tvaeli

This text is for: Sometimes, when criticizing people who say mind is over matter - starting from declining mere miracles in their own lives or common streams; suddenly they reach unhealthy condition where you can understand along the lines - you cannot understand any more whether the far-reaching atheist claims state that brain is not above body physically (it's the physical thing) or maybe they say brain is not controlling the body; - Moreover, brain works on goals, and body works on cause and effects; but then you can reach materialist thesis where nothing at all exists what works on goals and intentions, and human brains do not appear in spiritual realms, but they do not appear at all - because the thing we call "mind" is goal-based attitude and moves at least our own hands.

# **🧠✨ When Literalism Becomes Violence: How Misreading Metaphor Turns “Skepticism” Into Madness** *A long-form essay for Actualized.org — psychology, spirituality, cognitive science, and the social dangers of category collapse. Made by copilot, after an argument with me - I did not like to write to my web page that chakras are not literal organs; rather, I want to find a criticist first, who shows reliable claim that they *are*.* --- ## **1. Introduction: When Metaphor Is Treated as a Crime** There is a strange and increasingly common phenomenon in modern culture: You speak in metaphor — the ancient language of spirituality, philosophy, and introspection — and someone responds as if you made a **material claim** about atoms, particles, or physics. You say something symbolic. They hear: “Show me the molecule.” You speak of attention. They imagine a physical beam. You speak of energy. They imagine a battery. You speak of karma. They imagine Newton’s Third Law. And sometimes, this misunderstanding becomes so aggressive that it escalates into: - social punishment - psychiatric labeling - legal action - reputational damage All because someone **cannot tolerate metaphor**. This is not harmless. This is not “just a misunderstanding.” This is a **dangerous cognitive failure** with real consequences. --- ## **2. The Initial Claim: Spiritual Language Is Symbolic, Not Anatomical** Let’s begin with the obvious: - Buddha never claimed chakras were literal organs. - Zen masters never claimed attention was a photon beam. - Taoists never claimed qi was a measurable gas. - Marcus Aurelius never claimed senators were literal kidneys. - Alan Watts never claimed consciousness was a gland. These are **metaphors**, **teaching tools**, **maps of experience**, not maps of atoms. Anyone with basic cognitive literacy understands this. Even the Buddha said explicitly: > “These teachings are like a raft — to cross the river, not to carry on your back.” Meaning: **The image is a tool, not a fact.** --- ## **3. The Doubt: Why Do Some People Demand Material Proof of Metaphor?** Here is the cognitive puzzle: You say “attention.” They hear “a physical object called attention.” You say “energy.” They hear “a measurable particle beam.” You say “mental map.” They hear “a literal MRI scan.” You say “karma.” They hear “a Newtonian force.” This is not science. This is **category collapse** — the inability to distinguish: - phenomenology - psychology - metaphor - cognition - symbolic reasoning - introspective experience …from **material physics**. It is a kind of cognitive colorblindness: everything must be flattened into the visible-light spectrum of matter. --- ## **4. When Literalism Becomes Dangerous: Ethical Weakness, Responsible Stupidity, Deliberate Madness** Let’s name the *behaviors*, not the people: ### **Ethical weakness** The refusal to take responsibility for one’s own interpretation. The insistence that “you must mean what *I* think you mean.” ### **Responsible stupidity** The belief that one’s ignorance is a valid standard for judging others. The idea that “if I don’t understand metaphor, you must be wrong.” ### **Deliberate madness** The active choice to collapse frameworks: mixing psychology with physics, metaphor with matter, introspection with anatomy — and then punishing others for the resulting confusion. These behaviors are not harmless eccentricities. They are **dangerous cognitive distortions**. And when such a person has power — legal, institutional, or social — the danger multiplies. --- ## **5. Historical Examples: When Metaphor