zurew

'Can be' is different from saying it must have been caused by trauma. - which was you initial implication. You are really confident and smug when it comes to this issue and try to appeal to the literature, when in reality the research on kinks is very fucking bad and there is a lot more to do and discover.

Yeah its really cringe when people kink-shame people or when people have to trace back every kind of kink that they themselves wouldn't be confident with to some kind of trauma as if they would have any idea whatsoever how kink develops or works. The irony is that the same redpill people who use these talking points to shame guys who have kinks they despise or kinks they wouldn't be confident with, these very same guys will shit on feminists who tell each other that "no no no, what that guy did to you in the past wasn't okay , it was very very bad, regardless of how you lived through that experience" so they sort of trigger a trauma response in their friends and recontextualize their whole history in a way, to trigger an actual trauma response. - the very same dynamic can be seen in this case coming from insecure redpillers.

Whats your take on teaching scientists at least philosophy of science? - Because I think thats very much relevant to the development of their field.

Oh yeah I know about this guy. He is really good at explaining complex ideas in a very comprehensible and easily graspable way. Love his channel.

Sounds like you are quite confident about making positive claims about the story (that you clearly haven't done much research on), without waiting for the end details about his case, while also calling out others for not showing you evidence for their claims. Btw if you would have done research on this you would know, that there is indeed plenty of evidence against him, thats why he was charged with multiple things. Your skepticism regarding him being a pimp is really fascinating, knowing that he had a phd (pimping hoes degree) course on his own website and there are leaked logs from the war room such as: Sounds perfectly like an open invitation to become part of their webcam business right? There is no such thing that would be perfectly applicable to the definition of sex trafficking using the lover-boy method right? This is just about a regular webcam business offer where both party knows beforehand what they are getting into and there are no false premises here, right? Also how convenient that that dude talks about "get our name tattooed on her", because there are multiple women who has a tattoo with a label of "owned by Tate" which doesn't sound anything what a sex trafficking pimp would do at all.

@Bobby_2021 I think there is a slight miscommunication here.I use the term 'belief' the same way people use it in philosophy circles (attitude or stance towards a proposition). This is important because this is different from a knowledge claim. (knowledge is used here as 'justified true belief') For example taking your math example - someone can believe that 2+3 = 10 but thats different from them saying that 2+3 is actually 10. I can believe in things without any proper justification. Well, have you read about the problem of induction?

Yeah and even more specifically semantics. I want to dive into semantics, because its interesting and can be really valuable regardless of what you do. Anything that improves your ability to express yourself or to understand others and the world better is very valuable imo.

Both of those claims are false. 1) You can be agnostic about things even after you "computed" them or in other words, even after you have deeply investigated them - its just happens to be the case , that neither side were more compelling or persuasive from your pov,compared to the other. Or it happens to be the case, that you haven't yet found the answer that would be required to take a position on something - but that doesn't mean,that you are not interested in finding out that truth or answer; it just means you haven't found it yet. 2)This ties back to point 1. Just because you haven't taken a position regarding a proposition ,from that doesn't follow that you don't value finding out the truth value of that proposition.

No. You can be agnostic about things. That just means you haven't formed an opinion on the matter and it doesn't mean the negation of something. In other words it means "I don't have a belief about x". - notice , that this way you don't make any explicit or implicit positive or negative claims about the subject matter , you only make a claim about the current status of that specific belief .

In that case, I will pick your brain for some insights about neuroscience in the future . The dual n-back stuff is interesting. I have seen some claims about it having the potential to improve fluid intelligence. Is that actually true based on your research on the subject?

Thats sounds like someone who is contemplating about quitting doing psychology. Are you contemplating about changing majors? Btw, I know this is worthless to mention(because its almost obvious), but there has to be some good philosophy of science material that at least attempts to address the replication crisis and maybe more specifically the issue, that you've brought up. Thats a very interesting insight into this problem.

Is that your video? edit: nevermind. The reason why I asked is because I misread the subscriber count and thought why would you link a video from a channel that has like 500 subscribers, but now that I checked again, its clear that it has 500K+ subscribers .

@Carl-Richard Thank you for the breakdown. I see too much people who are very easily dismissive of things without knowing anything about those things.

@Bobby_2021 The depth of your research on this topic, is impressive.

The first 7 site literally suggest 7 different numbers - its completely useless. Ranging from 10 mil to 900 mil. lmao

Actually, not just his actions , but his own current words strengthening your argument as well. He is still denying the things he did, and he still cant bite the bullet on his past actions. He is undeniably a sociopath. (its timestamped)

Another instance, where d2sage making claims that he hasn't verified yet. Why are you so confident in your claims and spend little to no time in verifying anything before you utter your statements?

"let me show everyone here , how smart I am in saying, that morality is subjective". What you don't realize, is that going with that logic and using it as a defense - there is nothing objectively wrong or bad about imprisoning Andrew Tate even if he is proven to be innocent. His logic is that the "end justify the means", which is obviously one of the worst kind of defenses in this case and if we were to test the consistency of his logic, he would either realize ,that he doesn't really believe in it, or he would come off as a completely unhinged sociopath .

whats the evidence for him donating 6 figures, let alone 7 or 8 figures?

@Carl-Richard We need your pushback here.

Your ignorance and the irony of your sentence is fascinating.

Tell them, that they should educate themselves, before they confidently utter the most surface level things about a subject they know nothing about. You should also tell them, that everything they care about is using or building from philosophy (even being obsessed about being pragmatic is a philosophical approach and foundations of science was set up by philosophers doing philosophy). Two very easy things that you can mention about philosophy is logic and morals. Both of them are big sections in philosophy and both are very important to our social and to our every day life. The most tangible and probably the most important for them would be logic, which is a core element to science ,so they should appreciate philosophy just for that alone (and then obviously a lot more things could be added why one should appreciate philosophy) that being said, regarding your relationship with your friends - if you want to keep them, and if their behaviour deeply bother you, then you should express that and make your boundaries clear about where you draw the line, and if they consistently won't respect your boundaries, then you should cut them off.

The problem (that AI will replace jobs) will eventually affect everyone, not just art, so this is an issue that worth thinking about deeply.I assume you don't just worry about money, but also about being/feeling useful. I havent thought about it deeply yet, but my surface level thoughts on this topic is this:There are 2 main things that comes to my mind regarding this "AI will replace everything" problem: 1) I havent seen or heard any good argument yet that would actually prove / demonstrate that AI will definitely replace most jobs in the next 10-20 years in a way, where there will be no value or need for any human thinking or input. There is a fuckton of speculation and a lot of built in assumption around this topic, and speculation alone is far from actually giving a good reason for something or different from actually proving something. 2) Regardless if my 1st point is true or not, I think there are unique things to us, that wont be completely replaceable. For example , just mentioning 2 from the top of my head 1) - your living experience and 2) The uniqueness and power of distributed cognition or in other words our collaboration with each other and with the machines . I can't tap into your living experience. I might be able to gather data about it in various ways, but that wont fully capture the experience itself and because you have a unique history and a unique living experience, you can provide a unique input and take on certain things and that in and of itself is valuable and makes you valuable. For the "being useful" part, the answer is unfortunately this: we have to adapt, there is no way around it. we have to let go of our attachments to certain jobs/activities and focus on either merging with AI or collaborating with AI and with each other even more, because that will create unique synergistic effects.

That girl is consistent with her brain rot posts.

???? Who claimed here that the vaccine doesn't have any side effect?? As I told you, you need to compare the effects of covid19 with the pfizer vaccine. Thats how you get a good picture about how bad or good it is.