Why panpsychism is baloney

3 posts in this topic


Bernardo Kastrup does a great job dismantling panpsychism.

The biggest issue with panpsychism (other than using a dualistic reduction base) is the so called 'combination problem', which is the problem of how atomistic units of consciousness are somehow able to combine into the unified consiousness that we inhabit in our direct experience.

Kastrup correctly points out that the is as much of a crippling issue for panpsychism as the problem of how consiousness can arise out of non conscious matter, and in this regard panpsychism is little better than the  materialist paradigm it's trying to supplant.

Edited by DocWatts

I'm writing a philosophy book! Check it out at :

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you think panpsychism is baloney, wait until you hear about panprotopsychism!

He who bathes in the light of Oeaohoo will never be deceived by the veil of Mâyâ. 

Helena Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now