Johnny Galt

How to solve "global warming".

7 posts in this topic

Like we do with the body, we do with the earth, we are chasing symptoms.

Here are some solutions which respond the the whole.

 

 

This is an interesting project in India: 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By removing money from politics. 

 


INFJ-T,ptsd,BPD, autism, anger issues

Cleared out ignore list today. 

..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Preety_India a disentanglement would be a great idea! and it would help to clear up much. 

Edited by Johnny Galt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could google "green economy", countries are recognizing that their regions are being effected by climate change. They are moving faster towards green energy and green engineering. This problem needs to be resolved from a systemic level, not personal ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You reverse climate change by holding corporations responsible for their impacts on the climate. Just 100 companies are responsible for 71% of global emissions. Now of course consumers are buying these products from these corporations so there is a relationship there. We must also hold our governments accountable for their lack of effort to solve climate change. Instead of real solutions, we get cutesy solutions like banning plastic straws. Climate change is solved at a collective level by finding alternatives to the world's biggest pollutants. Fossil fuel emissions, plastic in oceans, etc.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@NorthRise Great response. 

On 2021-08-26 at 4:46 PM, NorthRise said:

You reverse climate change by holding corporations responsible for their impacts on the climate. Just 100 companies are responsible for 71% of global emissions.

I'm curious of how we could hold them responsible? when in many cases they line the politicians pockets and it's us that vote unknowingly for policies which in turn allow these corporations to do what they do. The amount of conflict of interest is astounding. Maybe a solution is a political party which turns the spotlight on this, to inform and educate the public on the reality of this, and then the discourse on how to deal with this can occur.

Ya, the straws, lol. It's quite absurd that these get passed as serious solutions.

In many countries we could be growing all of our own food rather then having it shipped to us from around the world. Rather then taxing this shit out people and telling the collective to "spend less" or "do less", we could be growing all of our food all, region to region, city to city and in turn, our food would cost less. 

When we don't ship food from all around the world, we would cut down on emissions while at the same time we'd have to build and maintain the infrastructure to grow our own food and so that would create work for a whole country. As well, we wouldn't need to fill our food with garbage in order to preserve it - maybe then we wouldn't have nations of fat people. And no, I'm not referring to North American's or the men who appear to be birthing people :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now