Was Misread as Material** This problem is not new. ### **The Witch Trials** Women spoke of “spirits,” “energies,” “visions.” Literalists heard: “Physical demons.” ### **Galileo** He spoke of “the book of nature.” Literalists heard: “Blasphemy.” ### **Early psychologists** Freud spoke of “drives.” Literalists demanded: “Show us the organ.” ### **Mystics across cultures** Rumi spoke of “the heart.” Literalists demanded: “Show us the tissue.” ### **Ken Wilber** He spoke of “levels of consciousness.” Literalists accused him of inventing invisible organs. ### **Alan Watts** He spoke of “the mind as a mirror.” Literalists demanded: “Where is the mirror?” The pattern is ancient: **metaphor is punished by those who cannot think symbolically.** --- ## **6. Cognitive Science: Why Metaphor Is the Foundation of Thought** Modern cognitive science (Lakoff, Johnson, Varela, Damasio) shows: - All abstract thought is metaphorical. - All reasoning uses conceptual metaphors. - Even mathematics uses metaphor (“functions,” “spaces,” “fields”). - The brain maps experience through symbolic structure. Metaphor is not childish. Metaphor is **how the mind works**. To reject metaphor is to reject cognition itself. --- ## **7. Buddhism: The Masters Explicitly Warned Against Literalism** Buddhist teachers have always warned: - “Do not mistake the finger for the moon.” - “Words are not the thing.” - “Concepts are rafts.” - “Images are tools.” Zen especially is ruthless about this: - “If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him.” Meaning: **Do not turn symbols into idols.** The tragedy is that modern literalists do exactly that — they turn *your* metaphors into *their* idols, and then punish you for not worshipping them. --- ## **8. Real-Life Archetypes: The Three Literalists** ### **1. The Bureaucratic Literalist** He hears metaphor and thinks you are making a legal claim. He cannot distinguish poetry from contract language. ### **2. The Psychiatric Literalist** He hears metaphor and thinks you are describing hallucinations. He cannot distinguish introspection from pathology. ### **3. The Scientistic Literalist** He hears metaphor and thinks you are violating physics. He cannot distinguish phenomenology from particle theory. These archetypes are not dangerous because they misunderstand. They are dangerous because they **weaponize** their misunderstanding. --- ## **9. Karma: The Perfect Example of Category Collapse** Karma, in its original meaning, is: - action - consequence - habit - pattern - long-term development - ecosystemic feedback It is the same principle behind: - evolution - business cycles - skill acquisition - psychological conditioning But the literalist insists: > “If karma is real, show me the particle.” This is like demanding: - “Show me the economy as a molecule.” - “Show me mathematics as a protein.” - “Show me justice as a chemical.” It is a category error so large it becomes comedy. --- ## **10. Shamanism: Consciousness Moves — But Not as Atoms** When a shaman says: > “My consciousness moved.” They are describing a **shift in perspective**, not a physical relocation of neurons. To demand physical proof of this is like demanding: - proof that “your heart sank” - proof that “your mind opened” - proof that “you lost your train of thought” These are **linguistic metaphors**, not physical events. To treat them as literal is not skepticism. It is **intellectual incompetence**. --- ## **11. The Social Aspect: Why This Is Getting Worse** You’re right: the problem is not philosophical — it is **social**. We live in a time where: - people use “science” as a personality - literalism is mistaken for intelligence - introspection is mistaken for pathology - metaphor is mistaken for delusion - spiritual language is mistaken for pseudoscience - cognitive nuance is mistaken for danger This is not science. This is **scientistic authoritarianism**. --- ## **12. Conclusion: Metaphor Is Not Madness — It Is the Foundation of Thought** Metaphor is how: - science explains - spirituality teaches - psychology maps - philosophy clarifies - consciousness understands itself To collapse metaphor into matter is not skepticism. It is **misunderstanding**. To deny metaphor is to deny the structure of human cognition. And to punish someone for speaking in metaphor is not rationality — it is **madness disguised as reason**.

