numbersinarow

Yeah haha so funny dude. I'm not sure if you're trying to run away from your past or want those weapons in order to be more effective when you finally you-know-what. Either way that's quite the outdated weapon these days.

Only you can ultimately know if you are strong enough, but you also actively choose it in the moment.

You'd assume, if you were in your left brain too much, that Jon Jones stands no chance of losing since he will just out-wrestle Aspinall. But I'm not ruling out a first round TKO for Aspinall. Jones himself wants to avoid him and Ngannou. If Jones himself doesn't have the confidence, why think you know better?

Why do leftists and artificial intelligence refer to diablo immortal as "diablo"?

The quote by David Lynch is stage turquoise.

Yep, most of these psychos that come out of nowhere were you-know-what as kids. Adding that person to my block list now since there is only so much second-hand embarrassment I can take. To OP: women don't have a sex drive. Men are attracted to them but they don't desire men at all, don't love them at all, don't have sexual feelings at all. ARe fully cold and calculating. Normies could eventually wake up to this optimistically.

It's oddly easy to interpret the quote that way. So judging things as bad can be a coping mechanism but the inverse can't really be?

True, the quote can easily be interpreted as "You delude yourself into thinking nothing bad has ever happened and that everything is pure perfection because your ego is fragile."

You can imagine someone else having an ego and them imagining bad and wrong existing. But it's a construct/projection.

You don't actually know. Even if Leo confirms or clarifies the meaning himself, you still weren't sure at the time of interpreting. You were saying the true meaning is the inverse of what I initially assumed AKA "You haven't let anything bad happen because you're that selfish." but then said it's gullible to try to interpret the quote. Of course they assume the word selfish is about them, that's the reasonable inference. If there is any meaning to the insight itself, as opposed to being purely a mental exercise to show you the folly of interpreting things, then go back to my original comment.

So heartbreaking.

Oh, I went on the forum didn't see a thread by the monster who was repeatedly raped as a child, about something completely trivial, for no purpose but to offend God? This must be some kind of mistake.

If you fail a goal that is supposed to help all of humanity, you always have the consolation of knowing everyone else who ever existed also failed.

https://x.com/InfraHaz/status/1886562913931981037 Everyone you know who magically gets drugs is a CIA operative there to brainwash people. Leo's smart. He knows that if one olive is theft, making people constantly look at fucking affiliate link posts is theft. He is 100% sure even consciously, he hasn't even made an attempt to lie to himself. But he and countless others are controlled by the CIA. There are no legal paths to money or success in a controlled and patched system like what we live in.

I assume the concept is too advanced to actually be put into words. If Leo is saying "Well, you're selfish and that's not a bad thing, but that's certainly the reason why you think bad things can happen." he's not right IMO. What is selfish? Right, actions that take you into account far more than others. How do we get from this to "bad" in order to show it's impossible to call someone selfish after saying nothing bad ever happened? You'd first assume we can trace back definitions of every word in what I typed from "right" to "How" until we get to "bad" but it's far simpler actually, "bad" never came from anything but selfishness. "But I can just not judge the selfishness, whereas "bad" is always a judgement." The reality is that I'm talking about the first judgement, the judgement that says the thing is selfish in the first place. This is merely a projection. If "bad" only exists insofar as you have an ego, the same thing applies to "selfish."

Don't use the internet if you're small and insecure.

Ok I'll stop but I'm really really hoping the ableist meltdown he had on the vegan thread got him warning points.

Literally think about it. Either a complete troll post or legally illiterate.

No, millions of years of evolution just led to a random mutation which then resulted in an insectoid randomly getting hotter. You literally are either in this situation because you are using a singular microscopic brain cell to decide what to use, or you are defying a doctor's orders because, as we all know, someone like you thinks that spewing an ableist tantrum at the doctor is the best choice the second you realize he's more qualified. Amusing that someone has to live an existence like that.

Well, no, if you're more likely to think 1000 times in a row is explained by luck than admit the supernatural is real, that means you're closed-minded, that doesn't mean you're smart. That's the lowest possible sophistic side-step. I honestly agree the video isn't amazing proof of anything, but there is proof of supernatural luck out there. You can choose to believe whatever you want about it but it's true. "But it COULD happen in a hypothetical materialistic universe." I can't blame you for thinking that, but when you think about it deeply there is no justification for a worldview in which you have the ability to compare things and say "Okay so my mind works in such a way that I ought to be so skeptical that a hypothetical of this sort convinces me of a position." which isn't true since the first layer is whether you're aligned with the truth or not, whether your skepticism is justified or not is secondary, which, at the same time, means that it's not granted your skepticism is justified.

What was his haircut? Go see a psychiatrist btw.

I disagree, it's even easier to perform this technique than you make it out to be. You don't even need to sit in the sun.

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO--------OOOOOOOOO---OOOOOOO-O-O-OO-OOOOO-OOO-OOO--OOOO--OOO-OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH

Luckily one of Leo's old videos has prepared me for the sensation of wanting to badly vomit from an experience where I identify with the light, one where he talks about how someone taking psychedelics needed to vomit all night long. I didn't end up vomiting but at the same time it can be incredibly creepy and unnerving knowing you misidentified. In dreams, you're still yourself. When you wake up from a dream you get the feeling of remembering, but when you wake up in real life you get an overwhelming feeling of dread that you misidentified this entire time. I'm not prepared for that level of dread, not even close.

Once you realize you are the clear light you become slow, the way David Hawkins was. You talk slowly, there is lag, you aren't commanding your body from itself, you are commanding your body from the light that is way beyond this existence. Second tier VS first tier spiral dynamics doesn't matter, if you aren't at mid-turquoise you are too ignorant to actually realize the truth. Tools such as ways of reasoning, faith, mental health techniques, logic etc. are all incredibly limited, they don't even matter. You can't listen to music or play video games etc. if you are in touch with clear light. The light is still, while those things are based around conflict and ups and downs. You can see some game developer (e.g. Ken Levine seem happy) which can be true but he's missing the whole completely. The only music you can listen to if you're enlightened doesn't really qualify as music, it's just unchanging frequency, - changes would be superficial, lower, more stuck. The language that those who have seen the truth use can't help you see the truth if you haven't seen it yourself, putting it into words is pointless, since, again, if you're stuck at a certain level or haven't had certain experiences, the language is pointless and nonsensical to you. Science and faith both fail, but these experiences, do they also fail? Nope, they objectively bring you closer to meaning. What can reveal meaning or even is required to truly understand things? The techniques used by higher beings. Truly enlightened humans should be able to replicate these techniques to an extent that makes them useful.