zurew

What year do you predict, when an AI will be able to pass an 6-8 hour long turing test done by an AI engineer?

"I am so smart guys, I see a random graph with more excess mortality rate, and I know that it must be because of vaccines, and that graph alone without a doubt proves my point about vaxx being bad" "FDA needs 75 years to release the data, therefore I can make up whatever fucking numbers and stats I fucking want about the vaccine and conclude that the vaxx is bad" - another salient and smart point.

So you are telling me , that when it comes to your other claims you have nothing to backed them up and your just made them the fuck up? If you go with that "I can't show evidence or studies, because they have all been censored in the past 3 years" - the only thing you are communicating to me with that, is that you are making up numbers without being able to ground them.

"I am really smart guys, thankfully i am not a sheep like those dumb vaxxed guys, i have my own unique opinions and I do my own research on youtube. All my thinking process can be boiled down to anything that is anti mainstream"

So you want to dig into these things? Let me see first your cited studies about your claims.

"ohh dude look around you, more people are dying nowadays than in the past - therefore vaccines are bad". Really smart my dude, your epistemic process is shit and there is nothing more to say about it.

"observant person" - makes light year steps in logic. This brain rot has to stop. I guess before the covid vaccine people have never died or fall to the ground.

*brain rot take.

Sneako is such a bot. His mind is so rotten from the anti mainstream - anti matrix bullshit narrative.

Why do you assume that vaccination has anything to do with this incident?

If thats the case, God should be capable to give you free will.

I didn't say that it is evidence, i just gave a response to your narrative, where you implied that even entertaining the possibility that he would do something like that makes no sense at all, or that it is almost completely out of reach.

Is it impossible to imagine that there are people in the world, who don't act in a perfectly rational way all the time and their narcissism sometimes can overwrite their rationality, and sometimes they will do and say some shit that won't lead to the best calculated outcome(s)?

What about the part where he said that he did some shady shit in the past, and he flushed his phone down the toilet when the police came, and what about the part where he said that he didn't let his women to go out anywhere? This is of course is not evidence, but it seems that top g did his own self snitching by being vaguely vocal about his shady past.

I guess the most genius and intelligent way to tackle with any question or problem is to invoke the absolute, and then virtue signal that we are so wise and spiritual.

Those two things is not necessarily mutually exclusive. There are stepping stones here, that need to be recognized. Its clear that rules can work at some places and rules are the best we have at some places.

I like the "make teachers be transparent by their own code of ethics. I don't agree with the 'as many code as you like'. I think there should be a minimum number that must cover certain things like teacher-student realtionship. It would make it so that teachers could be hold accountable to standards that they have given to themselves.

When I say "the alternative is worse" I mean the alternative when we don't do shit, if you have better ideas, then say them.

The argument is that the alternative is worse, and you have yet to make the argument why would it be worse than cults being totally free to trap people and to operate.

The point is not to give a specific number, the point is to make at least some action, more specifically a structure (like an ethics code) that can lower it, without ignoring it all together and without not giving any fucks at all.

and yet how many bad examples we can look at. This all or nothing mentality is bullshit, because basically in one hand i can take the teaching of truth and on the other hand I can put anything (any volume from the worst things possible) that can justify the teaching of truth. Also I don't see what serious teaching tool is taken away by the implementation of that list. Also, we can talk about the modification of that list (but we can't get to that point, if we can't acknowledge, that no list is = to (the spiritual teacher can do basically any fucking thing he/she wants for the sake of teaching the truth)