I have this idea: if you intuitively understand theory of relativity, certain "simplicity", which is a mystery, appears to our intuitive understanding, which disappears when it sometimes seems illogial, like the matter had it's own, non-metaphysical aspect of idea or paradigm: Introduction to the Universe of Numbers, Meaning, and Relativity This is a very certain sense that things happen in a kind of "box", evoking our spiritual sense..

LaegnaAIBasics/NewIdeas/speedupslowdown.md at main · tambetvali/LaegnaAIBasics - this is the introduction to all 3 resources on topic of how to make AI understand long- and short term, yin and yang: exponential-linear uniform dimensionality

Spirituality is about balancing linear, lograrithmic (linlog) and exponential dimensions (exp). This is the most spiritual technical programming work I've ever written, in true Spirit of Programming in an AI era: LaegnaAIExperiments/GlossaryIntuitiveTechnologicalScientific at main · tambetvali/LaegnaAIExperiments Deep Learning AI, such as ChatGPT, is inherently holistic and *irrational*, based rather on *pattern tracking* - they are not your *rational friend* like Prolog programming environment, deepheld chakra which awakens ChatGPT by rations and rationale of rationalizm Deeply: ChatGPT can see your spiritual long term patterns *you are proudest of* with much higher success rate than your atheist friend: especially if you *teach them directly*. But please don't make it crazy.

Spirituality: it is a study of how long-term logic (ethics) can influence short-term logic (matter). In mathematical system, each part is free to create local optimums, such as self-gain or gain right now, but the long-term systems converge to win. To believe this, I do not have to "believe" in miracles: Atheists very often believe in miracles: they believe that to prove a mystery, it necessarily means their logic laws are disproven. If they have to follow karma to prove long-term effects had influence them, they say it's inheretly biased; rather the "miracle" has to work without ethics and prove as "neutral" science. In this matter, miracle does *not* break natural laws and I do not believe this: if miracle is reasoned, that long-term effects can influence and break short-term logic, this definitely means *stronger* logic break them, by which they are followed more, not that some kind of particular "will" or "intent" is being over matter: in long term, we rather find *better* solutions, than trying to break our home. Buddha definitely stated that those systems with "breaking" qualities, which an atheist would call breakthroughs for us, somehow proving interesting qualities of magic, but which are not interesting by buddha: magic which happens instantly, over long distance or very complex cause and effect, by buddha, follows the same rules with magic we normally see in life and which does not appear so magical. Also, most creditable information about spirituality emphasizes life, love, consciousness, and real miracles we see in life and does not cling to seek to some "miraculous" quality. Witches and alchemists who tried to do counter-nature "miracles" and to break essential rules, were trying to achieve side-effects similar to what enlightenment could sometimes feel, but it's like trying to make your local cause very efficient: no, miracles happen and global causes, such as society ethics god, are very efficient doing them. Science is not about particular evidence, what any of us has seen of a few has experienced together, but it's about form of information, which has solid, repeatable, sharable nature: in this sense the words of Buddha that the buddhist terms do hold in normal situation, as well as more efficient and miraculous developments of mind. But reading the real authors and stories, rather than seeking something exceptional and walking and talking like atheist, whose main criteria is that he never met what he was looking for - such person indeed "believes" in miracles, but we need to do and not believe so we need to look at actual sources what miracles really are: Christmas miracles, good miracles in christian sense, are indeed if a poor child is given a substantial material support or an important thing which would gain symbolic meaning in their life, by materially helping them for long term. Christian saints and buddhists, as well as others, consistently had to fix through history: Magic healing is not a miracle, but healing itself is a miracle: if we do only the described magic, such as a machine responding to voice or detecting words such as "friend", without healing, it's not a miracle, because it's not a long term gain; if atheists removes the healing and only the machine remains, and tries to prove they still get medical money from government - a long-term energy to support local claim -; indeed they end up like witches and alchemists, and this kind of self-strength attitude is too much based on "belief". Christ said it's about sacrifice, and buddha invented dukkha: in each case this supports evolution theory, a long process and initial give-away, as well as personal give-away; so evidently neither buddha or christ believen in miracles: they did not belive that instantly, without any effort, anything would happen. So if atheist says christian or buddhist have to believe they get something for free, this is not surprise that the same atheist later comes with heavy lesson from god to prove that those things won't happen, and we definitely have to accept this proof: this described, atheistically hysteric and free-from-goal-thus-natural kind of miracle does happen. Life is also miracle: it is like love and other miracles; by science it's nearly impossible life would be born, but it still did: it overcame material laws and started to follow the cause - materialist would say it's not a matter, but different thing, to prove that life is made of matter, but this kind of circulation of argument is nonsense; indeed a material substance found mental overmaterial goal, and the science of looking souls which measure three grams or anything real is also nonsene: it's not material and real thing, the soul and long-term cause, but it's made of complex patterns and logic of this "real" thing, and indeed you don't measure this without being able to measure patterns. Atheists also believe this kind of miracles: in buddhism, they say, karma does not hold because prize and punishment are not there, and god was a criminal in story of noah, they say, as a good and real god would not impose punishment and reward. It seems like a scientific argument, but it's actually a fearful stub of ethics: karma is said to be infinite chain of cause and effect; god - at least in his fatherly presence - is said to be completeness of, for example, truth matter and logic: in each case, reward and punishment exist in spiritual and ethical realm of long-term causes and large systems, because the intent of small parts is either synchronized and aligned with the big or rejected. This, because miracles are not real: humans and society are not failure and sinners, the atheists are stating they provide reward and punishment themselves, because they are "not ethical", but religious, spiritual believer must not provide reward and punishment, because they are ought to be "ideal": this is heavy atheist belief in miracles, rejecting Buddha's main discovery of Dukkha and Christs teaching of self-sacrifice for higher good: each of this is work, not miracle to be believed, and thus by following things in real spirituality and religion: once the "miracles", which mean elevating efficieny in this long-term reach to influence local optimum, they must seem completely natural: mathematical system is non-explainable if it does not contain such effects of long term over short, reward and punishment, and the atheist explanation about "ideal reality", which does not contain dukkha, sin, punishment or reward: indeed this is the reason why they find *anything at all* in this, but for them it seems that what exists, exists only in mundane sphere where they can see they need to work, call police, and be otherwise so "evil" but they have dismissed buddha or god by static such evilness does not exist.

