couldn’t remember its true nature while being weak and enduring tribulations. You mentioned it would be a limitation if God remembered He was God, but you need to understand that there are necessary limitations and unnecessary ones.

Everything has a reason; logic wasn’t created, and nothing is ever truly created or destroyed, only transformed. Logic is beautiful because it cuts through the noise, revealing what is real and what isn’t. You assume that God has no reason, so it’s on you to prove that.

You better be right.

I can agree to some extent, but I don’t see why it’s necessary to impose such limitations on God. Why would God need to forget that He is God? It just doesn’t add up.

Well said! But I believe God is present in everything, even if that presence isn't always felt in every moment of life."

I agree to some extent, but certain things are simply illogical, it's not a matter of belief.

Thank you for your insight. I understand that God can only explore itself, but why? Why not remain in the state of oneness?

Separation is an illusion, yet that doesn’t negate the reality of our experience of it.

No, no, no! Who says that? Stop being swayed by Leo Gura and think for yourself for once! There’s no law dictating that God must experience both the limited and the unlimited, and I specifically mentioned the idea of being 'much limited.' So please, let’s not sidestep my question. God has the capacity to do anything, but what we really need to understand is the reasoning behind its actions. It doesn’t engage in this existence simply for amusement—that notion is utterly absurd.

Thank you for your insightful perspective. I encourage you to remain open-minded to all possibilities and ideas.

God is not external to logic; if that were the case, we would have no basis for reaching any conclusions. Logic is a profound and beautiful construct. The phrase 'everything is consciousness' lacks depth in defining the underlying mechanisms at play. Nature is intricately involved, and we are all engaged in the exploration of its mechanics. Even if we collectively acknowledged consciousness as the fundamental condition of existence, we would still grapple with numerous questions and issues. We would continue to explore: How is consciousness possible? What underpins it? Where does it reside? Why does it produce or support the myriad phenomena we observe? I’m not suggesting that I believe God was bored, although it seems to be a common belief among some. Such limitations on understanding do not resonate with me; they seem inherently nonsensical.

God is a traitor, a horrible deceiving creature. Or it had been deceived itself. Part of its creation has to suffer. And it’s God plan. Even if I am God myself (as eternal light) then I would like to unalive myself (meaning kill God) since God makes us love in the world where the greatest desire is to leave this world. Someone who hasn’t faced TRUE HORRORS of life will never understand what I’m talking about. Not a single saint, enlightened or wise man throughout space and time has ever found an answer to the question ”Why there is actually suffering (exhaustion) existing in Gods plan. The answer that without suffering we would not appreciate love and happiness is bullshit. The best moments of my life were when I was completely unaware of any suffering. Pure joy and life of abundant life where everyone around is happy. Therefore God is not all allmighty. We are all slaves here in this doomed world, yes there is a righteous path. But this is not the point. I wish all the paths were righteous. I wish none of this madness never existed. But God wishes that I go trough this experience of denial. I don’t want to play this stupid game. ENOUGH. So we are destined and doomed to live this ugly life. And even if it at some point evolves to really something beautiful and non violent, and we will never have to come here again for eternity. I don’t care it’s only in my mind, the illusion is still real. Yes in the end it’s all bearable and it will be forgotten and lost in eternity, but it’s no excuse. This simply should have never existed. And nobody even knows why it exists this way. Is just way too much trash here. It’s horrible balanced. If the “oneness” has the best feeling in the world then why would we want a lower frequency feeling of joy rather than bliss?. Stuck in a body and not knowing your purpose or why everything is structured this way, is the saddest thing that can happen to a person.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts.

I understand your perspective, and I appreciate it. However, the point is that God could experience everything without being confined by limitations. It's a misconception to assume that God must undergo unawareness or any form of ignorance; such notions are merely speculative. God could experience existence while fully retaining divine consciousness. Ultimately, everything can seem absurd, and while some may label me as biased or closed-minded, I believe many intuitively recognize that this approach feels deeply flawed. It's hard to see this as a well-thought-out plan.

I believe it's a common notion that something truly perfect requires nothing; if it does, then it ceases to be perfect. However, one could argue that perfection may have multiple definitions. Perhaps perfection lies not in the absence of need, but in the capacity to embrace growth and evolution. As for reincarnation, I'm not entirely certain about it, but Leo posits that God seeks to experience all facets of infinity.