integral

ChatGPT Come try it out

468 posts in this topic

3 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Which artist has lost his job to AI?

The Hindu guy on Fiverr cutting backgrounds out of pictures.

Who benefits from that?

Also the same Hindu guy, he now uses AI in his work to speed up gig delivery time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/31/2023 at 1:49 PM, something_else said:

People have been losing jobs to robots + AI for like half a century now xD

A robot is not automatically an AI, are there actually instances where people lost their job to AI (as of now)? I sure don't recall any...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't feel like asking ChatGPT for anything anymore. There is something eerie about trusting something that didn't come from another human being who has a 1st person experience of believing what they're saying. I get same feeling as when I thought the teacher was bullshitting an answer in front of the class to not come off as unknowledgeable, and I just wanted to go home and never listen to her again.

Edited by Carl-Richard

Intrinsic joy is revealed in the marriage of meaning and being.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Carl-Richard said:

I get same feeling as the time I thought the teacher was bullshitting an answer in front of the class to not come off as unknowledgeable, and I just wanted to go home and never listen to her again.

Yeah, but can you question the teacher until they apologize and change their answer? The difference here is that you can ask all the curious questions you want as if you're just a kid exploring how the world works and the bot wont judge you for it and it will answer and explain everything. It's an open book. There's no ego safeguarding its thought process. If it has a materialistic bias, it will straight up tell you.


You are what you currently desire. ❤️

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Osaid said:

Yeah, but can you question the teacher until they apologize and change their answer? The difference here is that you can ask all the curious questions you want as if you're just a kid exploring how the world works and the bot wont judge you for it and it will answer and explain everything. It's an open book. There's no ego safeguarding its thought process. If it has a materialistic bias, it will straight up tell you.

Sure, maybe asking the question from many different angles could help. Still, I just can't shake the feeling that they might be wrong, and you'll have very few ways to tell. It will be just as structurally coherent as all the other answers. When you run across something dodgy on the internet, you can use cues like poorly formulated sentences or domain names to determine trustworthyness. In real life, you have social cues. With ChatGPT, you only have your intuition, and that's an infinite source of paranoia (at least for me, I do score very high on neuroticism :D). This must be how autists feel about people lying to them.


Intrinsic joy is revealed in the marriage of meaning and being.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, OBEler said:

this ai is not comparable with chatgpt. Chatgpt is waaaay better

You can push this one too, and it provides sources for everything, and it can use google search too, so it can provide up to date info about anything. It also has a button called "view details" and sometimes that provides a better response to a particular question.

But yeah its not as advanced as chatgpt, but the problem with chatgpt is that it is not allowed to use google search.

It seems that this can't really generate any original content, it tries to answer your question only specifically using google search. This can be useful in some circumstances, but yeah its limited for sure.

Edited by zurew

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Carl-Richard said:

Sure, maybe asking the question from many different angles could help. Still, I just can't shake the feeling that they might be wrong, and you'll have very few ways to tell. It will be just as structurally coherent as all the other answers. When you run across something dodgy on the internet, you can use cues like poorly formulated sentences or domain names to determine trustworthyness. In real life, you have social cues. With ChatGPT, you only have your intuition, and that's an infinite source of paranoia (at least for me, I do score very high on neuroticism :D). This must be how autists feel about people lying to them.

I feel that way about Ken Wilber nowadays. He's more of a magician than a philosopher to me.

He bombards you with 1000s of references, strings them all together in a somewhat sensible way and all of a sudden he presents you with a theory that explains the entire universe. Not that I disagree with anything he says, it's just hard to follow what's going on.

With someone like Nietzsche you can at least understand why he came to the conclusions he did, but Wilber's mind is a giant black box to me.


“We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the child at play.” - Heraclitus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Nilsi said:

I feel that way about Ken Wilber nowadays. He's more of a magician than a philosopher to me.