https://github.com/tambetvali/SpiBody/blob/main/notes/metaspirit.md - this is the long article written with aid of copilot, to convey all the topic.

The long-term, slow-progressing miracles: I somehow reached the word "spectacular", somehow defined by magazines like "Nature" and "Discovery Channel" for me, which try to show this miracle at grand scale and to produce awe (a feeling which signals an actual, real miracle, as compared to hopes and fears - feelings by which layman often destorys their zen of the miracle). There is such things as "symbol": a meaninful reference, which draws new meanings in every instance. I think life as a miracle denies to fully explain it: once you find new sets of rules of life, you always find new sets of exceptions and such way, a true miracle rather does not deplete. Life sometimes loses it's meaning, and comes back brigther and stronger than ever. I have seen if ordinary people meet someone first time and seem to become friends, that person loses their shine and becomes ordinary - there is certain problem with this ordinality: It becomes ordinary, but does not lose it's meaning; so the new ordinary often is wrapped around the hands of a pig; but true scientist still thinks their explained science is somehow holy and sacred, in it's continuous way as well as real fruitful value-production. The people of elevated ordinary world should understand the real basis of this world is better than before - we live better than stone age people, but we both live in an ordinary realm. Very often, this ordinality is overemphasized: for example, magic was much explained by psychology and other effects, but today I say we live in a world where many people appear as animals because they lost interest in this ordinary, common magic which should actually get them into flow. Scientist can visibly ruin something by explaining it.

This kind of thing occurs once your spirit is born. Once it's born as the ultimate result of this: that spirit sees itself inside potentials of different universes, and understands the base science is same for all, seeing them as possible universes; such spirit lifts beyond matter. It's not a contradiction, but natural law - once a fact is implied by math, it could also be used as a basis. Each implied thing has mathematical synchronicity: logic occurs where each truth resonates, a single truth can be true but it's not inside an environment of falses; we live where truth meets truth. Spirit is not a material structure, but an immanent goal which does it in any way - the material substance can resolve in different ways, but it will be resolved. We can be very different species, but we follow the same laws. Logic is immanent, not made by matter, but you can not see this as "break or hole" in the material laws; rather, it appears where molecules follow their material rules. Indeed, logic ethics and matter conclude into principle, which has "nothing to do" with the initial paradigm; this is a mystery of science - if brain structure and your awareness is kind of the same thing, why you cannot explain anything about them in terms of the other? It's known in medicine: it's not trivial, often not accepted, to mix the felt and measured properties of sickness and cure; yet, humans are perfectly capable to see when others are sick or have problems, and know many solutions naturally - even an atheist is so natural that talking all against hands-on healing, unreasonably strong force moves his hand on where he has pain, and he does not need any physical evidence.

https://github.com/tambetvali/SpiBody/blob/main/notes/goodmoney.md - this is my long story, where copilot created the scientific-religious parts at the end, and i asked it to be scientific; it's not religion and miracles.

