numbersinarow

Great thread. Spoiler: OP feels homicidal urges when he loses a debate.

What puzzle has to be solved through an element that you would absolutely and utterly reasonably assume (at first) is useless?

If someone's denying that intolerant (especially misandrist) leftists are stage blue, they don't know what they're talking about.

Your reaction to that is embedded in the universe, it's not embedded in the universe in the sense that it's meaning isn't and in the sense that there can be exceptions, but your instinctive reaction is embedded into reality and it might feel incredibly natural to be suspicious of certain relationships.

Are monsters born or made? Could a monster exist in human form and merit comparisons to the Antichrist or Satan himself?

Really? I'm shocked. You literally have the engagement level of a 2 year old. I hope you throw the next tantrum even more embarrassingly.

If someone claims that they know the true nature of everything AKA have the ultimate truth, but they don't account for supernatural luck levels being different in different beings, I, as someone who has confirmed the aforementioned, can know that person is lying. There is a 0.01% chance that the level of delusion present in people who block out insane traumatic memories is also present in the people claiming to have the ultimate truth, but in reality that person is simply lying.

Even death (eternal inability to suffer) is sick. Why? Death pervades everything. Imagine being told that the ultimate end is non-existence, and this is unavoidable. You can see this demonstrated when you switch from the mode of seeing yourself as having, for whatever period of time, avoided tragedy, to seeing that your distinction between yourself and a rape-victim is put into context when you realize everyone is a death-victim. Objectively, your existence is death, subjectively, the time you spend on earth alive matters.

In order to truly live your best, you must control all the thoughts and language you use.

Draw a card for me please.

1. Andrew Yang did a more close salute to Hitler's than Elon did, on a talk show, but made it clear that the hand started from the forehead, and nobody cared. Elon makes it clear that the salute started from the chest. 2. That's not the fascist salute in the first place, the fascist salute has the hand aligned with the arm. This is a completely different salute.

The right wing's claims about black crime are much more extreme than you simply pointing out one type of crime among white people. If you were sitting on the fence, who would you be more likely to think is convincing? This is not me saying the right wing is correct or more persuasive, they just appear so when you use a talking point about whites committing more school shootings.

Yes it very much so is.

Without the focus practices, what are you ever going to accomplish in terms of your mind? Without the ability to control your mind in that way, what can you really expect? "Mindfulness" in the sense that you just observe but don't focus is insufficient. Focus meditation is way more effective for me.

It's at the very core of reality.

I was looking forward to his next movie announcement, needless to say... Either way I actually predicted he would die in 2024 because of the deaths of Don Beck and Cormac McCarthy lining up.

Low perspective: Singularity will solve all my problems. Low perspective: After I kill myself I will be transported into a realm in which I will be omnipotent. Low perspective: An afterlife of eternal torture is impossible.

But he's not even joking.

Contemplate: How are affiliate links theft? Theft has countless forms, throughout much of history all that mattered is whether something was tied to something/someone (as opposed to being free game) and whether it was easy for you to acquire it from someone else or not. These are degrees of separation between you and the thing you want, considered purely pragmatically. But to truly identify theft ask yourself: What are the resources being used? Who is in possession of less because of what you did? There are other questions, but those are the 2 fundamental questions.

Well it's not that simple, even if you argue that everything copies something else, the way that AI copies the material it's trained on is still much more direct than what humans do. Plus you directly used the other person's work as your tool by putting it into the AI.

So... am I missing something obvious? Why is OP literally posting obviously AI-generated things as if he wrote them? I know that redditors aren't able to tell, but in general, the way the post is structured is a dead giveaway.

Wherever you look, there's only winning or losing [which is to say, evil], and it's utterly unfair and miserable. The way the universe is structured, the only way to live is to never lose, to completely avoid the pain of losing. You know deep down that you are at least close to losing because of the words that you hear.

It doesn't, that just sounds appealing to stage blue people.

I can't zoom in enough on the pictures but it seems Alan Turing isn't on the list despite enabling the existence of this list. Goethe isn't either. If I was ignorant I'd take extreme issue with below-average-intelligence people such as wittgenstein and elon musk not being included.