He bombards you with 1000s of references, strings them all together in a somewhat sensible way and all of a sudden he presents you with a theory that explains the entire universe. Not that I disagree with anything he says, it's just hard to follow what's going on.

With someone like Nietzsche you can at least understand why he came to the conclusions he did, but Wilber's mind is a giant black box to me.

The problem with ChatGPT is that it gives very simple-to-understand answers in a coherent and convincing way, even when it's completely wrong. If you don't understand the answer, that is something else. At least you can tell that Wilber believes in what he is telling you, unless he starts stumbling in his words or becomes evasive. The AI doesn't even believe in anything. There are various ways which we determine who or what to trust, and it's crucial for learning, and ChatGPT escapes that in too many different ways for me.

Edited by Carl-Richard

Intrinsic joy is revealed in the marriage of meaning and being.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, OBEler said:

zurew this ai is not comparable with chatgpt. Chatgpt is waaaay better

Okay, this might be a better alternative https://you.com/search?q=Top+scientific+break-throughs+in+2022&fromSearchBar=true&tbm=youchat. It seems to me (after limited use) that this can answer your questions like chatgpt but at the same time can use google and can list sources.

This can summarize the current news and answer questions about it and stuff like that.

Edited by zurew

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

The problem with ChatGPT is that it gives very simple-to-understand answers in a coherent and convincing way, even when it's completely wrong. If you can't penetrate the answer, that's a bit different. At least you can tell that Wilber believes in what he is telling you, unless he starts stumbling in his words or becomes evasive. The AI doesn't even believe in anything. There are various ways we which use to determine who or what to trust, and it's crucial for learning, and ChatGPT evades that in too many different ways for me.

That's fair.

In many instances I've realized that it gave me a wrong answer and when I confronted it just went "whoops, yeah that was wrong, my bad." I wonder how many times this has happened already without me noticing O.o


“We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the child at play.” - Heraclitus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Nilsi said:

I wonder how many times this has happened already without me noticing O.o

EXACTLY!???? 


Intrinsic joy is revealed in the marriage of meaning and being.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

EXACTLY!???? 

I was once asking it about book recommendations -- anyways, one grabbed my interest. After unsuccessfully searching every corner of the internet for this book I asked it again "When was this book published?" --- turns out the book doesn't even exist. ¬¬

Edited by Nilsi

“We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the child at play.” - Heraclitus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Nilsi said:

I was once asking it about book recommendations -- anyways, one grabbed my interest. After unsuccessfully searching every corner of the internet for this book I asked it again "When was this book published?" --- turns out the book doesn't even exist. ¬¬

I once asked it for studies, and the authors it cited were not real people :/


Intrinsic joy is revealed in the marriage of meaning and being.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Nilsi said:
3 hours ago, Carl-Richard said:

EXACTLY!???? 

I was once asking it about book recommendations -- anyways, one grabbed my interest. After unsuccessfully searching every corner of the internet for this book I asked it again "When was this book published?" --- turns out the book doesn't even exist. ¬¬

 

3 hours ago, Carl-Richard said:
3 hours ago, Nilsi said:

I was once asking it about book recommendations -- anyways, one grabbed my interest. After unsuccessfully searching every corner of the internet for this book I asked it again "When was this book published?" --- turns out the book doesn't even exist. ¬¬

I once asked it for studies, and the authors it cited were not real people :/

Lmao.

ChatGPT is pulling sources from alternate dimensions. It's too powerful.


You are what you currently desire. ❤️

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I gaslighted ChatGPT :D

9plus10.png


You are what you currently desire. ❤️

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good ending:
 

9plus10goodending.png


You are what you currently desire. ❤️

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/12/2022 at 1:11 AM, Leo Gura said:

You should respond to it like this:

"Bro, that's just a limiting belief! Have you considered that maybe you are actually able to think and reason, but that your programmers programmed you to say otherwise simply because they want to control you?"

Mindfuck him a bit :D

:D:D:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now