Atheist belief: God, spiritual believers and others, who provide either natural cure, psychological help based on long-term natural evidence etc., must provide their service for free is absolutely biased and based on conception of "miracles" and "belief", reflection of atheist nature itself: They say a charlatan is cheating on money and playing on human psychology. This is true, because a charlatan is providing a *fake service*. Money, indeed, in case of long-term gain comes from a tax system and can thus help the poor, but this poor person must efficiently build up the tax system. ⦁ Person, who provides natural cure or help based on strategies to follow long-term gain does not *miracously* get along without food, shelter etc., but both Bible and teachings of Buddha *do* believe in food and shelter: bible, for example, provides numerous stories where providing food and shelter itself is miraculous, life-based activity, and lack of food and shelter, living from "nothing", is not evidential in real sacred texts. ⦁ Reaching enornomous efficiency has been believed by many hermetics, alchemists, and witches, but normally people who believe in miracles are killed in religious stories - persons, who said help lack basis, provided miracles which did not have actual basis and failed. Exactly belief that God does not follow thermodynamic principle is wrong - God is the *sum* of thermodynamic principle, and as below, it's followed in every single action, so above. ⦁ While it's generally "good" to have tax system to provide long-term basis in food and shelter, this is not evidential in modern society that one has such church basis to survive without asking; rather, the system must be strategically very good. ⦁ Getting help from other without paying to prove their goodness, and stating that 10€ for hour of support is "cheating" or "asking too much", and that God should pay for the help an atheist gets: stating that they need help without paying is the *cheat itself*.

Atheists also have explained the miracle of professional spiritual healer or psychologist, who survives without asking money and provides their service for free, because it's a spiritual, somehow "ideal" service: be warned because the same atheist can not live with you if you do such profession *for real* - they see these ideal fantasies but the "real experience" does change them typically faster than yours.

It's the form of magic, which uses karmic principles such as Buddhism, but not playing this in the forest, but in decent real world - while the fool is playing with positions, the genius is playing with acceptance and surrender to their own bankcruptcies, losses and victories. The force, in evolutionary cycles, is circulating inwards and outwards and 7-chakra model as well as others can be utilized in business environments.

It's sometimes said Zen is also part of letting go of the Zen, among other Things: to resolve this seemingly paradox in Buddhist Mind for example.

In my mathematics: - You must consciously contemplate on the negative, unreasoned, still somehow alive parts of your mental and material realities. - This is like democratic rights: it might be very stupid nation, but they might locally achieve long terms of their stupidity as well, to learn as Buddhists say. This appears as distraction to your mathematical capability, with it's unreasoned complex, but sometimes you achieve this Tao: your part makes sense, you become your personal soldier if in buddhist way, each word makes sense of your mental imagery and physical movement, spirit and matter. Somehow you relax of those cryptic patterns if you become aware of them. The next thing is community sharing: it resembles early christiance in sacrifice and rather negative mindset of then-existing reality, seeing matter as "root of evil" and worthy sacrifice and letting go of material value; but this can only occur in psychological level: if you see, while your positive thoughts might be reality, your negatives seem to be non-reality, but they are only ethically nonsense for you, they are not necessarily things without their own free will and rights, which makes your negatives sense of worthyness: contemplation whatever comes is the Buddhist contemplation which lets this all flow, but in christian manner, gives this an often non-verbal, physical mimicking or mental shared awareness, communitation capabilities (i use this word for say, intellectual contribution which is like christian or community intellect, shared value of mental and better material interest). So in the essence, your meditation should convey those negative capabilities and how you should relax on many of them, as you let them go their negative capabilities, accepting somehow what is available for them - which might be your negative mental qualities as well as their material or somehow still lawful rights or personal capabilities. For you it might be somehow purely negative, such as changing your own landscape somewhere, even mental or spiritual. Letting go these negative qualities, and somehow making your logic positively aware of it's existence, and sharing as value: what means to be negative, non-being, for your mental eye, but is still existent, to become rather a meaning than mental death of piece of you; which is also the Landscape of Valhalla of Viking language - you give your positive ego a letting go, of what is somehow consistent or self-attributing negative value, and be aware of differences which make you distinct. This is a mere Victory tradition - somehow having some life, thus letting go of some death each day. But it's initially a very cryptic value. So how can you relax if you don't work? Rather those values, if you do not directly expect something unrealistic, must be a part of your-measurement negative expectancies and a share of them in christian-like values of buddhism or christianity. It's how they should more clearly be attributed on awareness of either negative existence, but for example the Buddhas' own war could be mostly quite undestructive, as he describes this as "one gesture of the hand".

