@Leo Gura Insights from all my contemplation so far:
All words are interchangeable meaningless labels
There is something (or nothing), and I don't know what it is; labeling it with words is putting it in a box
The only way to comprehend/understand this something/nothing is with consciousness, not language
This aligns with what I have heard in the past many times from you and other mystics.
But in your conversation you mentioned "infinity", "field", "point", "singularity", and then you said, "I mean these things more technically than scientists do". And you also said that reality is perfectly logical.
So when you are applying these labels like "infinity", "field", "point", "singularity", etc., are you at the same time aware that this is "maya", and that you are simply using language to explain your worldview because that's the format of your interaction with DemystifySci? Or not?