Bluevinn

So, simply put, the process of breaking this finite bubble is solipsism — more like the endpoint, the destination. Like a wave of the ocean reconnecting with the whole ocean. Right ?

In your last video, "8 unique & original proofs of God," you said there can't be a finite object existing. Either that thing is God, or it's one finite thing of a chain which goes to infinity (which is ultimately God). But then here in solipsism, you say only my finite self is conscious. So this has to go to either: 1. It's infinity (This can't be true — this self is finite; I can't do whatever I wish. Obviously there are limits) 2. Or you're just one chain of a chain of infinity (which suits this so well — you're just one conscious self of many, which is ultimately god)

Do you agree with absolute solipsism? You can't claim that both subjective solipsism and absolute solipsism are equally valid, because you've already made a clear distinction between individual experience and collective experience—and even stated that individual experience holds more weight. You can’t uphold both positions without contradicting yourself. All should be equally weighted.

Still it's a ego driven thing what's going on with you. So does your understanding about solipsism. It's tied so hard to your ego. To the point where you claim that an individual experience is better than a collective experience.

This is Not this Right ?

Such minds ?? There’s no other minds. Why would you say that? Don’t you believe in solipsism? It's only your mind.

You're nuts. Just look at what you're saying. You've gone so deep down the solipsism tunnel that your comments don't even make sense anymore. It's like: 'Why not why myself talk I talk myself blah blah blah…' Sounds like a drunk 3-year-old talking.

Ya clearly

Why even bother replying? You're talking to yourself. There's no one else here

I read all your comments. If you truly believed in solipsism like you're claiming in the comments, you wouldn’t even be here arguing with anyone — because literally, there's no one else here to argue with. So clearly, you don’t fully believe it yourself, yet you’re trying so hard to prove it to others. LOL

Why would other minds not be ?

Exactly

There's no way you can know the answer to it. Right?

Nah, he summed it up perfectly. You're just not getting it.

Thanks man. Appreciate it

Yeah, I agree with that. But for 99.99% of people, accessing multiple POVs just isn't possible. Maybe for someone like Leo or others in these kinds of forums, sure — but for the average person, you're locked inside a self-contained, finite bubble. And if everyone could just break out of that bubble at will, the whole idea of being “finite” or “limited” would lose its meaning. The definitions themselves would collapse. That’s why I said it’s a feature, not a bug . The limitation is what holds the structure of individual experience together.

Then you won't be a limited finite being. If you could access anyone's POV whenever you want. (even they're non existent zombie minds or whatever) It breaks your limited finite bubble. And also in dreams you can't access other people's POV. It will make the dream so shit. You will not feel the individuality.

Why ?

If two fingers on the same hand could fully access each other, are they really two fingers — or just one thing pretending to be two? That’s the point I was making. The separation between minds isn’t just a technical limitation, it’s what creates the experience of individuality in the first place. If you could access any other point of view at will, the distinction between "you" and "them" breaks down. You’d just be one mind shifting perspectives, not separate minds. So yeah, logically you can imagine a system where minds are accessible but then they stop being truly separate minds. You don’t get multiplicity and unity at the same time without changing what it means to be “another person.”

It didn't take much time you to do the exact same. LOL

You probably said that because of the comment I made on someone asking why we can't experience other people's minds. I said, "That's a feature, not a bug," because if you could randomly access other people's minds, it would disrupt the duality of this world. Okay, that's a dogmatic position. Can you actually answer it? Why can't we access each other's minds whenever we want? Your reply will be so profound. Not some dogmatic shit. Because clearly, YOU'RE NOT THAT GUY.

Can you explain what it is ? Is it that only the self with lowercase "s" exists ?

Yes i remember it too. Right after the solipsism video leo made that infinity of gods video.

So true. But I still don’t understand why Leo did that exactly. In his earlier videos, from about 3 or 4 years ago, he clearly distinguished between self with a lowercase s and Self with an uppercase S. He made a clear separation between absolute truth and relative truth when explaining these concepts. However, around the time his solipsism video came out, he communicated it as if only the lowercase self exists, without making a distinction between absolute and relative truth. Why did he do that? I’ve seen some comments suggesting he does it intentionally to break your ego. Could that be the reason?

How do you assume that leo went the deeper than him?