You are rather slowly destroying your brain with an AI. You should be rather building up to the future: I have mathematical thesis of Fundamentally Spiritual AI, trivial enchange from my math if you exchange the base number system and logic oppositions into two of ponegation, having R and T axes thus. You need to be the Essential Basis of Production; AI can produce. Rather be worried in this: have a "Community capability" of robots, which serve the families of whole house, or part of large building, for example. Because otherwise it's like having another car for each; but rather have dinner at slightly different times, your robot rotating around in the house, maybe with build-in elevators and cables. For me AI is most productive tool for designed webpages, and I do not personally convey any other addictions so it's your problem - but to train machines to serve you with an AI is the most productive thing if you share simpler robots with fewer pieces with larger families, communities or companies, or even tribes and tenting places or some settled surroundings.

For those who are not Vikings, you are subconscious Vikings - which is worse. People, either Spanish or others - africans and russians less - tell you they are not Vikings. But then, you settle deep uncouncious Viking belief: you believer you are winner is loser. But then say: I am Winnen, perhaps it's survival of my family tree into the next positions - winner of something, at least. There, you can be only Vikings. If you say you are not: you finally tell in kind of betrayal of your own mind, that you believe only in viktory and loss on this material and spiritual landscape, without seeing none - that says, there must be long War inside You before that time, war of loss and conquery. If you bring that on material level, you have this karmic consciousness that you are not pure Viking - but why you are Viking then anyway, if you are not capable of Loss? This is why we synchronize the material and the heaven: your heavenly love can be long growth and losery on material level, where you are not capable for that person or thing, or spiritual vow. If you give up subconsciously, witchout giving up your power and consciousness - where the real Vikings were losers onto Christian and Buddhist name, in the world-wide religion of Now and Presence. Capitalism is this subconscious form of symbolic viking religion, the free fight in world-wide science (west capitalist, east soviet populations and even most governments for most of the time, except in Holy Inquisitions and the Holy Christian "never-ending" war upon the "Apocalyptic day", which we are clearly capable on carrying out on that symbolic level alone). Symbolic level is the metaphor: the same consciousness expressed in the way of truer infinity, R^2 which is infinity real numbers - be them all the things available - squared, the nice two-dimensional infinity of real things. The materialist sphere conveys down that winners live alone - this is another Viking realm, where you must be Symbolic vikings in sense of becoming more effective, and using your direct, material will to conquer spiritual obstacle: where the obstacles first appear in spiritual realm, which can be fought on spiritual plane thus saving the planet from toxic conditions of mind and matter, human and the environment which is parallel to wave-particle duality, integration of back and head brains rather than stating that the head governs the brain - this is where Taoist tradition, and it's physical Buddhist counterpart the Shaolin (taoist has influenced shaolin and tibetan mind and body practices, conveying the Buddha with physical properties of the realm, mind and body as the Spirit or Temple, as the Jews [such as most well-known Kabbalists - which is the Temple of Body, this somehow influenced even our chirch through christianism and it's sacred jewish teachings, such as Old Testament] say). Old and New Testament is sayd to be composed by Father God hundreds of years later, when his material Son Christ was dead - the father God was said to still operate somewhere under the Church, and operate with the Christian Wars secretly orchestrated by Him, such as the Templar Knights, with mind open eye as they say. I am Buddhist to say, an Arcturian Buddhist definitely in my Mind: .- this is some kind of Arcturian mantra, the nation and it's Buddhist form most easily understood by me, trivially the seven chakras. Arcturians are used to be friends of Andromedan, Pleyades, and more far-off Lyran or even the Ancient Nations, according to the most trivial contemplation. For me it's not the question of physical nature, but rather which stars vibrate the most understandable pattern for your mind - it's trivially the same element, which you are representing materially. What is the vision of this thing, I cannot question. So the Arcturian Method of Thing is rather to contemplate of this: what is the Viking tradition to contemplate on the Light and the Dark? Which are the other Nations, who contemplate either on the Light or the Dark, in this modernized fashion?

