zurew

What would prevent that infinity, to have infinite versions of itself? (not just the parts, but the whole) Even if there is an infinite number of You(not talking about parts, but the whole), you can't access that because you are already Absolute. You can only access your own Absolute version of other Absolutes (if there are any). But ultimately you cannot know, because you can't escape your Absolute consciousness, and you can only interact with your own Self. So basically if there are an infinite number of solipsistic bubbles, they cannot know about each other. They can only interact with their own Absolute selves.

The fucking sneaky and slimy nature of God/Reality. The structure cannot be pinned down, because in the process of pinning it down, it changes and adapts itself. In short, Reality/God is whatever you want to imagine it to be. I am actively creating my own self and my reality ( so if i want to imagine myself and reality as seperate, then it will be)

Drop here anything that is related to the title, including movie and game soundtracks.

Would you say that every single part of my own reality could be traced back to infinite number of sovereign,absolute Gods? (like every single particle or atom or quark or we are only talking about humans or my whole reality overall could be traced back to Gods?) And i am as an absolute, i hold all those Gods in my own consciousness so they are part of me, because they are part of my consciousness, so at the end of the day, we are all one and we are in each other's consciousness or in other words in each other's dreams. And i can only access my own version of those infinite Gods in my consciousness, but there are an infinite number of other Gods that are holding an infinite number of other Gods in their own consciousness (inlcuding me). Would you say that the relationship between Gods something like this: We are 100% identical but at the same time 100% seperate and 100% connected. 100% seperate, because i can only hold your version of absolute in my own absolute consciousness ( and i can't escape my own absolute consciousness). 100% connected because all the Absolute Gods are 100% identical to me . An Absolute containing an infinite number of Absolutes in itself.

If you are dreaming at night, and in your dream you are in your room, the same process is happening what you just described above. The point is that there is no clear line you can point to between imaginary and not imaginary. Everything is inside your concious experience or simply put (in your consciousness). You are always interacting with your own consciousness.

The goal would be to make spirtuality and spiritual practices much more common in society, where most humans can embody love and empathy. We start giving more fucks about other creatures and people, if our sense of self is containing more and more things. No one would want to hurt his/her own parts (unless he/she is masochistic). So the goal would be to embody love, and to make our sense of self bigger (the end goal is to make it so big that it contains the whole Universe). We would still need some kind of a morality system probably, but it would be much easier to navigate, compared to now. So this would transcend the rational morality, where you need to basically justify everything, what i am talking about would be based upon embodyment. But the embodyment of love is a pipe dream for now, we are really far away from it, so we will need morality for a long time.

https://huggingface.co/spaces/dalle-mini/dalle-mini This is a different tool, works the same way, the only difference is that it generates 9 pictures in 15 seconds. (and you can't choose any background) Joe rogan, after smoking some DMT.

Wow, i couldn't help myself, i had to write "scary alien". This tool is actually addicting.

Yeah, exactly.

Giving Elon Musk some tips, how to make a Mars colony

It can create really good horror images. This tool is way too good.

Are you sure, that you need a PhD?

This comes back to the same lines we have discussed already. You can't prove nor disprove it using your current level of consciousness. This problem can only be solved, by looking at it from an infinitely big perspective that includes everything. Infinity the only thing that includes everything even its own self. So if you think about it, your question can only be solved using infinite consciousness. You can say, that its imposibble to have an infinitely big perspective, but thats the only way to solve existential problems and questions.

I am inside your dream, you are inside my dream. Can you tell me anything that was or is beyond your dream? If not, then why assume that anything can be outside of it?

You are inside my dream.

There is nothing beyond my dream. There is only perception change when i wake up, how i view myself and the world. Notice, that you haven't experienced anything that was outside of your dream.

I would say , that i can. There are more accurate perspectives compared to other perspectives. There are perspectives that can include other pespectives. If we want to get the most accurate perspective, we should use an infinitely big perspective, which includes all possible perspectives. We could call that becoming infinitely conscious. The only way you can know, that you are sleeping right now, if you actually wake up. You cannot judge it from lower, you can only judge it from upper. Because when you are having a dream ( not a lucid dream ) , then you are not conscious that you are dreaming in that moment, you only realize that you were dreaming, when you wake up from the dream. So reversing back my point it being unfalsifiable, it can be tested. Its only unfalsifiable in your current state of consciousness.

Exactly this. We can't abandon all our constructed morality, because the courtsystem is based upon morality. There are many many heavy and hard problems that can't be thrown to other people's judgement to decide in what situation what should they do. Imagine if being able to murder, rape, torture, theft, scamming, kidnapping, robbing would based upon individual feelings and choice. If there is no morality in use, then all the choices are made by that particuar individual's moral framework. The problem comes when one person's moral framework is that slavery, rape, kindapping,torturing is an okay thing to do, and in an other peson's moral framework its not. How can we have a functioning society like that?

Regardless of what kind of wordview we are using, the only thing i can interact with and access is my dream. So even if there is an objective true part of you, i cannot access it, so thats why i call it a dream. The only thing i can be sure of is my conscious experience, anything more would be based upon further assumptions.

It doesn't absurd at all. "Reality is a dream" claim is correct on many levels. Even if you want to make the argument, that there is an objective reality out there, even then, you don't really access that reality, but you only experience your own interpretation of that reality. Interpretation is basically reality, and interpretation = creating reality. So by you making your own interpretation of your own self and reality either consciously or unconsciously you are making your own dream. When you read this message, you won't read my message, you only read your own interpretation of my message. I am always inside your head, you basically can't get around that. You are communicating with an idea of Zurew in your head, you can't access any objective Zurew. So even with the "there is an objective world outhere" assumption, you still only access your own biased, distorted version of reality.

Because there is no difference between real and not real. What makes the "real beings" real and the dream characters not real? Also you are asking for evidence and proof, when this thing is unfalsifiable in the firstplace.

Yeah this is really true. I find it way too reductive to say that "all judgements just in your head" implying that its just subjective so it has no real substance on reality. There are a set of characteristics that we can agree on that is really destructive, unproductive and unhealthy in a society. The mind is constantly making judgements on reality and on its own self. The mind is a good tool for survival, and its necessary for survival. Survival is not bad, using judgements to survive is not bad either. We can use the mind consciously and unconsciously. Making a judgement call, that a person based on certain characteristic traits can ruin your life, could save your mental health and could save you from a lot of trouble.

Good stuff This is another one ,that is really good from Shpongle.

This assumes, that after death you won't have any experience. There is no objective answer that can be given, why experience makes life worth living. However, if we want to go with the conventional definition of death, then we can say, that paradoxically death making life worth living. When you ask yourself the question why living is better than being dead, its basically a subjective question. Because any experience can be subjectively evaluated on the good and bad scale. You are the one, who evaluates an experience and put a value on it. So the answer can only be given by you. On the other hand, we can talk about generally speaking why people subjectively value life over death. For instance being able to have enjoyable, pleasurable experiences, to create, to connect with others, to develop yourself, to express your unique nature in the world to have the ability to love to have the ablity to fall in love etc With life you have the ability to create. Lack of meaning is better than a deterministic meaning, because you can create the meaning yourself.