Hen Zuhe

Enlightenment - (Scale 500 - 1000) - Dr. David Hawkins Calibrated List

45 posts in this topic

Let’s look at this testing method first. If it would be reliable we would use it it in courts with 100% right conviction rates, find all missing people, know answer to basically every question... It’s absurd...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Hen Zuhe I don't see why Christian communion scored higher than Transcendental Meditation, Reiki, and Hatha Yoga. Can you possibly explain technically why? I've been doing TM for 4 years, have had great results (certainly better than the Christian stuff), but want to make sure I'm doing the most potent practice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

C. Communion 700, TM 220?
Gandhi 760, Yogananda 540?
Mother Theresa 710, Thich Naht Hahn 460?

he puts Pedophilia between Cristian Practices :D:D:D
Most comical thing is that he rates Robert Powell 575 because acted as Jesus hahaha
In short very biased work (as if it could have been otherwise): how can you put Jesus at 1000 when most of his techings are lost and rate in the 500's teachers of wich we have whole bibliographies?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I really the only one who’s having trouble believing his measuring technique ?? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's based on the assumption that the body is a perfect instrument that isn't influenced by biases etc.

The whole LOC model is BS though, same as spiral dynamics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, At awe said:

Let’s look at this testing method first. If it would be reliable we would use it it in courts with 100% right conviction rates, find all missing people, know answer to basically every question... It’s absurd...

It really only works mostly for Enlightened Ones.  One has to not have any bias at least for what one is calibrating.

The ego can not be involved. Hawkins says one needs to at least calibrate over 200 to even use.  And it can't be used to help the ego. 

Also one can't use it to against karma. So one could theoretically use it to locate missing persons 

Basically it can only be used for the highest good for all. Questions have to be integritious also.

The more one is unattached to the outcome the better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

God is not a ruler over all. He does not need a ruler. If he does use a ruler, it's to help create something really awesome, not for measuring things, because God knows that creation is always in a state of creating, and is never complete. And it just so happens that THAT is the most awesome non-state of things that anything could ever "reach". 

1200px-Michelangelo_-_Creation_of_Adam_(cropped).jpg 


My Youtube Channel- Light on Earth “We dance round in a ring and suppose, but the Secret sits in the middle and knows.”― Robert Frost

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@freejoy I’m not buying it. Comparing, measuring, judging has ego written all over it. Just mind games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Hen Zuhe said:

I find this list important, as I do not want to be duped (smile) on my spiritual path by any book or teacher not yet teaching from the conscious level of (500+ which is unconditional non-duality love.)

So, why do you follow Dr. David Hawkins studies then? 'Unconditional non-duality love' don't put any levels on itself, the gradation strengthens the belief in separation. 'Unconditional non-duality love' sees everything as One.

I appreciate Dr. David Hawkins work, the "Letting go" book is amazing. If you really don't want to be duped, don't take any teachings too seriously, find your own way. 'Living' guides you through the feeling all the time.


⭐ if you want some spiritual hints - feel free to DM me the questions: https://www.instagram.com/dima.happy.living/ 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, At awe said:

@freejoy I’m not buying it. Comparing, measuring, judging has ego written all over it. Just mind games.

It can be useful if used by an integritious person. 

I'm not asking for anyone to buy it.

I'm just pointing out what Hawkins has basically said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Eternity said:

But, integrity wise, he does stick to his views impeccably.

Lol

And Hitler too?

Ben Shapiro is full of shit. So obviously that it's laughable that anyone in the world takes him seriously.


You are God. You are Love. You are Infinity. You are Leo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Gandhi calibrating above Ramana Maharshi is also absurd.

Or Mother Theresa above Meister Eckhart...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, The0Self said:

Or Mother Theresa above Meister Eckhart...

meh, these lists and distinctions are sorta silly.

Mother Theresa was incredibly conscious, just cause she wasn't a writer doesn't mean much

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Lyubov said:

meh, these lists and distinctions are sorta silly.

Mother Theresa was incredibly conscious, just cause she wasn't a writer doesn't mean much

Certainly, but at least in my view, Meister Eckhart was one of the most conscious people in history, and certainly for his time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I understand his listing, but I do have things that I don't really like about  it, it seems kind of pointless to give points to anyone who still has ego, ofc there are some base state differences, but I don't think they matter, besides you can have same qualities in different states and as I said, I don't think that qualities matter at all ,as they are all bs anyway, just distraction. 

Also I don't think it really matter who had most points, it will not  effect me fore sure, he put J Krishnamuri at mere 520 , but he has most accurate information for my brain. 

Edited by PureRogueQ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

@PureRogueQ It is just the begining of a way to clasificate the level of enlightenment, books, filosophy, expressions, and more (people)...   it was made some years ago, In a next future we will obtain presission about that clasification.

 

The age of enlightenment is starting, knowledge, information, Meditations, Music, Mantras, REIKI, Power of mind, DMT, share experiences around the world, internet, and more... 

 

It is the begining.. We have to be patience...

 

And.... NOTHING IS PERFECT in this DIMENSSION.

NAMASTE

Edited by Hen Zuhe
Typing wrong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, but i don't believe in any of this numbers. It is pure nonsense and nothing more. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MODS!!!! This is not the original research he is twisting it all as he pleases. Check for yourself the numbers dont match with the original work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@njuufa You have the original work? Year ? We have to study that.

NAMASTE.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Arbitrary and dumb.  

There's a lot of irony of attempting to create a rigid, numerical, and objective system which calculates spiritual "power levels."

The concept in it of itself is low consciousness from my point of view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now