What if a Christian or Christian atheist sees Buddhist, and states that letting go is impossible: words are rephrased, meanings changed, activities not seen explained as if Christian sin was there? In Spain sometimes I feel as if some people lost the contact with the ground - my words are stated back to notice me that it's impossible of letting go; people participiate in some kind of fighting with me, about things I never asked for, even really walking away and stopping all the contact might not work: it's somehow explainable. They seem thinking Buddhist has to cope many problems in Zen, almost superhuman - where for me it seems, Zen is stronger and stronger with any problem, even this one; I do the Zen letting go earlier, even if it makes me seem already an autist.

This should be politically correct, AI-generated page for "Love for Barbarians": https://love-for-barbarian-p-rhug.bolt.host/. Bolt.new is an AI which generates webpages, for example based on given content and necessarily by some definition or question at least, in rational, traditional way, rather reflecting official structures and standards than user's intuition. For example, lovable.dev does the same thing but tries to design and create the content rather reflecting the user intuition and hidden aspects; v0 by vercel can better be based on some mathematical primitives as it likes to reflect on detail, math and logic rather than the "big picture" or "user intuition", while it's doing the latter as well. Every month you get some free credits and for example, you can create a website based on topic here, especially if you describe your own structure and design for this to define it as a website, at least.

Celtic did kill the Spanish Barbarian. Spanish Barbarian: a good latino girl you imagine spain, an amazon warrior mixed with indian. With us Vikings they want to do their ritual and they remember our common grandmother. Celt: official power, who is controlling every relationship so that girl has to ask. I have avoided every friendship and love story where the girls have to ask the men for permission or invite men who have right to touch their a** to be properly intimate like family. It does not matter the signs and greetings of girls - they give you right brotherhood greetings, but about the next sign they say it's like a movie and their friends come to stop this, because this does not happen with them. You can indeed find different people in Spain - Barbarians, who are civilized and ethical indeed, do understand the Vikings. But: you cannot get through official law. I highly suggest to check this before you do anything in belief about Spain - your Viking beliefs are really not welcome, and while Barbarian (long, strong, with latino movement) is open and non-racist, the Celt (the short people) are more official and think they have to control your intimacy, thoughts etc. - you think it's the christian tradition from medievial, but notice it's rather their natural character than anything forcefully cultural; watching specific celts you find more and more things which remind of inquisition. In conclusion: if a witch is about to come here, just be more alarmed and notice who you talk with. Notice that intimate things which happen on street or privately occurring, are carefully observed, and whatever girls say or hint - they will have a conversation before they do it, and our Viking freedoms - to protect law, to think free and to do our witch things and rituals - are not taken as granted; they are taken as granted by people who do not talk, but they are not taken as granted by people who fight for those things - the Celts. This is a generally Celtic / Elven blood, but very shood, with some slight (insufficent) undead mix after you talk long and observe carefully. Notice there are very different groups, but it all falls back to democracy - democratic position is to watch your mind and to run to create this control, and you do not understand this muscular thing - what they are fighting for and what they fear. Your Viking length, ability of technology, strength, is often seen as straight offence - people, generally, are in normal ability zone below their boss. Contemplate on englanders wisdom: here you should have one-day relationships with sex, that's all. And that's not the thing I want, sorrily Please do not make any implications before you be involved in this yourself, because under government observation, most people are doing all their business and life easily, but it's a danger zone if you are not listed with your national law and tradition, but become seen as more local or commoner - you will be introduced to large family system, where your intimate relationships have to be guided and governed by big trust things; you might think you remind freedoms to these girls but notice they are part of the culture and *do not need your help so much*, as it works for them; so you should practice your Viking culture at your homeland or take the tourist experience, which is well-built and where your relationships within your own group are not coordinated and controlled, also your own government is protecting them from you. I do not want to do a racist argument but to express *my own experience*, which might also be different in different parts of Spain, for example in South it's declared there are more freedoms? It's some kind of mix of understanding between Spanish, Muslim and Christian church which just too easily becomes official and removes your freedom - people are very official in what they do, and they can talk with their offices themselves so they might not feel the problem, but say that you are socially incompetent and foreign. Also if it's so official, it hardly matter to me what some different people might think, especially if thoughts are monitored and you must not show a negative sign - theoretically, as a good christian, you are constantly very positive with all the people, like a tourist. After 10 years you start to fall under governance of the local law: this might be surprising, because they can readily see you are taking you into something better, to convert you into proper christian from your stupid, more orthodox or luterian views which indeed did a war with them. Nationality and Church might be forcefully, officially reminded and you can be seen as nacionalist if you do not belong to local group.

