Fragmentation... “the individual” and “society/world”      Control implies division, the controller and the thing to be controlled; this division, as all division, brings about conflict and distortion in action and behavior in relationship.    This fragmentation is the work of thought, one fragment trying to control the other parts — call this one fragment, the controller, which tries to control “apparent parts” of thought.  This false division followed by action, (divided action), is limited action and the mischief maker.   The controller is the controlled.    Fragmentation is the effect of seeing oneself as ultimately separate from that which is thought, felt, perceived, and so on.  Or for the controller, “the i”, wants to control fear, but the controller is also a fragment of fear.  Also the controller wants to control desire, but the controller is just another fragment of desire trying to control an opposing fragment of desire.  Thought in its very nature is fragmentary and this causes confusion and sorrow, which effects the psychological field (psyche), and is reflected out into the world.    Inwardly, is “the i” separate from fear?  And outwardly, are we as “individuals” seperate from society/world?    Inwardly, “the i” sets out to control fear...a fragment that sets out to to control a fragment, and so on, moving towards the abstraction.  And that same inward movement of fragmentation is expressed outward born of this false notion that “the individual” is fundamentally seperate from the society, in which we invent abstract ideals and so on to solve fundamental problems that arise within that society. The fact is disorder, (the fact), is constantly evaded by seeking security in the abstraction that thinks will bring about order, by the intellect, in the form of analysis. But just as analysis cannot bring about order in the relationship with ourselves, so the same the application of analysis as applied on political science to bring about order in relationship between (man-woman) kind.  This outward disorder, (corruption in society) is merely a reflection of the inner disorder of “the individual”. And vice versa.... The individual is the reflection of the society, and the society is an expression of the individual.    The cause and the effect are one and the same movement of fragmentation.    Political science may have its place in practical matters, but when it comes to relationship in society/the world, this application of incomplete action only causes more disorder.    IS THIS PROCESS OF FRAGMENTATION THE ROOT OF THIS DISORDER, AND THE REASON FOR THIS FAILURE IN THE ATTEMPT TO APPLY POLITICAL SCIENCE AS A MEANS TO BRING ABOUT ORDER IN SOCIETY/THE WORLD?