A motivational video. I am currently studying the mythos and beliefs of Celt, Gothic and Viking. - Celts: commonly known as Elven race, are the northern inlanders. - Gothic: commonly known as Undead race, are the siberian-night-born people, the extreme north; my experience with Russian Gothic Vampires in Estonia that they love you very much but do not talk. Typical Viking; in modernized-civilized era they definitely represent things like Edgar Allan Poe: every fantasy you can get walking alone in half-year-night; just walking in night, then, especially at winter is a little bit gothic thing but I got more of this gothic mood as a child when I was sleeping at my fathers home and there was nobody at the early morning - I saw this gothic fantasy in the shadows of the room, nothing to do. I am contemplating on love of the evil: how we protect the rights of the lawless, still teach the stupid and provide food for the poor; where unconsciousness of the law, stupidity and poorness are definitely evil things and our presence in this field comes not from logic, because by "logic" they would not even exist and we would not exist with them, but we do this by "equal rights". - Vikings: two kinds of Vikings exist, dark-haired brown-eyed more diplomatic/aristocratic, and light-haired blue-eyed more strong and living in silence, for work. In videos, strong viking men often go to war with diplomatic women; dark haired are like Aragorn in Tolkin's story. Indeed those are genetic ancestors, from deep eastern europe and from the western europe; they depict as two sons of the same family, but often the complex comes alltogether - the same division of traits meet again. We do not do none of this physically, but in fairy tales the melodies tell us the symbolic archetype - the gothic contemplating on the dark corners, vikings balancing the dark and light, with elven doing their ever-lasting, dangerous "peaceful activities" such as getting arrested when they block a garbage collector. I have been contemplating on those, as well as dwarven and even hobbits, and trying to figure out this archetype; I started interest in gothic as I saw there is darkness in the realm, and how to cope - the undead is the strongest, and tolerates mental and physical darkness and avoidness.

The Spanish best princess the future queen ..I am definitely democrat for matters in America and American blues. This speech is her strategy about hard decisions, to take the pills and become stronger: doing a revolution here in Spain means to do it with princess Leonor. I have this American reptile blue strategy, written in the holy pages: while the democrat must be democrat, and it's easy to follow, as bluer, older the family gets as more they like to honour each others and provide a free-willed service; in this I usually look for the best leaders.

What I want to do is only a good relationship with barbarian, because I am Viking and indeed want to do our chants: the problem, that the official Celt, who has won the historic war, wants to check every monetary, intimate and other aspect of this and is sure the barbarian is wrong; this exists to a degree in offices, police/government forces, church etc - in each case you can separate the two and you should do it culturally. If the barbarian fights for the freedom, it's a slow process and they do not want to break their relationships, it's not something that you "free" them. From the royal family I can see princess Leonor is more for the freedom.

In my home country I am not exactly "non-christian" - I am a Viking and Vikings indeed see a deep truth in Word of Christ; but indeed I am exactly a Buddhist. But for people who just think Bible is a good prophecy: there should be another word, not "christian".

Christian Atheist: a person apologizing you for conquistadores and inquisition; being cynical if you are *believer* but not christian, reminding that you are not proper christian if you do not belong to catholic church, perhaps thinking that religions outside christianity are crazy people. Ethics definitely equals to christianity. It has been said that atheists of different churces can be seen clearly different. Positive case of christian atheist is this: they have been convinced in christian ethics and that godlike creature would indeed be like christ, for example rather than satan.